Defining diagnostic cutoffs in neurological patients for serum very long chain fatty acids (VLCFA) in genetically confirmed X-Adrenoleukodystrophy
Open accessAbstract
X-linked Adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD) is caused by mutations in the ABCD1 gene resulting in the accumulation of very long chain fatty acids (VLCFA). X-ALD is the most common peroxisomal disorder with adult patients (male and female) presenting with progressive spastic paraparesis with bladder disturbance, sensory ataxia with impaired vibration sense, and leg pain. 80% of male X-ALD patients have an adrenal failure, while adrenal dysfunction is rare in women with X-ALD. The objective of this study was to define optimal serum VLCFA cutoff values in patients with X-ALD-like phenotypes for the differentiation of genetically confirmed X-ALD and Non-X-ALD individuals. Three groups were included into this study: a) X-ALD cases with confirmed ABCD1 mutations (n = 34) and two Non-X-ALD cohorts: b) Patients with abnormal serum VCLFA levels despite negative testing for ABCD1 mutations (n = 15) resulting from a total of 1,953 VLCFA tests c) Phenotypically matching patients as Non-X-ALD controls (n = 104). Receiver operating curve analysis was used to optimize VLCFA cutoff values, which differentiate patients with genetically confirmed X-ALD and Non-X-ALD individuals. The serum concentration of C26:0 was superior to C24:0 for the detection of X-ALD. The best differentiation of Non-X-ALD and X-ALD individuals was obtained with a cutoff value of < 1.0 for the C24:0/C22:0 ratio resulting in a sensitivity of 97%, a specificity of 94.1% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 83.8% for true X-ALD. Our findings further suggested a cutoff of < 0.02 for the ratio C26:0/C22:0 leading to a sensitivity of 90.9%, a specificity of 95.0%, and a PPV of 80.6%. Pearson correlation indicated a significant positive association between total blood cholesterol and VLCFA values. Usage of serum VLCFA are economical and established biomarkers suitable for the guidance of genetic testing matching the X-ALD phenotype. We suggest using our new optimized cutoff values, especially the two ratios (C24:0/C22:0 and C26:0/C22:0), in combination with standard lipid profiles.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In genetically confirmed X-ALD and X-ALD-like Non-X-ALD patients, ROC analysis identified optimized serum VLCFA cutoffs, especially C24:0/C22:0 < 1.0 and C26:0/C22:0 < 0.02, that improve sensitivity over prior in-house cutoffs. Serum VLCFA ratios, interpreted with lipid profiles, are proposed as economical screening biomarkers to guide ABCD1 genetic testing.
Key findings
- Among 153 phenotypically similar cases (34 genetically confirmed X-ALD, 15 ABCD1-negative with elevated VLCFA, 104 phenotypic controls), the best differentiation was C24:0/C22:0 < 1.0: sensitivity 97%, specificity 94.1%, PPV 83.8%; C26:0/C22:0 < 0.02 gave sensitivity 90.9%, specificity 95.0%, PPV 80.6%.
- C26:0 < 1.2 µmol/l had sensitivity 81.8%, specificity 94.1%, PPV 82.1%; C24:0 < 92 µmol/l had sensitivity 24.2%, specificity 94.1%, PPV 50.0%; C22:0 < 105 µmol/l had sensitivity 0%, specificity 92.4%, PPV 0%. C26:0 was superior to C24:0 for detection of X-ALD.
- New cutoffs increased sensitivity versus previous in-house cutoffs, e.g. C26:0 +15.1%, C24:0/C22:0 +6.1%, C26:0/C22:0 +24.2%, but increased false-positive findings by n = 3 (total n = 18) when all VLCFA values were considered.
- Total cholesterol and LDL correlated with absolute VLCFA levels (LDL: C22:0 rs = 0.521, C24:0 rs = 0.548, C26:0 rs = 0.415; all p < 0.001), but associations were lost when values were analyzed as ratios; mutation type and VLCFA levels did not correlate.
Methods
- Retrospective single-center study at University Hospital Tübingen: 1,953 serum VLCFA tests from 01/2008–01/2020 in patients where X-ALD was a differential diagnosis; 45 had at least one positive VLCFA result and were genetically tested, yielding 30 ABCD1-mutation-positive and 15 ABCD1-negative cases. Four additional X-ALD patients with VLCFA below old cutoffs were added, totaling 34 X-ALD cases; 104 phenotypically matched Non-X-ALD controls (63 HSP, 41 other neurodegenerative) were used for ROC analysis.
- VLCFA measured by gas chromatography after Lepage/Roy transesterification; routine lipid analysis was performed for n = 90 cases. ROC analysis optimized cutoffs; correlations used Spearman/Pearson methods with Bonferroni-corrected significance at p < 0.002.
Limitations
- Stated by the paper: even optimized cutoffs did not achieve 100% sensitivity and specificity; one female with c.1816T>C, p.S606P would have been missed using the adjusted ratio cutoffs; VLCFA can detect only about 85% of heterozygous female carriers; cutoffs are laboratory-, method-, and assay-specific; spontaneous fasted and unfasted samples were used, and fasted lipid status plus serial testing are recommended for uncertain results.
- Stated/evident: the study did not include neurologically healthy controls, instead using phenotypically similar patients as controls; the X-ALD group was small (n = 34), with only 15 ABCD1-negative elevated-VLCFA cases, limiting precision and generalizability.
- Evident from the text: single-center retrospective design and use of clinical/stored samples may introduce selection and preanalytical variability.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
5 of 26 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationreasoning
The number of false-positives from reference ranges is too large to allow screening for X-ALD in neurologically affected patients with an incidence at birth of approximately 1:17,000.
“This number of false-positives is too large to allow screening for X-ALD in neurologically affected patients with an incidence at the birth of ~ 1:17,0002.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] Engelen, M. et al. X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD): clinical presentation and guidelines for diagnosis, follow-up and management. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 7, 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-7-51 (2012). source
The Epidemiology section gives an estimated birth incidence of 1 in 17,000, and Differential diagnosis notes that elevated plasma VLCFA can yield false positives. Neither passage says that false positives from reference ranges are too numerous to allow screening neurologically affected patients. The Biochemical and molecular diagnosis section instead describes testing males with neurological symptoms when X-ALD is suspected. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
VLCFA are elevated in all male X-ALD patients regardless of age, disease duration, metabolic status, or clinical symptoms.
