Cited by 143Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationClinical practice guidelines implementation

PRISMA AI reporting guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on AI in healthcare

Open access
Cacciamani, Giovanni E., Chu, Timothy N., Sanford, Daniel I., Abreu, Andre, Duddalwar, Vinay, Oberai, Assad, Kuo, C.-C. Jay, Liu, Xiaoxuan +16 more·2023·Nature Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-022-02139-w

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The scoping review was conducted according to the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guideline and the PRISMA-AI extension.

    “This scoping review was conducted according to the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guideline [57] and the PRISMA-AI extension [58].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cacciamani, G. E., Chu, T. N., Sanford, D. I., Abreu, A., Duddalwar, V., Oberai, A., Kuo, C.-C. J., Liu, X., Denniston, A. K., Vasey, B., McCulloch, P., Wolff, R. F., Mallett, S., Mongan, J., Kahn, C. E., Sounderajah, V., Darzi, A., Dahm, P., Moons, K. G. M., Topol, E., Collins, G. S., Moher, D., Gill, I. S., & Hung, A. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Scripps Research Institute (US)
  • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA)
Corresponding author
Cacciamani, Giovanni E.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2023-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
14-15
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W4316507599
Cited by
143
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 9
FWCI
8.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Alan Turing Institute (TU/ASG/R-SPEH-113)
  • Cancer Research UK (27294)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR205103, NF-SI-0510-10186, NF-SI-0617-10038)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
reporting guidelines, artificial intelligence in healthcare, systematic reviews, meta-analysis
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Delivery of Health Care, Publishing, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review