Cited by 658Barrier Structure and Function StudiesAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Accelerated pericyte degeneration and blood–brain barrier breakdown in apolipoprotein E4 carriers with Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Halliday, Matthew R, Rege, Sanket V, Ma, Qingyi, Zhao, Zhen, Miller, Carol A, Winkler, Ethan A, Zlokovic, Berislav V·2016·Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism

Abstract

The blood–brain barrier (BBB) limits the entry of neurotoxic blood-derived products and cells into the brain that is required for normal neuronal functioning and information processing. Pericytes maintain the integrity of the BBB and degenerate in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The BBB is damaged in AD, particularly in individuals carrying apolipoprotein E4 ( APOE4) gene, which is a major genetic risk factor for late-onset AD. The mechanisms underlying the BBB breakdown in AD remain, however, elusive. Here, we show accelerated pericyte degeneration in AD APOE4 carriers >AD APOE3 carriers >non-AD controls, which correlates with the magnitude of BBB breakdown to immunoglobulin G and fibrin. We also show accumulation of the proinflammatory cytokine cyclophilin A (CypA) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in pericytes and endothelial cells in AD ( APOE4 > APOE3), previously shown to lead to BBB breakdown in transgenic APOE4 mice. The levels of the apoE lipoprotein receptor, low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-1 (LRP1), were similarly reduced in AD APOE4 and APOE3 carriers. Our data suggest that APOE4 leads to accelerated pericyte loss and enhanced activation of LRP1-dependent CypA–MMP-9 BBB-degrading pathway in pericytes and endothelial cells, which can mediate a greater BBB damage in AD APOE4 compared with AD APOE3 carriers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/jcbfm.2015.44

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Loss of pericytes is probably caused by increased expression of Fli-1 after activation.

    “The loss of pericytes is probably caused by increased expression of friend leukemia virus integration 1 (Fli-1) after being activated.503”

    From Role of neuroinflammation in neurodegeneration development (2023) · cites this paper as [503]

    The section on cyclophilin A and MMP-9 accumulation reports that pericyte loss correlates with activation of the CypA–MMP-9 pathway, but says the nature of that relationship cannot be determined from the postmortem analysis. It does not identify Fli-1 or support increased Fli-1 expression as the cause of pericyte loss. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Human APOE4 carriers compared with non-carriers develop accelerated BBB breakdown and pericyte degeneration, early neurovascular dysfunction, impaired cerebrovascular reactivity, and diminished regional BBB uptake of glucose.

    “Human APOE4 carriers compared with non-carriers develop accelerated BBB breakdown and pericyte degeneration (229, 230, 267, 516, 691, 702), early neurovascular dysfunction (494, 531, 584), impaired cerebrovascular reactivity (227, 568), and diminished regional BBB uptake of glucose (457, 486).”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [230]

    The Discussion reports accelerated pericyte degeneration and BBB breakdown in human AD APOE4 carriers compared with AD APOE3 carriers. The citing sentence omits the AD restriction, so this paper does not establish that finding for APOE4 carriers generally. Its other claims have separate citation groups and are not attributed to this source here. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These blood-derived proteins are often found colocalized with Aβ and are more pronounced in APOE4 carriers compared with noncarriers.

    “These blood-derived proteins are often found colocalized with A 𝛃 (267, 509, 527) and are more pronounced in APOE4 carriers compared with noncarriers (230, 267, 516, 691).”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [230]

    The Results section on accelerated blood–brain barrier breakdown reports greater fibrin deposits and extravascular IgG in AD APOE4 carriers than in AD APOE3 carriers. Our copy does not report that these proteins colocalize with Aβ, and the comparison is specifically among patients with Alzheimer’s disease, not carriers and noncarriers generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Post mortem studies show vascular capillary leakages of blood-derived proteins in the prefrontal and entorhinal cortex and hippocampus of AD patients including perivascular accumulation of fibrin(ogen), thrombin, albumin, immunoglobulin G, and iron-containing proteins such as hemosiderin.

    “Post mortem studies show vascular capillary leakages of blood-derived proteins in the prefrontal and entorhinal cortex and hippocampus of AD patients including perivascular accumulation of fibrin(ogen), thrombin, albumin, immunoglobulin G (IgG), and iron-containing proteins such as hemosiderin (120, 125, 230, 267, 412, 509, 527, 691).”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [230]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Alzheimer's disease, post mortem human studies show reduced capillary length and microvascular degeneration with diminished tight junction protein expression, capillary basement membrane alterations, and brain endothelial degeneration.

    “Further evidence of BBB breakdown in AD is repeatedly observed in numerous post mortem human studies showing reduced capillary length and microvascular degeneration with diminished TJ protein expression, capillary basement membrane alterations, and brain endothelial degeneration (36, 40, 230, 516, 527, 656).”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [230]

    The Results section on pericyte degeneration and microvascular reductions reports shorter total capillary length in post mortem AD samples, and the BBB breakdown section reports vascular leakage. The Discussion mentions tight-junction and basement-membrane protein degradation in APOE4 mice, not measurements of those changes in the human samples; the paper also does not establish brain endothelial degeneration in those samples. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halliday, M. R., Rege, S. V., Ma, Q., Zhao, Z., Miller, C. A., Winkler, E. A., & Zlokovic, B. V.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Center for Neurodegeneration and Regeneration, Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
Venue
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
Published
2015-03-11
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
216-227
ISSN
  • 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-7016
OpenAlex
W2055467683
Cited by
649
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 18
FWCI
21.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Scholars Repository - LLU (Loma Linda University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG023084, R01AG039452, R37AG023084, P50-AG05142, P50AG005142, R37AG23084, RF1AG039452)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R37NS034467, R01NS034467, R37NS34467)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, APOE ε4, blood-brain barrier disruption, pericyte degeneration, cyclophilin A, MMP-9, LRP1, IgG, fibrin, inflammatory cytokines, endothelial cells, APOE ε4 carriers
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alleles, Alzheimer Disease, Blood-Brain Barrier, Cell Count, Endothelium, Vascular, Female, Humans, Male, Cohort Studies, Protein Isoforms, Pericytes, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review