Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Blood–brain-barrier organoids for investigating the permeability of CNS therapeutics

Open access
Bergmann, Sonja, Lawler, Sean E., Qu, Yuan, Fadzen, Colin M., Wolfe, Justin M., Regan, Michael S., Pentelute, Bradley L., Agar, Nathalie Y. R., Cho, Choi-Fong·2018·Nature Protocols

Abstract

In vitro models of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) are critical tools for the study of BBB transport and the development of drugs that can reach the CNS. Brain endothelial cells grown in culture are often used to model the BBB; however, it is challenging to maintain reproducible BBB properties and function. ‘BBB organoids’ are obtained following coculture of endothelial cells, pericytes and astrocytes under low-adhesion conditions. These organoids reproduce many features of the BBB, including the expression of tight junctions, molecular transporters and drug efflux pumps, and hence can be used to model drug transport across the BBB. This protocol provides a comprehensive description of the techniques required to culture and maintain BBB organoids. We also describe two separate detection approaches that can be used to analyze drug penetration into the organoids: confocal fluorescence microscopy and mass spectrometry imaging. Using our protocol, BBB organoids can be established within 2–3 d. An additional day is required to analyze drug permeability. The BBB organoid platform represents an accurate, versatile and cost-effective in vitro tool. It can easily be scaled to a high-throughput format, offering a tool for BBB modeling that could accelerate therapeutic discovery for the treatment of various neuropathologies. Endothelial cells, pericytes and astrocytes are cocultured to generate organoids that reproduce many features of the blood–brain barrier. This protocol also describes how to analyze drug penetration into the organoids.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41596-018-0066-x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Bergmann, S., Lawler, S. E., Qu, Y., Fadzen, C. M., Wolfe, J. M., Regan, M. S., Pentelute, B. L., Agar, N. Y. R., & Cho, C.-F.
Venue
Nature Protocols
Published
2018-10-31
Volume
13
Issue
12
Pages
2827-2843
ISSN
  • 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2189
OpenAlex
W2898829113
Cited by
285
References
33
FWCI
8.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blood–brain-barrier organoids for investigating the permeability of CNS therapeutics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41596-018-0066-x
The paper
Bergmann, S., Lawler, S. E., Qu, Y., Fadzen, C. M., Wolfe, J. M., Regan, M. S., Pentelute, B. L., Agar, N. Y. R., & Cho, C.-F. (2018). Blood–brain-barrier organoids for investigating the permeability of CNS therapeutics. Nature Protocols. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-018-0066-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.