Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 729

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Recommendations for performing, interpreting and reporting hydrogen deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) experiments

Open access
Masson, Glenn R., Burke, John E., Ahn, Natalie G., Anand, Ganesh S., Borchers, Christoph, Brier, Sébastien, Bou-Assaf, George M., Engen, John R., Englander, S. Walter, Faber, Johan, Garlish, Rachel, Griffin, Patrick R., Gross, Michael L., Guttman, Miklos, Hamuro, Yoshitomo, Heck, Albert J. R., Houde, Damian, Iacob, Roxana E., Jørgensen, Thomas J. D., Kaltashov, Igor A., Klinman, Judith P., Konermann, Lars, Man, Petr, Mayne, Leland, Pascal, Bruce D., Reichmann, Dana, Skehel, Mark, Snijder, Joost, Strutzenberg, Timothy S., Underbakke, Eric S., Wagner, Cornelia, Wales, Thomas E., Walters, Benjamin T., Weis, David D., Wilson, Derek J., Wintrode, Patrick L., Zhang, Zhongqi, Zheng, Jie, Schriemer, David C., Rand, Kasper D.·2019·Nature Methods

Abstract

Hydrogen deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) is a powerful biophysical technique being increasingly applied to a wide variety of problems. As the HDX-MS community continues to grow, adoption of best practices in data collection, analysis, presentation and interpretation will greatly enhance the accessibility of this technique to nonspecialists. Here we provide recommendations arising from community discussions emerging out of the first International Conference on Hydrogen-Exchange Mass Spectrometry (IC-HDX; 2017). It is meant to represent both a consensus viewpoint and an opportunity to stimulate further additions and refinements as the field advances. Members of the hydrogen deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) community provide their ‘best practices’ recommendations for HDX-MS data collection, analysis and reporting.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41592-019-0459-y

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 729

Metadata

Authors
Masson, G. R., Burke, J. E., Ahn, N. G., Anand, G. S., Borchers, C., Brier, S., Bou-Assaf, G. M., Engen, J. R., Englander, S. W., Faber, J., Garlish, R., Griffin, P. R., Gross, M. L., Guttman, M., Hamuro, Y., Heck, A. J. R., Houde, D., Iacob, R. E., Jørgensen, T. J. D., Kaltashov, I. A., Klinman, J. P., Konermann, L., Man, P., Mayne, L., Pascal, B. D., Reichmann, D., Skehel, M., Snijder, J., Strutzenberg, T. S., Underbakke, E. S., Wagner, C., Wales, T. E., Walters, B. T., Weis, D. D., Wilson, D. J., Wintrode, P. L., Zhang, Z., Zheng, J., Schriemer, D. C., & Rand, K. D.
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2019-06-27
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
595-602
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W2955168413
Cited by
729
References
0
FWCI
28.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recommendations for performing, interpreting and reporting hydrogen deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) experiments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41592-019-0459-y
The paper
Masson, G. R., Burke, J. E., Ahn, N. G., Anand, G. S., Borchers, C., Brier, S., Bou-Assaf, G. M., Engen, J. R., Englander, S. W., Faber, J., Garlish, R., Griffin, P. R., Gross, M. L., Guttman, M., Hamuro, Y., Heck, A. J. R., Houde, D., Iacob, R. E., Jørgensen, T. J. D., . . . Rand, K. D. (2019). Recommendations for performing, interpreting and reporting hydrogen deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) experiments. Nature Methods. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0459-y

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.