Cited by 66Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene Regulatory Network AnalysisGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

PhyloVelo enhances transcriptomic velocity field mapping using monotonically expressed genes

Wang, Kun, Hou, Liangzhen, Wang, Xin, Zhai, Xiangwei, Lu, Zhaolian, Zi, Zhike, Zhai, Weiwei, He, Xionglei +3 more·2024·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a powerful approach for studying cellular differentiation, but accurately tracking cell fate transitions can be challenging, especially in disease conditions. Here we introduce PhyloVelo, a computational framework that estimates the velocity of transcriptomic dynamics by using monotonically expressed genes (MEGs) or genes with expression patterns that either increase or decrease, but do not cycle, through phylogenetic time. Through integration of scRNA-seq data with lineage information, PhyloVelo identifies MEGs and reconstructs a transcriptomic velocity field. We validate PhyloVelo using simulated data and Caenorhabditis elegans ground truth data, successfully recovering linear, bifurcated and convergent differentiations. Applying PhyloVelo to seven lineage-traced scRNA-seq datasets, generated using CRISPR-Cas9 editing, lentiviral barcoding or immune repertoire profiling, demonstrates its high accuracy and robustness in inferring complex lineage trajectories while outperforming RNA velocity. Additionally, we discovered that MEGs across tissues and organisms share similar functions in translation and ribosome biogenesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41587-023-01887-5

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • p21+ and p16+ populations are distinct and do not transition into one another.

    “This suggests that these populations are distinct and do not transition into one another (Wang et al, 2024b) (Fig. 1E).”

    From Distinct senotypes in p16- and p21-positive cells across human and mouse aging tissues (2025) · cites this paper as Wang et al, 2024b

    The ‘PhyloVelo identifies lung tumor dedifferentiation’ section discusses transitions among lung tumor cell types, not p21+ and p16+ populations. Searches for p21, p16, CDKN1A, CDKN2A, and senescence found no passage addressing whether those populations are distinct or transition into one another. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [58]Gu, Y., Blaauw, D. & Welch, J.D. Bayesian Inference of RNA Velocity from Multi-Lineage Single820 Cell Data. bioRxiv , 2022.2007.2008.499381 (2022). 821
  2. [59]Cui, H., Maan, H., Taylor, M.D. & Wang, B. DeepVelo: Deep Learning extends RNA velocity to 822 multi-lineage systems with cell-specific kinetics. bioRxiv , 2022.2004.2003.486877 (2022). 823
  3. [70]Singh, R., Wu, A.P., Mudide, A. & Berger, B. Unraveling causal gene regulation from the RNA 843 velocity graph using Velorama. bioRxiv , 2022.2010.2018.512766 (2023). 844
  4. [74]Jindal, K. et al. Multiomic single-cell lineage tracing to dissect fate-specific gene regulatory 852 programs. bioRxiv , 2022.2010.2023.512790 (2022). 853
  5. [75]Gillespie, D.T. Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. The journal of 854 physical chemistry 81 , 2340-2361 (1977). 855
  6. [79]Jia, C. Kinetic foundation of the zero-inflated negative binomial model for single-cell RNA 862 sequencing data. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 80 , 1336-1355 (2020). 863
  7. [80]Prim, R.C. Shortest connection networks and some generalizations. The Bell System Technical 864 Journal 36 , 1389-1401 (1957). 865

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, K., Hou, L., Wang, X., Zhai, X., Lu, Z., Zi, Z., Zhai, W., He, X., Curtis, C., Zhou, D., & Hu, Z.
Affiliations
  • Xiamen University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Zhou, Da
  • Hu, Zheng
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2023-07-31
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
778-789
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W4385415871
Cited by
66
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 3
FWCI
5.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (11971405, 32270693)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M693303)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
single-cell RNA sequencing, cell fate transitions, lineage tracing, RNA velocity, cell differentiation, ribosome biogenesis, translation (biology)
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Humans, Phylogeny, Caenorhabditis elegans, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Cell Lineage, Computational Biology, Gene Expression Profiling, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review