Cited by 111Ubiquitin and proteasome pathwaysProtein Degradation and InhibitorsEnzyme Structure and Function

Molecular basis of GID4-mediated recognition of degrons for the Pro/N-end rule pathway

Dong, Cheng, Zhang, Heng, Li, Li, Tempel, Wolfram, Loppnau, Peter, Min, Jinrong·2018·Nature Chemical Biology

Abstract

The N-end rule pathway senses the N-terminal destabilizing residues of degradation substrates for the ubiquitin-proteasome system, whose integrity shields against various human syndromes including cancer and cardiovascular diseases. GID4, a subunit of the ubiquitin ligase GID complex, has been recently identified as the N-recognin of the new branch of the N-end rule pathway responsible for recognizing substrates bearing N-terminal proline residues (Pro/N-degrons). However, the molecular mechanism of GID4-mediated Pro/N-degron recognition remains largely unexplored. Here, we report the first crystal structures of human GID4 alone and in complex with various Pro/N-degrons. Our complex crystal structures, together with biophysical analyses, delineate the GID4-mediated Pro/N-degron recognition mechanism and substrate selection criteria for the Pro/N-end rule pathway. These mechanistic data on the Pro/N-recognin activity of GID4 will serve as a foundation to facilitate the identification of authentic physiological substrates as well as the development of inhibitors of therapeutic values for the Pro/N-end rule pathway.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41589-018-0036-1

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GID4 features a substrate-binding domain with a deep, enclosed and ligandable pocket that recognizes the amino-terminal proline residue of protein substrates, leading to their proteasomal degradation.

    “GID4, the subunit of the GID E3 ligase complex, features a substrate-binding domain with a deep, enclosed and ligandable pocket that recognizes the amino-terminal proline residue of protein substrates, leading to their proteasomal degradation 131,132 .”

    From Targeted protein degradation: expanding the toolbox (2019) · cites this paper as [131]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dong, C., Zhang, H., Li, L., Tempel, W., Loppnau, P., & Min, J.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Min, Jinrong
Venue
Nature Chemical Biology
Published
2018-04-09
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
466-473
ISSN
  • 1552-4450 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4469
OpenAlex
W2795376620
Cited by
111
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Chemical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
N-end rule pathway, N-recognin, protein degradation, substrate recognition, substrate selection, ubiquitin-proteasome system, crystal structure
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Cloning, Molecular, Humans, Mutation, Proline, Protein Binding, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Substrate Specificity, Protein Structure, Secondary, Crystallography, X-Ray, Ubiquitin, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review