“VLCFA are elevated in all male X-ALD patients regardless of age, disease duration, metabolic status, or clinical symptoms15.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Wiesinger, C., Eichler, F. S. & Berger, J. The genetic landscape of X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy: inheritance, mutations, modifier genes, and diagnosis. Appl. Clin. Genet. 8, 109. https://doi.org/10.2147/TACG.S49590 (2015). source
- Premisecitation
The mutation c.1816 T > C, p.S606P is shown to be pathogenic in at least seven patients according to the ALD mutation database.
“Two of the three cases which were not recognized by a cutoff ≥ 0.02 for the ratio of C26:0/C22:0 presented with the mutation c.1816 T > C, p.S606P (both females), shown to be pathogenic in at least seven patients according to the ALD mutation database (http://adrenoleukodystrophy.info18–21.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 4 sources checked- cites [18] Wang, Y. et al. X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy: ABCD1 de novo mutations and mosaicism. Mol. Genet. Metab. 104, 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.05.016 (2011). source
- cites [19] Feigenbaum, V. et al. Mutational and protein analysis of patients and heterozygous women with X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 58, 1135–1144 (1996).
- cites [20] Shukla, P. et al. Molecular analysis of ABCD1 gene in Indian patients with X-linked Adrenoleukodystrophy. Clin. Chim. Acta 412, 2289–2295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2011.08.026 (2011). source
- cites [21] Pereira, F. d. S. et al. Mutations, clinical findings and survival estimates in South American patients with X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy. PLOS ONE 7, e34195. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034195 (2012). source
Table 1 in Results > Molecular results lists c.1816T>C (p.Ser606Pro) in a male patient with cerebral X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy, supporting its association with disease. Our copy does not say the ALD mutation database classifies this variant as pathogenic in at least seven patients; the table documents one patient in this series. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
There was no positive correlation between VLCFA levels and mutation type (missense vs. frameshift/deletion/nonsense) for C22:0, C24:0, C26:0, and the ratios C24:0/C22:0 and C26:0/C22:0.
“There was no positive correlation using a point-biserial coefficient between VLCFA levels and mutation type (missense vs. frameshift/deletion/nonsense) C22:0 (r(32) = − 0.10, p = 0.592) and C24:0 (r(32) = − 0.06, p = 0.975), C26:0 (r(32) = − 0.06, p = 0.973) nor the ratios C24:0/C22:0 (r(33) = 0.11, p = 0.537) and C26:0/C22:0 (r(33) = 0.05, p = 0.766).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In 15 cases, no ABCD1 gene mutation or another underlying disease was identified.
“In 15 cases, no ABCD1 gene mutation or another underlying disease was identified.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
ROC analysis yielded a new cutoff value for ratio C26:0/C22:0 of < 0.02.
“This analysis resulted in the following new cutoff values: C22:0 < 105 µmol/l, C24:0 < 92 µmol/l, C26:0 < 1.2 µmol/l, ratio C24:0/C22:0 (< 1.0) and ratio C26:0/C22:0 (< 0.02).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Some ABCD1-negative neurodegenerative cases with mostly spastic para-/or tetraplegia displayed an elevation of single VLCFA.
“Some ABCD1-negative neurodegenerative cases with mostly spastic para-/or tetraplegia displayed an elevation of single VLCFA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The ratio of C24:0/C22:0 showed higher sensitivity for detection of genetically confirmed ABCD1-positive patients compared to the ratio C26:0/C22:0.
“However, considering the ratio of VLCFA in our cohort we found that the ratio of C24:0/C22:0 showed lower specificity than the ratio of C26:0/C22:0 but C24:0/C22:0 showed a higher sensitivity for detection of genetically confirmed ABCD1-positive patients, compared to the ratio C26:0/C22:0 (Table 5 and Supplementary Table 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The mutation type and VLCFA levels did not show a correlation in our analysis.
“The mutation type and VLCFA levels did not show a correlation in our analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In all cases (n = 10) with elevated VLCFA levels, cholesterol and/or triglyceride levels, if available, were elevated.
“We found that in all cases (n = 10) with elevated VLCFA levels, cholesterol and/or triglyceride levels, if available, were elevated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The analysis led to a total of 45 positive cases with at least one elevated VLCFA result.
“This analysis led to a total of 45 positive cases with at least one elevated VLCFA results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Two of the three elevated C24:0/C22:0 ratios had very low C22:0 values.
“Remarkably, two of them had very low C22:0 values.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The associations between C22:0, C24:0 and C26:0 levels and LDL levels are lost when values are analyzed as a ratio to C22:0.
“Detailed results presented in Table 4 show that C22:0, C24:0 and C26:0 levels are significantly correlated to LDL levels but the associations are lost when values were analyzed as a ratio to C22:0.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“However, normalizing to C22:0 this elevation is no longer significant (p ~ 0.06).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data
Elevated VLCFA were observed in obviously lipemic sera.
“We observed elevated VLCFA in obviously lipemic sera and, therefore, consecutively analyzed the lipid profiles in VLCFA samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In our cohort of 34 VLCFA measured X-ALD patients, one female carrying the previously discussed c.1816 T > C, p.S606P mutation would have been missed using the adjusted cutoff ratios.
“In our cohort of 34 VLCFA measured X-ALD patients, one female carrying the previously discussed c.1816 T > C, p.S606P mutation would have been missed using the adjusted cutoff ratios.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using the new cutoff values, there was an increase by n = 3 false-positive findings (total n = 18) when taking all VLCFA values into account.
“We found substantially increased sensitivity values particularly for C26:0 (+ 15.1%) and the ratios C24:0/C22:0 (+ 6.1%) and C26:0/C22:0 (+ 24.2%) (see Table 5) using the new cutoff values but also an increase by n = 3 false-positive findings (total n = 18) when taking all VLCFA values into account.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The serum concentration of C26:0 was superior to C24:0 for the detection of X-ALD.
“The serum concentration of C26:0 was superior to C24:0 for the detection of X-ALD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When comparing X-ALD with the increased VLCFA Non-X-ALD group (n = 15), significant differences were also found.
