Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 498

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reduction of physiological stress by urban green space in a multisensory virtual experiment

Open access
Hedblom, Marcus, Gunnarsson, Bengt, Iravani, Behzad, Knez, Igor, Schaefer, Martin, Thorsson, Pontus, Lundström, Johan N.·2019·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Although stress is an increasing global health problem in cities, urban green spaces can provide health benefits. There is, however, a lack of understanding of the link between physiological mechanisms and qualities of urban green spaces. Here, we compare the effects of visual stimuli (360 degree virtual photos of an urban environment, forest, and park) to the effects of congruent olfactory stimuli (nature and city odours) and auditory stimuli (bird songs and noise) on physiological stress recovery. Participants (N = 154) were pseudo-randomised into participating in one of the three environments and subsequently exposed to stress (operationalised by skin conductance levels). The park and forest, but not the urban area, provided significant stress reduction. High pleasantness ratings of the environment were linked to low physiological stress responses for olfactory and to some extent for auditory, but not for visual stimuli. This result indicates that olfactory stimuli may be better at facilitating stress reduction than visual stimuli. Currently, urban planners prioritise visual stimuli when planning open green spaces, but urban planners should also consider multisensory qualities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-019-46099-7

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Kaplan, R. K. S. The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. (Cambridge University press, 1989).
  2. McLean, K. Towards a Visual Voice for Smells. Landsc Archit Front 4, 131–141 (2016).
  3. Deming, S. N. & Morgan, S. L. In Experimental Design: A chemometric approach (eds Morgan, S. L. & Deming, S. N.) Ch. 135–156, (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, 1987).

Cited by

See all 498

Metadata

Authors
Hedblom, M., Gunnarsson, B., Iravani, B., Knez, I., Schaefer, M., Thorsson, P., & Lundström, J. N.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2019-07-12
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
10113-10113
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2961468220
Cited by
498
References
59
FWCI
14.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Licence
Funders
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas (942-2015-610)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reduction of physiological stress by urban green space in a multisensory virtual experiment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41598-019-46099-7
The paper
Hedblom, M., Gunnarsson, B., Iravani, B., Knez, I., Schaefer, M., Thorsson, P., & Lundström, J. N. (2019). Reduction of physiological stress by urban green space in a multisensory virtual experiment. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46099-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.