Cited by 56RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsForce Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Determining structures of RNA conformers using AFM and deep neural networks

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Much of the human genome is transcribed into RNAs 1 , many of which contain structural elements that are important for their function. Such RNA molecules—including those that are structured and well-folded 2 —are conformationally heterogeneous and flexible, which is a prerequisite for function 3,4 , but this limits the applicability of methods such as NMR, crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy for structure elucidation. Moreover, owing to the lack of a large RNA structure database, and no clear correlation between sequence and structure, approaches such as AlphaFold 5 for protein structure prediction do not apply to RNA. Therefore, determining the structures of heterogeneous RNAs remains an unmet challenge. Here we report holistic RNA structure determination method using atomic force microscopy, unsupervised machine learning and deep neural networks (HORNET), a novel method for determining three-dimensional topological structures of RNA using atomic force microscopy images of individual molecules in solution. Owing to the high signal-to-noise ratio of atomic force microscopy, this method is ideal for capturing structures of large RNA molecules in distinct conformations. In addition to six benchmark cases, we demonstrate the utility of HORNET by determining multiple heterogeneous structures of RNase P RNA and the HIV-1 Rev response element (RRE) RNA. Thus, our method addresses one of the major challenges in determining heterogeneous structures of large and flexible RNA molecules, and contributes to the fundamental understanding of RNA structural biology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-024-07559-x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. Pertea, M. The human transcriptome: an unfinished story. Genes 3, 344–360 (2012). · DOI
  2. Ding, J. et al. Visualizing RNA conformational and architectural heterogeneity in solution. Nat. Commun. 14, 714 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ganser, L. R., Kelly, M. L., Herschlag, D. & Al-Hashimi, H. M. The roles of structural dynamics in the cellular functions of RNAs. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 474–489 (2019). · DOI
  4. Ken, M. L. et al. RNA conformational propensities determine cellular activity. Nature 617, 835–841 (2023). · DOI
  5. Mustoe, A. M., Brooks, C. L. & Al-Hashimi, H. M. Hierarchy of RNA functional dynamics. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 83, 441–466 (2014). · DOI
  6. Russell, R. et al. Exploring the folding landscape of a structured RNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 155–160 (2002). · DOI
  7. Dykstra, P. B., Kaplan, M. & Smolke, C. D. Engineering synthetic RNA devices for cell control. Nat. Rev. Genet. 23, 215–228 (2022). · DOI
  8. Childs-Disney, J. L. et al. Targeting RNA structures with small molecules. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 21, 736–762 (2022). · DOI
  9. Kim, S. H. et al. Three-dimensional structure of yeast phenylalanine transfer RNA: folding of the polynucleotide chain. Science 179, 285–288 (1973). · DOI
  10. Ladner, J. E. et al. Atomic co-ordinates for yeast phenylalanine tRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2, 1629–1637 (1975). · DOI
  11. Das, R. RNA structure: a renaissance begins? Nat. Methods 18, 439 (2021). · DOI
  12. Qin, P. Z. & Dieckmann, T. Application of NMR and EPR methods to the study of RNA. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 14, 350–359 (2004). · DOI
  13. Marusic, M., Schlagnitweit, J. & Petzold, K. RNA dynamics by NMR spectroscopy. ChemBioChem 20, 2685–2710 (2019). · DOI
  14. Bothe, J. R. et al. Characterizing RNA dynamics at atomic resolution using solution-state NMR spectroscopy. Nat. Methods 8, 919–931 (2011). · DOI
  15. Kazantsev, A. V. et al. Solution structure of RNase P RNA. RNA 17, 1159–1171 (2011). · DOI
  16. Salmon, L., Yang, S. & Al-Hashimi, H. M. Advances in the determination of nucleic acid conformational ensembles. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 65, 293–316 (2014). · DOI
  17. Shi, X., Bonilla, S., Herschlag, D. & Harbury, P. Quantifying nucleic acid ensembles with X-ray scattering interferometry. Methods Enzymol. 558, 75–97 (2015). · DOI
  18. Feng, X. A., Poyton, M. F. & Ha, T. Multicolor single-molecule FRET for DNA and RNA processes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 70, 26–33 (2021). · DOI
  19. Ray, S., Chauvier, A. & Walter, N. G. Kinetics coming into focus: single-molecule microscopy of riboswitch dynamics. RNA Biol. 16, 1077–1085 (2019). · DOI
