Cited by 319Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Astrocyte reactivity influences amyloid-β effects on tau pathology in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Bellaver, Bruna, Povala, Guilherme, Ferreira, Pamela C. L., Ferrari-Souza, João Pedro, Leffa, Douglas T., Lussier, Firoza Z., Benedet, Andréa L., Ashton, Nicholas J. +25 more·2023·Nature Medicine

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

An unresolved question for the understanding of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathophysiology is why a significant percentage of amyloid-β (Aβ)-positive cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals do not develop detectable downstream tau pathology and, consequently, clinical deterioration. In vitro evidence suggests that reactive astrocytes unleash Aβ effects in pathological tau phosphorylation. Here, in a biomarker study across three cohorts ( n = 1,016), we tested whether astrocyte reactivity modulates the association of Aβ with tau phosphorylation in CU individuals. We found that Aβ was associated with increased plasma phosphorylated tau only in individuals positive for astrocyte reactivity (Ast + ). Cross-sectional and longitudinal tau–positron emission tomography analyses revealed an AD-like pattern of tau tangle accumulation as a function of Aβ only in CU Ast + individuals. Our findings suggest astrocyte reactivity as an important upstream event linking Aβ with initial tau pathology, which may have implications for the biological definition of preclinical AD and for selecting CU individuals for clinical trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-023-02380-x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Astrocyte activation leading to a chronic inflammatory response is considered to be one of the important pathological processes in AD.

    “is considered to be one of the important pathological processes in AD”

    From Nuclear SphK2/S1P signaling is a key regulator of ApoE production and Aβ uptake in astrocytes (2024) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Main section describes astrocyte reactivity as one of the earliest abnormalities in AD, and the Discussion links it to early tau pathology in preclinical AD (page numbers unavailable). The paper does not establish that astrocyte activation leads to a chronic inflammatory response; searches for chronic inflammation and neuroinflammation did not find that link. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Astrocyte activation leading to a chronic inflammatory response has been proposed as a mechanism linking Aβ accumulation and tau pathology.

    “Astrocyte activation leading to a chronic inflammatory response has been proposed as a mechanism linking Aβ accumulation and tau pathology (7)”

