The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tutorial: guidance for quantitative confocal microscopy
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis
Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., Preibisch, S., Rueden, C., Saalfeld, S., Schmid, B., et al. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019 · Cited by 66,890
International Organization for Standardization
(2011) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_16847 · Cited by 12,534
QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis
Bankhead, P., Loughrey, M. B., Fernández, J. A., Dombrowski, Y., McArt, D. G., Dunne, P. D., McQuaid, S., Gray, R. T., Murray, L. J., Coleman, H. G., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-17204-5 · Cited by 8,908
A guided tour into subcellular colocalization analysis in light microscopy
BOLTE, S., & CORDELIÈRES, F. P. (2006) · Journal of Microscopy · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2818.2006.01706.x · Cited by 5,324
Optical properties of biological tissues: A review
Jacques, S. L. (2013) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/58/11/r37 · Cited by 4,008
Nonlinear magic: multiphoton microscopy in the biosciences
Zipfel, W. R., Williams, R. M., & Webb, W. W. (2003) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt899 · Cited by 3,893
TrackMate: An open and extensible platform for single-particle tracking
Tinevez, J.-Y., Perry, N., Schindelin, J., Hoopes, G. M., Reynolds, G. D., Laplantine, E., Bednarek, S. Y., Shorte, S. L., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2017) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.09.016 · Cited by 3,380
Moving to a World Beyond “ p < 0.05”
Wasserstein, R. L., Schirm, A. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2019) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913 · Cited by 2,976
Trainable Weka Segmentation: a machine learning tool for microscopy pixel classification
Arganda-Carreras, I., Kaynig, V., Rueden, C., Eliceiri, K. W., Schindelin, J., Cardona, A., & Sebastian Seung, H. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx180 · Cited by 2,424
Direct observation of individual endogenous protein complexes in situ by proximity ligation
Söderberg, O., Gullberg, M., Jarvius, M., Ridderstråle, K., Leuchowius, K.-J., Jarvius, J., Wester, K., Hydbring, P., Bahram, F., Larsson, L.-G., et al. (2006) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth947 · Cited by 2,419
Cited by
From Donor to the Lab: A Fascinating Journey of Primary Cell Lines
Richter, M., Piwocka, O., Musielak, M., Piotrowski, I., Suchorska, W. M., & Trzeciak, T. (2021) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.711381 · Cited by 174
Metadata
- Authors
- Jonkman, J., Brown, C. M., Wright, G. D., Anderson, K. I., & North, A. J.
- Venue
- Nature Protocols
- Published
- 2020-03-31
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1585-1611
- ISSN
- 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-2189
- OpenAlex
- W3014687364
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 90
- FWCI
- 22.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tutorial: guidance for quantitative confocal microscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41596-020-0313-9
- The paper
- Jonkman, J., Brown, C. M., Wright, G. D., Anderson, K. I., & North, A. J. (2020). Tutorial: guidance for quantitative confocal microscopy. Nature Protocols. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-020-0313-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
