Cited by 165Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentCancer Cells and MetastasisPARP inhibition in cancer therapy

Patient-derived Ovarian Cancer Organoids Capture the Genomic Profiles of Primary Tumours Applicable for Drug Sensitivity and Resistance Testing

Open access
Nanki, Yoshiko, Chiyoda, Tatsuyuki, Hirasawa, Akira, Ookubo, Aki, Itoh, Manabu, Ueno, Masaru, Akahane, Tomoko, Kameyama, Kaori +3 more·2020·Scientific Reports

Abstract

The use of primary patient-derived organoids for drug sensitivity and resistance testing could play an important role in precision cancer medicine. We developed expandable ovarian cancer organoids in < 3 weeks; these organoids captured the characteristics of histological cancer subtypes and replicated the mutational landscape of the primary tumours. Seven pairs of organoids (3 high-grade serous, 1 clear cell, 3 endometrioid) and original tumours shared 59.5% (36.1-73.1%) of the variants identified. Copy number variations were also similar among organoids and primary tumours. The organoid that harboured the BRCA1 pathogenic variant (p.L63*) showed a higher sensitivity to PARP inhibitor, olaparib, as well as to platinum drugs compared to the other organoids, whereas an organoid derived from clear cell ovarian cancer was resistant to conventional drugs for ovarian cancer, namely platinum drugs, paclitaxel, and olaparib. The overall success rate of primary organoid culture, including those of various histological subtypes, was 80% (28/35). Our data show that patient-derived organoids are suitable physiological ex vivo cancer models that can be used to screen effective personalised ovarian cancer drugs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-020-69488-9

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These ovarian tumoroid models show great promise for conducting ex vivo drug assays to predict therapeutic response in the women from which they were established.

    “These models show great promise for conducting ex vivo drug assays to predict therapeutic response in the women from which they were established (De Witte et al., 2020; Maenhoudt et al., 2020; Nanki et al., 2020; Gorski et al., 2021).”
  • Nanki and colleagues propagated primary ovarian tumor organoids from a variety of histological subtypes including HGSOC, OCCC, and EnOC with an 80% success rate and maintenance of their original tumor mutational profiles.

    “Nanki and colleagues were able to propagate primary ovarian tumor organoids from a variety of histological subtypes including HGSOC, OCCC, and EnOC with an 80% success rate and maintenance of their original tumor mutational profiles (Nanki et al., 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nanki, Y., Chiyoda, T., Hirasawa, A., Ookubo, A., Itoh, M., Ueno, M., Akahane, T., Kameyama, K., Yamagami, W., Kataoka, F., & Aoki, D.
Affiliations
  • Keio University (JP)
  • Okayama University (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Chiyoda, Tatsuyuki
  • Hirasawa, Akira
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2020-07-28
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
12581-12581
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3045560651
Cited by
165
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 3
FWCI
18.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KeiO Associated Repository of Academic Resources (Keio University) (submittedVersion)
  • Okayama University Scientific Achievement Repository (Okayama University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • JSPS Bilateral program
  • JSR Corporation (JKiC Strategic Project)
  • JSPS KAKENHI (17K19611, 17K19613, 18K09298, 19K18651)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Keywords
ovarian cancer, patient-derived organoids, drug susceptibility testing, drug resistance, mutational landscape, copy number variation, high-grade serous ovarian cancer, ovarian clear cell carcinoma, endometrioid ovarian cancer, BRCA1 pathogenic variants, PARP inhibitors, olaparib, platinum drugs, paclitaxel, precision oncology
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Female, Humans, Organoids, Ovarian Neoplasms, Genome, Human, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review