Cited by 1,831Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

The ENCODE Blacklist: Identification of Problematic Regions of the Genome

Open access
Amemiya, Haley M., Kundaje, Anshul, Boyle, Alan P.·2019·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Functional genomics assays based on high-throughput sequencing greatly expand our ability to understand the genome. Here, we define the ENCODE blacklist- a comprehensive set of regions in the human, mouse, worm, and fly genomes that have anomalous, unstructured, or high signal in next-generation sequencing experiments independent of cell line or experiment. The removal of the ENCODE blacklist is an essential quality measure when analyzing functional genomics data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-019-45839-z

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [1]ENCODE Project Consortium et al. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature489, 57–74 (2012). PMC3439153 22955616
  2. [2]Carroll TS Liang Z Salama R Stark R de Santiago I Impact of artifact removal on ChIP quality metrics in ChIP-seq and ChIP-exo data Front. Genet. 2014 5 75 10.3389/fgene.2014.00075 24782889 PMC3989762 · DOI
  3. [3]Boyle AP Comparative analysis of regulatory information and circuits across distant species Nature 2014 512 453 456 10.1038/nature13668 25164757 PMC4336544 · DOI
  4. [4]Yue F A comparative encyclopedia of DNA elements in the mouse genome Nature 2014 515 355 364 10.1038/nature13992 25409824 PMC4266106 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [6]Pickrell JK Gaffney DJ Gilad Y Pritchard JK False positive peaks in ChIP-seq and other sequencing-based functional assays caused by unannotated high copy number regions Bioinformatics 2011 27 2144 2146 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr354 21690102 PMC3137225 · DOI
  6. [7]Li W Freudenberg J Characterizing regions in the human genome unmappable by next-generation-sequencing at the read length of 1000 bases Comput Biol Chem 2014 53 108 117 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2014.08.015 25241312 · DOI
  7. [8]Auerbach RK Mapping accessible chromatin regions using Sono-Seq Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009 106 14926 14931 10.1073/pnas.0905443106 19706456 PMC2736440 · DOI
  8. [9]Diehl AG Boyle AP Deciphering ENCODE Trends Genet 2016 32 238 249 10.1016/j.tig.2016.02.002 26962025 · DOI
  9. [11]Karimzadeh, M., Ernst, C., Kundaje, A. & Hoffman, M. M. Umap and Bismap: quantifying genome and methylome mappability. Nucleic Acids Research, gky677 (2018). PMC6237805 30169659

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amemiya, H. M., Kundaje, A., & Boyle, A. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Kundaje, Anshul
  • Boyle, Alan P.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2019-06-27
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
9354-9354
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2953622121
Cited by
1,831
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 259 · 2025: 367 · 2024: 334 · 2023: 316 · 2022: 236 · 2021: 195 · 2020: 107 · 2019: 16 · 2012: 1
FWCI
46.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007315)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Human Genome Research Institute (U24HG009446, U41HG009293)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
sequencing artifacts, human genome, mouse genome, Caenorhabditis elegans genome, Drosophila genome
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Software, Genome, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Computational Biology, Genomics, Databases, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review