Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 365

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structural and kinetic basis for the selectivity of aducanumab for aggregated forms of amyloid-β

Open access
Arndt, Joseph W., Qian, Fang, Smith, Benjamin A., Quan, Chao, Kilambi, Krishna Praneeth, Bush, Martin W., Walz, Thomas, Pepinsky, R. Blake, Bussière, Thierry, Hamann, Stefan, Cameron, Thomas O., Weinreb, Paul H.·2018·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Aducanumab, a human-derived antibody targeting amyloid-β (Aβ), is in Phase 3 clinical trials for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Biochemical and structural analyses show that aducanumab binds a linear epitope formed by amino acids 3–7 of the Aβ peptide. Aducanumab discriminates between monomers and oligomeric or fibrillar aggregates based on weak monovalent affinity, fast binding kinetics and strong avidity for epitope-rich aggregates. Direct comparative studies with analogs of gantenerumab, bapineuzumab and solanezumab demonstrate clear differentiation in the binding properties of these antibodies. The crystal structure of the Fab fragment of aducanumab bound to its epitope peptide reveals that aducanumab binds to the N terminus of Aβ in an extended conformation, distinct from those seen in structures with other antibodies that target this immunodominant epitope. Aducanumab recognizes a compact epitope that sits in a shallow pocket on the antibody surface.In silico analyses suggest that aducanumab interacts weakly with the Aβ monomer and may accommodate a variety of peptide conformations, further supporting its selectivity for Aβ aggregates. Our studies provide a structural rationale for the low affinity of aducanumab for non-pathogenic monomers and its greater selectivity for aggregated forms than is seen for other Aβ-targeting antibodies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-018-24501-0

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 66 references

Cited by

See all 365

Metadata

Authors
Arndt, J. W., Qian, F., Smith, B. A., Quan, C., Kilambi, K. P., Bush, M. W., Walz, T., Pepinsky, R. B., Bussière, T., Hamann, S., Cameron, T. O., & Weinreb, P. H.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2018-04-23
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
6412-6412
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2802724927
Cited by
365
References
66
FWCI
10.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structural and kinetic basis for the selectivity of aducanumab for aggregated forms of amyloid-β. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41598-018-24501-0
The paper
Arndt, J. W., Qian, F., Smith, B. A., Quan, C., Kilambi, K. P., Bush, M. W., Walz, T., Pepinsky, R. B., Bussière, T., Hamann, S., Cameron, T. O., & Weinreb, P. H. (2018). Structural and kinetic basis for the selectivity of aducanumab for aggregated forms of amyloid-β. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24501-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.