“When comparing the X-ALD with the increased VLCFA Non-X-ALD group (n = 15), significant differences were also found.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
By analyzing ROC of VLCFA levels in genetically confirmed cases, the serum concentration of C26:0 was superior to C24:0 for the detection of X-ALD.
“By analyzing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) of VLCFA levels in genetically confirmed cases, we show that the serum concentration of C26:0 was superior to C24:0 (Table 5 and Fig. 2) for the detection of X-ALD well in line with previous reports14.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Moser, H. W. et al. Adrenoleukodystrophy: increased plasma content of saturated very long chain fatty acids. Neurology 31, 1241–1241. https://doi.org/10.1212/Wnl.31.10.1241 (1981). source
- Findingown data
ROC analysis in the cohort yielded a new cutoff value for C22:0 of < 105 μmol/l.
“This analysis resulted in the following new cutoff values: C22:0 < 105 µmol/l, C24:0 < 92 µmol/l, C26:0 < 1.2 µmol/l, ratio C24:0/C22:0 (< 1.0) and ratio C26:0/C22:0 (< 0.02).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The ratio of C24:0/C22:0 showed lower specificity than the ratio of C26:0/C22:0.
“However, considering the ratio of VLCFA in our cohort we found that the ratio of C24:0/C22:0 showed lower specificity than the ratio of C26:0/C22:0 but C24:0/C22:0 showed a higher sensitivity for detection of genetically confirmed ABCD1-positive patients, compared to the ratio C26:0/C22:0 (Table 5 and Supplementary Table 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The C24:0/C22:0 ratio was above > 1.0 in all five measurements.
“The C24:0/C22:0 ratio was above > 1.0 in all five measurements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
C22:0, C24:0 and C26:0 levels are significantly correlated to LDL levels.
“Detailed results presented in Table 4 show that C22:0, C24:0 and C26:0 levels are significantly correlated to LDL levels but the associations are lost when values were analyzed as a ratio to C22:0.”
- Also stated in: § VCLFA analysis · hedged
“Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient indicated a significant correlation for LDL with C22:0 (rs = 0.521; n = 89; p < 0.001), C24:0 (rs = 0.548; n = 89; p < 0.001), and C26:0 (rs = 0.415; n = 89; p < 0.001), but not for the ratios C24:0/C22:0 (rs = 0.305; n = 89; p = 0.004), and C26:0/C22:0 (rs = 0.262; n = 89; p = 0.013).”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · boosted
“Our data indicate that LDL levels strongly correlate to all VLCFA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § VCLFA analysis · hedged
- Findingown data
A combination of the cutoff values (two ratios and C26:0) with a sum score did not improve the sensitivity or the specificity compared to the ratio C24:0/C22:0 alone.
“A combination of the cutoff values (two ratios and C26:0) with a sum score did not improve the sensitivity or the specificity compared to the ratio C24:0/C22:0 alone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Even by optimizing cutoff values, we did not obtain a sensitivity of 100% with a high specificity of also 100%.
“Even by optimizing cutoff values, we did not obtain a sensitivity of 100% with a high specificity of also 100%, being aware that reference ranges and cutoff values are linked to each other.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Two of the three cases which were not recognized by a cutoff ≥ 0.02 for the ratio of C26:0/C22:0 presented with the mutation c.1816 T > C, p.S606P (both females).
“Two of the three cases which were not recognized by a cutoff ≥ 0.02 for the ratio of C26:0/C22:0 presented with the mutation c.1816 T > C, p.S606P (both females), shown to be pathogenic in at least seven patients according to the ALD mutation database (http://adrenoleukodystrophy.info18–21.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The new cutoff (> 0.02 ratio C26:0/C22:0) missed one female patient with five follow-up measurements available: four were below 0.02 and one equal to 0.02.
“The new cutoff (> 0.02 ratio C26:0/C22:0) missed one female patient with five follow-up measurements available: four were below 0.02 and one equal to 0.02.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
There was an increase in false-positive results by 16.7% with the new cutoff values.
“There was an increase in false-positive results by 16.7% with the new cutoff values.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For C24:0 (< 85 μmol/l), the sensitivity was 36.4% with 88.2% specificity and a PPV of 48% in genetically confirmed X-ALD cases.
“For C24:0 (< 85 µmol/l) the sensitivity was 36.4% with 88.2% specificity and a PPV of 48%, and for C26:0 (< 1.9 µmol/l)13 the sensitivity was 66.7% with 99.2% specificity and a PPV of 92%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ROC analysis yielded a new cutoff value for C26:0 of < 1.2 μmol/l.
“This analysis resulted in the following new cutoff values: C22:0 < 105 µmol/l, C24:0 < 92 µmol/l, C26:0 < 1.2 µmol/l, ratio C24:0/C22:0 (< 1.0) and ratio C26:0/C22:0 (< 0.02).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ROC analysis yielded a new cutoff value for ratio C24:0/C22:0 of < 1.0.
“This analysis resulted in the following new cutoff values: C22:0 < 105 µmol/l, C24:0 < 92 µmol/l, C26:0 < 1.2 µmol/l, ratio C24:0/C22:0 (< 1.0) and ratio C26:0/C22:0 (< 0.02).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the ratio C26:0/C22:0 (< 0.04), the sensitivity was 66.7% with 100% specificity and a PPV of 96% in genetically confirmed X-ALD cases.
“For the ratio C24:0/C22:0 (< 1.11)13 the sensitivity was 90.9% with 96.6% specificity and a PPV of 91% for C26:0/C22:0 (< 0.04) the sensitivity was 66.7% with 100% specificity and a PPV of 96%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In 30 cases, an ABCD1 gene mutation was identified.
“In 30 cases, an ABCD1 gene mutation was identified and these cases were included prospectively into the patient cohort.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
VLCFA analyses identified significant differences on a group level in VLCFA levels (C22:0, C24:0, C26:0, and both ratios) when comparing X-ALD cases with phenotypic controls.
“VLCFA analyses identified significant differences on a group level in VLCFA levels (C22:0, C24:0, C26:0, and both ratios) when comparing the X-ALD cases with the phenotypic controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ROC analysis yielded a new cutoff value for C24:0 of < 92 μmol/l.