  20. Xie, Z., Srividya, N., Sosnick, T. R., Pan, T. & Scherer, N. F. Single-molecule studies highlight conformational heterogeneity in the early folding steps of a large ribozyme. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 534–539 (2004). · DOI
  21. Vicens, Q. & Kieft, J. S. Thoughts on how to think (and talk) about RNA structure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2112677119 (2022). · DOI
  22. Stumme-Diers, M. P., Stormberg, T., Sun, Z. & Lyubchenko, Y. L. Probing the structure and dynamics of nucleosomes using atomic force microscopy imaging. J. Vis. Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/58820 (2019). · DOI
  23. Lyubchenko, Y. L., Shlyakhtenko, L. S. & Ando, T. Imaging of nucleic acids with atomic force microscopy. Methods 54, 274–283 (2011). · DOI
  24. Lyubchenko, Y. L., Shlyakhtenko, L. S. & Gall, A. A. Atomic force microscopy imaging and probing of DNA, proteins, and protein DNA complexes: silatrane surface chemistry. Methods Mol. Biol. 543, 337–351 (2009). · DOI
  25. Shlyakhtenko, L. S. et al. Silatrane-based surface chemistry for immobilization of DNA, protein-DNA complexes and other biological materials. Ultramicroscopy 97, 279–287 (2003). · DOI
  26. Shlyakhtenko, L. S., Potaman, V. N., Sinden, R. R., Gall, A. A. & Lyubchenko, Y. L. Structure and dynamics of three-way DNA junctions: atomic force microscopy studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 3472–3477 (2000). · DOI
  27. Townshend, R. J. L. et al. Geometric deep learning of RNA structure. Science 373, 1047–1051 (2021). · DOI
  28. Merino, E. J., Wilkinson, K. A., Coughlan, J. L. & Weeks, K. M. RNA structure analysis at single nucleotide resolution by selective 2 ‘-hydroxyl acylation and primer extension (SHAPE). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 4223–4231 (2005). · DOI
  29. Kenzaki, H. et al. CafeMol: A coarse-grained biomolecular simulator for simulating proteins at work. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7, 1979–1989 (2011). · DOI
  30. Niina, T., Fuchigami, S. & Takada, S. Flexible fitting of biomolecular structures to atomic force microscopy images via biased molecular simulations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 16, 1349–1358 (2020). · DOI
  31. Kazantsev, A. V. et al. Crystal structure of a bacterial ribonuclease P RNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 13392–13397 (2005). · DOI
  32. Fechner, P. et al. Structural information, resolution, and noise in high-resolution atomic force microscopy topographs. Biophys. J. 96, 3822–3831 (2009). · DOI
  33. Cruz, J. A. & Westhof, E. The dynamic landscapes of RNA architecture. Cell 136, 604–609 (2009). · DOI
  34. Wang, J. B. et al. A method for helical RNA global structure determination in solution using small-angle X-Ray scattering and NMR measurements. J. Mol. Biol. 393, 717–734 (2009). · DOI
  35. McGreevy, R. et al. xMDFF: molecular dynamics flexible fitting of low-resolution X-ray structures. Acta Crystallogr. D 70, 2344–2355 (2014). · DOI
  36. Marvin, M. C. & Engelke, D. R. RNase P: increased versatility through protein complexity? RNA Biol. 6, 40–42 (2009). · DOI
  37. Kazantsev, A. V., Krivenko, A. A. & Pace, N. R. Mapping metal-binding sites in the catalytic domain of bacterial RNase P RNA. RNA 15, 266–276 (2009). · DOI
  38. Pucci, F., Zerihun, M. B., Peter, E. K. & Schug, A. Evaluating DCA-based method performances for RNA contact prediction by a well-curated data set. RNA 26, 794–802 (2020). · DOI
  39. Frellsen, J. et al. A probabilistic model of RNA conformational space. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000406 (2009). · DOI
  40. Xu, Y. & Goodacre, R. On splitting training and validation set: a comparative study of cross-validation, bootstrap and systematic sampling for estimating the generalization performance of supervised learning. J. Anal. Test. 2, 249–262 (2018). · DOI
  41. Zou, G., Zou, Y., Ma, C., Zhao, J. & Li, L. Development of an experiment-split method for benchmarking the generalization of a PTM site predictor: lysine methylome as an example. PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, e1009682 (2021). · DOI
  42. Gulshan, V. et al. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs. JAMA 316, 2402–2410 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  43. Watkins, A. M., Rangan, R. & Das, R. FARFAR2: improved de novo Rosetta prediction of complex global RNA folds. Structure 28, 963–976 e966 (2020). · DOI
  44. Johnson, J. E. Jr, Reyes, F. E., Polaski, J. T. & Batey, R. T. B12 cofactors directly stabilize an mRNA regulatory switch. Nature 492, 133–137 (2012). · DOI
  45. Bhandari, Y. R. et al. Topological structure determination of RNA using small-angle X-ray scattering. J. Mol. Biol. 429, 3635–3649 (2017). · DOI
  46. Marcia, M. & Pyle, A. M. Visualizing group II intron catalysis through the stages of splicing. Cell 151, 1386–1386 (2012). · DOI
  47. Ehrhardt, J. E. & Weeks, K. M. Time-resolved, single-molecule, correlated chemical probing of RNA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 18735–18740 (2020). · DOI
