Cited by 32Syphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentInfectious Diseases and TuberculosisBacterial Infections and Vaccines

Serological response predicts normalization of cerebrospinal fluid abnormalities at six months after treatment in HIV-negative neurosyphilis patients.

Open access
Xiao, Yao, Tong, Man-Li, Lin, Li-Rong, Liu, Li-Li, Gao, Kun, Chen, Mei-Jun, Zhang, Hui-Lin, Zheng, Wei-Hong +5 more·2017·Scientific Reports

Abstract

This study aimed to determine whether a serological response could predict the normalization of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) abnormalities at 6 months after treatment in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative neurosyphilis patients. A total of 123 neurosyphilis patients were recruited at baseline, 58 of these patients undergoing treatment, repeated CSF examinations and serological tests for syphilis at 6 months after treatment were included in the follow-up study. Before treatment, the CSF rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titer, CSF Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) titer, CSF leukocyte count, and CSF protein concentration were correlated with both serum RPR and TPPA titers. At 6 months after treatment, 28 and nine patients achieved serological responses of RPR and TPPA tests, respectively. The sensitivities of the serological response of RPR and TPPA tests for identifying the normalization of CSF abnormalities were 60.0∼83.3% and 17.1~22.2%, respectively; and 75.0∼91.3% of patients showing serological response of RPR test also achieved CSF normalization, suggesting that the serological response could predict CSF normalization to some degree. Particularly, in patients with ≥8-fold decreases in the serum RPR titer, the CSF RPR, CSF leukocyte count, and CSF protein concentration had normalized, and follow-up lumbar puncture could be reduced considering the resolution of neurological symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-017-10387-x

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among immunocompetent persons and persons with HIV infection on effective ART, normalization of serum RPR titer predicts normalization of abnormal CSF parameters after neurosyphilis treatment.

    “Data from two studies indicate that, among immunocompetent persons and persons with HIV infection who are on effective ART, normalization of the serum RPR titer predicts normalization of abnormal CSF parameters after neurosyphilis treatment (614,615).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [615]

    The Discussion reports that a serum RPR response predicted normalization of CSF abnormalities after treatment in HIV-negative patients, especially those with a ≥8-fold titer decrease. It also describes a prior study involving HIV-infected patients, but does not establish that those patients were on effective ART. This source therefore supports the HIV-negative finding, not the claim’s ART-qualified finding. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xiao, Y., Tong, M.-L., Lin, L.-R., Liu, L.-L., Gao, K., Chen, M.-J., Zhang, H.-L., Zheng, W.-H., Li, S.-L., Lin, H.-L., Lin, Z.-F., Yang, T.-C., & Niu, J.-J.
Affiliations
  • Fujian Medical University (CN)
  • Xiamen University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yang, Tian-Ci
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2017-08-30
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
9911-9911
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2748955003
Cited by
32
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2014D001)
  • Fujian Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission
  • Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (2014D001, 2016 J01628)
  • National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (2014D001)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
Keywords
neurosyphilis, HIV-negative, serological response, cerebrospinal fluid abnormalities, RPR, TPPA, treatment response prediction, cerebrospinal fluid protein, CSF leukocyte count
MeSH terms
Adult, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Ceftriaxone, Inclusion Bodies, Doxycycline, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neurosyphilis, Penicillins, Serologic Tests, Syphilis Serodiagnosis, Time Factors, Treponema pallidum, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review