Cited by 223Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysHeat shock proteins research

Ubiquitination and Degradation of Mutant p53

Open access
Lukashchuk, Natalia, Vousden, Karen H.·2007·Molecular and Cellular Biology

Abstract

While wild-type p53 is normally a rapidly degraded protein, mutant forms of p53 are stabilized and accumulate to high levels in tumor cells. In this study, we show that mutant and wild-type p53 proteins are ubiquitinated and degraded through overlapping but distinct pathways. While Mdm2 can drive the degradation of both mutant and wild-type p53, our data suggest that the ability of Mdm2 to function as a ubiquitin ligase is less important in the degradation of mutant p53, which is heavily ubiquitinated in an Mdm2-independent manner. Our initial attempts to identify ubiquitin ligases that are responsible for the ubiquitination of mutant p53 have suggested a role for the chaperone-associated ubiquitin ligase CHIP (C terminus of Hsc70-interacting protein), although other unidentified ubiquitin ligases also appear to contribute. The contribution of Mdm2 to the degradation of mutant p53 may reflect the ability of Mdm2 to deliver the ubiquitinated mutant p53 to the proteasome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mcb.00050-07

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased expression of GOF mut-p53 is due to disruption of the MDM2/p53 negative feedback loop.

    “Increased expression of GOF mut-p53 is due to the disruption of the MDM2/p53 negative feedback loop.”

    From The p53 Pathway in Glioblastoma (2018) · cites this paper as [65]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lukashchuk, N., & Vousden, K. H.
Affiliations
Cancer Research UK Scotland Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Vousden, Karen H.
Venue
Molecular and Cellular Biology
Published
2007-12
Volume
27
Issue
23
Pages
8284-8295
ISSN
  • 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5549
OpenAlex
W2102368462
Cited by
223
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular and Cellular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
Keywords
mutant p53, p53 ubiquitination, protein degradation, MDM2, CHIP, ubiquitin ligase, proteasome, wild-type p53
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Protein Binding, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Protein Transport, Cell Line, Tumor, Mutant Proteins, Mice, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2, Ubiquitination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review