The emergent landscape of the mouse gut endoderm at single-cell resolution
Open accessAbstract
Here we delineate the ontogeny of the mammalian endoderm by generating 112,217 single-cell transcriptomes, which represent all endoderm populations within the mouse embryo until midgestation. We use graph-based approaches to model differentiating cells, which provides a spatio-temporal characterization of developmental trajectories and defines the transcriptional architecture that accompanies the emergence of the first (primitive or extra-embryonic) endodermal population and its sister pluripotent (embryonic) epiblast lineage. We uncover a relationship between descendants of these two lineages, in which epiblast cells differentiate into endoderm at two distinct time points-before and during gastrulation. Trajectories of endoderm cells were mapped as they acquired embryonic versus extra-embryonic fates and as they spatially converged within the nascent gut endoderm, which revealed these cells to be globally similar but retain aspects of their lineage history. We observed the regionalized identity of cells along the anterior-posterior axis of the emergent gut tube, which reflects their embryonic or extra-embryonic origin, and the coordinated patterning of these cells into organ-specific territories.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This study generated 112,217 single-cell transcriptomes spanning mouse endoderm from E3.5 to E8.75 and used graph-based trajectory inference to map endoderm ontogeny. It shows that epiblast cells contribute to endoderm before and during gastrulation, that embryonic and extra-embryonic endoderm converge transcriptionally in the gut tube while retaining lineage memory, and that anterior-posterior organ territories are transcriptionally primed before overt organ formation.
Key findings
- Profiled 112,217 cells across 13 tissue types from E3.5 to E8.75, covering primitive/extra-embryonic endoderm, definitive/embryonic endoderm, and emergent gut endoderm.
- Identified an epiblast-to-endoderm contribution: a subset of EPI cells acquired endoderm identity before gastrulation, validated by Sox2-Cre lineage tracing (GFP-positive cells in emVE: 1–5 cells, 10/20 embryos) and tetraploid ESC chimeras (1–5 cells, 9/19 embryos); Ttr-Cre tracing showed no EPI contribution from VE (0/27 embryos).
- VE and DE descendants intermixed along the E8.75 gut tube AP axis, with DE enriched anteriorly and VE posteriorly; a classifier trained on E7.5 VE/DE cells achieved auROC 0.96 and predicted E8.75 origin with auROC 0.92, indicating retained lineage history.
- E8.75 gut tube cells ordered along AP pseudo-space matched the stereotypical order of organ identities; TF expression predicted AP pseudo-space with correlation 0.97, and a core set of 20 TFs was identified.
Methods
- Mouse embryos were collected from E3.5 to E8.75; pre-/early post-implantation stages used whole embryos, while E6.5–E8.75 used endodermal tissue enrichment, including Afp-GFP FACS to separate GFP-positive extra-embryonic and GFP-negative embryonic populations.
- Single-cell 3′ RNA-seq libraries were generated on the 10x Genomics Chromium platform, with 13 tissue types collected in duplicate or triplicate; bulk RNA-seq, in situ hybridization, immunofluorescence, and lineage tracing were used for validation.
- Computational analysis combined Harmony to bridge time-points with Palantir for pseudo-time, branch probabilities, and differentiation potential; Phenograph and tSNE were used for clustering/visualization, plus manifold classifiers and sparse regression models for AP pseudo-space and VE/DE classification.
Limitations
- The paper states that investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments and outcome assessment.
- No formal limitations section is present; the text makes evident that findings are restricted to the mouse embryo and rely heavily on computational trajectory inference, with many predictions validated by imaging/ISH rather than functional perturbation.
- The study notes that Afp-GFP/Ttr-Cre-based discrimination of VE versus DE origin was limited to stages up to E8.75, the latest stage analyzed.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
43 of 60 cited sources checked · 27 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
ICM lineage divergence into EPI and PrE occurs at E3.5.
“The changes in DP and BP suggest ICM lineage divergence into EPI and PrE occurs at E3.5 consistent with previous analyses using limited markers20,21”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [20] Plusa, B., Piliszek, A., Frankenberg, S., Artus, J. & Hadjantonakis, A. K. Distinct sequential cell behaviours direct primitive endoderm formation in the mouse blastocyst. Development 135, 3081–3091 (2008). source
- cites [21] Chazaud, C., Yamanaka, Y., Pawson, T. & Rossant, J. Early lineage segregation between epiblast and primitive endoderm in mouse blastocysts through the Grb2-MAPK pathway. Dev. Cell 10, 615–624 (2006). source
- The authors state this as an assumption: Regions along pseudo-time where differentiation potential drops represent points where lineage specification and commitment occur.
- Premisecitation
The gut endoderm is comprised of cells of both PrE and DE.
“Our previous studies revealed the gut endoderm to be comprised of cells of both PrE and DE (Extended Data Fig. 1a)5–7.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [5] Viotti, M., Nowotschin, S. & Hadjantonakis, A. K. SOX17 links gut endoderm morphogenesis and germ layer segregation. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 1146–1156 (2014). source
- cites [6] Viotti, M., Nowotschin, S. & Hadjantonakis, A. K. Afp:mCherry, a red fluorescent transgenic reporter of the mouse visceral endoderm. Genesis 49, 124–133 (2011). source
- cites [7] Kwon, G. S., Viotti, M. & Hadjantonakis, A. K. The endoderm of the mouse embryo arises by dynamic widespread intercalation of embryonic and extraembryonic lineages. Dev. Cell 15, 509–520 (2008). source
- Interpretationcitation
Two PrE clusters at E3.5 represent nascent and more advanced populations during lineage maturation.
“We also identified two PrE clusters at E3.5, which we propose represent nascent (light blue) and more advanced (dark blue) populations during lineage maturation22”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Artus, J., Piliszek, A. & Hadjantonakis, A. K. The primitive endoderm lineage of the mouse blastocyst: sequential transcription factor activation and regulation of differentiation by Sox17. Dev. Biol. 350, 393–404 (2011). source
- The authors state this as an assumption: Regions along pseudo-time where differentiation potential drops represent points where lineage specification and commitment occur.
- Findingcitation
TE cells were substantially further away (average diffusion distance 13.9) from ICM than EPI (0.41) or PrE (2.0).
“Based on the average diffusion distance10,11 from the bipotent inner cell mass (ICM), TE cells were substantially further away (13.9) from ICM than either EPI (0.41) or PrE (2.0) (Extended Data Fig. 4b, Methods)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] Setty, M. et al. Palantir characterizes cell fate continuities in human hematopoiesis. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/08/05/385328 (2018). source
- cites [11] Setty, M. et al. Characterization of cell fate probabilities in single-cell data with Palantir. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 451–460 (2019). source
- Findingown data
These analyses provide precise ordering of markers during ICM lineage specification.
“These analyses provide precise ordering of markers during ICM lineage specification (Extended Data Fig. 5c)3,22,28.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [3] Chazaud, C. & Yamanaka, Y. Lineage specification in the mouse preimplantation embryo. Development 143, 1063–1074 (2016). source
- cites [22] Artus, J., Piliszek, A. & Hadjantonakis, A. K. The primitive endoderm lineage of the mouse blastocyst: sequential transcription factor activation and regulation of differentiation by Sox17. Dev. Biol. 350, 393–404 (2011). source
- cites [28] Ohnishi, Y. et al. Cell-to-cell expression variability followed by signal reinforcement progressively segregates early mouse lineages. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 27–37 (2014). source
The Results section (‘Progressive establishment of correlation’; page unavailable) reports an approximate activation hierarchy for seven PrE markers during the E3.5–E4.5 transition. It says evidence for a hierarchy was much weaker earlier, so it does not establish a precise ordering of markers throughout ICM lineage specification. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Mouse mutants in Fgfr1 and Fgfr2 phenocopy embryos lacking Fgf4, with defects in PrE specification and exit from naïve pluripotency in EPI.
“Mouse mutants in both Fgfr1 and Fgfr2 phenocopy embryos lacking Fgf4, with defects in PrE specification and exit from naïve pluripotency in the EPI26,27,29.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [26] Molotkov, A., Mazot, P., Brewer, J. R., Cinalli, R. M. & Soriano, P. Distinct requirements for FGFR1 and FGFR2 in primitive endoderm development and exit from pluripotency. Dev. Cell 41, 511–526 (2017). source
The Results (page unavailable) say Fgfr1/Fgfr2 double-null embryos phenocopy Fgf4-null embryos in disrupted PrE development. The Discussion (page unavailable) says PrE cells appear to be specified but not maintained, contrary to the claim of defective specification. It also reports persistent Nanog in mutant embryos and proposes impaired EPI maturation, while the direct exit-from-pluripotency experiments used ES cells. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [27] Kang, M., Garg, V. & Hadjantonakis, A. K. Lineage establishment and progression within the inner cell mass of the mouse blastocyst requires FGFR1 and FGFR2. Dev. Cell 41, 496–510 (2017). source
- cites [29] Kang, M., Piliszek, A., Artus, J. & Hadjantonakis, A. K. FGF4 is required for lineage restriction and salt-and-pepper distribution of primitive endoderm factors but not their initial expression in the mouse. Development 140, 267–279 (2013). source
- Premisecitation
Common endodermal genes are expressed by both PrE and DE cell types, hampering marker-based discrimination of embryonic and extra-embryonic descendants.
“Common endodermal genes are expressed by both cell types hampering marker-based discrimination of embryonic and extra-embryonic descendants8,9.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [8] Sherwood, R. I., Chen, T. Y. & Melton, D. A. Transcriptional dynamics of endodermal organ formation. Dev. Dyn. 238, 29–42 (2009). source
The Results section on microarray analysis describes markers shared across or restricted to embryonic endodermal organ populations, but does not compare primitive endoderm (PrE) with definitive endoderm (DE). Searches for primitive endoderm, extraembryonic endoderm, and shared markers found no passage addressing whether common genes hamper discrimination between those lineages. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [9] Hou, J. et al. A systematic screen for genes expressed in definitive endoderm by Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE). BMC Dev. Biol. 7, 92 (2007).
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
At gastrulation (E7.0-E7.5), EPI-derived DE cells intercalate into the emVE epithelium to form the gut endoderm.
“At gastrulation (E7.0-E7.5), EPI-derived (embryonic) DE cells intercalate into the emVE epithelium to form the gut endoderm5,7.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [5] Viotti, M., Nowotschin, S. & Hadjantonakis, A. K. SOX17 links gut endoderm morphogenesis and germ layer segregation. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 1146–1156 (2014). source
- cites [7] Kwon, G. S., Viotti, M. & Hadjantonakis, A. K. The endoderm of the mouse embryo arises by dynamic widespread intercalation of embryonic and extraembryonic lineages. Dev. Cell 15, 509–520 (2008). source
- Premisecitation
Gut endoderm comprises EPI-derived DE and VE descendants.
“Gut endoderm comprises EPI-derived DE and VE descendants6,7.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [6] Viotti, M., Nowotschin, S. & Hadjantonakis, A. K. Afp:mCherry, a red fluorescent transgenic reporter of the mouse visceral endoderm. Genesis 49, 124–133 (2011). source
- cites [7] Kwon, G. S., Viotti, M. & Hadjantonakis, A. K. The endoderm of the mouse embryo arises by dynamic widespread intercalation of embryonic and extraembryonic lineages. Dev. Cell 15, 509–520 (2008). source
- Premisecitation
13ss (E8.75) is the latest stage at which the visceral endoderm versus definitive endoderm origin of gut tube cells can be unambiguously assigned using Afp-GFP or Ttr-Cre mouse lines.
“13ss (E8.75), approximately corresponding to midgestation, the latest stage analyzed in this study, is the latest stage for unambiguous assignment of visceral endoderm (VE)-vs.-definitive endoderm (DE) origin of gut tube cells using Afp-GFP7,12 or Ttr-Cre7,35 mouse lines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [7] Kwon, G. S., Viotti, M. & Hadjantonakis, A. K. The endoderm of the mouse embryo arises by dynamic widespread intercalation of embryonic and extraembryonic lineages. Dev. Cell 15, 509–520 (2008). source
The Results section, “Visceral endoderm-derived cells are incorporated into the gut tube” (page unavailable), supports using Afp::GFP and Ttr::Cre to identify visceral endoderm-derived gut cells and says reporter reactivation precluded analysis at 20+ somites. It reports analysis at 12–18 somites, however, so it does not support 13 somites as the latest stage for unambiguous assignment. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [12] Kwon, G. S. et al. Tg(Afp-GFP) expression marks primitive and definitive endoderm lineages during mouse development. Dev. Dyn. 235, 2549–2558 (2006). source
The Introduction (page not provided) identifies Afp-GFP mouse lines as tools for tagging and tracking primitive and definitive endodermal cells. It does not establish that 13ss (E8.75) is the latest stage for unambiguous assignment of gut-tube cell origin, and the cited passages do not address Ttr-Cre. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [35] Kwon, G. S. & Hadjantonakis, A. K. Transthyretin mouse transgenes direct RFP expression or Cre-mediated recombination throughout the visceral endoderm. Genesis 47, 447–455 (2009). source
The ‘ADDITIONAL SITES OF RFP EXPRESSION AND Cre RECOMBINATION IN LATE STAGE EMBRYOS’ section says later transgene activity precludes further analysis of visceral-endoderm-derived cells in embryonic endoderm derivatives. It does not establish that 13 somites (E8.75) is the latest stage at which gut-tube cell origins can be unambiguously assigned using Afp-GFP or Ttr-Cre. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Cells labeled as exVE and emVE based on expression of known markers match expected Palantir branch probabilities.
