Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 396

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Brain capillary pericytes exert a substantial but slow influence on blood flow

Open access
Hartmann, David A., Berthiaume, Andrée-Anne, Grant, Roger I., Harrill, Sarah A., Koski, Tegan, Tieu, Taryn, McDowell, Konnor P., Faino, Anna V., Kelly, Abigail L., Shih, Andy Y.·2021·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

The majority of the brain’s vasculature is composed of intricate capillary networks lined by capillary pericytes. However, it remains unclear whether capillary pericytes influence blood flow. Using two-photon microscopy to observe and manipulate brain capillary pericytes in vivo, we find that their optogenetic stimulation decreases lumen diameter and blood flow, but with slower kinetics than similar stimulation of mural cells on upstream pial and precapillary arterioles. This slow vasoconstriction was inhibited by the clinically used vasodilator fasudil, a Rho-kinase inhibitor that blocks contractile machinery. Capillary pericytes were also slower to constrict back to baseline following hypercapnia-induced dilation, and slower to dilate towards baseline following optogenetically induced vasoconstriction. Optical ablation of single capillary pericytes led to sustained local dilation and a doubling of blood cell flux selectively in capillaries lacking pericyte contact. These data indicate that capillary pericytes contribute to basal blood flow resistance and slow modulation of blood flow throughout the brain. Vast networks of capillaries feed the brain. Hartmann et al. show that pericyte contractility is critical for maintenance of enduring capillary tone, which sets an optimized rate and distribution of blood flow through brain capillary networks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41593-020-00793-2

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

2 retracted

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 396

Metadata

Authors
Hartmann, D. A., Berthiaume, A.-A., Grant, R. I., Harrill, S. A., Koski, T., Tieu, T., McDowell, K. P., Faino, A. V., Kelly, A. L., & Shih, A. Y.
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2021-02-18
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
633-645
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W3130987271
Cited by
396
References
18
FWCI
20.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brain capillary pericytes exert a substantial but slow influence on blood flow. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41593-020-00793-2
The paper
Hartmann, D. A., Berthiaume, A.-A., Grant, R. I., Harrill, S. A., Koski, T., Tieu, T., McDowell, K. P., Faino, A. V., Kelly, A. L., & Shih, A. Y. (2021). Brain capillary pericytes exert a substantial but slow influence on blood flow. Nature Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00793-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.