“This analysis resulted in the following new cutoff values: C22:0 < 105 µmol/l, C24:0 < 92 µmol/l, C26:0 < 1.2 µmol/l, ratio C24:0/C22:0 (< 1.0) and ratio C26:0/C22:0 (< 0.02).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Two genetically confirmed ABCD1 mutation carriers were included in the cohort for ROC analysis despite negative VLCFA results using the current cutoffs.
“Two genetically confirmed ABCD1 mutation carriers were included in the cohort for ROC analysis despite negative VLCFA results using the current cutoffs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Reference ranges (mean ± 2SD) are not optimal to assess results obtained from rare diseases because 2.5% of healthy controls have values above two standard deviations.
“However, reference ranges (mean ± 2SD), which cover 95% of the values of the reference cohort) are not optimal to assess results obtained from rare diseases because, by definition, 2.5% of the healthy controls have values above two standard deviations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Instead of using reference ranges, establishment of a threshold or cutoff is more helpful for the clinician in the case of X-ALD.
“Instead of using reference ranges, the establishment of a threshold or cutoff is more helpful for the clinician in the case of X-ALD: 2.5% out of 17,000 healthy individuals = 425 will show elevated VLCFA, i.e. far too many false-positive values will be obtained.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
For any 1000 healthy controls tested, 25 have elevated VLCFA values.
“This means that for any 1000 healthy controls tested, 25 have elevated VLCFA values.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Reference ranges for VLCFA vary considerably between reports.
“However, reference ranges vary considerably between the reports: e.g. for C26:0: 0.66 ± 03810; 1.3 ± 0.416 and 0.3–1.913 µmol/L and for the ratio C26:0/C22:0: 0.01 ± 0.0210; 0.02 ± 0.0116 and 0.02–0.02513, respectively, just to mention the most differing reference ranges.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Table 1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Elevated levels of C26:0 and the ratios C24:0/C22:0 and C26:0/C22:0 are used for diagnostic purposes in X-ALD from plasma or serum.
“Elevated levels of cerotic acid (C26:0) [overall reference range 0.15–1.9 µmol/l] and the ratios C24:0/C22:0 [0.32–1.19] and C26:0/C22:0 [0.0–0.03] are used for diagnostic purposes (see cutoff level comparison in Table 1 and as previously discussed by Moser et al.9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Moser, H. W., Mahmood, A. & Raymond, G. V. X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 3, 140 (2007). source
- Premiseown data
Elevated serum lipids may influence VLCFA values.
“These reports and our observation that elevated serum lipids may influence VLCFA values led us to simultaneously determine the lipid profile in samples with requests for VLCFA analysis to evaluate this factor and improve the diagnostic workup.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Measurement of VLCFA can only detect about 85% of heterozygous female carriers.
“While the measurement of total C26:0 is highly specific in male patients (100%), measurement of VLCFA can only detect about 85% of heterozygous female carriers22.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Moser, H. W., Moser, A. E., Trojak, J. E. & Supplee, S. W. Identification of female carriers of adrenoleukodystrophy. J. Pediatrics 103, 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(83)80775-6 (1983). source
- Interpretationreasoning
If all VLCFA are elevated to a similar extent, their ratios will be normal.
“This is not surprising as if all VLCFA are elevated to a similar extent, their ratios will be normal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The measurement of total C26:0 is highly specific in male patients (100%).
“While the measurement of total C26:0 is highly specific in male patients (100%), measurement of VLCFA can only detect about 85% of heterozygous female carriers22.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Moser, H. W., Moser, A. E., Trojak, J. E. & Supplee, S. W. Identification of female carriers of adrenoleukodystrophy. J. Pediatrics 103, 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(83)80775-6 (1983). source
- Interpretationcitation
This is slightly better than the previously published rate of 15% false-negative test results in females due to the heterozygosity of ABCD1 in females.
“This is slightly better than the previously published rate of 15% false-negative test results in females22 due to the heterozygosity of ABCD1 in females.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Moser, H. W., Moser, A. E., Trojak, J. E. & Supplee, S. W. Identification of female carriers of adrenoleukodystrophy. J. Pediatrics 103, 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(83)80775-6 (1983). source
- Premisenone given
Previously published studies used clinical X-ALD diagnosis or heterogeneous groups with partially genetically confirmed cases for retrieval of cutoff values.
“Previously published studies (compare Table 1) used clinical X-ALD diagnosis or heterogeneous groups with partially genetically confirmed cases for retrieval of cutoff values.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
These adjusted cutoffs will lead to increased sensitivity for the detection of X-ALD in neurodegenerative patients if routine serum lipid levels are within normal ranges.
“These adjusted cutoffs will lead to increased sensitivity for the detection of X-ALD in neurodegenerative patients if routine serum lipid levels are within normal ranges, as these are important in identifying false-positive elevated VLCFA levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This study is the first using only genetically confirmed X-ALD cases to redefine cutoff values.
“This study is the first using only genetically confirmed X-ALD cases to redefine cutoff values.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It is not surprising to not have a single neurologically healthy patient with elevated VLCFA levels in all 1,953 samples tested since 2008.
“Therefore, it is not surprising to not have a single neurologically healthy patient with elevated VLCFA levels in all 1,953 samples tested since 2008.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 24
- May combine two claims. 20
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe AMN phenotype is an important differential diagnosis to hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSP).
“The AMN phenotype is an important differential diagnosis to hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSP)6,7, which are clinically and genetically very heterogeneous (80+ genes are described—see8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [6] Chen, Y.-J. et al. Chinese patients with adrenoleukodystrophy and Zellweger spectrum disorder presenting with hereditary spastic paraplegia. Parkinsonism Related Disord. 65, 256–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.06.008 (2019). source
- cites [7] D’Amore, A. et al. Next generation molecular diagnosis of hereditary spastic paraplegias: an italian cross-sectional study. Front. Neurol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00981 (2018). source
The Results (Molecular Findings; page unavailable) report ABCD1 variants in two patients with an X-linked HSP diagnosis, providing some evidence of diagnostic overlap. The paper does not identify those patients as having an AMN phenotype or state that AMN is an important differential diagnosis for HSP. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHereditary spastic paraplegias are clinically and genetically very heterogeneous, with more than 80 genes described.