“Cells labeled as exVE and emVE based on expression of known markers (plot on the left), match expected Palantir branch probabilities (4 plots on the right).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] Setty, M. et al. Palantir characterizes cell fate continuities in human hematopoiesis. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/08/05/385328 (2018). source
The Palantir Algorithm section describes how the method assigns branch probabilities to cells, but it does not report whether marker-labeled exVE and emVE cells match those probabilities. Searches of our full-text copy for exVE, emVE, and visceral endoderm found no passage addressing that comparison; page numbers are unavailable in the copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [11] Setty, M. et al. Characterization of cell fate probabilities in single-cell data with Palantir. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 451–460 (2019). source
The Palantir Algorithm section says the method assigns cells branch probabilities, but it does not report exVE or emVE labels or compare their marker-based labels with those probabilities. Searches for “exVE emVE” and visceral endoderm markers found no passage addressing the claimed match. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
By E5.5, a continuum of cells exhibiting gradual increase in endodermal marker gene expression bridges EPI to VE.
“While EPI and PrE were distinct at E4.5, by E5.5, we observed a continuum of cells exhibiting a gradual increase in expression of endodermal marker genes bridging EPI to VE (Fig. 2a, Extended Data Fig. 6a (black arrowhead) and 6c–d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The data identified key bifurcation and convergence points of embryonic and extra-embryonic tissues leading to establishment of distinct territories along the AP axis of the E8.75 gut tube, prior to overt appearance of endodermal organs.
“The data identified key bifurcation and convergence points of embryonic and extra-embryonic tissues leading to the establishment of distinct territories along the AP axis of the E8.75 gut tube, prior to the overt appearance of endodermal organs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ExE cells were phenotypically more distinct from EPI and VE at E5.5 based on average pairwise distances.
“ExE cells were phenotypically more distinct from EPI and VE at E5.5, based on average pairwise distances (Extended Data Fig. 6a–d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The study generated 112,217 single-cell transcriptomes representing all endoderm populations within the mouse embryo until midgestation.
“we generated 112,217 single-cell transcriptomes representing all endoderm populations within the mouse embryo until midgestation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In tetraploid embryo <-> CAG-H2B-tdTomato ESC chimeras, tdTomato-positive cells were distributed throughout the EPI and sparsely within the emVE (1-5 cells, 9/19 embryos).
“We also generated tetraploid embryo <-> CAG-H2B-tdTomato embryonic stem cell (ESC) chimeras, observed tdTomato-positive cells distributed throughout the EPI, and also sparsely within the emVE (1–5 cells, 9/19 embryos, Extended Data Fig. 6g).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Bridging cells had high propensity towards VE.
“Following the region of high DP, a sharp increase in VE BP was observed, indicating that bridging cells had high propensity towards VE (Fig. 2b, arrows with dotted lines).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Regions along pseudo-time where differentiation potential drops represent points where lineage specification and commitment occur.
- Findingown data
No connection was observed between EPI or VE and extra-embryonic ectoderm (ExE) at E5.5.
“By contrast, no connection was observed between EPI or VE and extra-embryonic ectoderm (ExE, a TE descendant).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At E4.5, distinct EPI and PrE populations were observed.
“At E4.5 we observed distinct EPI and PrE populations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Genes correlating with endoderm factors (Foxa2, Gata4, Gata6, Sox7, Sox17) and pluripotency-associated factors (Nanog, Pou3f1, Klf4) were identified within EPI and VE.
“Investigation of gene trends within the EPI and VE (Supplementary Fig. 4) identified genes correlating with endoderm factors such as Foxa2, Gata4, Gata6, Sox7 and Sox17, and pluripotency-associated factors such Nanog, Pou3f1 and Klf4 (Supplementary Table 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
An increase in DP was observed in a subset of EPI cells bridging to E5.5 VE.
“An increase in DP was also observed in a subset of EPI cells bridging to E5.5 VE (Fig. 2b, black arrowhead).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Regions along pseudo-time where differentiation potential drops represent points where lineage specification and commitment occur.
- Findingown data
Endoderm cells that acquired embryonic versus extra-embryonic fates spatially converged within the nascent gut endoderm.
“Trajectories of endoderm cells were mapped as they acquired embryonic versus extra-embryonic fates, and as they spatially converged within the nascent gut endoderm; revealing them to be globally similar but retaining aspects of their lineage history.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Epiblast cells differentiate into endoderm at two distinct time-points, before and during gastrulation.
“We uncovered a relationship between descendants of these two lineages, whereby epiblast cells differentiate into endoderm at two distinct time-points, before and during gastrulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
There is transcriptional priming of spatial patterning of cells along the AP axis at E7.5.
“For example, there is transcriptional priming of spatial patterning of cells along the AP axis at E7.5.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
DE and VE cells were predominantly primed towards anterior and posterior localization, respectively.
“Notably, DE and VE cells were predominantly primed towards anterior and posterior localization, respectively (Extended Data Fig. 8k, black arrowheads).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Regions along pseudo-time where differentiation potential drops represent points where lineage specification and commitment occur.
- Findingown data
The model identified a core group of 20 TFs predicting AP pseudo-space ordering.
“This model identified a core group of 20 TFs predicting AP pseudo-space ordering (Fig. 5e and Extended Data Fig. 9d–f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The strongest signal in the data, as determined by the first diffusion component, was cell ordering along the AP axis.
“The strongest signal in the data, as determined by the first diffusion component, was cell ordering along the AP axis (Extended Data Fig. 8c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A clear distinction was evident between cells specifying towards YsE-vs.-gut tube at E6.5 and E7.5.
“A clear distinction was evident between cells specifying towards YsE-vs.-gut tube at E6.5 and E7.5 (Supplementary Fig. 5a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The data pinpoint the order and timing of key events starting with emergence of first endodermal population within blastocyst.
“The data pinpoint the order and timing of key events starting with the emergence of the first (primitive) endodermal population within the blastocyst.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The classifier trained on E7.5 predicted origin of cells within E8.75 gut tube with high accuracy (auROC 0.92).
“We applied this classifier (trained on E7.5) to predict the origin of cells within the E8.75 gut tube, achieving a similarly high accuracy (Fig. 4d, auROC: 0.92).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The ordering of clusters along AP pseudo-space matched the sequence of organ identities along the AP axis of the gut tube.
“The resulting ordering of clusters matched the sequence of organ identities along the AP axis of the gut tube (Fig. 5a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A small fraction of cells acquiring AP identities was present in both DE and VE compartments at E7.5.
“Our results revealed the presence of a small fraction of cells acquiring AP identities in both DE and VE compartments at E7.5 (Extended Data Fig. 8k).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Regions along pseudo-time where differentiation potential drops represent points where lineage specification and commitment occur.
- Findingown data
Visual inspection revealed two clusters of genes in emVE with strong intra-cluster correlation but anti-correlation across the clusters.
“Visual inspection revealed the presence of two clusters of genes in emVE with strong intra cluster correlation, but anti correlated across the clusters (Supplementary Fig. 5b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Extra-embryonic endoderm (PrE and VE derivatives) cells contribute to the gut tube of the E8.75 embryo.
“Extra-embryonic endoderm (PrE and VE derivatives) cells contribute to the gut tube of the E8.75 embryo.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In an E5.5 wild-type 4n <-> H2B-tdTomato ESC embryo chimera, an EPI cell is intercalating into the visceral endoderm layer (VE).
“An EPI cell is intercalating into the visceral endoderm layer (VE) (yellow arrowheads).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
exVE cells at E6.5 and E7.5 show an increasing probability towards the yolk sac endoderm.
“(c) exVE cells at E6.5 and E7.5 show an increasing probability towards the yolk sac endoderm (Supplementary Fig. 5a, Extended Data Fig. 7e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In E5.5 wild-type 4n <-> H2B-tdTomato ESC embryo chimeras, 9/19 showed Tomato-positive cells in the VE.
“(n = 9/19 showed Tomato-positive cells in the VE).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Lhx1 and Lefty1 are genes specific for emVE.
“ISH of E6.25 embryos showing expression of Lhx1 (n = 3) and Lefty1 (n = 3), genes specific for emVE, and Apln (n = 3) and Msx1 (n = 3) specific for exVE.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
2239 genes are differentially expressed in emVE at E7.5, derived using bulk RNA-seq data.
“Plots showing differentially expressed genes between of exVE (291 genes) and emVE (2239 genes) derived using bulk RNA-seq data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
E7.5 VE cells are predominantly destined towards posterior.
“Black arrowheads indicate early emergence of AP spatial patterning at E7.5, with E7.5 DE cells predominantly destined towards anterior, and VE cells predominantly destined towards posterior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
emVE cells at E6.5 and E7.5 show an increasing probability towards the gut tube.
“(b) emVE cells at E6.5 and E7.5 show an increasing probability towards the gut tube”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In VE cells from stages E3.5-E8.75, drops in differentiation potential occur at two time points: E5.5 and E7.5.
“Drops in differential potential occur at two time points. The first at E5.5, as cells acquire a distal versus proximal fate and the second at E7.5 as cells acquire an anterior versus posterior fate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At E5.5, ExE cells are significantly further from EPI and VE cells.
“Similar to the analysis above, the ExE cells at E5.5 continue to be significantly further from EPI and VE cells (Extended Data Fig. 6a–b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
E3.5 and E4.5 VE cells do not show any change in differentiation potential along pseudo-time.
“(a) E3.5 and E4.5 cells do not show any change in differentiation potential along pseudo - time (Supplementary Fig. 5a) and thus are representative of uncommitted cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In Sox2-Cre embryos, 10/20 GFP-positive cells in VE.
“(n = 10/20 GFP-positive cells in VE of Sox2-CreTG/+;ROSA26mT/mG embryos, n = 0/27 GFP-positive cells in the EPI of Ttr-CreTG/+;ROSA26mT/mG embryos).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Hox genes expressed in gut endoderm cells at E8.75 show distribution along the AP axis.
“Whole-mount mRNA in situ hybridizations on whole E8.75 embryos (n > 3 for each gene) and micro-dissected gut tubes (n > 3 for each gene) of Hox genes depicting their distribution along the AP axis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Bulk RNA-seq expression of Nkx2-1 and Hoxb9 in quadrants of the gut tube along the AP axis compares with A-P single cell expression patterns.
“Bulk RNA-seq expression of Nkx2–1 and Hoxb9 in quadrants of the gut tube along the AP axis compares with A-P single cell expression patterns.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Heatmaps of highly expressed genes specifically in exVE or emVE at E5.5 also distinguish exVE and emVE cells at E6.5 and E7.5.
“Heatmaps of highly expressed genes specifically in exVE or emVE at E5.5 also distinguish exVE and emVE cells at E6.5 and E7.5.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
MNNs are enriched along the boundary between time-points.
“The MNNs are enriched along the boundary between time-points, supporting augmentation of the kNN graph with additional edges between mutually nearest neighbors (MNNs) between the consecutive time-points.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Apln and Msx1 are genes specific for exVE.
“ISH of E6.25 embryos showing expression of Lhx1 (n = 3) and Lefty1 (n = 3), genes specific for emVE, and Apln (n = 3) and Msx1 (n = 3) specific for exVE.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Nkx2.1 is an anterior marker in E8.75 cells.
“Plots showing the expression of anterior marker Nkx2.1 and posterior marker Hoxb9 in E8.75 cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The path from EPI to ExE boundary cells includes steps that are substantially distant.
“The path from EPI to ExE boundary cells includes steps that are substantially distant (Extended Data Fig. 6d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
291 genes are differentially expressed in exVE at E7.5, derived using bulk RNA-seq data.
“Plots showing differentially expressed genes between of exVE (291 genes) and emVE (2239 genes) derived using bulk RNA-seq data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In situ hybridization of representative differentially expressed genes in each cluster on whole E8.75 embryos or micro-dissected E8.75 gut tubes shows expression of representative gene for each particular cluster.
“In situ hybridization of representative differentially expressed genes in each cluster on whole E8.75 embryos (n > 3 for each gene) or micro-dissected E8.75 gut tubes (n > 3 for each gene) (right panels). Arrowheads point to expression of representative gene for each particular cluster.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
E7.5 DE cells are predominantly destined towards anterior.
“Black arrowheads indicate early emergence of AP spatial patterning at E7.5, with E7.5 DE cells predominantly destined towards anterior, and VE cells predominantly destined towards posterior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In Ttr-Cre embryos, 0/27 GFP-positive cells in EPI.
“(n = 10/20 GFP-positive cells in VE of Sox2-CreTG/+;ROSA26mT/mG embryos, n = 0/27 GFP-positive cells in the EPI of Ttr-CreTG/+;ROSA26mT/mG embryos).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Hoxb9 is a posterior marker in E8.75 cells.
“Plots showing the expression of anterior marker Nkx2.1 and posterior marker Hoxb9 in E8.75 cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Endoderm cells emerge twice during mammalian development.
“Endoderm cells emerge twice during mammalian development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The TE-vs.-ICM decision is complete before ICM cells make a PrE-vs.-EPI choice.