    From Nuclear SphK2/S1P signaling is a key regulator of ApoE production and Aβ uptake in astrocytes (2024) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Discussion reports that astrocyte reactivity plays a role in the association between Aβ and early tau phosphorylation in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. It does not establish that astrocyte activation leads to a chronic inflammatory response or identify that response as the linking mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. [1]Jack CR Jr Tracking pathophysiological processes in Alzheimer’s disease: an updated hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers Lancet Neurol. 2013 12 207 216 23332364 PMC3622225
  2. [2]Hansson O Biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases Nat. Med. 2021 27 954 963 34083813
  3. [4]Hanseeuw BJ Association of amyloid and tau with cognition in preclinical Alzheimer disease: a longitudinal study JAMA Neurol. 2019 76 915 924 31157827 PMC6547132
  4. [6]Ossenkoppele R Amyloid and tau PET-positive cognitively unimpaired individuals are at high risk for future cognitive decline Nat. Med. 2022 28 2381 2387 36357681 PMC9671808
  5. [7]Roberts RO Prevalence and outcomes of amyloid positivity among persons without dementia in a longitudinal, population-based setting JAMA Neurol. 2018 75 970 979 29710225 PMC6142936
  6. [8]Josephs KA Weigand SD Whitwell JL Characterizing amyloid-positive individuals with normal tau PET levels after 5 years: an ADNI study Neurology 2022 98 e2282 e2292 35314506 PMC9162162
  7. [9]Nordberg A Dementia in 2014. Towards early diagnosis in Alzheimer disease Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2015 11 69 70 25623789
  8. [10]Sperling RA Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease Alzheimers Dement. 2011 7 280 292 21514248 PMC3220946
  9. [11]Pike CJ Cummings BJ Cotman CW Early association of reactive astrocytes with senile plaques in Alzheimer’s disease Exp. Neurol. 1995 132 172 179 7789457
  10. [12]Beach TG Walker R McGeer EG Patterns of gliosis in Alzheimer’s disease and aging cerebrum Glia 1989 2 420 436 2531723
  11. [14]Kumar A Fontana IC Nordberg A Reactive astrogliosis: a friend or foe in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease J. Neurochem. 2023 164 309 324 34931315
  12. [15]Wruck W Adjaye J Meta-analysis of human prefrontal cortex reveals activation of GFAP and decline of synaptic transmission in the aging brain Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2020 8 26 32138778 PMC7059712
  13. [16]Garwood CJ Pooler AM Atherton J Hanger DP Noble W Astrocytes are important mediators of Aβ-induced neurotoxicity and tau phosphorylation in primary culture Cell Death Dis. 2011 2 e167 21633390 PMC3168992
  14. [17]Mann CN Astrocytic α2-Na+/K+ ATPase inhibition suppresses astrocyte reactivity and reduces neurodegeneration in a tauopathy mouse model Sci. Transl. Med. 2022 14 eabm4107 35171651 PMC9161722
  15. [18]Litvinchuk A Complement C3aR inactivation attenuates tau pathology and reverses an immune network deregulated in tauopathy models and Alzheimer’s disease Neuron 2018 100 1337 1353 30415998 PMC6309202
  16. [21]Benedet AL Differences between plasma and cerebrospinal fluid glial fibrillary acidic protein levels across the Alzheimer disease continuum JAMA Neurol. 2021 78 1471 1483 34661615 PMC8524356
  17. [22]Chatterjee P Plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein is elevated in cognitively normal older adults at risk of Alzheimer’s disease Transl. Psychiatry 2021 11 27 33431793 PMC7801513
  18. [23]Pereira JB Plasma GFAP is an early marker of amyloid-β but not tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease Brain 2021 144 3505 3516 34259835 PMC8677538
  19. [24]Chatterjee P Plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein is associated with 18F-SMBT-1 PET: two putative astrocyte reactivity biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease J. Alzheimers Dis. 2023 92 615 628 36776057 PMC10041433
  20. [25]Palmqvist S Earliest accumulation of β-amyloid occurs within the default-mode network and concurrently affects brain connectivity Nat. Commun. 2017 8 1214 29089479 PMC5663717
  21. [28]Johansson C Plasma biomarker profiles in autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease Brain 2023 146 1132 1140 36626935 PMC9976964
  22. [29]Verberk IMW Serum markers glial fibrillary acidic protein and neurofilament light for prognosis and monitoring in cognitively normal older people: a prospective memory clinic-based cohort study Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021 2 e87 e95 36098162
  23. [30]Shen X-N Plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein in the Alzheimer disease continuum: relationship to other biomarkers, differential diagnosis, and prediction of clinical progression Clin. Chem. 2023 69 411 421 36861369
  24. [32]Palta P Sex differences in in vivo tau neuropathology in a multiethnic sample of late middle-aged adults Neurobiol. Aging 2021 103 109 116 33894641 PMC8178209
  25. [33]Tsiknia AA Sex differences in plasma p-tau181 associations with Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers, cognitive decline, and clinical progression Mol. Psychiatry 2022 27 4314 4322 35768637 PMC9718670
  26. [34]van Dyck CH Lecanemab in early Alzheimer’s disease N. Engl. J. Med. 2023 388 9 21 36449413
  27. [35]Ganguli M Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment by multiple classifications: the Monongahela-Youghiogheny Healthy Aging Team (MYHAT) project Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2010 18 674 683 20220597 PMC2906673
  28. [37]Cohen AD Connectomics in brain aging and dementia—the background and design of a study of a connectome related to human disease Front. Aging Neurosci. 2021 13 669490 34690734 PMC8530182
  29. [38]Aizenstein HJ Frequent amyloid deposition without significant cognitive impairment among the elderly Arch. Neurol. 2008 65 1509 1517 19001171 PMC2636844
  30. [39]Thurston RC Menopausal vasomotor symptoms and white matter hyperintensities in midlife women Neurology 2023 100 e133 e141 36224031 PMC9841446
  31. [40]Karikari TK Blood phosphorylated tau 181 as a biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease: a diagnostic performance and prediction modelling study using data from four prospective cohorts Lancet Neurol. 2020 19 422 433 32333900
  32. [41]Ashton NJ Plasma p-tau231: a new biomarker for incipient Alzheimer’s disease pathology Acta Neuropathol. 2021 141 709 724 33585983 PMC8043944
  33. [42]Triana-Baltzer G Development and validation of a high-sensitivity assay for measuring p217+tau in plasma Alzheimers Dement. (Amst.) 2021 13 e12204 34095436 PMC8158165
  34. [43]Ossenkoppele R Prevalence of amyloid PET positivity in dementia syndromes: a meta-analysis JAMA 2015 313 1939 1949 25988463 PMC4517678
  35. [44]Jack CR Jr. Defining imaging biomarker cut points for brain aging and Alzheimer’s disease Alzheimers Dement. 2017 13 205 216 27697430 PMC5344738
  36. [45]Gräsbeck R The evolution of the reference value concept Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2004 42 692 697 15327001
  37. [46]Jensen CS Exercise as a potential modulator of inflammation in patients with Alzheimer’s disease measured in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma Exp. Gerontol. 2019 121 91 98 30980923
  38. [47]Therriault J Determining amyloid-β positivity using (18)F-AZD4694 PET imaging J. Nucl. Med. 2021 62 247 252 32737243
  39. [48]Pascoal TA 18F-MK-6240 PET for early and late detection of neurofibrillary tangles Brain 2020 143 2818 2830 32671408
  40. [49]Cohen AD Classification of amyloid-positivity in controls: comparison of visual read and quantitative approaches Neuroimage 2013 71 207 215 23353602 PMC3605888
  41. [50]Mathotaarachchi S VoxelStats: a MATLAB package for multi-modal voxel-wise brain image analysis Front. Neuroinform. 2016 10 20 27378902 PMC4908129
  42. [51]Worsley KJ Taylor JE Tomaiuolo F Lerch J Unified univariate and multivariate random field theory Neuroimage 2004 23 S189 S195 15501088

