Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 553

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatiotemporal imaging of charge transfer in photocatalyst particles

Open access
Chen, Ruotian, Ren, Zefeng, Liang, Yu, Zhang, Guanhua, Dittrich, Thomas, Liu, Runze, Liu, Yang, Zhao, Yue, Pang, Shan, An, Hongyu, Ni, Chenwei, Zhou, Panwang, Han, Keli, Fan, Fengtao, Li, Can·2022·Nature

Abstract

The water-splitting reaction using photocatalyst particles is a promising route for solar fuel production1–4. Photo-induced charge transfer from a photocatalyst to catalytic surface sites is key in ensuring photocatalytic efficiency5; however, it is challenging to understand this process, which spans a wide spatiotemporal range from nanometres to micrometres and from femtoseconds to seconds6–8. Although the steady-state charge distribution on single photocatalyst particles has been mapped by microscopic techniques9–11, and the charge transfer dynamics in photocatalyst aggregations have been revealed by time-resolved spectroscopy12,13, spatiotemporally evolving charge transfer processes in single photocatalyst particles cannot be tracked, and their exact mechanism is unknown. Here we perform spatiotemporally resolved surface photovoltage measurements on cuprous oxide photocatalyst particles to map holistic charge transfer processes on the femtosecond to second timescale at the single-particle level. We find that photogenerated electrons are transferred to the catalytic surface quasi-ballistically through inter-facet hot electron transfer on a subpicosecond timescale, whereas photogenerated holes are transferred to a spatially separated surface and stabilized through selective trapping on a microsecond timescale. We demonstrate that these ultrafast-hot-electron-transfer and anisotropic-trapping regimes, which challenge the classical perception of a drift–diffusion model, contribute to the efficient charge separation in photocatalysis and improve photocatalytic performance. We anticipate that our findings will be used to illustrate the universality of other photoelectronic devices and facilitate the rational design of photocatalysts. Photovoltage measurements on cuprous oxide photocatalyst particles are used to spatiotemporally track the charge transfer processes on the femtosecond to second timescale at the single-particle level.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-022-05183-1

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Cited by

See all 553

Metadata

Authors
Chen, R., Ren, Z., Liang, Y., Zhang, G., Dittrich, T., Liu, R., Liu, Y., Zhao, Y., Pang, S., An, H., Ni, C., Zhou, P., Han, K., Fan, F., & Li, C.
Venue
Nature
Published
2022-10-12
Volume
610
Issue
7931
Pages
296-301
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4304698321
Cited by
553
References
42
FWCI
20.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatiotemporal imaging of charge transfer in photocatalyst particles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41586-022-05183-1
The paper
Chen, R., Ren, Z., Liang, Y., Zhang, G., Dittrich, T., Liu, R., Liu, Y., Zhao, Y., Pang, S., An, H., Ni, C., Zhou, P., Han, K., Fan, F., & Li, C. (2022). Spatiotemporal imaging of charge transfer in photocatalyst particles. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05183-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.