“The AMN phenotype is an important differential diagnosis to hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSP)6,7, which are clinically and genetically very heterogeneous (80+ genes are described—see8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Bis-Brewer, D. M. & Zuchner, S. Perspectives on the Genomics of HSP Beyond Mendelian Inheritance. Front. Neurol. 9, 958. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00958 (2018). source
The Introduction describes HSPs as genetically heterogeneous and distinguishes pure and complicated forms with different clinical features. It reports over 76 genomic loci but 58 corresponding genes, so it does not support the claim that more than 80 genes had been described. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataPearson correlation indicated a significant positive association between total blood cholesterol and VLCFA values.
“Pearson correlation indicated a significant positive association between total blood cholesterol and VLCFA values.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn Non-X-ALD patients, false-positive elevations occurred for C22:0 (n=9), C24:0 (n=7), C26:0 (n=5), ratio C24:0/C22:0 (n=6), and ratio C26:0/C22:0 (n=6).
“On an individual level, the following VLCFA values were elevated in Non-X-ALD patients resulting in false-positive findings with the possibility of more than one increased VLCFA value per patient: C22:0 n = 9, C24:0 n = 7, C26:0 n = 5, and the ratios C24:0/C22:0 n = 6 and C26:0/C22:0 n = 6.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUsing the new cutoff values, sensitivity increased substantially for C26:0 (+15.1%), ratio C24:0/C22:0 (+6.1%), and ratio C26:0/C22:0 (+24.2%).
“We found substantially increased sensitivity values particularly for C26:0 (+ 15.1%) and the ratios C24:0/C22:0 (+ 6.1%) and C26:0/C22:0 (+ 24.2%) (see Table 5) using the new cutoff values but also an increase by n = 3 false-positive findings (total n = 18) when taking all VLCFA values into account.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn addition to the 45 positive VLCFA cases (30 X-ALD and 15 Non-X-ALD), four further X-ALD patients with VLCFA values below the previously used cutoffs were added, resulting in 34 genetically confirmed X-ALD cases.
“In addition to the 45 positive VLCFA cases (30 X-ALD and 15 Non-X-ALD (see Table 2 and Fig. 1), four further X-ALD patients were added to the cohort with VLCFA values below the previously used cutoffs. Resulting in 34 genetically confirmed X-ALD cases (four minors; all mutations are specified in Supplementary Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhen using ratios relating to C22:0, not one single C26:0/C22:0 ratio and only three C24:0/C22:0 ratios remained elevated.
“However, when using the ratios (relating to C22:0), not one single C26:0/C22:0 ratio and only three C24:0/C22:0 ratios remained elevated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThere was no correlation between VLCFA levels and the ratios (C24:0/C22:0 and C26:0/C22:0).
“There was no correlation between VLCFA levels and the ratios (C24:0/C22:0 and C26:0/C22:0).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe phenotypical control group (n = 104) consisted of patients with the clinical diagnosis of hereditary spastic paraplegia (n = 63) and other matched neurodegenerative cases (n = 41).
“The phenotypical control group (n = 104, compare Fig. 2A) consisted of: a) Patients with the clinical diagnosis of hereditary spastic paraplegia (n = 63).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA cutoff of less than 0.02 for the ratio C26:0/C22:0 leads to a sensitivity of 90.9%, a specificity of 95.0%, and a positive predictive value of 80.6%.
“Our findings further suggested a cutoff of < 0.02 for the ratio C26:0/C22:0 leading to a sensitivity of 90.9%, a specificity of 95.0%, and a PPV of 80.6%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor C26:0 (< 1.9 μmol/l), the sensitivity was 66.7% with 99.2% specificity and a PPV of 92% in genetically confirmed X-ALD cases.
“For C24:0 (< 85 µmol/l) the sensitivity was 36.4% with 88.2% specificity and a PPV of 48%, and for C26:0 (< 1.9 µmol/l)13 the sensitivity was 66.7% with 99.2% specificity and a PPV of 92%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Morell, B. K., Teichler, J., Budak, K., Vollenweider, J. & Pavlicek, V. X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy presenting as Addison’s disease. Case Rep. 2010, bcr1120092419 (2010). source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe sensitivity increased with the addition of 37 samples from consecutive tests: C24:0 by 14.4% to 36.6%; C26:0 by 3.9% to 85.7%, while the sensitivity for the ratios C24:0/C22:0 and C26:0/C22:0 remained virtually unchanged.
“The sensitivity increased with the addition of 37 samples from consecutive tests (see Supplementary Material): C24:0 by 14.4% to 36.6%; C26:0 by 3.9% to 85.7%, while the sensitivity for the ratios C24:0/C22:0 and C26:0/C22:0 remained virtually unchanged.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf the hereditary spastic paraplegia patients, 73% (n = 49) had a genetically confirmed HSP diagnosis and 14 patients remained genetically unsolved despite exome analysis.
“Thereof, 73% (n = 49) had a genetically confirmed HSP diagnosis (one minor) and 14 patients remained genetically unsolved despite exome analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataA total of 1,953 VLCFA samples were tested for elevated VLCFA at the University Hospital Tübingen since 01/2008.
“In a first step, a total of n = 1,953 VLCFA samples were tested for elevated VLCFA in the Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Pathobiochemistry of the University Hospital Tübingen since 01/2008 (Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThere was a significant positive correlation between total serum cholesterol (driven by serum LDL levels) and VLCFA values.
“Spearman’s coefficient indicated that there was a significant positive correlation between total serum cholesterol (driven by serum LDL levels) and VLCFA values.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationFor the ratio C24:0/C22:0 (< 1.11), the sensitivity was 90.9% with 96.6% specificity and a PPV of 91% in genetically confirmed X-ALD cases.
“For the ratio C24:0/C22:0 (< 1.11)13 the sensitivity was 90.9% with 96.6% specificity and a PPV of 91% for C26:0/C22:0 (< 0.04) the sensitivity was 66.7% with 100% specificity and a PPV of 96%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Morell, B. K., Teichler, J., Budak, K., Vollenweider, J. & Pavlicek, V. X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy presenting as Addison’s disease. Case Rep. 2010, bcr1120092419 (2010). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe coefficients of variation were 2.25%, 2.8% and 9.4% for C22:0, C24:0 and C26:0 in QC 1, and 4.96%, 3.87% and 5.29% for C22:0, C24:0 and C26:0 in control 2.
