Cited by 53Cancer Research and TreatmentsGenetically Modified Organisms ResearchBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Use of genetically modified bacteria for drug delivery in humans: Revisiting the safety aspect

Open access
Wegmann, Udo, Carvalho, Ana Lucia, Stocks, Martin, Carding, Simon R.·2017·Scientific Reports

Abstract

The use of live, genetically modified bacteria as delivery vehicles for biologics is of considerable interest scientifically and has attracted significant commercial investment. We have pioneered the use of the commensal gut bacterium Bacteroides ovatus for the oral delivery of therapeutics to the gastrointestinal tract. Here we report on our investigations of the biological safety of engineered B . ovatus bacteria that includes the use of thymineless death as a containment strategy and the potential for the spread of transgenes in vivo in the mammalian gastrointestinal tract. We demonstrate the ability of GM-strains of Bacteroides to survive thymine starvation and overcome it through the exchange of genetic material. We also provide evidence for horizontal gene transfer in the mammalian gastrointestinal tract resulting in transgene-carrying wild type bacteria. These findings sound a strong note of caution on the employment of live genetically modified bacteria for the delivery of biologics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-017-02591-6

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bacteroides ovatus transferred modified genes to resident bacteria and acquired genes enabling survival in the mice gut within 72 hours, despite a biological kill switch.

    “Simon Carding’s team found that Bacteroides ovatus transferred the modified genes to resident bacteria and acquired genes enabling survival in the mice gut within 72 hours, despite the biological “kill switch” that was built to prevent the microbes from surviving in vitro.18,19”

    From Gut microbiota drives structural variation of exogenous probiotics to enhance colonization (2025) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Results and Discussion section reports gene transfer in the murine gut between genetically modified and wild-type B. ovatus that were both administered to the mice; the resulting bacteria could grow without thymidine, circumventing the engineered safety measure. It does not show transfer to resident gut bacteria. Its 72-hour result concerns survival in an in vitro viability test, not the timing of gene transfer in mice (page numbers unavailable in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]Syvanen, M. & Kado, C. I. Horizontal Gene Transfer, Edn. 2nd (Academic Press, San Diego, 2002).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wegmann, U., Carvalho, A. L., Stocks, M., & Carding, S. R.
Affiliations
  • Norwich Research Park (GB)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Carding, Simon R.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2017-05-23
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
2294-2294
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2614903907
Cited by
53
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council ((BB/J004529/1, J004529, BB/L004291/1, L004291)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Cancer Research and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
engineered bacteria, Bacteroides ovatus, thymineless death, transgene containment, horizontal gene transfer, biosafety
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacteroides, Genetic Engineering, Humans, Drug Delivery Systems, Transgenes, Gene Transfer, Horizontal, Gastrointestinal Tract, Microbial Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review