Cited by 44

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mutation type classification and pathogenicity assignment of sixteen missense variants located in the EGF-precursor homology domain of the LDLR

Galicia-Garcia, Unai, Benito-Vicente, Asier, Uribe, Kepa B., Jebari, Shifa, Larrea-Sebal, Asier, Alonso-Estrada, Rocio, Aguilo-Arce, Joseba, Ostolaza, Helena, Palacios, Lourdes, Martin, Cesar·2020·Scientific Reports

Abstract

The primary genetic cause of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is related to mutations in the LDLR gene encoding the Low-density Lipoprotein Receptor. LDLR structure is organized in 5 different domains, including an EGF-precursor homology domain that plays a pivotal role in lipoprotein release and receptor recycling. Mutations in this domain constitute 51.7% of the total missense variants described in LDLR. The aim of the present work was to analyse how clinically significant variants in the EGF-precursor homology domain impact LDLR. The activity of sixteen LDLR variants was functionally characterized by determining LDLR expression by Western blot and LDLR expression, LDL binding capacity and uptake, and LDLR recycling activity by flow cytometry in transfected CHO- ldl A7 cells. Of the analysed variants, we found six non-pathogenic LDLR variants and ten pathogenic variants distributed as follow: three class 3 variants; four class 2 variants; and three class 5 variants. These results can be incorporated into clinical management of patients by helping guide the appropriate level of treatment intensity depending on the extent of loss of LDLR activity. This data can also contribute to cascade-screening for pathogenic FH variants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-020-58734-9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Complete absence or defective LDLRs due to mutations in the LDLR gene cause familial hypercholesterolemia, characterized by autosomal dominant inheritance of hypercholesterolemia and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

    “Complete absence or defective LDLRs due to mutations in the LDLR gene cause FH, characterized by an autosomal dominant inheritance of hypercholesterolemia and premature ASCVD (a list of mutations can be found in Table 1)1–4.”

    From Pathways and Molecular Mechanisms Governing LDL Receptor Regulation (2025) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Introduction (page not provided) says LDLR mutations account for approximately 80–85% of FH cases, describes mutations that eliminate or impair receptor function, and links FH to high LDL cholesterol and premature atherosclerotic disease. Our copy does not state that FH has autosomal dominant inheritance, so that part of the claim is not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Of LDLR mutations, all result in familial hypercholesterolemia, and most result in loss of LDLR function, either through complete loss of protein or production of a modified nonfunctional protein.

    “Of these mutations, all result in FH, and most result in loss of LDLR function, either through complete loss of protein or production of a modified protein which is nonfunctional.”
  • Class V LDLR mutations allow LDLR to bind cargo for internalization but with weak affinity or inability to release cargo once internalized, prompting protein turnover.

