Cited by 37Recycling and Waste Management TechniquesEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityPhotovoltaic Systems and Sustainability

Disassembly-based bill of materials data for consumer electronic products

Open access
Babbitt, Callie W., Madaka, Hema, Althaf, Shahana, Kasulaitis, Barbara, Ryen, Erinn G.·2020·Scientific Data

Abstract

Consumer electronic products have a complex life cycle, characterized by environmental, social, and economic impacts and benefits associated with their manufacturing, use, and disposal at end-of-life. Accurately analysing these trade-offs and creating sustainable solutions requires data about the materials and components that make up these devices. Such information is rarely disclosed by manufacturers and only exists in the open literature in disparate case study format. This study presents a comprehensive database of bill of material (BOM) data describing the mass of major materials and components contained in 95 unique consumer electronic products. Data are generated by product disassembly and physical characterization and then validated against external benchmarks in the literature. The study also contributes a reproducible framework for organizing BOM data so that they can be expanded as new products enter the market. These data will benefit researchers studying all aspects of electronics and sustainability, including material scarcity, product design, environmental life cycle assessment, electronic waste policy, and environmental health and safety.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41597-020-0573-9

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [13]Huisman, J., Magalini, F., Kuehr, R. & Maurer, C. 2008 Review of Directive 2002/96 on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE), Final Report. Study No. 07010401/2006/442493/ETU/G4 (United Nations University, 2008).
  2. [26]Babbitt CW Madaka H Althaf S Kasulaitis B Ryen EG 2020 Data for: Material composition of consumer electronics figshare 10.6084/m9.figshare.11306792.v4 PMC7393088 32732912 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Babbitt, C. W., Madaka, H., Althaf, S., Kasulaitis, B., & Ryen, E. G.
Affiliations
  • Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
  • Finger Lakes Community College (US)
  • Wells College (US)
Corresponding author
Babbitt, Callie W.
Venue
Scientific Data
Published
2020-07-30
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
251-251
ISSN
2052-4463 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3046262883
Cited by
37
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3
Type
data paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Data (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (CBET-1254688, CBET-1236447)
  • Consumer Technology Association
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
Keywords
bill of materials, consumer electronics, product disassembly, electronic components, material shortages, electronic waste, life cycle assessment, product design, environmental health and safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review