Cited by 28Wildlife Ecology and ConservationPrimate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Individual and Seasonal Variation in Contact Rate, Connectivity and Centrality in Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) Social Groups

Open access
Dorning, Jo, Harris, Stephen·2019·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Examining temporal variation in social connectivity and relating this to individual behaviour can help understand the role of individuals within social groups. Although red foxes are solitary foragers, they form social groups at higher population densities. To investigate the effects of season, sex and status on social connectivity in red fox social groups, we set camera traps for four consecutive seasons to record contact rates and social network metrics at food patches in seven fox territories. Higher food availability was associated with higher contact rates. Individual contact rates peaked in different seasons depending on sex and social status. Dominant foxes held central network positions in all seasons but there was no consistent pattern in social connections within territories, suggesting a greater influence of features such as group size and composition on network structure than seasonal behaviour. Increased extraterritorial movements by males during winter contributed to a significant reduction in local network connectivity. Female network strength did not vary with season, suggesting that females play an important role in maintaining year-round group cohesion. These data advance our understanding of canid social systems, the benefits of group-living in solitary foraging carnivores, and the impacts of management interventions for an ecologically important species.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-019-56713-3

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Urban environments may enhance conspecific tolerance and social behaviours in foxes.

    “Thus, urban environments may enhance conspecific tolerance and social behaviours in foxes (Macdonald 1979, 1983; Marks and Bloomfield 1999; Dorning and Harris 2019).”

    From Red fox viromes in urban and rural landscapes (2020) · cites this paper as Dorning and Harris 2019

    The Discussion reports social interactions among foxes at provisioned food patches in an urban area and concludes that patchy resources facilitated sociality. It does not establish that urban environments, rather than patchy resources, enhance tolerance or social behaviour; it notes that similar interactions may occur in other habitats. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

9 of the 76 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [2]Macdonald, D. W., Creel, S. & Mills, M. G. L. Society in Biology and conservation of wild canids (eds Macdonald, D. W. & Sillero-Zubiri, C.) 85–106 (Oxford University Press, 2004).
  2. [5]Baker, P. J. & Harris, S. The behavioural ecology of red foxes in urban Bristol in Biology and conservation of wild canids (eds. Macdonald, D. W. & Sillero-Zubiri, C.) 207–216 (Oxford University Press, 2004).
  3. [24]Ames GM Using network properties to predict disease dynamics on human contact networks Proc. R. Soc. B. 2011 278 3544 3550 10.1098/rspb.2011.0290 21525056 PMC3189367 · DOI
  4. [34]Gadbois S Sievert O Reeve C Harrington FH Fentress JC Revisiting the concept of behavior patterns in animal behavior with an example from food-caching sequences in wolves (Canis lupus), coyotes (Canis latrans), and red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) Behav. Process. 2014 110 3 14 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.001 25446624 · DOI
  5. [55]Saunders G White PCL Harris S Rayner JMV Urban foxes (Vulpes vulpes): food acquisition, time and energy budgeting of a generalized predator Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1993 65 215 234
  6. [74]Cohen, B. H. Explaining psychological statistics, 4th ed. (Wiley & Sons, 2013).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dorning, J., & Harris, S.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Dorning, Jo
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2019-12-27
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
20095-20095
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2998557032
Cited by
28
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
  • League Against Cruel Sports
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
red fox, social networks, social connectedness, contact rate, seasonal variation, social status, dominance, sex differences, network centrality, group living, solitary foragers, food availability, group cohesion
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Female, Foxes, Male, Seasons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review