Cited by 161Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Behavior and ReproductionAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

Encounters between Red Foxes (Vulpes vulpes): Implications for Territory Maintenance, Social Cohesion and Dispersal

White, Piran C.L., Harris, Stephen·1994·The Journal of Animal Ecology

Abstract

Piran C.L. White, Stephen Harris, Encounters between Red Foxes (Vulpes vulpes): Implications for Territory Maintenance, Social Cohesion and Dispersal, Journal of Animal Ecology, Vol. 63, No. 2 (Apr., 1994), pp. 315-327

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/5550

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Males may be more likely to be involved in aggressive encounters with conspecifics than females.

    “However, our understanding of red fox sociality in Australia is limited (Newsome 1995) and males may be more likely to be involved in aggressive encounters with conspecifics than females (White and Harris 1994).”

    From Red fox viromes in urban and rural landscapes (2020) · cites this paper as White and Harris 1994

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
White, P. C. L., & Harris, S.
Venue
The Journal of Animal Ecology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1994-04
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
315
ISSN
0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084927128
Cited by
161
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 19 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Animal Ecology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Nature Conservancy
  • Ministry of Environment
  • Natural Environment Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
red fox, animal encounters, social cohesion, dispersal, territoriality, social behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review