    “The exception to this are Class V mutations where LDLR can still bind cargo for internalization, but binds with weak affinity or cannot release the cargo once internalized, prompting protein turnover1.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Hopkins, P. N., Toth, P. P., Ballantyne, C. M., Rader, D. J. & National Lipid Association Expert Panel on Familial, H. Familial hypercholesterolemias: prevalence, genetics, diagnosis and screening recommendations from the National Lipid Association Expert Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolemia. J. Clin. Lipidol. 5, S9–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2011.03.452 (2011). · DOI
  2. Talmud, P. J., Futema, M. & Humphries, S. E. The genetic architecture of the familial hyperlipidaemia syndromes: rare mutations and common variants in multiple genes. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 25, 274–281, https://doi.org/10.1097/MOL.0000000000000090 (2014). · DOI
  3. Ference, B. A. et al. Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Eur. Heart J. 38, 2459–2472, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx144 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Benito-Vicente, A. et al. Familial Hypercholesterolemia: The Most Frequent Cholesterol Metabolism Disorder Caused Disease. Int J Mol Sci, 19, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113426 (2018). · DOI
  5. Hobbs, H. H., Brown, M. S. & Goldstein, J. L. Molecular genetics of the LDL receptor gene in familial hypercholesterolemia. Hum. Mutat. 1, 445–466, https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.1380010602 (1992). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Goldstein, J. L. & Brown, M. S. The LDL receptor. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 29, 431–438, https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.179564 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Hobbs, H. H., Russell, D. W., Brown, M. S. & Goldstein, J. L. The LDL receptor locus in familial hypercholesterolemia: mutational analysis of a membrane protein. Annu. Rev. Genet. 24, 133–170, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ge.24.120190.001025 (1990). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Tolleshaug, H., Goldstein, J. L., Schneider, W. J. & Brown, M. S. Posttranslational processing of the LDL receptor and its genetic disruption in familial hypercholesterolemia. Cell 30, 715–724, https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(82)90276-8 (1982). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Jeon, H. et al. Implications for familial hypercholesterolemia from the structure of the LDL receptor YWTD-EGF domain pair. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 499–504, https://doi.org/10.1038/88556 (2001). · DOI
  10. Huang, S., Henry, L., Ho, Y. K., Pownall, H. J. & Rudenko, G. Mechanism of LDL binding and release probed by structure-based mutagenesis of the LDL receptor. J. Lipid Res. 51, 297–308, https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M000422 (2010). · DOI
  11. Zhao, Z. & Michaely, P. The epidermal growth factor homology domain of the LDL receptor drives lipoprotein release through an allosteric mechanism involving H190, H562, and H586. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 26528–26537, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M804624200 (2008). · DOI
  12. Rudenko, G. et al. Structure of the LDL receptor extracellular domain at endosomal pH. Sci. 298, 2353–2358, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078124 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Arias-Moreno, X., Velazquez-Campoy, A., Rodriguez, J. C., Pocovi, M. & Sancho, J. Mechanism of low density lipoprotein (LDL) release in the endosome: implications of the stability and Ca2+ affinity of the fifth binding module of the LDL receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 22670–22679, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M802153200 (2008). · DOI
  14. Kusters, D. M. et al. Founder mutations in the Netherlands: geographical distribution of the most prevalent mutations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor and apolipoprotein B genes. Neth. Heart J. 19, 175–182, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-011-0076-6 (2011). · DOI
  15. Medeiros, A. M., Alves, A. C., Francisco, V. & Bourbon, M. & investigators of the Portuguese, F. H. S. Update of the Portuguese Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Study. Atherosclerosis 212, 553–558, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.07.012 (2010). · DOI
  16. Bourbon, M. et al. Familial hypercholesterolaemia in Portugal. Atherosclerosis 196, 633–642, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.07.019 (2008). · DOI
  17. Fouchier, S. W., Kastelein, J. J. & Defesche, J. C. Update of the molecular basis of familial hypercholesterolemia in The Netherlands. Hum. Mutat. 26, 550–556, https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.20256 (2005). · DOI
  18. Huijgen, R., Kindt, I., Defesche, J. C. & Kastelein, J. J. Cardiovascular risk in relation to functionality of sequence variants in the gene coding for the low-density lipoprotein receptor: a study among 29,365 individuals tested for 64 specific low-density lipoprotein-receptor sequence variants. Eur. Heart J. 33, 2325–2330, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs038 (2012). · DOI
  19. Tavtigian, S. V., Samollow, P. B., de Silva, D. & Thomas, A. An analysis of unclassified missense substitutions in human BRCA1. Fam. Cancer 5, 77–88, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-005-2578-0 (2006). · DOI
  20. Adzhubei, I. A. et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat. Methods 7, 248–249, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth0410-248 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  21. Ng, P. C. & Henikoff, S. SIFT: Predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3812–3814, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg509 (2003). · DOI
  22. Blanchette, M. et al. Aligning multiple genomic sequences with the threaded blockset aligner. Genome Res. 14, 708–715, https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1933104 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  23. Etxebarria, A. et al. Functional characterization of splicing and ligand-binding domain variants in the LDL receptor. Hum. Mutat. 33, 232–243, https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.21630 (2012). · DOI
  24. Etxebarria, A. et al. Activity-associated effect of LDL receptor missense variants located in the cysteine-rich repeats. Atherosclerosis 238, 304–312, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.12.026 (2015). · DOI
  25. Etxebarria, A. et al. Functional characterization and classification of frequent low-density lipoprotein receptor variants. Hum. Mutat. 36, 129–141, https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22721 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  26. Benito-Vicente, A. et al. The importance of an integrated analysis of clinical, molecular, and functional data for the genetic diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia. Genet. Med. 17, 980–988, https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.14 (2015). · DOI
  27. Goldstein, J. L., Hobbs, H. H. & Brown, M. S. Familial hypercholesterolemia. In: Scriver, C. R., A. B., Sly, W. S., Valle, D., editors. The Metabolic and Molecular. Bases of Inherited Disease. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill (2001).
  28. Soufi, M. et al. Genetics and kinetics of familial hypercholesterolemia, with the special focus on FH-(Marburg) p.W556R. Atheroscler. Suppl. 10, 5–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1567-5688(09)71802-1 (2009). · DOI
  29. Schroeder, C. I. et al. Design and synthesis of truncated EGF-A peptides that restore LDL-R recycling in the presence of PCSK9 in vitro. Chem. Biol. 21, 284–294, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.11.014 (2014). · DOI
  30. Leren, T. P. & Hjermann, I. Is responsiveness to lovastatin in familial hypercholesterolaemia heterozygotes influenced by the specific mutation in the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene? Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 25, 967–973, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2362.1995.tb01975.x (1995). · DOI
  31. Vuorio, A. F. et al. Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: the influence of the mutation type of the low-density-lipoprotein receptor gene and PvuII polymorphism of the normal allele on serum lipid levels and response to lovastatin treatment. J. Intern. Med. 237, 43–48, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.1995.tb01138.x (1995). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Galicia-Garcia, U., Benito-Vicente, A., Uribe, K. B., Jebari, S., Larrea-Sebal, A., Alonso-Estrada, R., Aguilo-Arce, J., Ostolaza, H., Palacios, L., & Martin, C.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2020-02-03
Volume
10
Issue
1
ISSN
2045-2322
Cited by
44
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review