Cited by 1,342Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

Reconstructing lineage hierarchies of the distal lung epithelium using single-cell RNA-seq

Open access
Treutlein, Barbara, Brownfield, Doug G., Wu, Angela R., Neff, Norma F., Mantalas, Gary L., Espinoza, F. Hernan, Desai, Tushar J., Krasnow, Mark A. +1 more·2014·Nature

Abstract

The mammalian lung is a highly branched network in which the distal regions of the bronchial tree transform during development into a densely packed honeycomb of alveolar air sacs that mediate gas exchange. Although this transformation has been studied by marker expression analysis and fate-mapping, the mechanisms that control the progression of lung progenitors along distinct lineages into mature alveolar cell types are still incompletely known, in part because of the limited number of lineage markers and the effects of ensemble averaging in conventional transcriptome analysis experiments on cell populations. Here we show that single-cell transcriptome analysis circumvents these problems and enables direct measurement of the various cell types and hierarchies in the developing lung. We used microfluidic single-cell RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) on 198 individual cells at four different stages encompassing alveolar differentiation to measure the transcriptional states which define the developmental and cellular hierarchy of the distal mouse lung epithelium. We empirically classified cells into distinct groups by using an unbiased genome-wide approach that did not require a priori knowledge of the underlying cell types or the previous purification of cell populations. The results confirmed the basic outlines of the classical model of epithelial cell-type diversity in the distal lung and led to the discovery of many previously unknown cell-type markers, including transcriptional regulators that discriminate between the different populations. We reconstructed the molecular steps during maturation of bipotential progenitors along both alveolar lineages and elucidated the full life cycle of the alveolar type 2 cell lineage. This single-cell genomics approach is applicable to any developing or mature tissue to robustly delineate molecularly distinct cell types, define progenitors and lineage hierarchies, and identify lineage-specific regulatory factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature13173

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]Dalerba P Single-cell dissection of transcriptional heterogeneity in human colon tumors Nat. Biotechnol 2011 29 1120 1127 22081019 PMC3237928
  2. [7]Trapnell C Pachter L Salzberg SL TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq Bioinformatics 2009 25 1105 1111 19289445 PMC2672628
  3. [11]Wu AR Quantitative assessment of single-cell RNA-sequencing methods Nature Methods 2013 PMC4022966 24141493
  4. [16]Huang DW Sherman BT Lempicki RA Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources Nature Protocols 2009 4 44 57 19131956

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Treutlein, B., Brownfield, D. G., Wu, A. R., Neff, N. F., Mantalas, G. L., Espinoza, F. H., Desai, T. J., Krasnow, M. A., & Quake, S. R.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Desai, Tushar J.
  • Krasnow, Mark A.
  • Quake, Stephen R.
Venue
Nature
Published
2014-04-13
Volume
509
Issue
7500
Pages
371-375
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2068881679
Cited by
1,342
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 97 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 120 · 2020: 134 · 2019: 146 · 2018: 161 · 2017: 155 · 2016: 137 · 2015: 106 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
57.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K08HL084095, U01HL099995, U01HL099999)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (T32HD007249)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
distal lung epithelium, lung development, alveolar progenitor cells, alveolar type II cells, alveolar type I cells, cell type markers, lineage hierarchy, alveolar differentiation, transcription factors, mouse lung
MeSH terms
Animals, Bronchi, Cell Differentiation, Epithelial Cells, Female, Genetic Markers, Lung, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Pulmonary Alveoli, Pulmonary Gas Exchange, Stem Cells, Genome, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Cell Lineage, Genomics, Mice, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review