The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Complexity of avian evolution revealed by family-level genomes
Open accessAbstract
Despite tremendous efforts in the past decades, relationships among main avian lineages remain heavily debated without a clear resolution. Discrepancies have been attributed to diversity of species sampled, phylogenetic method and the choice of genomic regions 1–3. Here we address these issues by analysing the genomes of 363 bird species 4 (218 taxonomic families, 92% of total). Using intergenic regions and coalescent methods, we present a well-supported tree but also a marked degree of discordance. The tree confirms that Neoaves experienced rapid radiation at or near the Cretaceous–Palaeogene boundary. Sufficient loci rather than extensive taxon sampling were more effective in resolving difficult nodes. Remaining recalcitrant nodes involve species that are a challenge to model due to either extreme DNA composition, variable substitution rates, incomplete lineage sorting or complex evolutionary events such as ancient hybridization. Assessment of the effects of different genomic partitions showed high heterogeneity across the genome. We discovered sharp increases in effective population size, substitution rates and relative brain size following the Cretaceous–Palaeogene extinction event, supporting the hypothesis that emerging ecological opportunities catalysed the diversification of modern birds. The resulting phylogenetic estimate offers fresh insights into the rapid radiation of modern birds and provides a taxon-rich backbone tree for future comparative studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
IQ-TREE: A Fast and Effective Stochastic Algorithm for Estimating Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies
Nguyen, L.-T., Schmidt, H. A., von Haeseler, A., & Minh, B. Q. (2015) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msu300 · Cited by 26,046
MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform
Katoh, K. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkf436 · Cited by 17,027
IQ-TREE 2: New Models and Efficient Methods for Phylogenetic Inference in the Genomic Era
Minh, B. Q., Schmidt, H. A., Chernomor, O., Schrempf, D., Woodhams, M. D., von Haeseler, A., & Lanfear, R. (2020) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msaa015 · Cited by 16,873
PAML 4: Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood
Yang, Z. (2007) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msm088 · Cited by 13,879
phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things)
Revell, L. J. (2012) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00169.x · Cited by 9,277
MissForest—Non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data
Stekhoven, D. J., & Bühlmann, P. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr597 · Cited by 6,156
Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution
Pagel, M. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44766 · Cited by 5,200
RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference
Kozlov, A. M., Darriba, D., Flouri, T., Morel, B., & Stamatakis, A. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz305 · Cited by 4,253
Self-citationSeqKit: A Cross-Platform and Ultrafast Toolkit for FASTA/Q File Manipulation
Shen, W., Le, S., Li, Y., & Hu, F. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163962 · Cited by 3,380
CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC
Plummer, M., Best, N., Cowles, K., & Vines, K. (2006) · Open Research Online (The Open University) · Cited by 3,317
Cited by
The chromosome folding problem and how cells solve it
Dekker, J., & Mirny, L. A. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.10.026 · Cited by 112
Christidis, L., Rheindt, F. E., Iliff, M. J., Lepage, D., Rasmussen, P. C., Donald, P., Alström, P., Areta, J. I., Brammer, F., Chesser, T., et al. (2026) · AviList · doi:10.2173/avilist.v2025b · Cited by 27
Self-citationMalovichko, Y. V., Bein, B., Gonzales-Irribarren, A., Leushkin, E., Hilgers, L., Stephen, A., Yi, X., Albertini, M., Stadager, T., Zumpt, M., et al. (2026) · doi:10.64898/2026.06.30.735536 · Cited by 5
Wing morphology of Anchiornis huxleyi and the evolution of molt strategies in paravian dinosaurs
Kiat, Y., Wang, X., Zheng, X., Wang, Y., & O’Connor, J. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-09019-2 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Stiller, J., Feng, S., Chowdhury, A.-A., Rivas-González, I., Duchêne, D. A., Fang, Q., Deng, Y., Kozlov, A., Stamatakis, A., Claramunt, S., Nguyen, J. M. T., Ho, S. Y. W., Faircloth, B. C., Haag, J., Houde, P., Cracraft, J., Balaban, M., Mai, U., Chen, G., Gao, R., Zhou, C., Xie, Y., Huang, Z., Cao, Z., Yan, Z., Ogilvie, H. A., Nakhleh, L., Lindow, B., Morel, B., Fjeldså, J., Hosner, P. A., da Fonseca, R. R., Petersen, B., Tobias, J. A., Székely, T., Kennedy, J. D., Reeve, A. H., Liker, A., Stervander, M., Antunes, A., Tietze, D. T., Bertelsen, M. F., Lei, F., Rahbek, C., Graves, G. R., Schierup, M. H., Warnow, T., Braun, E. L., Gilbert, M. T. P., Jarvis, E. D., Mirarab, S., & Zhang, G.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2024-04-01
- Volume
- 629
- Issue
- 8013
- Pages
- 851-860
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W4393371874
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 100
- FWCI
- 34.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complexity of avian evolution revealed by family-level genomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41586-024-07323-1
- The paper
- Stiller, J., Feng, S., Chowdhury, A.-A., Rivas-González, I., Duchêne, D. A., Fang, Q., Deng, Y., Kozlov, A., Stamatakis, A., Claramunt, S., Nguyen, J. M. T., Ho, S. Y. W., Faircloth, B. C., Haag, J., Houde, P., Cracraft, J., Balaban, M., Mai, U., Chen, G., . . . Zhang, G. (2024). Complexity of avian evolution revealed by family-level genomes. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07323-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.