Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 587

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dense reinforcement learning for safety validation of autonomous vehicles

Feng, Shuo, Sun, Haowei, Yan, Xintao, Zhu, Haojie, Zou, Zhengxia, Shen, Shengyin, Liu, Henry X.·2023·Nature

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-023-05732-2

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Kalra, N. & Paddock, S. M. Driving to safety: how many miles of driving would it take to demonstrate autonomous vehicle reliability? Transp. Res. A 94, 182–193 (2016).
  2. Paz, D., Lai, P. J., Chan, N., Jiang, Y. & Christensen, H. I. Autonomous vehicle benchmarking using unbiased metrics. In IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 6223–6228 (IEEE, 2020). · doi:10.1109/iros45743.2020.9340902
  3. Nalic, D. et al. Scenario based testing of automated driving systems: a literature survey. In Proc. of the FISITA Web Congress 1–10 (Fisita, 2020). · doi:10.46720/f2020-acm-096
  4. Sinha, A., O’Kelly, M., Tedrake, R. & Duchi, J. C. Neural bridge sampling for evaluating safety-critical autonomous systems. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 33, 6402–6416 (2020).
  5. Donoho, D. L. High-dimensional data analysis: the curses and blessings of dimensionality. AMS Math Challenges Lecture 1, 32 (2000).
  6. Cummings, M. L. Rethinking the maturity of artificial intelligence in safety-critical settings. AI Mag. 42, 6–15 (2021).
  7. Sutton, R. S. & Barto, A. G. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction (MIT Press, 2018).
  8. Sauerbier, J., Bock, J., Weber, H. & Eckstein, L. Definition of scenarios for safety validation of automated driving functions. ATZ Worldwide 121, 42–45 (2019). · doi:10.1007/s38311-018-0197-2
  9. Yan, X., Feng, S., Sun, H., & Liu, H. X. Distributionally consistent simulation of naturalistic driving environment for autonomous vehicle testing. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.02828 (2021). · arXiv

Cited by

See all 587

Metadata

Authors
Feng, S., Sun, H., Yan, X., Zhu, H., Zou, Z., Shen, S., & Liu, H. X.
Venue
Nature
Published
2023-03-22
Volume
615
Issue
7953
Pages
620-627
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4353056919
Cited by
587
References
38
FWCI
42.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dense reinforcement learning for safety validation of autonomous vehicles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41586-023-05732-2
The paper
Feng, S., Sun, H., Yan, X., Zhu, H., Zou, Z., Shen, S., & Liu, H. X. (2023). Dense reinforcement learning for safety validation of autonomous vehicles. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05732-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.