Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial competition shapes the dynamic mutational landscape of normal esophageal epithelium

Open access
Colom, Bartomeu, Alcolea, Maria P., Piedrafita, Gabriel, Hall, Michael W. J., Wabik, Agnieszka, Dentro, Stefan C., Fowler, Joanna C., Herms, Albert, King, Charlotte, Ong, Swee Hoe, Sood, Roshan K., Gerstung, Moritz, Martincorena, Inigo, Hall, Benjamin A., Jones, Philip H.·2020·Nature Genetics

Abstract

During aging, progenitor cells acquire mutations, which may generate clones that colonize the surrounding tissue. By middle age, normal human tissues, including the esophageal epithelium (EE), become a patchwork of mutant clones. Despite their relevance for understanding aging and cancer, the processes that underpin mutational selection in normal tissues remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated this issue in the esophageal epithelium of mutagen-treated mice. Deep sequencing identified numerous mutant clones with multiple genes under positive selection, including Notch1, Notch2 and Trp53, which are also selected in human esophageal epithelium. Transgenic lineage tracing revealed strong clonal competition that evolved over time. Clone dynamics were consistent with a simple model in which the proliferative advantage conferred by positively selected mutations depends on the nature of the neighboring cells. When clones with similar competitive fitness collide, mutant cell fate reverts towards homeostasis, a constraint that explains how selection operates in normal-appearing epithelium. Deep sequencing and lineage tracing analysis of esophageal epithelium of mutagen-treated aging mice leads to a model in which the proliferative advantage of positively selected mutations depends on the competitive fitness of neighboring cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41588-020-0624-3

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 161

Metadata

Authors
Colom, B., Alcolea, M. P., Piedrafita, G., Hall, M. W. J., Wabik, A., Dentro, S. C., Fowler, J. C., Herms, A., King, C., Ong, S. H., Sood, R. K., Gerstung, M., Martincorena, I., Hall, B. A., & Jones, P. H.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2020-05-18
Volume
52
Issue
6
Pages
604-614
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W3025298198
Cited by
161
References
7
FWCI
6.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial competition shapes the dynamic mutational landscape of normal esophageal epithelium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41588-020-0624-3
The paper
Colom, B., Alcolea, M. P., Piedrafita, G., Hall, M. W. J., Wabik, A., Dentro, S. C., Fowler, J. C., Herms, A., King, C., Ong, S. H., Sood, R. K., Gerstung, M., Martincorena, I., Hall, B. A., & Jones, P. H. (2020). Spatial competition shapes the dynamic mutational landscape of normal esophageal epithelium. Nature Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-020-0624-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.