Cited by 604Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Population dynamics of normal human blood inferred from somatic mutations

Open access
Lee-Six, Henry, Øbro, Nina Friesgaard, Shepherd, Mairi S., Grossmann, Sebastian, Dawson, Kevin, Belmonte, Miriam, Osborne, Robert J., Huntly, Brian J. P. +8 more·2018·Nature

Abstract

Haematopoietic stem cells drive blood production, but their population size and lifetime dynamics have not been quantified directly in humans. Here we identified 129,582 spontaneous, genome-wide somatic mutations in 140 single-cell-derived haematopoietic stem and progenitor colonies from a healthy 59-year-old man and applied population-genetics approaches to reconstruct clonal dynamics. Cell divisions from early embryogenesis were evident in the phylogenetic tree; all blood cells were derived from a common ancestor that preceded gastrulation. The size of the stem cell population grew steadily in early life, reaching a stable plateau by adolescence. We estimate the numbers of haematopoietic stem cells that are actively making white blood cells at any one time to be in the range of 50,000-200,000. We observed adult haematopoietic stem cell clones that generate multilineage outputs, including granulocytes and B lymphocytes. Harnessing naturally occurring mutations to report the clonal architecture of an organ enables the high-resolution reconstruction of somatic cell dynamics in humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-018-0497-0

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Time-dependent accumulation of stochastic DNA damage hampers stem cell functionality, increases mutations during human HSC ageing, impairs functional properties, promotes clonal expansion and loss of clonal diversity, and raises oncogenic potential.

    “Thus, time-dependent accumulation of stochastic DNA damage severely hampers stem cell functionality, increasing mutations during human HSC ageing80, impairing functional properties, promoting clonal expansion of positively selected somatic mutations resulting in loss of clonal diversity81 or raising the potential for oncogenic transformation.”

    From The central role of DNA damage in the ageing process (2021) · cites this paper as [80]

  • Humans have 50,000 to 200,000 hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs).

    “It is estimated that humans have 50,000 to 200,000 hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) 13.”

    From Clonal hematopoiesis in human aging and disease (2019) · cites this paper as [13]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]Till JE McCulloch EA A direct measurement of the radiation sensitivity of normal mouse bone marrow cells Radiat Res 1961 14 213 22 13776896

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee-Six, H., Øbro, N. F., Shepherd, M. S., Grossmann, S., Dawson, K., Belmonte, M., Osborne, R. J., Huntly, B. J. P., Martincorena, I., Anderson, E., O’Neill, L., Stratton, M. R., Laurenti, E., Green, A. R., Kent, D. G., & Campbell, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
  • Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Green, Anthony R.
  • Kent, David G.
  • Campbell, Peter J.
Venue
Nature
Published
2018-09
Volume
561
Issue
7724
Pages
473-478
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2889734305
Cited by
604
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 7
FWCI
44.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • European Hematology Association
  • Leukemia and Lymphoma Research
  • Wellcome Trust (103858/Z/14/Z, 107630/Z/15/Z, WT088340MA)
  • Cancer Research UK (21762, 25508, 21777)
  • Lundbeckfonden (R210-2015-2686)
  • Blood Cancer UK (15008)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/M008975/1, MC_PC_12009, MR/M010392/1, MR/R009708/1, MC_PC_16040)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (1800757)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
hematopoietic stem cells, somatic mutations, clonal dynamics, hematopoiesis, phylogenetic inference, embryonic cell division, B cells, granulocytes, myeloid cells, human blood
MeSH terms
Bayes Theorem, Blood Cells, Cell Count, Cell Division, Clone Cells, DNA Mutational Analysis, Granulocytes, Hematopoiesis, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Humans, Lymphocytes, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Time Factors, Genome, Human, Cell Lineage, Embryonic Development, Adult Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review