“The coefficient of variations was 2.25, 2.8 and 9.4% for C22:0, C24:0, C26:0 (QC 1) and 4.96, 3.87 and 5.29% for C22:0, C24:0, C26:0 for control 2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAn increasingly important alternative for determination of VLCFA is the use of 26:0-lyso-PC in dried blood spots, which is sensitive for females.
“An increasingly important alternative for the determination of VLCFA is the use of 1-hexacosanosyl-2-lyso-sn-3-glycero-phosphatidylcholine (26:0-lyso-PC) in dried blood spots (Hubbard WC et al., 2009), being sensitive for females (Huffnagel et al. 2017) as well.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hubbard WC et al., 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Huffnagel et al. 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe coefficient of variation from day to day was below 5% for all lipid analytes.
“The coefficient of variation from day to day was below 5% for all analytes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenBoth patient samples and controls were cross-checked with a reference laboratory at least yearly to verify the accuracy of the analysis.
“Both patient samples and controls were cross-checked with a reference laboratory at least yearly to verify the accuracy of the analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationVLCFA values are partially influenced by current diet, including ketogenic or vegetarian diet, with vegetarians potentially showing elevated values.
“Preanalytical issue need to be considered e.g. VLCFA values are partially influenced by current diet e.g. by ketogenic (shown by Moser et al.10 and others) or vegetarian diet, with vegetarians potentially showing elevated values (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Moser et al. [10] Moser, A. B. et al. Plasma very long chain fatty acids in 3,000 peroxisome disease patients and 29,000 controls. Ann. Neurol. 45, 100–110 (1999). source
- cites Table 1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenBoth quality controls were analyzed every run together with patients' samples.
“Both quality controls were analyzed every run together with patients' samples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningAll patient samples with concentrations of C26:0 greater than 0.5 μmol/l were analyzed a second time independently, not to miss an elevated VLCFA.
“All patient samples with concentrations of C26:0 > 0.5 µmol/l were analyzed a second time independently, not to miss an elevated VLCFA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMoser et al. introduced a discriminant function based on measurement of C26:0 and the ratios C26/22 and C24/22 to enhance the distinction between X-ALD males and control males and between X-ALD females and control females.
“Moser et al.10 introduced a discriminant function based on the measurement of C26:0 and the two ratios C26/22 and C24/22 to enhance the distinction between values obtained for X-ALD males and control males and X-ALD females and control females.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Moser, A. B. et al. Plasma very long chain fatty acids in 3,000 peroxisome disease patients and 29,000 controls. Ann. Neurol. 45, 100–110 (1999). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataRepeated analysis yielded results differing by less than 8% from the first analysis.
“In any case, we found that the repeated analysis yielded results differing by less than 8% from the first analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe study was carried out in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Tübingen, reference number (690/2011BO1).
“This study was carried out in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Tübingen, reference number (690/2011BO1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationX-linked Adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD) is caused by mutations in the X-chromosomal ABCD1 gene.
“X-linked Adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD) is the most common peroxisomal disorder worldwide1,2 and caused by mutations in the X-chromosomal ABCD1 gene3.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“X-linked Adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD) is caused by mutations in the ABCD1 gene resulting in the accumulation of very long chain fatty acids (VLCFA).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Mosser, J. et al. Putative X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy gene shares unexpected homology with Abc transporters. Nature 361, 726–730. https://doi.org/10.1038/361726a0 (1993). source
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenWritten informed consent was obtained from all patients or caregivers/legal guardians if applicable.
“Written informed consent was obtained from all patients or caregivers/legal guardians if applicable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning2.5% out of 17,000 healthy individuals equals 425 who will show elevated VLCFA, which is far too many false-positive values.
“Instead of using reference ranges, the establishment of a threshold or cutoff is more helpful for the clinician in the case of X-ALD: 2.5% out of 17,000 healthy individuals = 425 will show elevated VLCFA, i.e. far too many false-positive values will be obtained.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenOnly genetically tested positive ABCD1 mutation carriers were considered to be X-ALD cases.
“Additionally, only genetically tested positive ABCD1 mutation carriers were considered to be X-ALD cases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOur observations that both total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol levels, but not triglycerides levels, show a significant correlation to VLCFA C24:0 and C26:0 levels indicate that low-density lipoprotein contains lipids carrying VLCFA.
“Our observations that both total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol levels, but not triglycerides levels, show a significant correlation to VLCFA C24:0 and C26:0 levels (Table 4) indicate that low-density lipoprotein contains lipids carrying VLCFA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: LDL is composed of approximately 50% cholesterol, most of it esterified with fatty acids, and 20% phospholipids containing fatty acids.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationVegetarian diet in healthy individuals seems to influence VLCFA levels shifting values towards those found in X-ALD patients.
“Vegetarian diet in healthy individuals seems to influence VLCFA levels shifting values towards those found in X-ALD patients16.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Martinez, M., Mougan, I., Roig, M. & Ballabriga, A. Blood polyunsaturated fatty acids in patients with peroxisomal disorders. A multicenter study. Lipids 29, 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02536332 (1994). source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataElevated LDL levels influence VLCFA levels but only barely C24:0/C22:0 and C26:0/C22:0 ratios.
“Thus, elevated LDL levels influence VLCFA levels but only barely C24:0/C22:0 and C26:0/C22:0 ratios.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenSerum VLCFA are economical and established biomarkers suitable for guiding genetic testing that matches the X-ALD phenotype.
“Usage of serum VLCFA are economical and established biomarkers suitable for the guidance of genetic testing matching the X-ALD phenotype.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationVLCFA tests are only performed in neurological patients if X-ALD is considered a relevant differential diagnosis.
“VLCFA tests are only performed in neurological patients if X-ALD is considered a relevant differential diagnosis (e.g. in our specialty clinic for hereditary spastic paraplegias17, where VLCFA are routinely tested).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Schüle, R. et al. Hereditary spastic paraplegia: Clinicogenetic lessons from 608 patients. Ann. Neurol. 79, 646–658. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24611 (2016). source
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningIn contrast to previous studies, this study did not include a large number of healthy controls but focused on phenotypical controls mimicking the X-ALD phenotype.