“suggesting that the TE-vs.-ICM decision is complete before ICM cells make a PrE-vs.-EPI choice, and that EPI cells are phenotypically closer to ICM cells, than PrE”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Replicate reproducibility was verified.
“verified replicate reproducibility (Supplementary Fig. 2), before combining.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
EPI cells are phenotypically closer to ICM cells than PrE.
“suggesting that the TE-vs.-ICM decision is complete before ICM cells make a PrE-vs.-EPI choice, and that EPI cells are phenotypically closer to ICM cells, than PrE”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Two clusters within E4.5 PrE likely represent emergent visceral (VE) and parietal (ParE) endoderm.
“Two clusters were identified within the E4.5 PrE (light and dark blue, black arrowhead), which likely represent emergent visceral (VE, orange arrowhead) and parietal (ParE, black arrowhead) endoderm”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
In EPI, Fgf4-Fgfr1 may be driving pluripotent state transitions.
“While in EPI, Fgf4-Fgfr1 may be driving pluripotent state transitions (Extended Data Fig. 5a, c–d, green arrowheads).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Tandem receptor expression suggests sequential Fgfr1/Fgfr2 activity during PrE specification.
“This tandem receptor expression suggests sequential Fgfr1/Fgfr2 activity during PrE specification (Extended Data Fig. 5c, second panel).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The continuity between EPI and VE results from a subset of EPI cells acquiring an endoderm identity.
“This suggests that this continuity results from a subset of EPI cells acquiring an endoderm identity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
This study provides the first comprehensive transcriptional characterization of the ontogeny of the endodermal organ system in a mammalian model.
“In sum, this study provides the first comprehensive transcriptional characterization of the ontogeny of the endodermal organ system in a mammalian model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
EPI descendants resembled embryonic VE (emVE) and anterior visceral endoderm (AVE), based on expression of markers including Lefty1, Cer1 and Hhex.
“Expression of markers of embryonic (em)VE, and anterior visceral endoderm (AVE), a specialized cellular cohort of emVE exhibiting an intra-epithelial, distal-to-anterior migratory behavior between E5.5 and E6.0, including Lefty1, Cer1 and Hhex30–32, suggested these EPI descendants resembled emVE and AVE (Fig. 2c, Extended Data Fig. 6e)33.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [30] Thomas, P. Q., Brown, A. & Beddington, R. S. Hex: a homeobox gene revealing peri-implantation asymmetry in the mouse embryo and an early transient marker of endothelial cell precursors. Development 125, 85–94 (1998). source
- cites [31] Meno, C. et al. Mouse Lefty2 and zebrafish Antivin are feedback inhibitors of nodal signaling during vertebrate gastrulation. Mol. Cell 4, 287–298 (1999). source
- cites [32] Belo, J. A. et al. Cerberus-like is a secreted factor with neutralizing activity expressed in the anterior primitive endoderm of the mouse gastrula. Mech. Dev. 68, 45–57 (1997). source
- cites [33] Arnold, S. J. & Robertson, E. J. Making a commitment: cell lineage allocation and axis patterning in the early mouse embryo. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 91–103 (2009). source
- Interpretationown data
EPI differentiates into endoderm before the onset of gastrulation.
“Application of Palantir to our data suggested an unprecedented plasticity within the EPI lineage, validated through lineage-tracing experiments, whereby EPI differentiates into endoderm before the onset of gastrulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Regions along pseudo-time where differentiation potential drops represent points where lineage specification and commitment occur.
- Study design and conductown data
Expression domains for core factors were validated by ISH, from Nkx2-1 at anterior to Hoxb9 and Hoxc9 at posterior.
“Expression domains for the core factors were validated by ISH; from Nkx2–1 at the anterior, to Hoxb9 and Hoxc9 at the posterior (Fig. 5e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Despite extensive morphological and transcriptional changes at E7.5-E8.75, VE lineage history is maintained through expression of a core set of genes including Rhox5, Trap1a, Xlr3a, Cdkn2a and Ttr.
“Thus, demonstrating that despite extensive morphological and transcriptional changes taking place at E7.5-E8.75, VE lineage history is maintained through expression of a core set of genes, including Rhox5, Trap1a, Xlr3a, Cdkn2a and Ttr (Fig. 4e, Extended Data Fig. 8i–j, Supplementary Table 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
VE descendant proportions in binned locations along the AP axis and AP pseudo-space axis were highly correlated.
“VE descendant proportions in binned locations along the AP axis and AP pseudo-space axis were highly correlated (Extended Data Fig. 8m), further demonstrating the accuracy of inferred AP pseudo-space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
These organ identity clusters were largely determined by spatial localization rather than lineage history.
“These were largely determined by spatial localization, rather than lineage history.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The study delineated the transcriptional landscape of mouse endoderm from preimplantation to midgestation.
“We have delineated the transcriptional landscape of mouse endoderm from preimplantation to midgestation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The sparse logistic regression classifier achieved near-perfect accuracy on E7.5 test data (auROC 0.96).
“This classifier achieved near-perfect accuracy on E7.5 test data (auROC:0.96) (Extended Data Fig. 8h).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Throughout embryogenesis cells acquire a transcriptional identity reflecting their future fate and spatial positioning prior to overt spatial organization.
“The analysis reveals that throughout embryogenesis cells acquire a transcriptional identity reflecting their future fate and spatial positioning prior to overt spatial organization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Wholemount ISH for Apln, Lhx1, Lefty1 and Msx1 at E6.25 validated regionalized expression.
“Wholemount in situ hybridization (ISH) for Apln, Lhx1, Lefty1 and Msx1 at E6.25 validated regionalized expression (Extended Data Fig. 7h).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
EPI and VE boundary cells are continuous in the embedded space.
“In contrast, the path from EPI to VE boundary cells includes relatively uniform step sizes and does not include substantially large steps indicating continuity (Extended Data Fig. 6d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Branch probabilities of E5.5 cells in committing towards YsE and gut tube were used to infer putative exVE and emVE identities at E5.5.
“Branch probabilities of E5.5 cells in committing towards YsE and gut tube were used to infer putative exVE and emVE identities at E5.5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
E3.5 and E4.5 VE cells are representative of uncommitted cells.
“(a) E3.5 and E4.5 cells do not show any change in differentiation potential along pseudo - time (Supplementary Fig. 5a) and thus are representative of uncommitted cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Early emergence of AP spatial patterning occurs at E7.5.
“Black arrowheads indicate early emergence of AP spatial patterning at E7.5, with E7.5 DE cells predominantly destined towards anterior, and VE cells predominantly destined towards posterior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
In E5.5 cells, there are cells that transdifferentiate from EPI to VE.
“Black arrowheads mark cells that transdifferentiate from EPI to VE.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Points of highest changes along pseudo-time represent inferred lineage specification and commitment.
“Points of highest changes along pseudo-time represent inferred lineage specification and commitment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
TF coefficients in regression are robust.
“Heatmap showing the Pearson correlation of TF coefficients in (e), highlighting the robustness of TF coefficients in regression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
In the mouse blastocyst, changes in differentiation potential, and hence lineage commitment, in both PrE and EPI lineages occur at E3.5.
“Plots showing the second derivative of PrE and EPI differentiation potential along pseudo-time suggesting that changes in differentiation potential, and hence lineage commitment in both lineages occur at E3.5.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
At E5.5, VE cells acquire a distal versus proximal fate.
“The first at E5.5, as cells acquire a distal versus proximal fate”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
At E7.5, VE cells acquire an anterior versus posterior fate.
“the second at E7.5 as cells acquire an anterior versus posterior fate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The lineage decision between ICM at E3.5 and TE occurs at a stage earlier than E3.5.
“This suggests that the lineage decision between ICM at E3.5 and TE occurs at a stage earlier than E3.5.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Harmony is robust to different values of k, the number of nearest neighbours for kNN graph construction.
“Robustness of Harmony: Plots showing the correlation between diffusion components for different values of k, the number of nearest neighbours for kNN graph construction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The AP pseudo-space ordering is robust to varying number of diffusion components.
“Heatmap showing Pearson correlations between AP pseudo-space orderings determined using a varying number of diffusion components highlighting the robustness of the ordering.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 25
- May combine two claims. 47
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationDefinitive (embryonic) endoderm (DE) is specified from pluripotent epiblast (EPI) at gastrulation around E7.0.
“Later, around E7.0, definitive (embryonic) endoderm (DE) is specified from pluripotent epiblast (EPI) at gastrulation4.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Nowotschin, S. & Hadjantonakis, A. K. Cellular dynamics in the early mouse embryo: from axis formation to gastrulation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 20, 420–427 (2010). source
The ‘Emergence of the primitive streak’ section says that during gastrulation the epiblast generates definitive endoderm, and ‘Intercalation and endoderm morphogenesis’ says DE cells may be specified within the streak. The paper places streak formation at E6.5 and its elongation through E7.5, but does not specifically place DE specification around E7.0. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe gut endoderm is the precursor of the respiratory and digestive tracts and their associated organs.
“The gut endoderm is the precursor of the respiratory and digestive tracts, and their associated organs1,2 (Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Zorn, A. M. & Wells, J. M. Vertebrate endoderm development and organ formation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 25, 221–251 (2009). source
- cites [2] Tremblay, K. D. Formation of the murine endoderm: lessons from the mouse, frog, fish, and chick. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 96, 1–34 (2010). source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationICM cell fate specification is driven in part by lineage-specific TFs Gata6 and Nanog, co-expressed in uncommitted ICM and exclusively expressed in and required for PrE and EPI respectively.
“ICM cell fate specification is driven in part by the lineage-specific transcription factors (TFs) Gata6 and Nanog, which are co-expressed in uncommitted ICM, and exclusively expressed in, and required for, PrE and EPI respectively23,24.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [23] Silva, J. et al. Nanog is the gateway to the pluripotent ground state. Cell 138, 722–737 (2009). source
The Results section on Nanog localization (page not provided) identifies Gata6 as a hypoblast specification factor and reports that Gata6 and Nanog occupy mutually exclusive cells by E4.5. The Discussion (page not provided) says Nanog is exclusively expressed in nascent epiblast and is essential for its transition to pluripotency. Our copy does not establish that Gata6 and Nanog are co-expressed in uncommitted ICM cells or that Gata6 is required for primitive endoderm formation. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [24] Schrode, N., Saiz, N., Di Talia, S. & Hadjantonakis, A. K. GATA6 levels modulate primitive endoderm cell fate choice and timing in the mouse blastocyst. Dev. Cell 29, 454–467 (2014). source
The Introduction and Results describe GATA6 and NANOG as lineage-specific transcription factors that are initially co-expressed in ICM cells and later become mutually exclusive in PrE and EPI precursors. The Results establish that GATA6 is required for PrE specification. Our copy identifies NANOG with EPI but does not establish that NANOG is required for EPI specification. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe early post-implantation (E5.5) mouse embryo is radially symmetrical, and the VE appears morphologically uniform around its proximal-distal axis.
“The early post-implantation (E5.5, Fig. 1) mouse embryo is radially symmetrical, and the VE appears morphologically uniform around its proximal-distal axis4,33.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] Nowotschin, S. & Hadjantonakis, A. K. Cellular dynamics in the early mouse embryo: from axis formation to gastrulation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 20, 420–427 (2010). source
The section “PD polarity at early postimplantation results in DVE cell specification” describes the E5.5 egg cylinder as radially symmetric. It does not establish that the VE appears morphologically uniform around the proximal-distal axis; instead, it describes distinct proximal and distal VE morphologies and morphologically distinct DVE cells around E5.5. The source therefore supports the embryo-symmetry part but not the unqualified VE-uniformity part. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [33] Arnold, S. J. & Robertson, E. J. Making a commitment: cell lineage allocation and axis patterning in the early mouse embryo. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 91–103 (2009). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFGF4 signaling is active across the ICM population and is critical for PrE specification.
“While active across the ICM population25–27, FGF4 signaling is critical for PrE specification28,29.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim4 of 5 sources checked- cites [25] Morgani, S. M. et al. A Sprouty4 reporter to monitor FGF/ERK signaling activity in ESCs and mice. Dev. Biol. 441, 104–126 (2018). source
- cites [26] Molotkov, A., Mazot, P., Brewer, J. R., Cinalli, R. M. & Soriano, P. Distinct requirements for FGFR1 and FGFR2 in primitive endoderm development and exit from pluripotency. Dev. Cell 41, 511–526 (2017). source
The citation is attached to the claim that FGF4 signaling is critical for PrE specification, not to the preceding claim about activity across the ICM. The Discussion says FGF4 promotes conversion of ICM cells toward a PrE fate. However, the Results section “Fgfr1 and Fgfr2 are Required for Maintenance but not Initiation of the PrE” says PrE development begins without FGF signaling but is not maintained, so the claim overstates its role in initial specification. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [27] Kang, M., Garg, V. & Hadjantonakis, A. K. Lineage establishment and progression within the inner cell mass of the mouse blastocyst requires FGFR1 and FGFR2. Dev. Cell 41, 496–510 (2017). source
- cites [28] Ohnishi, Y. et al. Cell-to-cell expression variability followed by signal reinforcement progressively segregates early mouse lineages. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 27–37 (2014). source
- cites [29] Kang, M., Piliszek, A., Artus, J. & Hadjantonakis, A. K. FGF4 is required for lineage restriction and salt-and-pepper distribution of primitive endoderm factors but not their initial expression in the mouse. Development 140, 267–279 (2013). source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataemVE represents a specialized variant of exVE, perhaps modulating a transcriptional program in response to stimuli such as BMP or Nodal.
