Cited by 1,452Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenome Rearrangement AlgorithmsFractal and DNA sequence analysis

Aligning Multiple Genomic Sequences With the Threaded Blockset Aligner

Open access
Blanchette, Mathieu, Kent, W. James, Riemer, Cathy, Elnitski, Laura, Smit, Arian F.A., Roskin, Krishna M., Baertsch, Robert, Rosenbloom, Kate +4 more·2004·Genome Research

Abstract

We define a “threaded blockset,” which is a novel generalization of the classic notion of a multiple alignment. A new computer program called TBA (for “threaded blockset aligner”) builds a threaded blockset under the assumption that all matching segments occur in the same order and orientation in the given sequences; inversions and duplications are not addressed. TBA is designed to be appropriate for aligning many, but by no means all, megabase-sized regions of multiple mammalian genomes. The output of TBA can be projected onto any genome chosen as a reference, thus guaranteeing that different projections present consistent predictions of which genomic positions are orthologous. This capability is illustrated using a new visualization tool to view TBA-generated alignments of vertebrate Hox clusters from both the mammalian and fish perspectives. Experimental evaluation of alignment quality, using a program that simulates evolutionary change in genomic sequences, indicates that TBA is more accurate than earlier programs. To perform the dynamic-programming alignment step, TBA runs a stand-alone program called MULTIZ, which can be used to align highly rearranged or incompletely sequenced genomes. We describe our use of MULTIZ to produce the whole-genome multiple alignments at the Santa Cruz Genome Browser.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.1933104

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MULTIZ shows good accuracy in simulation experiments, and synteny filters help ensure that only orthologous conserved elements are considered.

    “This program shows good accuracy in simulation experiments (Blanchette et al. 2004), and our synteny filters help to ensure that only orthologous conserved elements are considered, but whole-genome alignment is a difficult problem, and programs that address it are still in their infancy.”

    From Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes (2005) · cites this paper as Blanchette et al. 2004

  • Progressive alignment has been successfully applied to whole-genome alignment before, e.g., by progressiveMauve and TBA/MULTIZ.

    “Progressive alignment has been successfully applied to whole-genome alignment before—for example, by progressiveMauve21 and TBA/MULTIZ22.”
  • MULTIZ is reference-biased.

    “Because, unlike Progressive Cactus, MULTIZ is reference-biased”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Brudno, M. and Morgenstern, B. 2002. Fast and sensitive alignment of large genomic sequences. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Bioinformatics Conference, pp. 138-150. IEEE Press.
  2. Kent, W.J., Baertsch, R., Hinrichs, A., Miller, W., and Haussler, D. 2003. Evolution's cauldron: Duplication, deletion, and rearrangements in the mouse and human genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100: 11484-11489.
  3. Pollard, D.A., Bergman, C., Stoye, J., Celniker, S., and Eisen, M.B. 2004. Benchmarking tools for the alignment of functional noncoding DNA. BMC Bioinformatics 5: 6. The Rat Genome Sequencing Project Consortium. 2004. Genome sequence of the Brown Norway Rat yields insights into mammalian evolution. Nature (in press).
  4. Sankoff, D. and Kruskal, J.B. 1983. Time warps, string edits, and macromolecules: The theory and practice of sequence comparison. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
  5. Siepel, A. and Haussler, D. 2003. Phylogenetic estimation of context-dependent substitution rates by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. (in press).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blanchette, M., Kent, W. J., Riemer, C., Elnitski, L., Smit, A. F. A., Roskin, K. M., Baertsch, R., Rosenbloom, K., Clawson, H., Green, E. D., Haussler, D., & Miller, W.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Institute for Systems Biology (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2004-04
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
708-715
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112132489
Cited by
1,452
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 56
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (HG 02238, F32HG002325, P41HG002371, HG02325, R01HG002238)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
Keywords
multiple sequence alignment, ortholog prediction, Hox gene clusters, mammalian genomes, vertebrate evolution, alignment visualization
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Cats, Cattle, Computer Simulation, Dogs, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Genes, Homeobox, Multigene Family, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Ribosomal Proteins, Software, Genome, Human, Sequence Alignment, Genome, Genes, fos, Evolution, Molecular, Computational Biology, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review