“In contrast to previous studies10, this study did, therefore, not include a large number of healthy controls but focused on phenotypical controls mimicking the X-ALD phenotype.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Moser, A. B. et al. Plasma very long chain fatty acids in 3,000 peroxisome disease patients and 29,000 controls. Ann. Neurol. 45, 100–110 (1999). source
The paper relies on this without support.
Impaired peroxisomal beta-oxidation leads to accumulation of very long chain fatty acids (>22 carbon atoms) in blood and a variety of tissues.
“Impaired peroxisomal beta-oxidation leads to the accumulation of very long chain fatty acids (VLCFA > 22 carbon atoms) in blood and a variety of tissues (e.g. brain white matter, spinal cord, and adrenal cortex).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Adults with X-ALD usually develop an adrenomyeloneuropathy phenotype characterized by progressive spastic paraparesis with bladder disturbance, sensory ataxia with impaired vibration sense, leg pain, and adrenal failure in male patients.
“Adults usually develop an adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN) phenotype characterized by progressive spastic paraparesis with bladder disturbance, sensory ataxia with impaired vibration sense, leg pain, and adrenal failure in male patients.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Up-to-date assessment of VLCFA cutoffs in patients with a mimicking phenotype as well as in genetically confirmed X-ALD cases is missing.
“Up to date assessment of VLCFA cutoffs in patients with a mimicking phenotype as well as in genetically confirmed X-ALD cases is missing.”
The paper relies on this without support.
LDL is composed of approximately 50% cholesterol, most of it esterified with fatty acids, and 20% phospholipids containing fatty acids.
“LDL is composed of approximately 50% cholesterol, most of it is esterified with fatty acids and 20% phospholipids containing fatty acids.”
Statistics that don’t add up
Each reported p-value recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom.
Inconsistent p-value: r(32) = − 0.06, p = .973
MinorThe paper reports p = .973 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .736 (two-tailed). The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.
Reported p = .973 · recomputed p = .736
“r(32) = − 0.06, p = 0.973”
Inconsistent p-value: r(32) = − 0.06, p = .975
MinorThe paper reports p = .975 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .736 (two-tailed). The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.
Reported p = .975 · recomputed p = .736
“r(32) = − 0.06, p = 0.975”
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Doesn’t add upr(32) = -0.06reported p = .975 · recomputed p = .736
“r(32) = − 0.06, p = .975”
- Doesn’t add upr(32) = -0.06reported p = .973 · recomputed p = .736
“r(32) = − 0.06, p = .973”
- Consistentr(32) = -0.1reported p = .592 · recomputed p = .574
“r(32) = − 0.10, p = .592”
- Consistentr(33) = 0.11reported p = .537 · recomputed p = .529
“r(33) = 0.11, p = .537”
- Consistentr(33) = 0.05reported p = .766 · recomputed p = .775
“r(33) = 0.05, p = .766”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Perfect specificity conflicts with a PPV below 100%
MajorFor a test with detected positive cases, 100% specificity means there are no false positives, so its positive predictive value must also be 100%, not 96%.
“100% specificity”
“a PPV of 96%”
HSP percentage does not match the stated count
MinorThe phenotypical control group includes 63 HSP patients, of whom 49 had a genetically confirmed diagnosis. That is 77.8%, not 73%.
Reported 73 · recomputed 77.777778
“Patients with the clinical diagnosis of hereditary spastic paraplegia (n = 63). Thereof, 73% (n = 49) had a genetically confirmed HSP diagnosis”
Reported cholesterol correlation method changes
MinorThe abstract attributes the significant association between total cholesterol and VLCFA values to Pearson correlation, but the results and Table 4 attribute it to Spearman correlation.
“Pearson correlation indicated a significant positive association between total blood cholesterol and VLCFA values.”
“Spearman’s coefficient indicated that there was a significant positive correlation between total serum cholesterol (driven by serum LDL levels) and VLCFA values.”
Cholesterol correlation includes more cases than the stated lipid-analysis cohort
MinorThe methods state that routine lipid analysis was performed for 90 cases, but every total-cholesterol correlation in Table 4 reports 92 cases.
“For n = 90 cases, routine lipid analysis including total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and triglyceride levels was analyzed”
“p < 0.001rs = 0.638; n = 92”
Cites
Direct transesterification of all classes of lipids in a one-step reaction.