“Differential expression between bulk RNA sequenced E7.5 exVE and emVE populations suggested that emVE represents a specialized variant of exVE (Extended Data Fig. 7d), perhaps modulating a transcriptional program in response to stimuli, such as BMP or Nodal38–40.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [38] Paca, A. et al. BMP signaling induces visceral endoderm differentiation of XEN cells and parietal endoderm. Dev. Biol. 361, 90–102 (2012). source
- cites [39] Kruithof-de Julio, M. et al. Regulation of extra-embryonic endoderm stem cell differentiation by Nodal and Cripto signaling. Development 138, 3885–3895 (2011). source
- cites [40] Artus, J. et al. BMP4 signaling directs primitive endoderm-derived XEN cells to an extraembryonic visceral endoderm identity. Dev. Biol. 361, 245–262 (2012). source
In Results and Discussion (page unavailable), the paper reports that BMP4 changes gene expression in XEN cells toward an exVE-like identity, supporting BMP as a stimulus that can modulate a visceral-endoderm program. It does not show that emVE is a specialized variant of exVE or that emVE modulates its program in response to BMP. The Introduction mentions Nodal-induced XEN-cell differentiation, but does not establish a Nodal response in emVE. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationProximal-distal spatial patterning across the VE has been described preceding and coincident to onset of gastrulation at E6.5, with clear distinction between morphology and function of proximally located exVE and distal emVE.
“Proximal-distal spatial patterning across the VE has been described preceding, and coincident to the onset of gastrulation at E6.5, with a clear distinction between the morphology and function of the proximally located exVE (cuboidal epithelium, overlying the ExE, giving rise to yolk sac endoderm, YsE) and distal emVE (squamous epithelium, overlying the epiblast, contributing to the gut tube7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Kwon, G. S., Viotti, M. & Hadjantonakis, A. K. The endoderm of the mouse embryo arises by dynamic widespread intercalation of embryonic and extraembryonic lineages. Dev. Cell 15, 509–520 (2008). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCell fate is determined through a combination of cell intrinsic propensities to specific fates and extrinsic cues from the environment.
“Cell fate is determined through a combination of cell intrinsic propensities to specific fates and extrinsic cues (e.g. signaling) from the environment, detailed knowledge of which should yield improved protocols for differentiation into distinct endodermal derivatives49.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] McCauley, H. A. & Wells, J. M. Pluripotent stem cell-derived organoids: using principles of developmental biology to grow human tissues in a dish. Development 144, 958–962 (2017). source
The Introduction explains that external signals, including Wnt and FGF, direct PSC-derived endoderm toward distinct fates, supporting the role of extrinsic cues and their use in differentiation protocols. It does not establish the claimed contribution of cell-intrinsic propensities to fate determination. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataTF expression was exceptionally accurate in predicting AP pseudo-space order (correlation 0.97), indicating that transcriptional regulation, presumably in response to signals from neighboring mesenchyme, plays a key role in gut tube patterning.
“TF expression was exceptionally accurate in predicting AP pseudo-space order (Extended Data Fig. 9c, Correlation: 0.97), indicating that transcriptional regulation, presumably in response to signals from neighboring mesenchyme1, plays a key role in gut tube patterning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Zorn, A. M. & Wells, J. M. Vertebrate endoderm development and organ formation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 25, 221–251 (2009). source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe high resolution achieved by Palantir allows detailed mapping of gene expression trends and dynamics that are correlated with changes in lineage potential.
“The high resolution achieved by Palantir allows detailed mapping of gene expression trends and dynamics that are correlated with changes in lineage potential10,11.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] Setty, M. et al. Palantir characterizes cell fate continuities in human hematopoiesis. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/08/05/385328 (2018). source
- cites [11] Setty, M. et al. Characterization of cell fate probabilities in single-cell data with Palantir. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 451–460 (2019). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPalantir models cell fate choices as continuous probabilistic processes rather than treating lineage decisions as bifurcations.
“A key distinguishing feature of Palantir is that rather than treating lineage decisions as bifurcations, cell fate choices are modeled as continuous probabilistic processes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] Setty, M. et al. Palantir characterizes cell fate continuities in human hematopoiesis. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/08/05/385328 (2018). source
- cites [11] Setty, M. et al. Characterization of cell fate probabilities in single-cell data with Palantir. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 451–460 (2019). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPalantir results are robust to the parameters used.
“Palantir results however have been shown to be robust to these parameters10,11,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] Setty, M. et al. Palantir characterizes cell fate continuities in human hematopoiesis. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/08/05/385328 (2018). source
- cites [11] Setty, M. et al. Characterization of cell fate probabilities in single-cell data with Palantir. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 451–460 (2019). source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataUsing mnnCorrect for global batch effect correction leads to over-correction and loss of signal between time-points.
“Right: Plot generated using mnnCorrect27 for global batch effect correction leading to “over-correction” and loss in signal between time-points.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Kang, M., Garg, V. & Hadjantonakis, A. K. Lineage establishment and progression within the inner cell mass of the mouse blastocyst requires FGFR1 and FGFR2. Dev. Cell 41, 496–510 (2017). source
The STAR METHODS sections describe fluorescence-decay correction and normalization of single-cell gene-expression data, but do not discuss mnnCorrect or global batch-effect correction. The Results report that E3.5 and E4.5 cells generally clustered apart, but do not assess over-correction or loss of signal between time-points. Searches for mnnCorrect and batch correction found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataEndoderm cells that acquired embryonic versus extra-embryonic fates were globally similar but retained aspects of their lineage history.
“Trajectories of endoderm cells were mapped as they acquired embryonic versus extra-embryonic fates, and as they spatially converged within the nascent gut endoderm; revealing them to be globally similar but retaining aspects of their lineage history.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGata6/Fgf4 also tracked with EPI specification but trailed Gata6/Nanog.
“Gata6/Fgf4 also tracked with EPI specification, but trailed Gata6/Nanog.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt E5.5, GFP-positive Gata6-positive cells were observed in distal locations, whereas by E6.0 they predominantly resided more anteriorly.
“At E5.5, GFP-positive Gata6-positive cells were observed in distal locations, whereas by E6.0, they predominantly resided more anteriorly (Extended Data Fig. 6f).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAdditional genes correlated along pseudo-time with Fgf4 in EPI (e.g., Tcf7l1) and with Gata6 and Gata4 in PrE.
“Additional genes correlated along pseudo-time with Fgf4 in EPI (e.g. Tcf7l1, Extended Data Fig. 5d, b, e–f, green arrowhead), and Gata6 and Gata4 in PrE (Extended Data Fig. 5b, Supplementary Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Gata6/Nanog ratio closely tracked with EPI specification and is a strong descriptor of ICM fate specification.
“The Gata6/Nanog ratio closely tracked with EPI specification and a strong descriptor of ICM fate specification (Extended Data Fig. 5b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe emergent gut tube shows regionalized identity of cells along the anterior-posterior axis, reflecting their embryonic or extra-embryonic origin, and coordinate patterning into organ-specific territories.
“We observed the regionalized identity of cells along the anterior-posterior axis of the emergent gut tube, reflecting their embryonic or extra-embryonic origin, and their coordinate patterning into organ-specific territories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPalantir ordered cells along developmental trajectories with high DP at E3.5, corresponding to EPI-vs.-PrE lineage divergence.
“Palantir ordered cells along their developmental trajectories with high DP at E3.5, corresponding to EPI-vs.-PrE lineage divergence (Fig. 2b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Regions along pseudo-time where differentiation potential drops represent points where lineage specification and commitment occur.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn Sox2-Cre;ROSA26mTmG embryos at E5.5-E6.0, the majority of GFP-positive cells were within the EPI, with single cells also observed within the emVE (1-5 cells, 10/20 embryos), but not extra-embryonic VE.
“Imaging of E5.5-E6.0 Sox2-CreTG/+;ROSA26mTmG/+ embryos revealed the majority of GFP-positive cells within the EPI, with single cells also observed within the emVE (yellow arrowhead, 1–5 cells, 10/20 embryos), but not extra-embryonic (ex)VE.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFgfr1 was expressed in uncommitted ICM cells and downregulated upon PrE specification, at the time of transient Fgfr2 activation.
“Palantir suggested Fgfr1 was expressed in uncommitted ICM cells (Extended Data Fig. 5a, c–d), and downregulated upon PrE specification, at the time of transient Fgfr2 activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn Ttr-Cre;ROSA26mTmG embryos, all GFP-positive cells were restricted to the VE, with no cells detected in the EPI (0/27 embryos).
“By contrast, all GFP-positive cells were restricted to the VE in Ttr-CreTG/+;ROSA26mTmG embryos, with no cells detected in the EPI (0/27 embryos, Fig. 2e, Extended Data Fig. 6f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTwo ICM clusters were identified: one uncommitted with equal propensity for PrE or EPI fates, and another uncommitted but started to specify towards PrE or EPI.
“Two ICM clusters were identified; one representing uncommitted cells having equal propensity for PrE or EPI fates (purple), and another (green), that albeit uncommitted, had started to specify towards PrE or EPI”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Regions along pseudo-time where differentiation potential drops represent points where lineage specification and commitment occur.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe data define previously unappreciated sub-states within well-studied cell populations and uncovered detailed gene expression trends.
“The data also define previously unappreciated sub-states within well-studied cell populations and uncovered detailed gene expression trends.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf Hox genes expressed within E8.75 gut tube, the majority were posteriorly localized, including several displaying robust, more anterior expression within mesoderm and/or neurectoderm.
“While not all Hox genes were expressed within the E8.75 gut tube, of those that were, the majority were posteriorly localized (Fig. 5d and Extended Data Fig. 10), including several displaying robust, more anterior expression within mesoderm and/or neurectoderm (Extended Data Fig. 10: Hoxb1, Hoxd4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere was a high degree of variability in density of cells along the pseudo-spatial axis, with low density regions between clusters.
“We observed a high degree of variability in the density of cells along the pseudo-spatial axis (Fig. 5b–c, Extended Data Fig. 9a–b), with low density regions between clusters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBy E8.75, clusters of cells expressing markers of organ identity could be identified, correlating in AP pseudo-space with stereotypical order of endodermal organs.
“By the time the gut endoderm has internalized forming the gut tube (E8.75), clusters of cells expressing markers of organ identity could be identified, correlating in AP pseudo-space with the stereotypical order of endodermal organs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBMP, HH, JAK/STAT and HIPPO pathway activation encompassed multiple domains, Nodal signaling was not active at this stage, and both positive and negative read-outs of Retinoic Acid signaling were posteriorly localized.
“BMP, HH, JAK/STAT and HIPPO pathway activation encompassed multiple domains, Nodal signaling was not active at this stage, while both positive and negative read-outs of Retinoic Acid signaling were posteriorly localized.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll tested organ marker genes (Nkx2-1, Irx1, Ppy, Pdx1, Fabp1, Hoxb9) were expressed at substantial levels in both VE and DE cells at comparable AP positions, except Nkx2-1, which was exclusive to DE.
“All genes were expressed at substantial levels in both VE and DE cells, and at comparable AP positions, except for Nkx2–1, which is expressed in the anterior-most cells of the gut tube and therefore exclusive to DE (Fig. 4c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCells specifying towards YsE and gut tube were exVE and emVE, respectively.
“Based on the expression of marker genes in scRNA-seq data, and correlation to bulk RNA-seq gene expression of sorted E7.5 exVE and emVE tissues, cells specifying towards YsE and gut tube were exVE and emVE, respectively, consistent with reported spatial patterning at these stages (Extended Data Fig. 7c–e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataemVE-specific genes include Lhx1 and Lefty1, and AVE-specific genes include Cer1 and Hhex; exVE-specific genes include Apln and Msx1.
“emVE-specific genes (Fig. 3c, Cluster 1) included Lhx1 and Lefty1, and AVE-specific genes Cer1 and Hhex30,32,37. ExVE-specific genes (Fig. 3c, Cluster 2) included Apln and Msx1 (Supplementary Table 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [30] Thomas, P. Q., Brown, A. & Beddington, R. S. Hex: a homeobox gene revealing peri-implantation asymmetry in the mouse embryo and an early transient marker of endothelial cell precursors. Development 125, 85–94 (1998). source
- cites [32] Belo, J. A. et al. Cerberus-like is a secreted factor with neutralizing activity expressed in the anterior primitive endoderm of the mouse gastrula. Mech. Dev. 68, 45–57 (1997). source
- cites [37] Takaoka, K., Yamamoto, M. & Hamada, H. Origin and role of distal visceral endoderm, a group of cells that determines anterior–posterior polarity of the mouse embryo. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 743–752 (2011). source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe data validate FGF and WNT signaling and reveal NOTCH signaling at the posterior (small/large intestine clusters).
“Our data validate FGF and WNT, and reveal NOTCH signaling at the posterior (small/large intestine clusters, Fig. 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTwo covarying gene sets exhibit contrasting expression patterns in putative E5.5 exVE and emVE cells and distinguish bona fide exVE and emVE cells at E6.5 and E7.5.
