Quantifying constraint in the human mitochondrial genome
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has an important yet often overlooked role in health and disease. Constraint models quantify the removal of deleterious variation from the population by selection and represent powerful tools for identifying genetic variation that underlies human phenotypes 1-4. However, nuclear constraint models are not applicable to mtDNA, owing to its distinct features. Here we describe the development of a mitochondrial genome constraint model and its application to the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD), a large-scale population dataset that reports mtDNA variation across 56,434 human participants 5. Specifically, we analyse constraint by comparing the observed variation in gnomAD to that expected under neutrality, which was calculated using a mtDNA mutational model and observed maximum heteroplasmy-level data. Our results highlight strong depletion of expected variation, which suggests that many deleterious mtDNA variants remain undetected. To aid their discovery, we compute constraint metrics for every mitochondrial protein, tRNA and rRNA gene, which revealed a range of intolerance to variation. We further characterize the most constrained regions within genes through regional constraint and identify the most constrained sites within the entire mitochondrial genome through local constraint, which showed enrichment of pathogenic variation. Constraint also clustered in three-dimensional structures, which provided insight into functionally important domains and their disease relevance. Notably, we identify constraint at often overlooked sites, including in rRNA and noncoding regions. Last, we demonstrate that these metrics can improve the discovery of deleterious variation that underlies rare and common phenotypes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
ClinVar: improving access to variant interpretations and supporting evidence
Landrum, M. J., Lee, J. M., Benson, M., Brown, G. R., Chao, C., Chitipiralla, S., Gu, B., Hart, J., Hoffman, D., Jang, W., et al. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1153 · Cited by 4,196 · see citing works
Mitochondria: More Than Just a Powerhouse
McBride, H. M., Neuspiel, M., & Wasiak, S. (2006) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.06.054 · Cited by 1,985 · see citing works
Identifying a High Fraction of the Human Genome to be under Selective Constraint Using GERP++
Davydov, E. V., Goode, D. L., Sirota, M., Cooper, G. M., Sidow, A., & Batzoglou, S. (2010) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001025 · Cited by 1,757 · see citing works
Genic Intolerance to Functional Variation and the Interpretation of Personal Genomes
Petrovski, S., Wang, Q., Heinzen, E. L., Allen, A. S., & Goldstein, D. B. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003709 · Cited by 901 · see citing works
Gray, M. W. (2012) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a011403 · Cited by 639 · see citing works
Regional missense constraint improves variant deleteriousness prediction
Samocha, K. E., Kosmicki, J. A., Karczewski, K. J., O’Donnell-Luria, A. H., Pierce-Hoffman, E., MacArthur, D. G., Neale, B. M., & Daly, M. J. (2017) · doi:10.1101/148353 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Mitochondria, Oxidative Stress and Innate Immunity
Chen, Y., Zhou, Z., & Min, W. (2018) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.01487 · Cited by 315 · cited 13× · see citing works
“( b ) A suite of constraint metrics are available via Supplementary Datasets, including constraint metrics for each gene and non-coding element, as well as regional missense constraint for each protein gene, regional constraint for each rRNA gene, position constraint for tRNA genes, and local constraint for every posi…”
InfluentialMitochondrial copper metabolism and delivery to cytochrome <i>c</i> oxidase
Horn, D., & Barrientos, A. (2008) · IUBMB Life · doi:10.1002/iub.50 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Akesson, L. S., Eggers, S., Love, C. J., Chong, B., Krzesinski, E. I., Brown, N. J., Tan, T. Y., Richmond, C. M., Thorburn, D. R., Christodoulou, J., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41431-019-0477-3 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Lake, N. J., Ma, K., Liu, W., Battle, S. L., Laricchia, K. M., Tiao, G., Puiu, D., Ng, K. K., Cohen, J., Compton, A. G., Cowie, S., Christodoulou, J., Thorburn, D. R., Zhao, H., Arking, D. E., Sunyaev, S. R., & Lek, M.
- Affiliations
- Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
- Yale University (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Broad Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lake, Nicole J.
- Lek, Monkol
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2024-10-16
- Volume
- 635
- Issue
- 8038
- Pages
- 390-397
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC11646341
- OpenAlex
- W4403450829
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 16.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Yale University
- Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin Research Institute
- Children's Hospital Foundation
- Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute
- Royal Children's Hospital Foundation
- State Government of Victoria
- National Institutes of Health (1s10od028669-01, 17731, UL1TR001863)
- Medical Research Council (MC_PC_17228)
- National Health and Medical Research Council (1155244, 1159456)
- National Institute on Aging (P30AG021334)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL144569)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- mitochondrial DNA, constraint model, heteroplasmy, mitochondrial ribosomal RNA, mitochondrial protein-coding genes, mitochondrial tRNA genes, pathogenic variants, disease-associated variants, gnomAD
- MeSH terms
- Heteroplasmy, DNA, Mitochondrial, Female, Humans, Mitochondria, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Phenotype, RNA, Ribosomal, RNA, Transfer, Selection, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Genome, Human, Mitochondrial Proteins, Databases, Genetic, Genome, Mitochondrial, Datasets as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review