Cited by 561Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications

Large-scale deep multi-layer analysis of Alzheimer’s disease brain reveals strong proteomic disease-related changes not observed at the RNA level

Open access
Johnson, Erik C. B., Carter, E. Kathleen, Dammer, Eric B., Duong, Duc M., Gerasimov, Ekaterina S., Liu, Yue, Liu, Jiaqi, Betarbet, Ranjita +16 more·2022·Nature Neuroscience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract The biological processes that are disrupted in the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brain remain incompletely understood. In this study, we analyzed the proteomes of more than 1,000 brain tissues to reveal new AD-related protein co-expression modules that were highly preserved across cohorts and brain regions. Nearly half of the protein co-expression modules, including modules significantly altered in AD, were not observed in RNA networks from the same cohorts and brain regions, highlighting the proteopathic nature of AD. Two such AD-associated modules unique to the proteomic network included a module related to MAPK signaling and metabolism and a module related to the matrisome. The matrisome module was influenced by the APOE ε4 allele but was not related to the rate of cognitive decline after adjustment for neuropathology. By contrast, the MAPK/metabolism module was strongly associated with the rate of cognitive decline. Disease-associated modules unique to the proteome are sources of promising therapeutic targets and biomarkers for AD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41593-021-00999-y

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RNA-Seq offers an unbiased view of known and novel transcripts and has identified candidate hub genes within networks linked to lipid metabolism and innate immunity.

    “RNA-Seq offers an unbiased view of known and novel transcripts and has identified candidate “hub” genes within networks linked to lipid metabolism and innate immunity122,130,159,160.”

    From Artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics approaches in Alzheimer's disease: Progress, challenges, and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as [159]

    The Results section, “Modules Not Observed in Transcriptomic Networks” (page unavailable), reports RNA-seq analysis of 15,582 transcripts and construction of an Alzheimer’s disease RNA co-expression network. It does not say that RNA-seq identified hub genes in networks linked to lipid metabolism and innate immunity, or describe an unbiased view of known and novel transcripts. The hub proteins discussed in “TMT Consensus AD Protein Co-expression Network” were identified through proteomic analysis, not RNA-seq. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Integrating genomics, epigenomics, and transcriptomics within the same biological samples can yield highly informative insights into the molecular mechanisms of AD.

    “There is increasing recognition that integrating genomics, epigenomics, and transcriptomics within the same biological samples, a strategy commonly referred to as multi-omics integration, can yield highly informative insights into the molecular mechanisms of AD159,160.”

    From Artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics approaches in Alzheimer's disease: Progress, challenges, and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as [159]

    The Introduction describes analyzing genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics from cohorts with overlapping brain tissues, and the Discussion says integrating multiple omics levels improves understanding of AD. Our copy does not establish the claimed combination of genomics, epigenomics, and transcriptomics within the same samples; the study emphasizes proteomics rather than epigenomics. No page numbers are provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Multi-omics integration that combines genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic layers is creating more comprehensive models of AD biology.

    “Multi-omics integration that combines genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic layers is creating more comprehensive models of AD biology156,159,160.”

    From Artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics approaches in Alzheimer's disease: Progress, challenges, and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as [159]

    The Introduction says the AMP-AD Consortium uses genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiling to further understanding of AD. But the paper describes its own integrated analysis as genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic; it does not show a model combining all four layers, including metabolomics. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Proteomics and metabolomics directly capture functional endpoints such as proteins and metabolites, which often act as early indicators or amplifiers of disease progression.

    “Although genetic and transcriptomic studies have provided critical insights into AD, proteomics and metabolomics directly capture functional endpoints such as proteins and metabolites, which often act as early indicators or amplifiers of disease progression156,159.”

    From Artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics approaches in Alzheimer's disease: Progress, challenges, and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as [159]

    The Introduction (page not provided) describes proteins and the metabolic pathways they modulate as biological effectors of AD risk. The Discussion (page not provided) links protein modules to cognitive decline, but the study does not establish that proteins or metabolites often serve as early indicators of disease progression; it also does not directly analyze metabolites. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent advances in multi-omics technologies have enabled simultaneous profiling of genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and epigenomics within AD cohorts.

    “Recent advances in multi-omics technologies have enabled simultaneous profiling of genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and epigenomics within AD cohorts.”

    From Artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics approaches in Alzheimer's disease: Progress, challenges, and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as [159]

    The Introduction says the AMP-AD Consortium uses genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiling data, and describes this study’s analysis of genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data from AD cohorts. It does not establish simultaneous profiling of all five listed modalities or include epigenomics. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 116 · Cited by 561

