Cited by 292Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGene expression and cancer classification

MARS-seq2.0: an experimental and analytical pipeline for indexed sorting combined with single-cell RNA sequencing

Keren-Shaul, Hadas, Kenigsberg, Ephraim, Jaitin, Diego Adhemar, David, Eyal, Paul, Franziska, Tanay, Amos, Amit, Ido·2019·Nature Protocols

Abstract

Human tissues comprise trillions of cells that populate a complex space of molecular phenotypes and functions and that vary in abundance by 4-9 orders of magnitude. Relying solely on unbiased sampling to characterize cellular niches becomes infeasible, as the marginal utility of collecting more cells diminishes quickly. Furthermore, in many clinical samples, the relevant cell types are scarce and efficient processing is critical. We developed an integrated pipeline for index sorting and massively parallel single-cell RNA sequencing (MARS-seq2.0) that builds on our previously published MARS-seq approach. MARS-seq2.0 is based on >1 million cells sequenced with this pipeline and allows identification of unique cell types across different tissues and diseases, as well as unique model systems and organisms. Here, we present a detailed step-by-step procedure for applying the method. In the improved procedure, we combine sub-microliter reaction volumes, optimization of enzymatic mixtures and an enhanced analytical pipeline to substantially lower the cost, improve reproducibility and reduce well-to-well contamination. Data analysis combines multiple layers of quality assessment and error detection and correction, graphically presenting key statistics for library complexity, noise distribution and sequencing saturation. Importantly, our combined FACS and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) workflow enables intuitive approaches for depletion or enrichment of cell populations in a da…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41596-019-0164-4

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keren-Shaul, H., Kenigsberg, E., Jaitin, D. A., David, E., Paul, F., Tanay, A., & Amit, I.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
Corresponding author
  • Tanay, Amos
  • Amit, Ido
Venue
Nature Protocols
Published
2019-05-17
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
1841-1862
ISSN
  • 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2189
OpenAlex
W2945489451
Cited by
292
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 4
FWCI
10.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Protocols (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Nature
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
Keywords
single-cell RNA sequencing, FACS cell sorting, cell type annotation, rare cell populations, library complexity
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Flow Cytometry, Humans, RNA, Software, Reproducibility of Results, Gene Library, Gene Expression Profiling, Mice, Workflow, Single-Cell Analysis, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review