The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The HDOCK server for integrated protein–protein docking
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
The Amber biomolecular simulation programs
Case, D. A., Cheatham, T. E., Darden, T., Gohlke, H., Luo, R., Merz, K. M., Onufriev, A., Simmerling, C., Wang, B., & Woods, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20290 · Cited by 9,535
The I-TASSER Suite: protein structure and function prediction
Yang, J., Yan, R., Roy, A., Xu, D., Poisson, J., & Zhang, Y. (2015) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3213 · Cited by 5,596
HADDOCK: A Protein−Protein Docking Approach Based on Biochemical or Biophysical Information
Dominguez, C., Boelens, R., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2003) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja026939x · Cited by 3,187
Comparative Protein Structure Modeling of Genes and Genomes
Martí-Renom, M. A., Stuart, A. C., Fiser, A., Sánchez, R., Melo, F., & Šali, A. (2000) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.291 · Cited by 3,169
HHblits: lightning-fast iterative protein sequence searching by HMM-HMM alignment
Remmert, M., Biegert, A., Hauser, A., & Söding, J. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1818 · Cited by 2,288
How significant is a protein structure similarity with TM-score = 0.5?
Xu, J., & Zhang, Y. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq066 · Cited by 1,142
CAPRI: A Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions
Janin, J., Henrick, K., Moult, J., Eyck, L. T., Sternberg, M. J. E., Vajda, S., Vakser, I., & Wodak, S. J. (2003) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10381 · Cited by 703
Sequence co-evolution gives 3D contacts and structures of protein complexes
Hopf, T. A., Schärfe, C. P. I., Rodrigues, J. P. G. L. M., Green, A. G., Kohlbacher, O., Sander, C., Bonvin, A. M. J. J., & Marks, D. S. (2014) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.03430 · Cited by 515
NGL viewer: web-based molecular graphics for large complexes
Rose, A. S., Bradley, A. R., Valasatava, Y., Duarte, J. M., Prlić, A., & Rose, P. W. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty419 · Cited by 489
Protein-Protein Docking: From Interaction to Interactome
Vakser, I. A. (2014) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2014.08.033 · Cited by 318 · cited 2×
“Optional buttons on the right (3) can control the NGL viewer to visualize the binding model on the left (4).”
BackgroundBlind prediction of homo- and hetero-protein complexes: the CASP13-CAPRI experiment
Lensink, M. F., Brysbaert, G., Nadzirin, N., Velankar, S., Chaleil, R. A. G., Gerguri, T., Bates, P. A., Laine, E., Carbone, A., Grudinin, S., et al. (2019) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25838 · Cited by 122
Self-citationNithin, C., Ghosh, P., & Bujnicki, J. M. (2018) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes9090432 · Cited by 48
Cited by
Enhancing alphafold-multimer-based protein complex structure prediction with MULTICOM in CASP15
Liu, J., Guo, Z., Wu, T., Roy, R. S., Quadir, F., Chen, C., & Cheng, J. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-05525-3 · Cited by 86
Barh, D., Tiwari, S., Rodrigues Gomes, L. G., Ramalho Pinto, C. H., Andrade, B. S., Ahmad, S., Aljabali, A. A. A., Alzahrani, K. J., Banjer, H. J., Hassan, S. S., et al. (2023) · Inflammation · doi:10.1007/s10753-022-01734-w · Cited by 50
Arf GTPase activates the WAVE regulatory complex through a distinct binding site
Yang, S., Tang, Y., Liu, Y., Brown, A. J., Schaks, M., Ding, B., Kramer, D. A., Mietkowska, M., Ding, L., Alekhina, O., et al. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.add1412 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Yan, Y., Tao, H., He, J., & Huang, S.-Y.
- Venue
- Nature Protocols
- Published
- 2020-04-08
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1829-1852
- ISSN
- 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-2189
- OpenAlex
- W3015438624
- Cited by
- 1,857
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 43.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