“To explore this further, we identified two covarying gene sets (Supplementary Fig. 5b) exhibiting contrasting expression patterns in putative E5.5 exVE and emVE cells (Fig. 3c), and also distinguished bona fide exVE and emVE cells at E6.5 and E7.5 (Extended Data Fig. 7g).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere was extensive intermixing of DE and VE descendants along the AP pseudo-space axis, with enrichment of DE descendants in the anterior and VE descendants in the posterior.
“Consistent with previous findings, there was extensive intermixing of these descendants along the AP pseudo-space axis with enrichment of DE descendants in the anterior, and VE descendants in the posterior (Fig. 4b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataVE cells at E5.5 were distributed across pseudo-time: a subset did not exhibit any change in DP indicating a more uncommitted state, while the majority exhibited altered DP indicating propensity towards YsE-vs.-gut tube.
“Interestingly, VE cells at E5.5 were distributed across pseudo-time (Extended Data Fig. 7a): a subset did not exhibit any change in DP indicating a more uncommitted state (Extended Data Figs. 7e–f), while the majority exhibited altered DP indicating propensity towards YsE-vs.-gut tube (Extended Data Figs. 7e–f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Regions along pseudo-time where differentiation potential drops represent points where lineage specification and commitment occur.
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn E5.5 and E6.0 Sox2-Cre and Ttr-Cre embryos, cells of epiblast (EPI) origin are present within the visceral endoderm (VE) epithelial layer.
“Yellow arrowheads point cells of epiblast (EPI) origin present within the visceral endoderm (VE) epithelial layer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataPresumptive ParE and VE lineages are marked by black and orange arrowheads, respectively, in gene expression patterns of parietal and visceral endoderm markers.
“Black and orange arrowheads mark presumptive ParE and VE lineages, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataTcf7l1 expression in EPI is similar to Fgf4.
“Gene expression patterns of Tcf7l1 and Nanog depicting similar expression of Tcf7l1 in EPI as Fgf4 (green arrowhead).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt E3.5, the average distance between pairs of ICM and TE cells is 13.9, which is orders of magnitude greater than the distance between pairs of ICM and EPI cells (0.41) or ICM and PrE cells (2.0).
“The average distance between pairs of ICM and TE cells (13.9) at E3.5 and is orders of magnitude greater than distance between pairs of ICM and EPI (0.41) or PrE (2.0) cells (Fig. 2b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe path from EPI to VE boundary cells includes relatively uniform step sizes and does not include substantially large steps.
“In contrast, the path from EPI to VE boundary cells includes relatively uniform step sizes and does not include substantially large steps indicating continuity (Extended Data Fig. 6d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrimitive (extra-embryonic) endoderm (PrE) cells arise at the blastocyst stage, around mouse embryonic day 3.5-4.0, and predominantly contribute to parietal and visceral yolk sac endoderm.
“Primitive (extra-embryonic) endoderm (PrE) cells arise at the blastocyst stage, around mouse embryonic (E) day 3.5–4.03, and predominantly contribute to parietal and visceral yolk sac endoderm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Chazaud, C. & Yamanaka, Y. Lineage specification in the mouse preimplantation embryo. Development 143, 1063–1074 (2016). source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataTrans-migrating cells were Gata6-positive, indicating they had acquired an endoderm identity.
“Trans-migrating cells were Gata6-positive, indicating they had acquired an endoderm identity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataBy E4.5, a second phase of FGF signaling in PrE could be mediated by Fgf5/Fgf8-Fgfr4 in emergent VE and Fgf3-Fgfr3 in ParE.
“By E4.5, when Fgfr1 and Fgfr2 are no longer expressed, a second phase of FGF signaling in PrE could be mediated by Fgf5/Fgf8-Fgfr4 in emergent VE and Fgf3-Fgfr3 in ParE (Extended Data Fig. 5d, orange and black arrowheads).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSymmetry is broken and the AP axis established through migration of AVE.
“Symmetry is broken, and the AP axis established through the migration of AVE37.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Takaoka, K., Yamamoto, M. & Hamada, H. Origin and role of distal visceral endoderm, a group of cells that determines anterior–posterior polarity of the mouse embryo. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 743–752 (2011). source
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIsolation and dissociation did not alter cell proportions or transcriptional profiles.
“Comparison to bulk RNA-seq data demonstrated that isolation and dissociation did not alter cell proportions or transcriptional profiles (Extended Data Figs. 1c, 2b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataCluster-specific expression was validated using ISH, confirming accuracy of inferred AP pseudo-space and emergence of endodermal organ identities at E8.75.
“Cluster-specific expression was validated using ISH, confirming the accuracy of inferred AP pseudo-space, and the emergence of endodermal organ identities at E8.75 (Extended Data Fig. 9a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe inferred pseudo-space was robust to different parameters and reproducible across replicates.
“The inferred pseudo-space was robust to different parameters and reproducible across replicates (Extended Data Fig. 8e–g).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCells develop a marked propensity towards specific cell fates earlier than previously appreciated, yet retain a remarkable degree of plasticity.
“While cells develop a marked propensity towards specific cell fates earlier than previously appreciated, they nevertheless retain a remarkable degree of plasticity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Regions along pseudo-time where differentiation potential drops represent points where lineage specification and commitment occur.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataGene expression trends from scRNA-seq data were consistent with bulk RNA-seq data of micro-dissected gut tube quadrants, with Nkx2-1 anterior and Hoxb9 posterior exhibiting consistent expression patterns.
“To corroborate AP ordering reflecting spatial distribution along the gut tube, we confirmed consistency between gene expression trends from scRNA-seq data with bulk RNA-seq data of micro-dissected gut tube quadrants, such that Nkx2–1 an anterior gene, and Hoxb9, a posterior gene, exhibited consistent expression patterns (Extended Data Fig. 8c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll bulk RNA-seq samples were generated in duplicate.
“All samples were generated in duplicate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAt the transcriptional level, spatial patterning exists at E5.5, preceding morphological changes within the VE.
“Taken together, these data reveal that at the transcriptional level, spatial patterning exists at E5.5, preceding morphological changes within the VE.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Regions along pseudo-time where differentiation potential drops represent points where lineage specification and commitment occur.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataGut tube AP patterning and stereotypical emergence of organ identities precede or are independent of a Hox code.
“These data suggest that gut tube AP patterning and the stereotypical emergence of organ identities, precede or are independent of a Hox code.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataWherever possible, purity checks indicated >99.9% sample purity.
“Wherever possible, purity checks were performed indicating >99.9% sample purity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataVE and DE descendants retain a signature of their lineage history but largely acquire transcriptomic equivalence.
“While we show that VE and DE descendants retain a signature of their lineage history, the data suggest they largely acquire transcriptomic equivalence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe entropy of Palantir branch probabilities represents a quantitative measure of the differentiation potential or plasticity of a cell, with multipotent cells having the highest differentiation potential and mature terminal states the lowest.
“The entropy of these branch probabilities has been shown to represent a quantitative measure of the differentiation potential or plasticity of the cell, where multipotent cells have the highest differentiation potential and mature terminal states have the lowest potential.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments and outcome assessment.
“The investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments and outcome assessment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationHox gene expression in the developing central nervous system is considered a canonical descriptor of AP axis position.
“Hox gene expression in the developing central nervous system is considered a canonical descriptor of AP axis position46.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Deschamps, J. & van Nes, J. Developmental regulation of the Hox genes during axial morphogenesis in the mouse. Development 132, 2931–2942 (2005). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe annotations and STAR parameters used for single-cell RNA-seq data alignment were also used for bulk RNA-seq data to maintain consistency.
“The annotations and STAR parameters used for single cell RNA-seq data alignment were also used for bulk RNA-seq data to maintain consistency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll subcloned in situ hybridization probes were validated by sequencing.
“All subcloned ISH probes were validated by sequencing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataSingle-cell 3' RNA-seq libraries were generated in duplicate or triplicate.
“Cellular suspensions were loaded on a Chromium Controller54 targeting a 2,500–10,000 cell range, depending on tissue type and embryo stage, to generate single cell 3’ RNA-seq libraries, in duplicate or triplicate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe VE is patterned at the onset of post-implantation development, and the emVE, including the AVE subpopulation, are derivative of exVE.
“These data demonstrate that the VE is patterned at the onset of post-implantation development, and that the emVE, including the AVE subpopulation, are derivative of exVE.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThere was a strong correlation in global gene expression patterns between VE and DE cells in binned locations along AP pseudo-space, suggesting they were similarly patterned and acquiring regionalized organ-specific identities.
“Furthermore, we noted a strong correlation in global gene expression patterns between VE and DE cells in binned locations along AP pseudo-space (Fig. 4b, purple), suggesting they were similarly patterned and acquiring regionalized organ-specific identities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataDifferences between consecutive time-points represent underlying developmental changes but are also confounded by technical batch effects, including discontinuity between E3.5 and E4.5 and lack of spatial alignment between E6.5 and E7.5.
“Differences between consecutive time-points represent underlying developmental changes but are also confounded by technical batch effects, including discontinuity between E3.5 and E.4.5 and lack of spatial alignment between E6.5 and E7.5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenResults in Extended Data Figure 6f were validated in at least three independent experiments.
“Results validated in at least three independent experiments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataKey signaling pathways (FGF, WNT, BMP, NOTCH, HH, Nodal/TGF-beta, JAK/STAT, RA, HIPPO) act within the endoderm lineage of the embryo.
“Force directed layouts of context-independent targets of key signaling pathways acting within the endoderm lineage of the embryo.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The dynamics of key transcription factors and signaling pathway components within the ICM remain unclear.
“The dynamics of key TFs and signaling pathway components within the ICM remain unclear.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Regions along pseudo-time where differentiation potential drops represent points where lineage specification and commitment occur.
“Regions along pseudo-time where DP drops represent points where lineage specification and commitment occur.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PCA dimensionality reduction and mutual-nearest neighbours or Harmony batch correction was performed to correct for non-biological confounders between replicates and timepoints.
“PCA dimensionality reduction and mutual-nearest neighbours84 or Harmony34 batch correction was performed to correct for non-biological confounders between replicates and timepoints.”
From Cell diversity and plasticity during atrioventricular heart valve EMTs (2023) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Classifier accuracy cites the wrong panel
MinorThe Results cite Extended Data Fig. 8h for the E7.5 classifier's accuracy, whereas the caption describes the classifier's receiver operating curve in panel e and a different analysis in panel h.
“This classifier achieved near-perfect accuracy on E7.5 test data (auROC:0.96) (Extended Data Fig. 8h).”
“e, Receiver operating curve for classification of E7.5 VE and DE cells (4378 cells).”
Orange and black arrowheads identify opposite lineages
MinorThe Results assign the orange arrowhead to VE and the black arrowhead to ParE in Extended Data Fig. 5d, but that figure's caption assigns orange to ParE and black to VE.
“Fgf5/Fgf8-Fgfr4 in emergent VE and Fgf3-Fgfr3 in ParE (Extended Data Fig. 5d, orange and black arrowheads).”
“Orange, black and green arrowheads point to high expression in ParE, VE and EPI, respectively.”
VE-proportion comparison cites a replicate-ordering panel
MinorThe Results cite Extended Data Fig. 8m for the comparison between embryo VE proportions and AP pseudo-space. The caption describes that comparison in panel j, while panel m compares pseudo-space orderings across replicates.
“VE descendant proportions in binned locations along the AP axis and AP pseudo-space axis were highly correlated (Extended Data Fig. 8m)”
“m, Same as l, for replicates of anterior-posterior cells (Replicate 1: 1821 cells, replicate 2: 1691 cells). Plots show the Pearson correlation.”
AP-priming result cites a robustness panel
MinorThe Results cite Extended Data Fig. 8k for E7.5 anterior-posterior priming. The caption assigns that analysis to panel h; panel k instead concerns robustness of pseudo-space ordering.
“Notably, DE and VE cells were predominantly primed towards anterior and posterior localization, respectively (Extended Data Fig. 8k, black arrowheads).”
“k, Heatmap showing Pearson correlations between AP pseudo-space orderings determined using a varying number of diffusion components highlighting the robustness of the ordering.”