Lepage, G., & ROY, C. C. (1986) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-2275(20)38861-1 · Cited by 2,385 · see citing works
Putative X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy gene shares unexpected homology with ABC transporters
Mosser, J., Douar, A.-M., Sarde, C.-O., Kioschis, P., Feil, R., Moser, H., Poustka, A.-M., Mandel, J.-L., & Aubourg, P. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/361726a0 · Cited by 1,202 · see citing works
Multiple correlations and bonferroni’s correction
Curtin, F., & Schulz, P. (1998) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(98)00043-2 · Cited by 764 · see citing works
Moser, H. W., Mahmood, A., & Raymond, G. V. (2007) · Nature Clinical Practice Neurology · doi:10.1038/ncpneuro0421 · Cited by 663 · see citing works
Engelen, M., Kemp, S., de Visser, M., van Geel, B. M., Wanders, R. J., Aubourg, P., & Poll-The, B. (2012) · Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases · doi:10.1186/1750-1172-7-51 · Cited by 562 · see citing works
Moser, H. (1981) · doi:10.1212/wnl.31.10.1241 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Hereditary spastic paraplegia: Clinicogenetic lessons from 608 patients
Schüle, R., Wiethoff, S., Martus, P., Karle, K. N., Otto, S., Klebe, S., Klimpe, S., Gallenmüller, C., Kurzwelly, D., Henkel, D., et al. (2016) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24611 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Self-citationLagerstedt, S. A., Hinrichs, D. R., Batt, S. M., Magera, M. J., Rinaldo, P., & McConnell, J. P. (2001) · Molecular Genetics and Metabolism · doi:10.1006/mgme.2001.3170 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Berger, J., Wiesinger, C., & Eichler, F. (2015) · The Application of Clinical Genetics · doi:10.2147/tacg.s49590 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
(1996) · PubMed Central · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Identification of female carriers of adrenoleukodystrophy
Moser, H. W., Moser, A. E., Trojak, J. E., & Supplee, S. W. (1983) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(83)80775-6 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Theda, C., Moser, A. B., Powers, J. M., & Moser, H. W. (1992) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-510x(92)90028-j · Cited by 99 · see citing works
D'Amore, A., Tessa, A., Casali, C., Dotti, M. T., Filla, A., Silvestri, G., Antenora, A., Astrea, G., Barghigiani, M., Battini, R., et al. (2018) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.00981 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Nerve conduction studies in adrenomyeloneuropathy
Chaudhry, V, Moser, H. W., & Cornblath, D. R. (1996) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.61.2.181 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy: ABCD1 de novo mutations and mosaicism
Wang, Y., Busin, R., Reeves, C., Bezman, L., Raymond, G., Toomer, C. J., Watkins, P. A., Snowden, A., Moser, A., Naidu, S., et al. (2011) · Molecular Genetics and Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.05.016 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Blood polyunsaturated fatty acids in patients with peroxisomal disorders. A multicenter study
Martinez, M., Mougan, I., Roig, M., & Ballabriga, A. (1994) · Lipids · doi:10.1007/bf02536332 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Stellaard, F., ten Brink, H. J., Kok, R. M., van den Heuvel, L. P., & Jakobs, C. (1990) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0009-8981(90)90077-6 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
The importance of testing for adrenoleucodystrophy in males with idiopathic Addison's disease
Ronghe, M. (2002) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/adc.86.3.185 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Ogino, T., & Suzuki, K. (1981) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1981.tb01657.x · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Perspectives on the Genomics of HSP Beyond Mendelian Inheritance
Bis-Brewer, D. M., & Züchner, S. (2018) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.00958 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Pereira, F. D. S., Matte, U., Habekost, C. T., Castilhos, R. M. D., El Husny, A. S., Lourenço, C. M., Vianna-Morgante, A. M., Giuliani, L., Galera, M. F., Honjo, R., et al. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034195 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy: role of very long-chain acyl-CoA synthetases
Jia, Z., Pei, Z., Li, Y., Wei, L., Smith, K. D., & Watkins, P. A. (2004) · Molecular Genetics and Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2004.06.015 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Screening for <scp>X</scp>‐linked adrenoleukodystrophy among adult men with Addison's disease
Horn, M. A., Erichsen, M. M., Wolff, A. S. B., Månsson, J., Husebye, E. S., Tallaksen, C. M. E., & Skjeldal, O. H. (2013) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/cen.12159 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Nerve ultrasound characterizes AMN polyneuropathy as inhomogeneous and focal hypertrophic
Rattay, T. W., Just, J., Röben, B., Hengel, H., Schüle, R., Synofzik, M., Söhn, A. S., Winter, N., Dammeier, N., Schöls, L., et al. (2018) · Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases · doi:10.1186/s13023-018-0939-7 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationChen, Y.-J., Wang, M.-W., Dong, E.-L., Lin, X.-H., Wang, N., Zhang, Z.-Q., Lin, X., & Chen, W.-J. (2019) · Parkinsonism & Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.06.008 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Molecular analysis of ABCD1 gene in Indian patients with X-linked Adrenoleukodystrophy
Shukla, P., Gupta, N., Gulati, S., Ghosh, M., Vasisht, S., Sharma, R., Gupta, A. K., Kalra, V., & Kabra, M. (2011) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.cca.2011.08.026 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy presenting as Addison’s disease: Figure 1
Morell, B. K., Teichler, J., Budak, K., Vollenweider, J., & Pavlicek, V. (2010) · BMJ Case Reports · doi:10.1136/bcr.11.2009.2419 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Streck, S., Winnefeld, K., Maurer, I., et al. (2000) · Journal of Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1515/labm.2000.24.8.373 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Increased activity of surviving locus ceruleus neurons in Alzheimer's disease
Moser (1999) · Pure Amsterdam UMC · doi:10.1002/1531-8249(199901)45:1
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Moser, H. W., Mahmood, A. & Raymond, G. V. X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 3, 140 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Peroxisomal ABC Transporters: An Update
Tawbeh, A., Gondcaille, C., Trompier, D., & Savary, S. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22116093 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“Accumulation of saturated and monounsaturated VLCFAs indeed occurs in the plasma and tissues of X-ALD patients, and is used for diagnosis [31,32].”
Background
- Authors
- Rattay, T. W., Rautenberg, M., Söhn, A. S., Hengel, H., Traschütz, A., Röben, B., Hayer, S. N., Schüle, R., Wiethoff, S., Zeltner, L., Haack, T. B., Cegan, A., Schöls, L., Schleicher, E., & Peter, A.
- Affiliations
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DE)
- University of Tübingen (DE)
- Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research (DE)
- Helmholtz Munich (DE)
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schleicher, Erwin
- ORCID
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2020-09-15
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15093-15093
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7494896
- OpenAlex
- W3084746432
- Semantic Scholar
- 8b1edf77329bbb7b584466cdb202c7a5ef4a85ab
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 6.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Digitální knihovna Univerzity Pardubice (Univerzity Pardubice) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Site cant be reached (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Medizinischen Fakultät, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen (Clinician Scientist Program Grant: #386-0-0, fortüne program (#2554-0-0)., Clinician Scientist Program Grant: #434-0-0)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Open Access Publishing Fund of University of Tübingen, 418081722)
- European Reference Network for Rare Neurological Diseases (Project ID No 739510)
- Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts of Baden-Württemberg (31-7635)
- European Social Fund (41/67/1)
- Projekt DEAL
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Hereditary Neurological Disorders
- Keywords
- X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy, very long chain fatty acids, diagnostic thresholds, ABCD1 mutations, peroxisomal disorders, diagnostic biomarkers, spastic paraparesis, adrenal insufficiency, serum cholesterol, genetic testing
- MeSH terms
- Adrenoleukodystrophy, Adult, Aged, Astrocytes, Fatty Acids, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Sensitivity and Specificity, Biomarkers, ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-20.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-20.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review