Cited by 117Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthNatural Antidiabetic Agents Studies

Using probiotics for type 2 diabetes mellitus intervention: Advances, questions, and potential

Sun, Zhongke, Sun, Xuejiao, Li, Juan, Li, Zhaoyang, Hu, Qingwei, Li, Lili, Hao, Xinqi, Song, Maoping +1 more·2020·Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has become one of the most prevalent diseases on earth and several treatments have been developed. However, the current intervention approaches have not been as effective as expected. One promising supplementary strategy is the use of probiotics through direct or indirect approaches. Probiotics are microbial food cultures conferring health-promoting properties. In this review, we summarized the current theories and mechanisms of T2DM intervention using probiotics and hypothesize that probiotics intervene T2DM during its onsetting, developing, and complicating. For the first time, we comprehensively analyzed T2DM intervention in animal models using both wide-type probiotics in different forms and using recombinant probiotics. Then, probiotic intervention in T2DM patients was reviewed and the main results were compared with that obtained from animal studies. Finally yet importantly, remaining questions that are important such as in which form and in which state, as well as the future potential of probiotic intervention in T2DM were discussed from a perspective of food microbiologists. In conclusion, probiotic intervention in T2DM is promising but there are still many important issues unsolved yet. Critical review of the advances, questions, and potential of probiotic intervention in T2DM promotes the development of this approach for further application in humans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10408398.2018.1547268

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, Z., Sun, X., Li, J., Li, Z., Hu, Q., Li, L., Hao, X., Song, M., & Li, C.
Affiliations
  • Zhengzhou University (CN)
  • Zhoukou Normal University (CN)
  • Zhoukou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Zhoukou, China;
  • College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China;
Corresponding author
Li, Chengwei
Venue
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Published
2019-01-11
Volume
60
Issue
4
Pages
670-683
ISSN
  • 1040-8398 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7852
OpenAlex
W2909920335
Cited by
117
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Henan Province Science and Technology Agency (172102410055)
  • the Education Department of Henan Province (17A180017)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, probiotics, probiotic intervention, recombinant probiotics, animal models of diabetes, diabetes complications, gut microbiota, prebiotics, functional foods, diabetes prevention
MeSH terms
Animals, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Probiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review