Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 434

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Priorities for cancer research in low- and middle-income countries: a global perspective

Open access
Pramesh, C. S., Badwe, Rajendra A., Bhoo-Pathy, Nirmala, Booth, Christopher M., Chinnaswamy, Girish, Dare, Anna J., de Andrade, Victor Piana, Hunter, David J., Gopal, Satish, Gospodarowicz, Mary, Gunasekera, Sanjeeva, Ilbawi, Andre, Kapambwe, Sharon, Kingham, Peter, Kutluk, Tezer, Lamichhane, Nirmal, Mutebi, Miriam, Orem, Jackson, Parham, Groesbeck, Ranganathan, Priya, Sengar, Manju, Sullivan, Richard, Swaminathan, Soumya, Tannock, Ian F., Tomar, Vivek, Vanderpuye, Verna, Varghese, Cherian, Weiderpass, Elisabete·2022·Nature Medicine

Abstract

Cancer research currently is heavily skewed toward high-income countries (HICs), with little research conducted in, and relevant to, the problems of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This regional discordance in cancer knowledge generation and application needs to be rebalanced. Several gaps in the research enterprise of LMICs need to be addressed to promote regionally relevant research, and radical rethinking is needed to address the burning issues in cancer care in these regions. We identified five top priorities in cancer research in LMICs based on current and projected needs: reducing the burden of patients with advanced disease; improving access and affordability, and outcomes of cancer treatment; value-based care and health economics; quality improvement and implementation research; and leveraging technology to improve cancer control. LMICs have an excellent opportunity to address important questions in cancer research that could impact cancer control globally. Success will require collaboration and commitment from governments, policy makers, funding agencies, health care organizations and leaders, researchers and the public. Radical rethinking is needed to address the burning issues in cancer care in low- and middle-income countries. In this Perspective, the authors outline the main challenges and top priorities for cancer research now and into the future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-022-01738-x

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Cited by

See all 434

Metadata

Authors
Pramesh, C. S., Badwe, R. A., Bhoo-Pathy, N., Booth, C. M., Chinnaswamy, G., Dare, A. J., de Andrade, V. P., Hunter, D. J., Gopal, S., Gospodarowicz, M., Gunasekera, S., Ilbawi, A., Kapambwe, S., Kingham, P., Kutluk, T., Lamichhane, N., Mutebi, M., Orem, J., Parham, G., Ranganathan, P., Sengar, M., Sullivan, R., Swaminathan, S., Tannock, I. F., Tomar, V., Vanderpuye, V., Varghese, C., & Weiderpass, E.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2022-04
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
649-657
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W4224288650
Cited by
434
References
69
FWCI
45.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Priorities for cancer research in low- and middle-income countries: a global perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41591-022-01738-x
The paper
Pramesh, C. S., Badwe, R. A., Bhoo-Pathy, N., Booth, C. M., Chinnaswamy, G., Dare, A. J., de Andrade, V. P., Hunter, D. J., Gopal, S., Gospodarowicz, M., Gunasekera, S., Ilbawi, A., Kapambwe, S., Kingham, P., Kutluk, T., Lamichhane, N., Mutebi, M., Orem, J., Parham, G., . . . Weiderpass, E. (2022). Priorities for cancer research in low- and middle-income countries: a global perspective. Nature Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01738-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.