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bellaver, B., Povala, G., Ferreira, P. C. L., Ferrari-Souza, J. P., Leffa, D. T., Lussier, F. Z., Benedet, A. L., Ashton, N. J., Triana-Baltzer, G., Kolb, H. C., Tissot, C., Therriault, J., Servaes, S., Stevenson, J., Rahmouni, N., Lopez, O. L., Tudorascu, D. L., Villemagne, V. L., Ikonomovic, M. D., Gauthier, S., Zimmer, E. R., Zetterberg, H., Blennow, K., Aizenstein, H. J., Klunk, W. E., Snitz, B. E., Maki, P., Thurston, R. C., Cohen, A. D., Ganguli, M., Karikari, T. K., Rosa-Neto, P., & Pascoal, T. A.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Ouest-de-l’Île-de-Montréal (CA)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Pascoal, Tharick A.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2023-05-29
Volume
29
Issue
7
Pages
1775-1781
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W4378713804
Cited by
319
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 111 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 25
FWCI
56.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Association (ADSF-21-831377-C, ADSF‐21‐831376‐C, -21-850325, ADSF-21-831376-C, ADSF-21-831381-C and ADSF-21-831377-C, #ADSF-21-831381-C, AARGD-21-850670, AARFD-22-974627, 850325, AACSF-20-648075, -21- 831377-C, AARF-21-850325)
  • Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation (2016862, FO2017-0243, 201809, ADSF-21-831381-C, 2017-00915, UKDRI-1003, #ALFGBG-715986, ZEN-21-848495, 201809–2016862, ADSF-21-831377-C, 860197, JPND2019-466-236, JPND2021-00694, #ADSF-21-831376-C)
  • BrightFocus Foundation (AF-930627, A2020812F)
  • Familjen Erling-Perssons Stiftelse (860197)
  • Gun och Bertil Stohnes Stiftelse
  • Demensförbundet
  • Stiftelsen för Gamla Tjänarinnor (FO2022‐0270, 860197)
  • Weston Brain Institute
  • EU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND 2021-00694, JPND2019-466-236)
  • Consortium canadien en neurodégénérescence associée au vieillissement
  • European Commission (101,053,962, JPND2021‐00694, HORIZON2020, ALFGBG-71320, JPND2019‐466‐236, 860197)
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (88887, 88887.336490/2019‐00)
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Hjärnfonden (#FO2022-0270, #FO2020-0240, JPND2019-466-236)
  • Vetenskapsrådet (#101053962, 2021-03244, 2017-00915, 2022-01018, ALFGBG‐71320, 2022-00732, JPND2019-466-236)
  • Alzheimerfonden (#AF-930627, #AF‐968270, AF-930351, AF‐939721)
  • International Society for Neurochemistry
  • Instituto Serrapilheira
  • UK Dementia Research Institute (#2017-00915)
  • Olav Thon Stiftelsen
  • National Institutes of Health (1rf1ag052525-01a1)
  • Parkinsonfonden
  • HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme (101053962, 860197)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (#MOP-11-51-31, 201809, 152985, 159815, RFN 152,985, 162303, MOP-11-51-31; RFN 152985)
  • Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé (2020-VICO-279314)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG052521, R01AG052446, P01AG025204, RF1AG025516, P01AG014449, RF1 AG052525, R01AG052528, RF1AG053504, R37AG023651, P30AG066468, R01AG073267, R01AG075336, R01AG053504)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL105647, K24HL123565)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
astrocyte activation, amyloid-beta, tau phosphorylation, preclinical Alzheimer's disease, cognitively unimpaired individuals, tau tangles, plasma biomarkers, tau PET, astrocytes, clinical trial selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review