Cited by 24Adrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsAdrenal Hormones and DisordersPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments

Diagnostic accuracy of the different hormonal tests used for the diagnosis of autonomous cortisol secretion

Open access
Araujo-Castro, Marta, García Cano, Ana, Jiménez Mendiguchía, Lucía, Escobar-Morreale, Héctor F., Valderrábano, Pablo·2021·Scientific Reports

Abstract

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the different tests commonly used in the evaluation of adrenal incidentalomas (AIs) for the identification of autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS) and comorbidities potentially related to ACS. In a retrospective study of patients with AIs ≥ 1 cm, we evaluated the diagnostic reliability and validity of the dexamethasone suppression test (DST), urinary free cortisol (UFC), ACTH, late-night salivary cortisol (LNSC), and dehydroepiandrosterone-sulphate (DHEAS) for the diagnosis of comorbidities potentially related to ACS. Diagnostic indexes were also calculated for UFC, ACTH, LNSC, and DHEAS considering DST as the gold standard test for the diagnosis of ACS, using three different post-DST cortisol thresholds (138 nmol/L, 50 nmol/L and 83 nmol/L). We included 197 patients with AIs in whom the results of the five tests abovementioned were available. At diagnosis, 85.9% of patients with one or more AIs had any comorbidity potentially related to ACS, whereas 9.6% had ACS as defined by post-DST cortisol > 138 nmol/L. The reliability of UFC, ACTH, LNSC, and DHEAS for the diagnosis of ACS was low (kappa index < 0.30). Of them, LNSC reached the highest diagnosis accuracy for ACS identification (AUC = 0.696 [95% CI 0.626-0.759]). The diagnostic performances of these tests for comorbidities potentially related to ACS was poor; of them, the DST was the most accurate (AUC = 0.661 [95% CI 0.546-0.778]) and had the strongest association with these comorbidities (OR 2.6, P = 0.045). Patients presenting with increased values of both DST and LNSC had the strongest association with hypertension (OR 7.1, P = 0.002) and with cardiovascular events (OR 3.6, P = 0.041). In conclusion, LNSC was the test showing the highest diagnosis accuracy for the identification of ACS when a positive DST was used as the gold standard for its diagnosis. The DST test showed the strongest association with comorbidities potentially related to ACS. The definition of ACS based on the combination of elevated DST and LNSC levels improved the identification of patients with increased cardiometabolic risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-021-00011-4

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The limited number of studies published to date have shown that LNSC has a relatively low sensitivity for predicting ACS, and subsequently conclude that the test is not suitable for screening of this disorder.

    “The limited number of studies published to date have shown that LNSC has a relatively low sensitivity for predicting ACS, and subsequently conclude that the test is not suitable for screening of this disorder (11–16).”
  • All previous studies, regardless of analytical assay, have concluded that LNSC cannot be recommended as an exclusive screening method for ACS.

    “In fact, due to the low sensitivity, all previous studies, regardless of analytical assay, have concluded that LNSC cannot be recommended as an exclusive screening method for ACS (11–16).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Araujo-Castro, M., García Cano, A., Jiménez Mendiguchía, L., Escobar-Morreale, H. F., & Valderrábano, P.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Alcalá (ES)
  • Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (ES)
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2021-10-15
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
20539-20539
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3205803325
Cited by
24
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Sociedad de Endocrinología, Nutrición y Diabetes de la Comunidad de Madrid (BECA SENDIMAD de Ayuda a la Investigación en Endocrinología, Nutrición y Diabetes 2019)
  • IRYCIS (Convocatoria intramural de ayudas a proyectos de investigación de investigadores noveles, investigadores clínicos asociados y/o grupos emergentes del Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal 2019)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
autonomous cortisol secretion, adrenal incidentaloma, dexamethasone suppression test, late-night salivary cortisol, urinary free cortisol, ACTH, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, diagnostic accuracy, hypertension, cardiovascular events, Cushing's disease, Cushing's syndrome
MeSH terms
Adrenocortical Hyperfunction, Adrenal Gland Neoplasms, Aged, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review