Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Programmed ‘disarming’ of the neutrophil proteome reduces the magnitude of inflammation

Open access
Adrover, Jose M., Aroca-Crevillén, Alejandra, Crainiciuc, Georgiana, Ostos, Fernando, Rojas-Vega, Yeny, Rubio-Ponce, Andrea, Cilloniz, Catia, Bonzón-Kulichenko, Elena, Calvo, Enrique, Rico, Daniel, Moro, María A., Weber, Christian, Lizasoaín, Ignacio, Torres, Antoni, Ruiz-Cabello, Jesús, Vázquez, Jesús, Hidalgo, Andrés·2020·Nature Immunology

Abstract

The antimicrobial functions of neutrophils are facilitated by a defensive armamentarium of proteins stored in granules, and by the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). However, the toxic nature of these structures poses a threat to highly vascularized tissues, such as the lungs. Here, we identified a cell-intrinsic program that modified the neutrophil proteome in the circulation and caused the progressive loss of granule content and reduction of the NET-forming capacity. This program was driven by the receptor CXCR2 and by regulators of circadian cycles. As a consequence, lungs were protected from inflammatory injury at times of day or in mouse mutants in which granule content was low. Changes in the proteome, granule content and NET formation also occurred in human neutrophils, and correlated with the incidence and severity of respiratory distress in pneumonia patients. Our findings unveil a ‘disarming’ strategy of neutrophils that depletes protein stores to reduce the magnitude of inflammation. Hidalgo and colleagues describe a cell-intrinsic program that induces changes in the proteome, granule content and NET-forming capacity of neutrophils and is driven by the chemokine receptor CXCR2 and regulators of the circadian clock.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41590-019-0571-2

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Adrover, J. M., Aroca-Crevillén, A., Crainiciuc, G., Ostos, F., Rojas-Vega, Y., Rubio-Ponce, A., Cilloniz, C., Bonzón-Kulichenko, E., Calvo, E., Rico, D., Moro, M. A., Weber, C., Lizasoaín, I., Torres, A., Ruiz-Cabello, J., Vázquez, J., & Hidalgo, A.
Venue
Nature Immunology
Published
2020-01-13
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
135-144
ISSN
  • 1529-2908 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2916
OpenAlex
W2999714391
Cited by
282
References
52
FWCI
12.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Programmed ‘disarming’ of the neutrophil proteome reduces the magnitude of inflammation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41590-019-0571-2
The paper
Adrover, J. M., Aroca-Crevillén, A., Crainiciuc, G., Ostos, F., Rojas-Vega, Y., Rubio-Ponce, A., Cilloniz, C., Bonzón-Kulichenko, E., Calvo, E., Rico, D., Moro, M. A., Weber, C., Lizasoaín, I., Torres, A., Ruiz-Cabello, J., Vázquez, J., & Hidalgo, A. (2020). Programmed ‘disarming’ of the neutrophil proteome reduces the magnitude of inflammation. Nature Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-019-0571-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.