Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 694

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 111 of the 111 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Origin and evolution of the octoploid strawberry genome

Open access
Edger, Patrick P., Poorten, Thomas J., VanBuren, Robert, Hardigan, Michael A., Colle, Marivi, McKain, Michael R., Smith, Ronald D., Teresi, Scott J., Nelson, Andrew D. L., Wai, Ching Man, Alger, Elizabeth I., Bird, Kevin A., Yocca, Alan E., Pumplin, Nathan, Ou, Shujun, Ben-Zvi, Gil, Brodt, Avital, Baruch, Kobi, Swale, Thomas, Shiue, Lily, Acharya, Charlotte B., Cole, Glenn S., Mower, Jeffrey P., Childs, Kevin L., Jiang, Ning, Lyons, Eric, Freeling, Michael, Puzey, Joshua R., Knapp, Steven J.·2019·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Cultivated strawberry emerged from the hybridization of two wild octoploid species, both descendants from the merger of four diploid progenitor species into a single nucleus more than 1 million years ago. Here we report a near-complete chromosome-scale assembly for cultivated octoploid strawberry ( Fragaria × ananassa ) and uncovered the origin and evolutionary processes that shaped this complex allopolyploid. We identified the extant relatives of each diploid progenitor species and provide support for the North American origin of octoploid strawberry. We examined the dynamics among the four subgenomes in octoploid strawberry and uncovered the presence of a single dominant subgenome with significantly greater gene content, gene expression abundance, and biased exchanges between homoeologous chromosomes, as compared with the other subgenomes. Pathway analysis showed that certain metabolomic and disease-resistance traits are largely controlled by the dominant subgenome. These findings and the reference genome should serve as a powerful platform for future evolutionary studies and enable molecular breeding in strawberry.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41588-019-0356-4

Cites

111 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 111 references

Cited by

See all 694

Metadata

Authors
Edger, P. P., Poorten, T. J., VanBuren, R., Hardigan, M. A., Colle, M., McKain, M. R., Smith, R. D., Teresi, S. J., Nelson, A. D. L., Wai, C. M., Alger, E. I., Bird, K. A., Yocca, A. E., Pumplin, N., Ou, S., Ben-Zvi, G., Brodt, A., Baruch, K., Swale, T., Shiue, L., Acharya, C. B., Cole, G. S., Mower, J. P., Childs, K. L., Jiang, N., Lyons, E., Freeling, M., Puzey, J. R., & Knapp, S. J.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2019-02-25
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
541-547
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2916627756
Cited by
694
References
111
FWCI
60.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Origin and evolution of the octoploid strawberry genome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41588-019-0356-4
The paper
Edger, P. P., Poorten, T. J., VanBuren, R., Hardigan, M. A., Colle, M., McKain, M. R., Smith, R. D., Teresi, S. J., Nelson, A. D. L., Wai, C. M., Alger, E. I., Bird, K. A., Yocca, A. E., Pumplin, N., Ou, S., Ben-Zvi, G., Brodt, A., Baruch, K., Swale, T., . . . Knapp, S. J. (2019). Origin and evolution of the octoploid strawberry genome. Nature Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0356-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.