Cited by 338Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Multi-omic measurements of heterogeneity in HeLa cells across laboratories

Open access
Liu, Yansheng, Mi, Yang, Mueller, Torsten, Kreibich, Saskia, Williams, Evan G., Van Drogen, Audrey, Borel, Christelle, Frank, Max +15 more·2019·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

Reproducibility in research can be compromised by both biological and technical variation, but most of the focus is on removing the latter. Here we investigate the effects of biological variation in HeLa cell lines using a systems-wide approach. We determine the degree of molecular and phenotypic variability across 14 stock HeLa samples from 13 international laboratories. We cultured cells in uniform conditions and profiled genome-wide copy numbers, mRNAs, proteins and protein turnover rates in each cell line. We discovered substantial heterogeneity between HeLa variants, especially between lines of the CCL2 and Kyoto varieties, and observed progressive divergence within a specific cell line over 50 successive passages. Genomic variability has a complex, nonlinear effect on transcriptome, proteome and protein turnover profiles, and proteotype patterns explain the varying phenotypic response of different cell lines to Salmonella infection. These findings have implications for the interpretation and reproducibility of research results obtained from human cultured cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41587-019-0037-y

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Epigenetic changes happened immediately after treatment (2 hrs H2O2) and lasted for at least 1-2 cell divisions.

    “the epigenetic changes happened immediately after the treatment (2 hrs incubation with H2O2) and lasted for at least 1 – 2 cell divisions (cell-doubling time: 17.5 – 32.3 hours for HeLa cells58) (Extended Data Fig. 4).”
  • Previously described hallmark genomic events characteristic of PDAC lesions were observed in pseudo-bulk summary, in some cases only in a subset of genomic subclones for each line.

    “In this “pseudo-bulk” summary, previously described hallmark genomic events characteristic of PDAC lesions1–6 were readily observed, albeit in some cases only in a subset of genomic subclones for each line.”
  • Microsatellite assays typically used for confirmation of cell identity provide minimal insights into genomic and transcriptomic variabilities that might arise when the apparently identical line is propagated at different laboratories or in disparate culture conditions.

    “the microsatellite assays typically used for confirmation of cell identity provide minimal insights into genomic and transcriptomic variabilities that might arise when the apparently identical line is propagated at different laboratories5 or in disparate culture conditions”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Lorsch, J.R., Collins, F.S. & Lippincott-Schwartz, J. Cell Biology. Fixing problems with cell lines. Science 346, 1452-1453 (2014).
  2. Muff, R. et al. Genomic instability of osteosarcoma cell lines in culture: impact on the prediction of metastasis relevant genes. PloS one 10, e0125611 (2015).
  3. Frattini, A. et al. High variability of genomic instability and gene expression profiling in different HeLa clones. Sci Rep 5, 15377 (2015).
  4. Rosenberger, G. et al. A repository of assays to quantify 10,000 human proteins by SWATH-MS. Scientific data 1, 140031 (2014).
  5. Liu, Y. et al. Systematic proteome and proteostasis profiling in human Trisomy 21 fibroblast cells. Nat Commun 8, 1212 (2017).
  6. Fasterius, E. et al. A novel RNA sequencing data analysis method for cell line authentication. PloS one 12, e0171435 (2017).
  7. Lundberg, E. et al. Defining the transcriptome and proteome in three functionally different human cell lines. Molecular systems biology 6, 450 (2010).
  8. Stingele, S. et al. Global analysis of genome, transcriptome and proteome reveals the response to aneuploidy in human cells. Molecular systems biology 8, 608 (2012).
  9. Dephoure, N. et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis reveals posttranslational responses to aneuploidy in yeast. eLife 3, e03023 (2014).
  10. Misselwitz, B. et al. RNAi screen of Salmonella invasion shows role of COPI in membrane targeting of cholesterol and Cdc42. Molecular systems biology 7, 474 (2011).
  11. Misselwitz, B. et al. Near surface swimming of Salmonella Typhimurium explains target- site selection and cooperative invasion. PLoS Pathog 8, e1002810 (2012).
  12. Leung, E., Kim, J.E., Askarian-Amiri, M., Finlay, G.J. & Baguley, B.C. Evidence for the existence of triple-negative variants in the MCF-7 breast cancer cell population. Biomed Res Int 2014, 836769 (2014).
  13. Lin, Y.C. et al. Genome dynamics of the human embryonic kidney 293 lineage in response to cell biology manipulations. Nature communications 5, 4767 (2014).
  14. Cirulli, E.T. et al. Screening the human exome: a comparison of whole genome and whole transcriptome sequencing. Genome Biol 11, R57 (2010).
  15. Liu, Y. et al. Quantitative variability of 342 plasma proteins in a human twin population. Molecular systems biology 11, 786 (2015).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Y., Mi, Y., Mueller, T., Kreibich, S., Williams, E. G., Van Drogen, A., Borel, C., Frank, M., Germain, P.-L., Bludau, I., Mehnert, M., Seifert, M., Emmenlauer, M., Sorg, I., Bezrukov, F., Bena, F. S., Zhou, H., Dehio, C., Testa, G., Saez-Rodriguez, J., Antonarakis, S. E., Hardt, W.-D., & Aebersold, R.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • European Institute of Oncology (IT)
  • Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen Dresden (DE)
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Liu, Yansheng
  • Aebersold, Ruedi
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2019-02-18
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
314-322
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2912937988
Cited by
338
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 31
FWCI
18.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Bayer
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Universität Basel
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory
  • Cancer Research UK
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (107679, 163180, 3100A0)
  • Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
  • Ministero della Salute
  • Universität Zürich
  • Universitätsspital Zürich
  • Regione Lombardia
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (F32GM119190)
  • H2020 European Research Council (670821)
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (616441, 249968)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
HeLa cells, cell line heterogeneity, biological variation, reproducibility, copy number variation, transcriptome, proteome, protein turnover, multi-omics
MeSH terms
HeLa Cells, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Genome, Human, Proteome, Genomics, DNA Copy Number Variations, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review