The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantification for non-targeted LC/MS screening without standard substances
Open accessAbstract
Non-targeted and suspect analyses with liquid chromatography/electrospray/high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC/ESI/HRMS) are gaining importance as they enable identification of hundreds or even thousands of compounds in a single sample. Here, we present an approach to address the challenge to quantify compounds identified from LC/HRMS data without authentic standards. The approach uses random forest regression to predict the response of the compounds in ESI/HRMS with a mean error of 2.2 and 2.0 times for ESI positive and negative mode, respectively. We observe that the predicted responses can be transferred between different instruments via a regression approach. Furthermore, we applied the predicted responses to estimate the concentration of the compounds without the standard substances. The approach was validated by quantifying pesticides and mycotoxins in six different cereal samples. For applicability, the accuracy of the concentration prediction needs to be compatible with the effect (e.g. toxicology) predictions. We achieved the average quantification error of 5.4 times, which is well compatible with the accuracy of the toxicology predictions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018
Wishart, D. S., Feunang, Y. D., Guo, A. C., Lo, E. J., Marcu, A., Grant, J. R., Sajed, T., Johnson, D., Li, C., Sayeeda, Z., et al. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1037 · Cited by 8,404
Cited by
Plastic Products Leach Chemicals That Induce In Vitro Toxicity under Realistic Use Conditions
Zimmermann, L., Bartosova, Z., Braun, K., Oehlmann, J., Völker, C., & Wagner, M. (2021) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c01103 · Cited by 268
Hu, J., Lyu, Y., Chen, H., Cai, L., Li, J., Cao, X., & Sun, W. (2023) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2023.119735 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Liigand, J., Wang, T., Kellogg, J., Smedsgaard, J., Cech, N., & Kruve, A.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2020-04-02
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5808-5808
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3014785674
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantification for non-targeted LC/MS screening without standard substances. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41598-020-62573-z
- The paper
- Liigand, J., Wang, T., Kellogg, J., Smedsgaard, J., Cech, N., & Kruve, A. (2020). Quantification for non-targeted LC/MS screening without standard substances. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62573-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.