Cites
Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2
Love, M. I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · Cited by 95,106 · see citing works
STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner
Dobin, A., Davis, C. A., Schlesinger, F., Drenkow, J., Zaleski, C., Jha, S., Batut, P., Chaisson, M., & Gingeras, T. R. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · Cited by 51,709 · see citing works
Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells
Zheng, G. X. Y., Terry, J. M., Belgrader, P., Ryvkin, P., Bent, Z. W., Wilson, R., Ziraldo, S. B., Wheeler, T. D., McDermott, G. P., Zhu, J., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14049 · Cited by 7,353 · see citing works
Software for Computing and Annotating Genomic Ranges
Lawrence, M. F., Huber, W. K., Pagès, H., Aboyoun, P., Carlson, M. R. J., Gentleman, R. C., Morgan, M. T., & Carey, V. J. (2013) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003118 · Cited by 4,438 · see citing works
A global double-fluorescent Cre reporter mouse
Muzumdar, M. D., Tasic, B., Miyamichi, K., Li, L., & Luo, L. (2007) · genesis · doi:10.1002/dvg.20335 · Cited by 3,491 · see citing works
Data-Driven Phenotypic Dissection of AML Reveals Progenitor-like Cells that Correlate with Prognosis
Levine, J. H., Simonds, E. F., Bendall, S. C., Davis, K. L., Amir, E.-A. D., Tadmor, M. D., Litvin, O., Fienberg, H. G., Jager, A., Zunder, E. R., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.047 · Cited by 2,303 · see citing works
Self-citationSingle-Cell Map of Diverse Immune Phenotypes in the Breast Tumor Microenvironment
Azizi, E., Carr, A. J., Plitas, G., Cornish, A. E., Konopacki, C., Prabhakaran, S., Nainys, J., Wu, K., Kiseliovas, V., Setty, M., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.060 · Cited by 1,976 · see citing works
Self-citationRecovering Gene Interactions from Single-Cell Data Using Data Diffusion
van Dijk, D., Sharma, R., Nainys, J., Yim, K., Kathail, P., Carr, A. J., Burdziak, C., Moon, K. R., Chaffer, C. L., Pattabiraman, D., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.061 · Cited by 1,829 · see citing works
Self-citationAmir, E.-A. D., Davis, K. L., Tadmor, M. D., Simonds, E. F., Levine, J. H., Bendall, S. C., Shenfeld, D. K., Krishnaswamy, S., Nolan, G. P., & Pe'er, D. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2594 · Cited by 1,550 · see citing works
Self-citationPDX-1 is required for pancreatic outgrowth and differentiation of the rostral duodenum
Offield, M. F., Jetton, T. L., Labosky, P. A., Ray, M., Stein, R. W., Magnuson, M. A., Hogan, B. L. M., & Wright, C. V. E. (1996) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.122.3.983 · Cited by 1,514 · see citing works
Diffusion pseudotime robustly reconstructs lineage branching
Haghverdi, L., Büttner, M., Wolf, F. A., Buettner, F., & Theis, F. J. (2016) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3971 · Cited by 1,385 · see citing works
Nanog Is the Gateway to the Pluripotent Ground State
Silva, J., Nichols, J., Theunissen, T. W., Guo, G., van Oosten, A. L., Barrandon, O., Wray, J., Yamanaka, S., Chambers, I., & Smith, A. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.039 · Cited by 1,031 · see citing works
Chazaud, C., Yamanaka, Y., Pawson, T., & Rossant, J. (2006) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2006.02.020 · Cited by 898 · see citing works
Single-cell reconstruction of developmental trajectories during zebrafish embryogenesis
Farrell, J. A., Wang, Y., Riesenfeld, S. J., Shekhar, K., Regev, A., & Schier, A. F. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar3131 · Cited by 876 · see citing works
Palantir characterizes cell fate continuities in human hematopoiesis
Setty, M., Kiseliovas, V., Levine, J., Gayoso, A., Mazutis, L., & Pe’er, D. (2018) · doi:10.1101/385328 · Cited by 836 · see citing works
Self-citationCharacterization of cell fate probabilities in single-cell data with Palantir
Setty, M., Kiseliovas, V., Levine, J., Gayoso, A., Mazutis, L., & Pe’er, D. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0068-4 · Cited by 833 · see citing works
Self-citationMaking a commitment: cell lineage allocation and axis patterning in the early mouse embryo
Arnold, S. J., & Robertson, E. J. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2618 · Cited by 816 · see citing works
Vertebrate Endoderm Development and Organ Formation
Zorn, A. M., & Wells, J. M. (2009) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.042308.113344 · Cited by 812 · see citing works
Staging of gastrulating mouse embryos by morphological landmarks in the dissecting microscope
Downs, K. M., & Davies, T. J. (1993) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.118.4.1255 · Cited by 582 · see citing works
Wishbone identifies bifurcating developmental trajectories from single-cell data
Setty, M., Tadmor, M. D., Reich-Zeliger, S., Angel, O., Salame, T. M., Kathail, P., Choi, K., Bendall, S., Friedman, N., & Pe'er, D. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3569 · Cited by 558 · see citing works
Self-citationDistinct sequential cell behaviours direct primitive endoderm formation in the mouse blastocyst
Plusa, B., Piliszek, A., Frankenberg, S., Artus, J., & Hadjantonakis, A.-K. (2008) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.021519 · Cited by 556 · see citing works
Self-citationThomas, P. Q., Brown, A., & Beddington, R. S. P. (1998) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.125.1.85 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Efficient gene modulation in mouse epiblast using a Sox2Cre transgenic mouse strain
Hayashi, S., Lewis, P. M., Pevny, L., & McMahon, A. P. (2002) · Mechanisms of Development · doi:10.1016/s0925-4773(03)00099-6 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
Belo, J. A., Bouwmeester, T., Leyns, L., Kertesz, N., Gallo, M., Follettie, M., & De Robertis, E. M. (1997) · Mechanisms of Development · doi:10.1016/s0925-4773(97)00125-1 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Kwon, G. S., Viotti, M., & Hadjantonakis, A.-K. (2008) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2008.07.017 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Self-citationDevelopmental regulation of the Hox genes during axial morphogenesis in the mouse
Deschamps, J., & van Nes, J. (2005) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.01897 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Meno, C., Gritsman, K., Ohishi, S., Ohfuji, Y., Heckscher, E., Mochida, K., Shimono, A., Kondoh, H., Talbot, W. S., Robertson, E. J., et al. (1999) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80331-7 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
McCauley, H. A., & Wells, J. M. (2017) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.140731 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Lineage specification in the mouse preimplantation embryo
Chazaud, C., & Yamanaka, Y. (2016) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.128314 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Ohnishi, Y., Huber, W., Tsumura, A., Kang, M., Xenopoulos, P., Kurimoto, K., Oleś, A. K., Araúzo-Bravo, M. J., Saitou, M., Hadjantonakis, A.-K., et al. (2014) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2881 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Self-citationKang, M., Piliszek, A., Artus, J., & Hadjantonakis, A.-K. (2013) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.084996 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Self-citationPrimitive Endoderm Differentiates via a Three-Step Mechanism Involving Nanog and RTK Signaling
Frankenberg, S., Gerbe, F., Bessonnard, S., Belville, C., Pouchin, P., Bardot, O., & Chazaud, C. (2011) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2011.10.019 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
GATA6 Levels Modulate Primitive Endoderm Cell Fate Choice and Timing in the Mouse Blastocyst
Schrode, N., Saiz, N., Di Talia, S., & Hadjantonakis, A.-K. (2014) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2014.04.011 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Self-citationArtus, J., Piliszek, A., & Hadjantonakis, A.-K. (2011) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.12.007 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Self-citationTotipotent Embryonic Stem Cells Arise in Ground-State Culture Conditions
Morgani, S. M., Canham, M. A., Nichols, J., Sharov, A. A., Migueles, R. P., Ko, M. S. H., & Brickman, J. M. (2013) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.034 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Transcriptional dynamics of endodermal organ formation
Sherwood, R. I., Chen, T. A., & Melton, D. A. (2009) · Developmental Dynamics · doi:10.1002/dvdy.21810 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Cell Competition and Its Role in the Regulation of Cell Fitness from Development to Cancer
Gregorio, A. D., Bowling, S., & Rodríguez, T. A. (2016) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2016.08.012 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Molotkov, A., Mazot, P., Brewer, J. R., Cinalli, R. M., & Soriano, P. (2017) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2017.05.004 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Kang, M., Garg, V., & Hadjantonakis, A.-K. (2017) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2017.05.003 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Self-citationSOX17 links gut endoderm morphogenesis and germ layer segregation
Viotti, M., Nowotschin, S., & Hadjantonakis, A.-K. (2014) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb3070 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Self-citationHiramatsu, R., Matsuoka, T., Kimura-Yoshida, C., Han, S.-W., Mochida, K., ADACHI, T., Takayama, S., & Matsuo, I. (2013) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2013.09.026 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Takaoka, K., Yamamoto, M., & Hamada, H. (2011) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2251 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Ibarra-Soria, X., Jawaid, W., Pijuan-Sala, B., Ladopoulos, V., Scialdone, A., Jörg, D. J., Tyser, R. C. V., Calero‐Nieto, F. J., Mulas, C., Nichols, J., et al. (2017) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-017-0013-z · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Serra, M., Alysandratos, K., Hawkins, F. J., McCauley, K. B., Jacob, A., Choi, J., Caballero, I. S., Vedaie, M., Kurmann, A. A., Ikonomou, L., et al. (2017) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.150193 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
BMP signaling induces visceral endoderm differentiation of XEN cells and parietal endoderm
Paca, A., Séguin, C. A., Clements, M., Ryczko, M., Rossant, J., Rodriguez, T. A., & Kunath, T. (2012) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.10.013 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Tsai, Y.-H., Nattiv, R., Dedhia, P. H., Nagy, M. S., Chin, A. M., Thomson, M., Klein, O. D., & Spence, J. R. (2016) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.138453 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Artus, J., Douvaras, P., Piliszek, A., Isern, J., Baron, M. H., & Hadjantonakis, A.-K. (2012) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.10.015 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citationKwon, G. S., Fraser, S. T., Eakin, G. S., Mangano, M., Isern, J., Sahr, K. E., Hadjantonakis, A., & Baron, M. H. (2006) · Developmental Dynamics · doi:10.1002/dvdy.20843 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationCellular dynamics in the early mouse embryo: from axis formation to gastrulation
Nowotschin, S., & Hadjantonakis, A.-K. (2010) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2010.05.008 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citationKwon, G. S., & Hadjantonakis, A. (2009) · genesis · doi:10.1002/dvg.20522 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citationRegulation of extra-embryonic endoderm stem cell differentiation by Nodal and Cripto signaling
Julio, M. K.-D., Alvarez, M. J., Galli, A., Chu, J., Price, S. M., Califano, A., & Shen, M. M. (2011) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.065656 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Hou, J., Charters, A. M., Lee, S. C., Zhao, Y., Wu, M. K., Jones, S. J., Marra, M. A., & Hoodless, P. A. (2007) · BMC Developmental Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-213x-7-92 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationA Sprouty4 reporter to monitor FGF/ERK signaling activity in ESCs and mice
Morgani, S. M., Saiz, N., Garg, V., Raina, D., Simon, C. S., Kang, M., Arias, A. M., Nichols, J., Schröter, C., & Hadjantonakis, A.-K. (2018) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.06.017 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationIrx1 and Irx2 expression in early lung development
Becker, M.-B., Zülch, A., Bosse, A., et al. (2001) · Mechanisms of Development · doi:10.1016/s0925-4773(01)00412-9 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
<i>Afp::mCherry</i>, a red fluorescent transgenic reporter of the mouse visceral endoderm
Viotti, M., Nowotschin, S., & Hadjantonakis, A. (2011) · genesis · doi:10.1002/dvg.20695 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationStage specific reprogramming of mouse embryo liver cells to a beta cell-like phenotype
Yang, Y., Akıncı, E., Dutton, J. R., et al. (2013) · Mechanisms of Development · doi:10.1016/j.mod.2013.08.002 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Formation of the Murine Endoderm
Tremblay, K. D. (2010) · Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-381280-3.00001-4 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep learning and alignment of spatially resolved single-cell transcriptomes with Tangram
Biancalani, T., Scalia, G., Buffoni, L., Avasthi, R., Lu, Z., Sanger, A., Tokcan, N., Vanderburg, C. R., Segerstolpe, Å., Zhang, M., et al. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01264-7 · Cited by 931 · see citing works
CellRank for directed single-cell fate mapping
Lange, M., Bergen, V., Klein, M., Setty, M. N., Reuter, B., Bakhti, M., Lickert, H., Ansari, M., Gote-Schniering, J., Schiller, H. B., et al. (2022) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01346-6 · Cited by 734 · see citing works
“CellRank could also be extended by using temporal information, such as timepoints in the lung dataset 52 , to regularize the model, by only allowing transitions consistent with experimental time 64 .”
Self-citationLineage tracing meets single-cell omics: opportunities and challenges
Wagner, D. E., & Klein, A. M. (2020) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-020-0223-2 · Cited by 594 · see citing works
Regenerative lineages and immune-mediated pruning in lung cancer metastasis
Laughney, A. M., Hu, J., Campbell, N. R., Bakhoum, S. F. W., Setty, M. N., Lavallée, V., Xie, Y., Masilionis, I., Carr, A., Kottapalli, S. V., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0750-6 · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Self-citationLi, B., Zhang, W., Guo, C., Xu, H., Li, L., Fang, M., Hu, Y., Zhang, X., Yao, X., Tang, M., et al. (2022) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01480-9 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
Emergence of a High-Plasticity Cell State during Lung Cancer Evolution
Marjanovic, N. D., Hofree, M., Chan, J. E., Canner, D. A., Wu, K., Trakala, M., Hartmann, G. G., Smith, O. C. G., Kim, J. Y., Evans, K. V., et al. (2020) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2020.06.012 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
“Indeed, features of embryonic lineages more primitive than the primordial gut emerged in multiple subsets of lung tumor cells during tumor progression (Cao et al., 2019; Nowotschin et al., 2019) (Figure 2B).”
BackgroundInfluentialSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics reveal somitogenesis in gastruloids
van den Brink, S., Alemany, A., van Batenburg, V., Moris, N., Blotenburg, M., Vivié, J., Baillie‐Johnson, P., Nichols, J., Sonnen, K. F., Arias, A. M., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2024-3 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Lineage plasticity in prostate cancer depends on JAK/STAT inflammatory signaling
Chan, J. M., Zaidi, S., Love, J. R., Zhao, J. L., Setty, M. N., Wadosky, K. M., Gopalan, A., Choo, Z.-N., Persad, S., Choi, J., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abn0478 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Self-citationIntegration of spatial and single-cell transcriptomic data elucidates mouse organogenesis
Lohoff, T., Ghazanfar, S., Missarova, A. M., Koulena, N., Pierson, N. G., Griffiths, J. A., Bardot, E., Eng, C.-H. L., Tyser, R. C. V., Argelaguet, R., et al. (2021) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-01006-2 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Self-citationMouse embryonic stem cells self-organize into trunk-like structures with neural tube and somites
Veenvliet, J. V., Bolondi, A., Kretzmer, H., Haut, L., Scholze‐Wittler, M., Schifferl, D., Koch, F., Guignard, L., Kumar, A. S., Pustet, M., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aba4937 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Rethinking organoid technology through bioengineering
Garreta, E., Kamm, R. D., Lopes, S. M. C. D. S., Lancaster, M. A., Weiss, R., Trepat, X., Hyun, I., & Montserrat, N. (2020) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-020-00804-4 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Apical–basal polarity and the control of epithelial form and function
Buckley, C. E., & St Johnston, D. (2022) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-022-00465-y · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Elmentaite, R., Ross, A., Roberts, K., James, K. R., Ortmann, D., Gomes, T., Nayak, K., Tuck, E. J., Pritchard, S., Bayraktar, O. A., et al. (2020) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2020.11.010 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
A Cell Atlas of the Adult Drosophila Midgut
Hung, R., Hu, Y., Kirchner, R., Liu, Y., Xu, C., Comjean, A., Tattikota, S. G., Li, F., Song, W., Sui, S. H., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1916820117 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
“We also identified another transcription factor expressed in posterior EEs, Poxn, that is homologous to mouse Pax8, which is expressed regionally in the mouse gut tube (75).”
BackgroundEmbryo model completes gastrulation to neurulation and organogenesis
Amadei, G., Handford, C. E., Qiu, C., Jonghe, J. D., Greenfeld, H., Tran, M., Martin, B., Chen, D.-Y., Aguilera-Castrejon, A., Hanna, J. H., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05246-3 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Single-cell analysis of shared signatures and transcriptional diversity during zebrafish development
Sur, A., Wang, Y., Capar, P., Margolin, G., Prochaska, M. K., & Farrell, J. A. (2023) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2023.11.001 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
CellRank 2: unified fate mapping in multiview single-cell data
Weiler, P., Lange, M., Klein, M., Pe’er, D., & Theis, F. J. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02303-9 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
“While these trajectory inference (TI) methods have uncovered numerous biological insights 6 , they are typically designed for snapshot single-cell RNA sequencing data and cannot accommodate additional information relevant for understanding cell-state dynamics, including experimental time points,…”
Self-citationMolecular architecture of lineage allocation and tissue organization in early mouse embryo
Peng, G., Suo, S., Cui, G., Yu, F., Wang, R., Chen, J., Chen, S., Liu, Z., Chen, G., Qian, Y., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1469-8 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Self-Organization of Mouse Stem Cells into an Extended Potential Blastoid
Sözen, B., Cox, A. L., Jonghe, J. D., Bao, M., Hollfelder, F., Glover, D. M., & Zernicka‐Goetz, M. (2019) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2019.11.014 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
“5 (75 Cycles) Illumina Cat# 20024906 Deposited Data Sc-RNA sequencing data In this study GEO: GSE134240 Sc-RNA sequencing data Nowotschin et al., 2019 [https:// doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1127-1] GEO: GSE123046 Experimental Models: Cell Lines CF1 Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts (MEFs) Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, UK N/…”
BackgroundInfluentialA single-embryo, single-cell time-resolved model for mouse gastrulation
Mittnenzweig, M., Mayshar, Y., Cheng, S., Ben-Yair, R., Hadas, R., Rais, Y., Chomsky, E., Reines, N., Uzonyi, A., Lumerman, L., et al. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.004 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Epigenetic plasticity cooperates with cell-cell interactions to direct pancreatic tumorigenesis
Burdziak, C., Alonso-Curbelo, D., Walle, T., Reyes, J., Barriga, F., Haviv, D., Xie, Y.-B., Zhao, Z., Zhao, C. J., Chen, H.-A., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.add5327 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Self-citationEvaluating totipotency using criteria of increasing stringency
Pósfai, E., Schell, J. P., Janiszewski, A., Rovic, I., Murray, A., Bradshaw, B., Yamakawa, T., Pardon, T., Bakkali, M. E., Talón, I., et al. (2021) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-020-00609-2 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Clinical and translational values of spatial transcriptomics
Zhang, L., Chen, D., Song, D., Liu, X., Zhang, Y., Xu, X., & Wang, X. (2022) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-022-00960-w · Cited by 215 · see citing works
He, J., Babarinde, I. A., Sun, L., Xu, S., Chen, R., Shi, J., Wei, Y., Li, Y., Ma, G., Zhuang, Q., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21808-x · Cited by 197 · see citing works
A single-cell time-lapse of mouse prenatal development from gastrula to birth
Qiu, C., Martin, B., Welsh, I. C., Daza, R. M., Le, T.-M., Huang, X., Nichols, E. K., Taylor, M. L., Fulton, O., O’Day, D. R., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07069-w · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Progressive plasticity during colorectal cancer metastasis
Moorman, A., Benitez, E. K., Cambuli, F., Jiang, Q., Mahmoud, A., Lumish, M., Hartner, S., Balkaran, S., Bermeo, J., Asawa, S., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08150-0 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
“To map cells of each orga-noid sample to the phenotypically closest tumour cell state from the full KG146 patient dataset, we developed a manifold-based classifier that combines Harmony 77 , a framework for connecting scRNA-seq data using an affinity matrix augmented by mutual nearest neighbours bet-ween datasets, and…”
InfluentialSelf-citationHan, L., Chaturvedi, P., Kishimoto, K., Koike, H., Nasr, T., Iwasawa, K., Giesbrecht, K., Witcher, P. C., Eicher, A. K., Haines, L. E., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17968-x · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Mapping Development of the Human Intestinal Niche at Single-Cell Resolution
Holloway, E. M., Czerwinski, M. J., Tsai, Y.-H., Wu, J. H., Wu, A., Childs, C. J., Walton, K. D., Sweet, C. W., Yu, Q., Glass, I. A., et al. (2020) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2020.11.008 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
“Given the dramatic morphological changes that take place across this development time (Figure 1A), we implemented Harmony (Nowotschin et al., 2019), an algorithm that allows interrogation of scRNA-seq data across discrete time points (Figure 1D–”
InfluentialCharacterization of a common progenitor pool of the epicardium and myocardium
Tyser, R. C. V., Ibarra-Soria, X., McDole, K., Jayaram, S. A., Godwin, J., van den Brand, T., Miranda, A. M. A., Scialdone, A., Keller, P., Marioni, J. C., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb2986 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
A single-cell transcriptome atlas profiles early organogenesis in human embryos
Xu, Y., Zhang, T., Zhou, Q., Hu, M., Qi, Y., Xue, Y., Nie, Y., Wang, L., Bao, Z., & Shi, W. (2023) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-023-01108-w · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Bardot, E., & Hadjantonakis, A. (2020) · Mechanisms of Development · doi:10.1016/j.mod.2020.103617 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Self-citationJanosevic, D., Myslinski, J., McCarthy, T. W., Zollman, A., Syed, F., Xuei, X., Gao, H., Liu, Y., Collins, K. S., Cheng, Y., et al. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.62270 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Self-patterning of human stem cells into post-implantation lineages
Pedroza, M., Gassaloglu, S. I., Dias, N., Zhong, L., Hou, T.-C. J., Kretzmer, H., Smith, Z. D., & Sözen, B. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06354-4 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Epigenetic regulator function through mouse gastrulation
Grosswendt, S., Kretzmer, H., Smith, Z. D., Kumar, A. S., Hetzel, S., Wittler, L., Klages, S., Timmermann, B., Mukherji, S., & Meissner, A. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2552-x · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Zeng, B., Liu, Z., Lu, Y., Zhong, S., Qin, S., Huang, L., Zeng, Y., Li, Z., Dong, H., Shi, Y., et al. (2023) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2023.04.016 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
“We found that neural tube cells were regionalized along the cranial-caudal axis as forebrain, midbrain, hindbrain, and spinal cord progenitors (Figures 3A and 3B) and expressed distinct sets of genes along a pseudospatial trajectory (Figure 3C; Table S3).(4) To spatially resolve the expression of marker genes, we mapp…”
BackgroundMinn, K. T., Fu, Y. C., He, S., Dietmann, S., George, S. C., Anastasio, M. A., Morris, S. A., & Solnica‐Krezel, L. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.59445 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Schwann cell precursors represent a neural crest‐like state with biased multipotency
Kastriti, M. E., Faure, L., Ahsen, D. V., Bouderlique, T., Boström, J., Solovieva, T., Jackson, C. R., Bronner-Fraser, M. E., Meijer, D., Hadjab, S., et al. (2022) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.2021108780 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
“Recent advancements in single-cell transcriptomics established incremental fluidity of evolving transcriptional profiles during cell lineage development (Marques et al , 2018; Nowotschin et al , 2019; Mu et al , 2020).”
Temporal analyses of postnatal liver development and maturation by single-cell transcriptomics
Liang, Y., Kaneko, K., Xin, B., Lee, J., Sun, X., Zhang, K., & Feng, G.-S. (2022) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2022.01.004 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Primate gastrulation and early organogenesis at single-cell resolution
Zhai, J., Guo, J., Wan, H., Qi, L. Q. L., Liu, L., Xiao, Z., Long, Y., Schmitz, D. A., Xu, Y., Yu, D., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05526-y · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Cynomolgus monkey embryo model captures gastrulation and early pregnancy
Li, J., Zhu, Q., Cao, J., Liu, Y., Lu, Y., Sun, Y., Li, Q., Huang, Y., Shang, S., Bian, X., et al. (2023) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2023.03.009 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
LineageOT is a unified framework for lineage tracing and trajectory inference
Forrow, A., & Schiebinger, G. R. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25133-1 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Colombo, G., Cubero, R. J. A., Kanari, L., Venturino, A., Schulz, R., Scolamiero, M., Agerberg, J., Mathys, H., Tsai, L.-H., Chachólski, W., et al. (2022) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-022-01167-6 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Epithelial cell plasticity drives endoderm formation during gastrulation
Scheibner, K., Schirge, S., Burtscher, I., Büttner, M., Sterr, M., Yang, D., Böttcher, A., Ansarullah, M., Irmler, M., Beckers, J., et al. (2021) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-021-00694-x · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Evaluation of single-cell classifiers for single-cell RNA sequencing data sets
Zhao, X. S., Wu, S., Fang, N., Sun, X. S., & Fan, J. (2019) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbz096 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
“In addition, similar tests were performed on an scRNA-seq data set of the mouse gut endoderm with >100,000 cells [46].”
MethodConstruction of a mammalian embryo model from stem cells organized by a morphogen signalling centre
Xu, P., Borges, R. M., Fillâtre, J., Melo, M. D. O., Cheng, T., Thisse, B., & Thisse, C. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23653-4 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Unveiling Complexity and Multipotentiality of Early Heart Fields
Zhang, Q., Carlin, D. E., Zhu, F., Cattaneo, P., Ideker, T. E., Evans, S. Μ., Bloomekatz, J. E., & Neil, C. (2021) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.121.318943 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
The endoderm: a divergent cell lineage with many commonalities
Nowotschin, S., Hadjantonakis, A.-K., & Campbell, K. (2019) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.150920 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
“For example, the endoderm represents approximately 3.5% of all cells of the mouse embryo-proper at midgestation (Nowotschin et al., 2019).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationAndrews, S., Krueger, C., Mellado-López, M., Hemberger, M., Dean, W., Pérez-García, V., & Hanna, C. W. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36019-9 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Saiz, N., Mora-Bitria, L., Rahman, S., George, H. S., Herder, J. P., García‐Ojalvo, J., & Hadjantonakis, A. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.56079 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
“…feedback and the transient tandem expression of FGF receptors 1 and 2 in cells adopting a PrE fate (Kang et al., 2017; Molotkov et al., 2017; Nowotschin et al., 2019; Ohnishi et al., 2014) may further contribute to the directionality of this local gradient and the resulting induction of…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationSimon, C. S., Rahman, S., Raina, D., Schröter, C. J., & Hadjantonakis, A. (2020) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2020.09.030 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citation3D reconstruction of a gastrulating human embryo
Xiao, Z., Cui, L., Yuan, Y., He, N., Xie, X., Lin, S., Yang, X., Zhang, X., Shi, P., Wei, Z., et al. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.03.041 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Tissue schematics map the specialization of immune tissue motifs and their appropriation by tumors
Bhate, S. S., Barlow, G. L., Schürch, C. M., & Nolan, G. P. (2021) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2021.09.012 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Lotto, J., Drissler, S., Cullum, R., Wei, W., Setty, M., Bell, E. M., Boutet, S. C., Nowotschin, S., Kuo, Y.-Y., Garg, V., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.012 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Self-citationPetitpré, C., Faure, L., Uhl, P., Fontanet, P., Filová, I., Pavlínková, G., Adameyko, I. I., Hadjab, S., & Lallemend, F. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31580-1 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Miao, Y., Pek, N. M. Q., Tan, C. P. B., Jiang, C., Yu, Z., Iwasawa, K., Shi, M. Y., Kechele, D. O., Sundaram, N., Pastrana-Gomez, V., et al. (2025) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2025.05.041 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Multimodal characterization of murine gastruloid development
Suppinger, S., Zinner, M., Aizarani, N., Lukonin, I., Ortiz, R., Azzi, C., Stadler, M. B., Vianello, S., Palla, G., Kohler, H., et al. (2023) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2023.04.018 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Fowler, J. L., Ang, L., & Loh, K. (2019) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Developmental Biology · doi:10.1002/wdev.368 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
“…definitive endoderm as well as extraembryonic endoderm, although the extent of contribution from both types of progenitor and whether their respective progeny last into adulthood remains to be fully resolved (Chan et al., 2019; Kwon, Viotti, & Hadjantonakis, 2008; Nowotschin et al., 2019).”