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. [1]Karch CM & Goate AM Alzheimer’s disease risk genes and mechanisms of disease pathogenesis. Biol Psychiatry 77, 43– 51 (2015). 24951455 PMC4234692
  2. [4]Rauniyar N & Yates JR 3rd. Isobaric labeling-based relative quantification in shotgun proteomics. J Proteome Res 13, 5293– 5309 (2014). 25337643 PMC4261935
  3. [5]Ping L, Global quantitative analysis of the human brain proteome and phosphoproteome in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Data 7, 315 (2020). 32985496 PMC7522715
  4. [7]Johnson ECB, Large-scale proteomic analysis of Alzheimer’s disease brain and cerebrospinal fluid reveals early changes in energy metabolism associated with microglia and astrocyte activation. Nature medicine 26, 769– 780 (2020). PMC7405761 32284590
  5. [8]Bennett DA, The Rush Memory and Aging Project: study design and baseline characteristics of the study cohort. Neuroepidemiology 25, 163– 175 (2005). 16103727
  6. [9]Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Arvanitakis Z & Wilson RS Overview and findings from the religious orders study. Curr Alzheimer Res 9, 628– 645 (2012). 22471860 PMC3409291
  7. [10]Bennett DA, Overview and findings from the rush Memory and Aging Project. Curr Alzheimer Res 9, 646– 663 (2012). 22471867 PMC3439198
  8. [11]Beach TG, Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders and Brain and Body Donation Program. Neuropathology 35, 354– 389 (2015). 25619230 PMC4593391
  9. [13]Mirra SS, The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD). Part II. Standardization of the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 41, 479– 486 (1991). 2011243
  10. [17]Langfelder P & Horvath S WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 559 (2008). 19114008 PMC2631488
  11. [18]Choobdar S, Assessment of network module identification across complex diseases. Nat Methods 16, 843– 852 (2019). 31471613 PMC6719725
  12. [19]Tomasoni M, MONET: a toolbox integrating top-performing methods for network modularization. Bioinformatics 36, 3920– 3921 (2020). 32271874 PMC7320625
  13. [21]Naba A, The matrisome: in silico definition and in vivo characterization by proteomics of normal and tumor extracellular matrices. Mol Cell Proteomics 11, M111 014647 (2012). PMC3322572 22159717
  14. [23]Ping L, Global quantitative analysis of the human brain proteome in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Disease. Sci Data 5, 180036 (2018). 29533394 PMC5848788
  15. [25]Braak H, Thal DR, Ghebremedhin E & Del Tredici K Stages of the pathologic process in Alzheimer disease: age categories from 1 to 100 years. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 70, 960– 969 (2011). 22002422
  16. [26]Uribe C, Cortical atrophy patterns in early Parkinson’s disease patients using hierarchical cluster analysis. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 50, 3– 9 (2018). 29449187
  17. [27]Gorges M, Longitudinal brain atrophy distribution in advanced Parkinson’s disease: What makes the difference in “cognitive status” converters? Hum Brain Mapp 41, 1416– 1434 (2020). 31789477 PMC7267933
  18. [28]Zhang B, Proteogenomic characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature 513, 382– 387 (2014). 25043054 PMC4249766
  19. [29]Mertins P, Proteogenomics connects somatic mutations to signalling in breast cancer. Nature 534, 55– 62 (2016). 27251275 PMC5102256
  20. [30]Drummond E, Proteomic differences in amyloid plaques in rapidly progressive and sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol 133, 933– 954 (2017). 28258398 PMC5503748
  21. [31]Drummond E, Phosphorylated tau interactome in the human Alzheimer’s disease brain. Brain 143, 2803– 2817 (2020). 32812023 PMC7526722
  22. [32]Bruggink KA, Dickkopf-related protein 3 is a potential Abeta-associated protein in Alzheimer’s Disease. J Neurochem 134, 1152– 1162 (2015). 26119087
  23. [33]Esteve P, Elevated levels of Secreted-Frizzled-Related-Protein 1 contribute to Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. Nat Neurosci 22, 1258– 1268 (2019). 31308530
  24. [34]Wisniewski T, HB-GAM is a cytokine present in Alzheimer’s and Down’s syndrome lesions. Neuroreport 7, 667– 671 (1996). 8730853
  25. [35]Lassmann H, Synaptic pathology in Alzheimer’s disease: immunological data for markers of synaptic and large dense-core vesicles. Neuroscience 46, 1– 8 (1992). 1594095
  26. [36]Chalmers KA & Love S Neurofibrillary tangles may interfere with Smad 2/3 signaling in neurons. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 66, 158– 167 (2007). 17279001
  27. [38]Hondius DC, Proteomics analysis identifies new markers associated with capillary cerebral amyloid angiopathy in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun 6, 46 (2018). 29860944 PMC5985582
  28. [39]de Leeuw CA, Mooij JM, Heskes T & Posthuma D MAGMA: generalized gene-set analysis of GWAS data. PLoS Comput Biol 11, e1004219 (2015). 25885710 PMC4401657
  29. [40]Seyfried NT, A Multi-network Approach Identifies Protein-Specific Co-expression in Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Alzheimer’s Disease. Cell Syst 4, 60– 72 e64 (2017). 27989508 PMC5269514
  30. [42]Higginbotham L, Integrated proteomics reveals brain-based cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in asymptomatic and symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Adv 6 (2020). PMC7577712 33087358
  31. [45]Uren A, Secreted frizzled-related protein-1 binds directly to Wingless and is a biphasic modulator of Wnt signaling. J Biol Chem 275, 4374– 4382 (2000). 10660608
  32. [46]Esteve P, SFRPs act as negative modulators of ADAM10 to regulate retinal neurogenesis. Nat Neurosci 14, 562– 569 (2011). 21478884
  33. [49]Minhas PS, Restoring metabolism of myeloid cells reverses cognitive decline in ageing. Nature 590, 122– 128 (2021). 33473210 PMC8274816
  34. [50]Bennett DA, Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project. Journal of Alzheimer’s disease: JAD 64, S161– S189 (2018). 29865057 PMC6380522
  35. [51]Ince PG, Lowe J & Shaw PJ Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: current issues in classification, pathogenesis and molecular pathology. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 24, 104– 117 (1998). 9634206
  36. [52]Balsis S, Benge JF, Lowe DA, Geraci L & Doody RS How Do Scores on the ADAS-Cog, MMSE, and CDR-SOB Correspond? Clin Neuropsychol 29, 1002– 1009 (2015). 26617181
  37. [53]Pichler P, Peptide labeling with isobaric tags yields higher identification rates using iTRAQ 4-plex compared to TMT 6-plex and iTRAQ 8-plex on LTQ Orbitrap. Anal Chem 82, 6549– 6558 (2010). 20593797 PMC3093924
  38. [54]Mertins P, Reproducible workflow for multiplexed deep-scale proteome and phosphoproteome analysis of tumor tissues by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Nat Protoc 13, 1632– 1661 (2018). 29988108 PMC6211289
  39. [55]Wingo TS, Integrating Next-Generation Genomic Sequencing and Mass Spectrometry To Estimate Allele-Specific Protein Abundance in Human Brain. J Proteome Res 16, 3336– 3347 (2017). 28691493 PMC5698003
  40. [59]Sieberts SK, Large eQTL meta-analysis reveals differing patterns between cerebral cortical and cerebellar brain regions. Sci Data 7, 340 (2020). 33046718 PMC7550587
  41. [60]Ritchie ME, limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res 43, e47 (2015). 25605792 PMC4402510
  42. [61]Law CW, Chen Y, Shi W & Smyth GK voom: Precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biol 15, R29 (2014). 24485249 PMC4053721
  43. [63]Pearson K On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philos Mag 2, 559– 572 (1901).
  44. [64]Miller JA, Woltjer RL, Goodenbour JM, Horvath S & Geschwind DH Genes and pathways underlying regional and cell type changes in Alzheimer’s disease. Genome Med 5, 48 (2013). 23705665 PMC3706780
  45. [65]Newman ME Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 69, 066133 (2004). 15244693
  46. [67]McKenzie AT, Multiscale network modeling of oligodendrocytes reveals molecular components of myelin dysregulation in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener 12, 82 (2017). 29110684 PMC5674813
  47. [71]De Jager PL, A multi-omic atlas of the human frontal cortex for aging and Alzheimer’s disease research. Sci Data 5, 180142 (2018). 30084846 PMC6080491
  48. [72]Wingo AP, Integrating human brain proteomes with genome-wide association data implicates new proteins in Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. Nat Genet 53, 143– 146 (2021). 33510477 PMC8130821
  49. [73]Manichaikul A, Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 26, 2867– 2873 (2010). 20926424 PMC3025716
  50. [75]Das S, Next-generation genotype imputation service and methods. Nat Genet 48, 1284– 1287 (2016). 27571263 PMC5157836
  51. [76]Wilson RS, Late-life depression is not associated with dementia-related pathology. Neuropsychology 30, 135– 142 (2016). 26237627 PMC4740262

