Cited by 168Advanced Materials and MechanicsSoft Robotics and ApplicationsDielectric materials and actuators

A dynamically reprogrammable surface with self-evolving shape morphing

Open access
Bai, Yun, Wang, Heling, Xue, Yeguang, Pan, Yuxin, Kim, Jin-Tae, Ni, Xinchen, Liu, Tzu-Li, Yang, Yiyuan +4 more·2022·Nature

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Dynamic shape-morphing soft materials systems are ubiquitous in living organisms; they are also of rapidly increasing relevance to emerging technologies in soft machines 1-3, flexible electronics 4,5 and smart medicines 6. Soft matter equipped with responsive components can switch between designed shapes or structures, but cannot support the types of dynamic morphing capabilities needed to reproduce natural, continuous processes of interest for many applications 7-24. Challenges lie in the development of schemes to reprogram target shapes after fabrication, especially when complexities associated with the operating physics and disturbances from the environment can stop the use of deterministic theoretical models to guide inverse design and control strategies 25-30. Here we present a mechanical metasurface constructed from a matrix of filamentary metal traces, driven by reprogrammable, distributed Lorentz forces that follow from the passage of electrical currents in the presence of a static magnetic field. The resulting system demonstrates complex, dynamic morphing capabilities with response times within 0.1 second. Implementing an in situ stereo-imaging feedback strategy with a digitally controlled actuation scheme guided by an optimization algorithm yields surfaces that can follow a self-evolving inverse design to morph into a wide range of three-dimensional target shapes with high precision, including an ability to morph against extrinsic or intrinsic perturbations. These concepts support a data-driven approach to the design of dynamic soft matter, with many unique characteristics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-022-05061-w

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This type of FIM can morph its three-dimensional surface shape into a wide variety of target configurations within milliseconds.

    “This type of FIM can morph its 3D surface shape into a wide variety of target configurations within milliseconds.”

    From Emerging Technologies in Intelligent Metasurfaces: Shaping the Future of Wireless Communications (2026) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Abstract reports a wide range of 3D target shapes and a mechanical response time within 0.1 s (100 ms). But that response time is not the time needed to reach a target through self-evolving optimization: the Additional information section reports 5–15 iterations at about 0.25 s per feedback-control cycle. The claim conflates rapid physical response with completion of target-shape morphing. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Through an integrated digital control scheme and in-situ stereo imaging feedback, the FIM is capable of morphing into a variety of target shapes with response time in milliseconds.

    “Through an integrated digital control scheme and in-situ stereo imaging feedback, the FIM is capable of morphing into a variety of target shapes with response time in milliseconds.”

    From Emerging Technologies in Intelligent Metasurfaces: Shaping the Future of Wireless Communications (2026) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Abstract reports digitally controlled actuation with in-situ stereo-imaging feedback, morphing into a wide range of target shapes, and a mechanical response time within 0.1 s. But the feedback-guided process is slower: Additional information reports approximately 0.25 s per feedback cycle and 5–15 iterations for a representative target shape. The millisecond-scale response therefore does not describe completion of the feedback-guided target morphing claimed here. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A shape-morphable FIM has been developed using a mesh of tiny metallic filaments that can be precisely controlled by reprogrammable Lorentz forces generated by electrical currents passing through a static magnetic field.

    “More recently, a shape-morphable FIM has been developed using a mesh of tiny metallic filaments that can be precisely controlled by reprogrammable Lorentz forces generated by electrical currents passing through a static magnetic field [28].”
  • Bai et al. [28] created an FIM made of a mesh of filamentary metal traces, where programming distributed Lorentz forces generated by passing electrical currents in the presence of a static magnetic field accurately controls local deformations with high fidelity.

    “Similarly, Bai et al. [28] created an FIM made of a mesh of filamentary metal traces. By programming distributed Lorentz forces generated by passing electrical currents in the presence of a static magnetic field, local deformations can be accurately controlled with high fidelity.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. McEvoy, M. A. & Correll, N. Materials that couple sensing, actuation, computation, and communication. Science 347, 1261689 (2015).
  2. Wang, C., Wang, C., Huang, Z. & Xu, S. Materials and structures toward soft electronics. Adv. Mater. 30, 1801368 (2018).
  3. Boley, J. W., Rees, W., Lissandrello, C., Horenstein, M. N. & Mahadevan, L. Shape- shifting structured lattices via multimaterial 4D printing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 201908806 (2019).
  4. Kotikian, A., Truby, R. L., Boley, J. W., White, T. J. & Lewis, J. A. 3D printing of liquid crystal elastomeric actuators with spatially programed nematic order. Adv. Mater. 30, 1706164 (2018).
  5. Ford, M. J. et al. A multifunctional shape-morphing elastomer with liquid metal inclusions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 21438-21444 (2019).
  6. Ze, Q. et al. Magnetic shape memory polymers with integrated multifunctional shape manipulation. Adv. Mate. 32, 1906657 (2020).
  7. Zhang, F. et al. Rapidly deployable and morphable 3D mesostructures with applications in multimodal biomedical devices. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2026414118 (2021).
  8. Fan, Z. et al. Inverse design strategies for 3D surfaces formed by mechanically guided assembly. Adv. Mater. 32, 1908424 (2020).
  9. Bossart, A., Dykstra, D. M., van der Laan, J. & Coulais, C. Oligomodal metamaterials with multifunctional mechanics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2018610118 (2021).
  10. Baek, C., Martin, A. G., Poincloux, S., Chen, T. & Reis, P. M. Smooth triaxial weaving with naturally curved ribbons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 104301 (2021).
  11. Hines, L., Petersen, K., Guo, Z. L. & Sitti, M. Soft actuators for small-scale robotics. Adv. Mater. 29, 1603483 (2016).
  12. Yao, Y. et al. Multiresponsive polymeric microstructures with encoded predetermined and self-regulated deformability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 12950-12955 (2018).
  13. Park, J. K., Nan, K., Luan, H., Zheng, N. & Rogers, J. A. Remotely triggered assembly of 3D mesostructures through shape-memory effects. Adv. Mater. 31, 1905715 (2019).
  14. Kotikian, A. et al. Innervated, Self-sensing liquid crystal elastomer actuators with closed loop control. Adv. Mater. 33, 2101814 (2021).
  15. Wang, X. et al. Freestanding 3D mesostructures, functional devices, and shape- programmable systems based on mechanically induced assembly with shape memory polymers. Adv. Mater. 31, 1805615 (2019).
  16. Bessa, M. A., Glowacki, P. & Houlder, M. Bayesian machine learning in metamaterial design: fragile becomes supercompressible. Advanced Materials 31, 1904845 (2019).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bai, Y., Wang, H., Xue, Y., Pan, Y., Kim, J.-T., Ni, X., Liu, T.-L., Yang, Y., Han, M., Huang, Y., Rogers, J. A., & Ni, X.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Heling
  • Ni, Xinchen
  • Huang, Yonggang
  • Rogers, John A.
  • Ni, Xiaoyue
Venue
Nature
Published
2022-09-21
Volume
609
Issue
7928
Pages
701-708
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4296552404
Cited by
168
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 1
FWCI
12.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1635443)
  • Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Dielectric materials and actuators
Keywords
shape morphing, Lorentz force actuation, inverse design, data-driven design, distributed actuation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review