BackgroundAdvances and Challenges in Spatial Transcriptomics for Developmental Biology
Choe, K., Pak, U., Pang, Y., Hao, W., & Yang, X. (2023) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom13010156 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
“Further clustering and analysis for developmental trajectories have been validated by probe-dependent spatial transcriptomic analysis via ISH [81].”
MethodPhyloVelo enhances transcriptomic velocity field mapping using monotonically expressed genes
Wang, K., Hou, L., Wang, X., Zhai, X., Lu, Z., Zi, Z., Zhai, W., He, X., Curtis, C., Zhou, D., et al. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01887-5 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Signaling regulation during gastrulation: Insights from mouse embryos and in vitro systems
Morgani, S. M., & Hadjantonakis, A. (2019) · Current topics in developmental biology/Current Topics in Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/bs.ctdb.2019.11.011 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationExploring single cells in space and time during tissue development, homeostasis and regeneration
Mayr, U., Serra, D., & Liberali, P. (2019) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.176727 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
The covariance environment defines cellular niches for spatial inference
Haviv, D., Remšík, J., Gatie, M. I., Snopkowski, C., Takizawa, M. T., Pereira, N., Bashkin, J., Jovanovich, S. B., Nawy, T., Chaligné, R., et al. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-024-02193-4 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Self-citationEx utero monkey embryogenesis from blastocyst to early organogenesis
Gong, Y., Bai, B., Sun, N., Ci, B., Shao, H., Zhang, T., Yao, H., Zhang, Y., Niu, Y., Liu, L., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.04.020 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Capybara: A computational tool to measure cell identity and fate transitions
Kong, W., Fu, Y. C., Holloway, E. M., Garipler, G., Yang, X., Mazzoni, E. O., & Morris, S. A. (2022) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2022.03.001 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
“(C) Cell composition with a developmental atlas (Han et al., 2020; Nowotschin et al., 2019) or a combined regenerative liver atlas (Han et al.”
BackgroundMapping cell migrations and fates in a gastruloid model to the human primitive streak
Martyn, I., Siggia, E. D., & Brivanlou, A. H. (2019) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.179564 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Investigating Tumor Heterogeneity in Mouse Models
Tammela, T., & Sage, J. (2019) · Annual Review of Cancer Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-cancerbio-030419-033413 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
“Such multiparameter analyses enable the identification of the full range of cellular phenotypes arising from a subpopulation of interest in unprecedented detail (Nowotschin et al. 2019).”
BackgroundAll models are wrong, but some are useful: Establishing standards for stem cell-based embryo models
Pósfai, E., Lanner, F., Mulas, C., & Leitch, H. G. (2021) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.03.019 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Abuhashem, A., Lee, A. S., Joyner, A. L., & Hadjantonakis, A. (2022) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2022.03.013 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationNANOG initiates epiblast fate through the coordination of pluripotency genes expression
Allègre, N., Chauveau, S., Dennis, C., Renaud, Y., Meistermann, D., Estrella, L. V., Pouchin, P., Cohen‐Tannoudji, M., David, L., & Chazaud, C. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30858-8 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
An atlas of rabbit development as a model for single-cell comparative genomics
Ton, M.-L. N., Keitley, D., Theeuwes, B., Guibentif, C., Ahnfelt‐Rønne, J., Andreassen, T. K., Calero‐Nieto, F. J., Imaz-Rosshandler, I., Pijuan-Sala, B., Nichols, J., et al. (2023) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-023-01174-0 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
“These cells express markers of the extra-embryonic visceral endoderm, such as APOA2, CITED1 and TTR 38 .”
Schiffman, J. S., D’Avino, A. R., Prieto, T., Pang, Y., Fan, Y., Rajagopalan, S., Potenski, C. J., Hara, T., Suvà, M. L., Gawad, C., et al. (2024) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-024-01920-6 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Dissecting embryonic and extraembryonic lineage crosstalk with stem cell co-culture
Wei, Y., Zhang, E., Yu, L., Ci, B., Sakurai, M., Guo, L. M., Zhang, X., Lin, S., Takii, S., Liu, L., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.11.008 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Mu, T., Xu, L., Zhong, Y., Liu, X., Zhao, Z., Huang, C., Lan, X., Lufei, C., Zhou, Y., Su, Y., et al. (2020) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-020-01364-8 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Mesenchymal-epithelial interaction regulates gastrointestinal tract development in mouse embryos
Zhao, L., Song, W., & Chen, Y. (2022) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111053 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Cao, S., Feng, H., Yi, H., Pan, M., Lin, L., Zhang, Y. S., Feng, Z., Liang, W., Cai, B., Li, Q., et al. (2023) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/s41422-023-00802-6 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
“4).(77) The developmental pseudotime and branch probability of VSMC and ASMC were obtained via Python package Palantir (1.”
MethodMurphy, D., Salataj, E., Giammartino, D. C. D., Rodriguez-Hernaez, J., Kloetgen, A., Garg, V., Char, E., Uyehara, C. M., Ee, L.-S., Lee, U., et al. (2023) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-023-01130-4 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“Single-cell technologies have begun to be used in this context but they often suffer from poor genomic resolution 41–45 .”
Self-citationKim, J., Jakobsen, S. T., Natarajan, K. N., & Won, K. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa1014 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Thompson, J. J., Lee, D. J., Mitra, A., Frail, S., Dale, R., & Rocha, P. P. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31938-5 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Cell state transitions: definitions and challenges
Mulas, C., Chaigne, A., Smith, A. G., & Chalut, K. J. (2021) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.199950 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
geneBasis: an iterative approach for unsupervised selection of targeted gene panels from scRNA-seq
Missarova, A. M., Jain, J., Butler, A., Ghazanfar, S., Stuart, T., Brusko, M., Wasserfall, C. H., Nick, H. S., Brusko, T. M., Atkinson, M. A., et al. (2021) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-021-02548-z · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“To integrate scRNA-seq data of the whole mouse embryo [32] together with lineage-specific dataset for endodermal development [43], we concatenated log-normalized counts for cells from [32] annotated as “ Gut ” and cells collected at E8.”
MethodInfluentialFetal liver development and implications for liver disease pathogenesis
Lotto, J., Stephan, T. L., & Hoodless, P. A. (2023) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-023-00775-2 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationCellular diversity and lineage trajectory: insights from mouse single cell transcriptomes
Tam, P., & Ho, J. W. K. (2020) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.179788 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Magaletta, M. E., Lobo, M., Kernfeld, E. M., Aliee, H., Huey, J. D., Parsons, T. J., Theis, F. J., & Maehr, R. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28067-4 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Peng, G., Cui, G., Ke, J., & Jing, N. (2020) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-120219-083220 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Robust integration of multiple single-cell RNA sequencing datasets using a single reference space
Liu, Y., Wang, T., Zhou, B., & Zheng, D. (2021) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-00859-x · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Tracing colonic embryonic transcriptional profiles and their reactivation upon intestinal damage
Fazilaty, H., Brügger, M. D., Valenta, T., Szczerba, B. M., Berková, L., Doumpas, N., Hausmann, G., Scharl, M. M., & Basler, K. (2021) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109484 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“Previous studies either used in vitro organoids and induced pluripotent stem cells or focused solely on early embryonic development (Finkbeiner et al., 2015; Nowotschin et al., 2019; Spence et al., 2011b).”
BackgroundThe Intrinsic and Extrinsic Effects of Tet Proteins During Gastrulation
Cheng, S., Mittnenzweig, M., Mayshar, Y., Lifshitz, A., Dunjić, M., Rais, Y., Ben-Yair, R., Gehrs, S., Chomsky, E., Mukamel, Z., et al. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.049 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
The primitive endoderm supports lineage plasticity to enable regulative development
Linneberg-Agerholm, M., Sell, A. C., Riveiro, A. R., Perera, M., Proks, M., Knudsen, T. E., Barral, A., Manzanares, M., & Brickman, J. M. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.05.051 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Molecular and Morphological Signatures of Chordate Development: Two Distinct Pathways, One Tunicate
Kowarsky, M., Anselmi, C., Hotta, K., Burighel, P., Zaniolo, G., Caicci, F., Rosental, B., Neff, N. F., Ishizuka, K. J., Palmeri, K. J., et al. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108681 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
“Decades of studies on embryogenesis across deuterostomes traced the fate of specific cell lineages and revealed transcriptional blueprints of embryogenesis (Bosch, 2009; Cao et al., 2019; Chan et al., 2018; Conklin, 1905; Farrell et al., 2018; Nowotschin et al., 2019; Schaum et al., 2018; Sulston et al., 1983; Wagner…”
BackgroundImaz-Rosshandler, I., Rode, C., Guibentif, C., Harland, L. T. G., Ton, M.-L. N., Dhapola, P., Keitley, D., Argelaguet, R., Calero‐Nieto, F. J., Nichols, J., et al. (2023) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.201867 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Quantitative lineage analysis identifies a hepato-pancreato-biliary progenitor niche
Willnow, D., Benary, U., Margineanu, A., Vignola, M. L., Konrath, F., Pongrac, I. M., Karimaddini, Z., Vigilante, A., Wolf, J., & Spagnoli, F. M. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03844-1 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Temporal recording of mammalian development and precancer
Islam, M., Yang, Y., Simmons, A. J., Shah, V. M., Pavan, M. K., Xu, Y., Tasneem, N., Chen, Z., Trinh, L. T., Molina, P., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07954-4 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“In addition, our gut lineage analysis showed convergence of cells from extra-embryonic origin to an embryonic endoderm state, supporting previous observations 14,25,29,30 , and extending the contribution of extra-embryonic cells to gut epithelial development.”
InfluentialCorujo-Simón, E., Radley, A., & Nichols, J. (2023) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.201522 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Vianello, S., & Lütolf, M. P. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.06.07.138883 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Single-cell transcriptomic characterization of sheep conceptus elongation and implantation
Jia, G., Ma, W., Wu, Z.-B., Li, S., Zhang, X., He, Z., Wu, S., Tao, H.-P., Fang, Y., Song, Y.-W., et al. (2023) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112860 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Longitudinal single-cell transcriptional dynamics throughout neurodegeneration in SCA1
Tejwani, L., Ravindra, N. G., Lee, C., Cheng, Y., Nguyen, B., Luttik, K. P., Ni, L., Zhang, S., Morrison, L. M., Gionco, J. T., et al. (2023) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.10.039 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Guts and gastrulation: Emergence and convergence of endoderm in the mouse embryo
Nowotschin, S., & Hadjantonakis, A. (2019) · Current topics in developmental biology/Current Topics in Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/bs.ctdb.2019.11.012 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationTime-aligned hourglass gastrulation models in rabbit and mouse
Mayshar, Y., Raz, O., Cheng, S., Ben-Yair, R., Hadas, R., Reines, N., Mittnenzweig, M., Ben-Kiki, O., Lifshitz, A., Tanay, A., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.04.037 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Recent advances in mammalian reproductive biology
Wen, L., Liu, Q., Xu, J.-J., Liu, X., Shi, C.-Y., Yang, Z., Zhang, Y., Xu, H., Liu, J., Yang, H., et al. (2019) · Science China Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11427-019-1572-7 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nowotschin, S., Setty, M., Kuo, Y.-Y., Liu, V., Garg, V., Sharma, R., Simon, C. S., Saiz, N., Gardner, R., Boutet, S. C., Church, D. M., Hoodless, P. A., Hadjantonakis, A.-K., & Pe’er, D.
- Affiliations
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- 10X Genomics (United States) (US)
- BC Cancer Agency (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Hadjantonakis, Anna-Katerina
- Pe’er, Dana
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2019-04-08
- Volume
- 569
- Issue
- 7756
- Pages
- 361-367
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC6724221
- OpenAlex
- W2929173597
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 11.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (4r01ca164729-05)
- National Cancer Institute (R01-CA164729, P30CA008748)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK084391)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (DP1HD084071, R01HD094868)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
- Keywords
- gut endoderm, mouse embryo, single-cell transcriptomics, extraembryonic endoderm, primitive endoderm, gastrulation, cell differentiation trajectories, anterior-posterior axis, lineage history
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Blastocyst, Cell Differentiation, Endoderm, Female, Intestines, Male, Cell Lineage, Body Patterning, Mice, Gastrulation, Single-Cell Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-23.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-23.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review