Cited by 61Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

A novel quantification-driven proteomic strategy identifies an endogenous peptide of pleiotrophin as a new biomarker of Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Skillbäck, Tobias, Mattsson, Niklas, Hansson, Karl, Mirgorodskaya, Ekaterina, Dahlén, Rahil, van der Flier, Wiesje, Scheltens, Philip, Duits, Floor +5 more·2017·Scientific Reports

Abstract

We present a new, quantification-driven proteomic approach to identifying biomarkers. In contrast to the identification-driven approach, limited in scope to peptides that are identified by database searching in the first step, all MS data are considered to select biomarker candidates. The endopeptidome of cerebrospinal fluid from 40 Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients, 40 subjects with mild cognitive impairment, and 40 controls with subjective cognitive decline was analyzed using multiplex isobaric labeling. Spectral clustering was used to match MS/MS spectra. The top biomarker candidate cluster (215% higher in AD compared to controls, area under ROC curve = 0.96) was identified as a fragment of pleiotrophin located near the protein’s C-terminus. Analysis of another cohort (n = 60 over four clinical groups) verified that the biomarker was increased in AD patients while no change in controls, Parkinson’s disease or progressive supranuclear palsy was observed. The identification of the novel biomarker pleiotrophin 151–166 demonstrates that our quantification-driven proteomic approach is a promising method for biomarker discovery, which may be universally applicable in clinical proteomics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-017-13831-0

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Elevated PTN is detected in the substantia nigra of patients with Parkinson's disease and in the CSF of patients with AD.

    “Elevated PTN is detected in the substantia nigra of patients with Parkinson's disease and in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with AD. 41 , 42”

    From Loss of <i>Inpp5d</i> has disease‐relevant and sex‐specific effects on glial transcriptomes (2024) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Results (Validation of PTN 151–166 as a biomarker of AD; page unavailable) report elevated CSF levels in AD patients, supporting the AD portion of the sentence. The measured substance was the PTN 151–166 peptide, not full-length PTN; the paper does not establish elevated PTN in the substantia nigra of patients with Parkinson’s disease. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skillbäck, T., Mattsson, N., Hansson, K., Mirgorodskaya, E., Dahlén, R., van der Flier, W., Scheltens, P., Duits, F., Hansson, O., Teunissen, C., Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H., & Gobom, J.
Affiliations
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
Corresponding author
Gobom, Johan
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2017-10-17
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
13333-13333
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2763859909
Cited by
61
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Torsten Söderbergs Stiftelse
  • Demensförbundet
  • Lunds Universitet
  • Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset
  • Magnus Bergvalls Stiftelse
  • Alzheimerfonden
  • Emil och Wera Cornells Stiftelse
  • Parkinsonfonden
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, biomarker discovery, pleiotrophin, cerebrospinal fluid, spectral clustering, isobaric labeling, mild cognitive impairment, Parkinson's disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, peptide fragments
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Carrier Proteins, Female, Humans, Male, Peptides, ROC Curve, Reproducibility of Results, Biomarkers, Cytokines, Proteome, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review