Cited by 63Genomics and Rare DiseasesMitochondrial Function and PathologyGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Quantifying constraint in the human mitochondrial genome

Open access
Lake, Nicole J., Ma, Kaiyue, Liu, Wei, Battle, Stephanie L., Laricchia, Kristen M., Tiao, Grace, Puiu, Daniela, Ng, Kenneth K. +9 more·2024·Nature

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has an important yet often overlooked role in health and disease. Constraint models quantify the removal of deleterious variation from the population by selection and represent powerful tools for identifying genetic variation that underlies human phenotypes 1-4. However, nuclear constraint models are not applicable to mtDNA, owing to its distinct features. Here we describe the development of a mitochondrial genome constraint model and its application to the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD), a large-scale population dataset that reports mtDNA variation across 56,434 human participants 5. Specifically, we analyse constraint by comparing the observed variation in gnomAD to that expected under neutrality, which was calculated using a mtDNA mutational model and observed maximum heteroplasmy-level data. Our results highlight strong depletion of expected variation, which suggests that many deleterious mtDNA variants remain undetected. To aid their discovery, we compute constraint metrics for every mitochondrial protein, tRNA and rRNA gene, which revealed a range of intolerance to variation. We further characterize the most constrained regions within genes through regional constraint and identify the most constrained sites within the entire mitochondrial genome through local constraint, which showed enrichment of pathogenic variation. Constraint also clustered in three-dimensional structures, which provided insight into functionally important domains and their disease relevance. Notably, we identify constraint at often overlooked sites, including in rRNA and noncoding regions. Last, we demonstrate that these metrics can improve the discovery of deleterious variation that underlies rare and common phenotypes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-024-08048-x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Lake, N. J., Ma, K., Liu, W., Battle, S. L., Laricchia, K. M., Tiao, G., Puiu, D., Ng, K. K., Cohen, J., Compton, A. G., Cowie, S., Christodoulou, J., Thorburn, D. R., Zhao, H., Arking, D. E., Sunyaev, S. R., & Lek, M.
Affiliations
  • Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Lake, Nicole J.
  • Lek, Monkol
Venue
Nature
Published
2024-10-16
Volume
635
Issue
8038
Pages
390-397
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4403450829
Cited by
63
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
16.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin Research Institute
  • Children's Hospital Foundation
  • Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative
  • Murdoch Children's Research Institute
  • Royal Children's Hospital Foundation
  • State Government of Victoria
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10od028669-01, 17731, UL1TR001863)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_PC_17228)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1155244, 1159456)
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG021334)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL144569)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
mitochondrial DNA, constraint model, heteroplasmy, mitochondrial ribosomal RNA, mitochondrial protein-coding genes, mitochondrial tRNA genes, pathogenic variants, disease-associated variants, gnomAD
MeSH terms
Heteroplasmy, DNA, Mitochondrial, Female, Humans, Mitochondria, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Phenotype, RNA, Ribosomal, RNA, Transfer, Selection, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Genome, Human, Mitochondrial Proteins, Databases, Genetic, Genome, Mitochondrial, Datasets as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review