Cited by 11Insect Resistance and GeneticsGenetically Modified Organisms ResearchInsect-Plant Interactions and Control

Effects of purified or plant-produced Cry proteins on Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae) larvae

Open access
Haller, Simone, Romeis, Jörg, Meissle, Michael·2017·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Although genetically engineered crops producing insecticidal Cry proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) are grown worldwide, few studies cover effects of Bt crops or Cry proteins on dipteran species in an agricultural context. We tested the toxicity of six purified Cry proteins and of Bt cotton and Bt maize tissue on Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae) as a surrogate for decomposing Diptera. ELISA confirmed the presence of Cry proteins in plant material, artificial diet, and fly larvae, and concentrations were estimated. Median concentrations in emerging adult flies were below the limit of detection. Bioactivity of purified Cry proteins in the diet was confirmed by sensitive species assays using Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Purified Cry1Ab, Cry1Ac, Cry1B, Cry1C, Cry1F, or Cry2Aa, or leaf material from stacked Bt cotton (Bollgard II producing Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab) or Bt maize (SmartStax producing Cry1A.105, Cry1Fa2, Cry2Ab2, Cry3Bb1, Cry34Ab1 and Cry35Ab1) had no consistent effects on D. melanogaster survival, developmental time, adult body mass or morphometrics. However, D. melanogaster showed longer developmental time and smaller wing size when fed with cotton leaves from plants infested with H. virescens caterpillars compared to flies fed with leaves from uninfested plants, while no such effects were obvious for maize.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-017-10801-4

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pyramided insecticidal proteins typically act additively in sensitive species and cause no unexpected effects in species not sensitive to individual toxins.

    “The available data indicate that these pyramided insecticidal proteins typically act additively in sensitive species and cause no unexpected effects in species that are not sensitive to the individual toxins (Graser et al., 2017;Guo et al., 2016;Haller et al. 2017;Kumar et al., 2014;Levine et al., 2016;Raybould et al., 2012;Shu et al., 2018;Su et al., 2015;Svobodová et al., 2017;Tian et al., 2014T”

    From Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019) · cites this paper as Haller et al. 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]Teackle, R.E., Jensen, J.M. Heliothis punctiger. In: Handbook of Insect Rearing Vol. II. Pp. 313-322. Singh, P., Moore, R.F., ed., Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. Amsterdam, The Netherlands (1985).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haller, S., Romeis, J., & Meissle, M.
Affiliations
Agroscope (CH)
Corresponding author
Meissle, Michael
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2017-09-11
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
11172-11172
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2752080179
Cited by
11
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Universität Basel
  • European Food Safety Authority
  • Agroscope
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Keywords
Cry proteins, Bacillus thuringiensis, Bt cotton, Bt maize, Drosophila melanogaster, non-target effects, insecticidal proteins, Heliothis virescens, larval development, wing size, development time, plant-insect interactions, Bollgard II, genetically modified crops
MeSH terms
Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins, Animals, Bacterial Proteins, Biological Assay, Zea mays, Gossypium, Drosophila melanogaster, Endotoxins, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Hemolysin Proteins, Larva, Lepidoptera, Survival Analysis, Plants, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review