Authors
Johnson, E. C. B., Carter, E. K., Dammer, E. B., Duong, D. M., Gerasimov, E. S., Liu, Y., Liu, J., Betarbet, R., Ping, L., Yin, L., Serrano, G. E., Beach, T. G., Peng, J., De Jager, P. L., Haroutunian, V., Zhang, B., Gaiteri, C., Bennett, D. A., Gearing, M., Wingo, T. S., Wingo, A. P., Lah, J. J., Levey, A. I., & Seyfried, N. T.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Banner Sun Health Research Institute (US)
  • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US)
  • James J. Peters VA Medical Center (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Johnson, Erik C. B.
  • Levey, Allan I.
  • Seyfried, Nicholas T.
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2022-02
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
213-225
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W4210381047
Cited by
561
References
116
Citations by year
2026: 98 · 2025: 138 · 2024: 145 · 2023: 127 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 4
FWCI
74.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (K08AG068604, P30AG19610, RF1AG057440, U01AG046170, R01AG057911, P30AG10161, R01AG15819, R01AG17917, U01AG61356, R01AG056533, U54AG065187, U01AG061357, RF1AG057470, R01AG01581, R01AG061800, R01AG053960, RF1AG062181)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U24NS072026)
  • Arizona Department of Health Services (211002)
  • ADHS | Arizona Biomedical Research Commission (4001, 0011, 05-901 and 1001)
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (BX005219)
  • Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, brain proteome, proteomic networks, RNA networks, proteinopathies, MAPK signaling, metabolism, matrisome, APOE ε4, cognitive decline, therapeutic target, biomarkers
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Humans, RNA, Proteome, Proteomics, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review