  48. Homan, P. J. et al. Single-molecule correlated chemical probing of RNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 13858–13863 (2014). · DOI
  49. Fang, X. et al. An unusual topological structure of the HIV-1 Rev response element. Cell 155, 594–605 (2013). · DOI
  50. DiMattia, M. A. et al. Implications of the HIV-1 Rev dimer structure at 3.2 angstrom resolution for multimeric binding to the Rev response element. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5810–5814 (2010). · DOI
  51. Daugherty, M. D., Liu, B. & Frankel, A. D. Structural basis for cooperative RNA binding and export complex assembly by HIV Rev. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 1337–U1191 (2010). · DOI
  52. Sherpa, C., Rausch, J. W., Le Grice, S. F., Hammarskjold, M. L. & Rekosh, D. The HIV-1 Rev response element (RRE) adopts alternative conformations that promote different rates of virus replication. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 4676–4686 (2015). · DOI
  53. Eismann, S. et al. Hierarchical, rotation-equivariant neural networks to select structural models of protein complexes. Proteins 89, 493–501 (2021). · DOI
  54. Mukherjee, R. M., Crozier, P. S., Plimpton, S. J. & Anderson, K. S. Substructured molecular dynamics using multibody dynamics algorithms. Int. J. Nonlin. Mech. 43, 1040–1055 (2008). · DOI
  55. Herrero-Galan, E. et al. Mechanical identities of RNA and DNA double helices unveiled at the single-molecule level. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 122–131 (2013). · DOI
  56. Ido, S. et al. Beyond the helix pitch: direct visualization of native DNA in aqueous solution. ACS Nano 7, 1817–1822 (2013). · DOI
  57. Ares, P. et al. High resolution atomic force microscopy of double-stranded RNA. Nanoscale 8, 11818–11826 (2016). · DOI
  58. Beckers, M., Mann, D. & Sachse, C. Structural interpretation of cryo-EM image reconstructions. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 160, 26–36 (2021). · DOI
  59. Brion, P. & Westhof, E. Hierarchy and dynamics of RNA folding. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 26, 113–137 (1997). · DOI
  60. Das, R. & Baker, D. Automated de novo prediction of native-like RNA tertiary structures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 14664–14669 (2007). · DOI
  61. Klambauer, G., Unterthiner, T., Mayr, A. & Hochreiter, S. Self-normalizing neural networks. In Proc. 31st Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) (eds von Luxberg, U., Guyon, I., Bengio, S., Wallach, H. & Fergus, R.) (Curran Associates Inc., Long Beach, 2017).
  62. Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. & Salakhutdinov, R. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 1929–1958 (2014).
  63. Lamiable, A. et al. PEP-FOLD3: faster de novo structure prediction for linear peptides in solution and in complex. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W449–W454 (2016). · DOI
  64. Stagno, J. R. et al. Structures of riboswitch RNA reaction states by mix-and-inject XFEL serial crystallography. Nature 541, 242–246 (2017). · DOI
  65. Boniecki, M. J. et al. SimRNA: a coarse-grained method for RNA folding simulations and 3D structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, e63–e63 (2016). · DOI
  66. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  67. Massire, C., Jaeger, L. & Westhof, E. Derivation of the three-dimensional architecture of bacterial ribonuclease P RNAs from comparative sequence analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 279, 773–793 (1998). · DOI
  68. Bhandari, Y. R., Jiang, W., Stahlberg, E. A., Stagno, J. R. & Wang, Y.-X. Modeling RNA topological structures using small angle X-ray scattering. Methods 103, 18–24 (2016). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Degenhardt, M. F. S., Degenhardt, H. F., Bhandari, Y. R., Lee, Y.-T., Ding, J., Yu, P., Heinz, W. F., Stagno, J. R., Schwieters, C. D., Watts, N. R., Wingfield, P. T., Rein, A., Zhang, J., & Wang, Y.-X.
Affiliations
  • Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Yun-Xing
Venue
Nature
Published
2024-12-18
Volume
637
Issue
8048
Pages
1234-1243
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4405514994
Cited by
56
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 3
FWCI
7.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Leidos (75N91019D00024)
  • National Institutes of Health (Contract No.75N91019D00024, 75N91019D00024, -0001)
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • National Cancer Institute (Contract No: 75N91019D00024, 75N91019D00024)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
RNA structure determination, RNA conformational heterogeneity, atomic force microscopy, deep neural network, unsupervised learning, hornets, RNA tertiary structure, RNase P RNA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review