Serum cortisol: an up-to-date assessment of routine assay performance
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Accurate serum cortisol quantification is required for the correct diagnosis and management of adrenal pathologies. Presently, most laboratories use immunoassay to measure serum cortisol with proficiency schemes demonstrating a wide dispersion of results. Here, we investigate the effects of sex, matrix, and antibody specificity on serum cortisol quantification in 6 routine assays. METHODS: Surplus serum was obtained before disposal and the following cohorts were created: males, nonpregnant females, pregnant patients, and patients prescribed either metyrapone or prednisolone. Samples were anonymized and distributed to collaborating laboratories for cortisol analysis by 6 routine assays. Cortisol was also measured in all samples using an LC-MS/MS candidate reference measurement procedure (cRMP); cortisol-binding globulin (CBG) was measured in the nonpregnant and pregnant female cohorts. RESULTS: Considerable inter- and intraassay variation was observed across the male and nonpregnant female cohorts relative to the cRMP. Four immunoassays underrecovered cortisol in the pregnancy cohort, and CBG was found to be significantly higher in this cohort than in the nonpregnant females. In the metyrapone and prednisolone cohorts, all immunoassays overestimated cortisol. The first generation Roche E170 and Siemens Centaur XP were particularly prone to overestimation. In all cohorts the routine LC-MS/MS assay aligned extremely well with the cRMP. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the clinical importance of serum cortisol, the performance of routine immunoassays remains highly variable. Accurate quantification is compromised by both matrix effects and antibody specificity. Underpinning this study with a cRMP has highlighted the deficiencies in standardization across routine cortisol immunoassays.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Routine serum cortisol immunoassays show substantial sex-, matrix-, and antibody-specific bias relative to an LC-MS/MS candidate reference measurement procedure, while a routine LC-MS/MS assay aligns well with the cRMP across cohorts. The study highlights compromised standardization and assay-dependent over- or underrecovery in pregnancy, metyrapone, and prednisolone cohorts.
Key findings
- Considerable inter- and intraassay variation was observed across male and nonpregnant female cohorts relative to the cRMP; first-generation Roche E170 and Siemens Centaur XP showed positive bias (male cohort mean bias 17.0% and 18.5%, respectively; nonpregnant female cohort 11.8% and 14.6%).
- In pregnancy, four immunoassays underrecovered cortisol, and CBG was significantly higher in pregnant than nonpregnant females (mean 52.02 mg/L vs 27.23 mg/L, P < 0.0001); e.g., Siemens Centaur XP, Beckman Access, and Abbott Architect had mean biases of −5.5%, −23.3%, and −25.0%.
- In the metyrapone cohort, all immunoassays overestimated cortisol (mean bias 16.4% to 95.0%); in the prednisolone cohort, all immunoassays overestimated cortisol with mean biases from 690.9% to 8169.4% (56.0 to 658.6 nmol/L).
- The routine LC-MS/MS assay aligned extremely well with the cRMP in all cohorts; in the prednisolone cohort its mean bias was 15.5% but equated to only 3.1 nmol/L, and only 24/42 samples were quantifiable.
Methods
- Surplus serum cohorts were created: 51 males, 45 nonpregnant females, 72 pregnant females (10–20 weeks), 42 patients prescribed prednisolone, and 27 patients prescribed metyrapone.
- Cortisol was measured by an LC-MS/MS cRMP, 5 automated commercial immunoassays (Abbott Architect, Beckman Access, Roche E170 Generation I, Roche E170 Generation II, Siemens Centaur XP), and a routine LC-MS/MS assay; CBG was measured by commercial ELISA in nonpregnant and pregnant female cohorts.
- Analysis used Passing-Bablok regression, Bland-Altman bias plots, Pearson correlation, Shapiro-Wilk test, and dependent-samples t-test or Wilcoxon test as appropriate.
Limitations
- The paper states that the male and nonpregnant female cohorts lacked particularly high cortisol concentrations, which are difficult to obtain without sample adulteration.
- The paper notes that information on how commercial immunoassays liberate cortisol from binding proteins remains proprietary, and that further work with larger sample sizes is needed to substantiate the relationship between CBG concentration and cortisol quantification.
- Evident from the text: samples came from a single center (University Hospital South Manchester), some cohorts were small (metyrapone n = 27; prednisolone n = 42), and in the prednisolone cohort only 24/42 samples were quantifiable by the routine LC-MS/MS assay.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 30 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
In the male cohort, the routine LC-MS/MS, Abbott Architect, Beckman Access, and second generation Roche E170 assays had mean biases between -1.5% and -1.2% relative to the candidate reference measurement procedure.
“The routine LC-MS/MS, Abbott Architect, Beckman Access, and second generation Roche E170 all generated a mean bias between Ϫ1.5% and Ϫ1.2%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
In the male cohort, the first generation Roche E170 assay had a negative constant bias of -19.45 nmol/L.
“This relationship likely contributes to the negative constant bias of Ϫ19.45 nmol/L.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the male cohort, for the routine LC-MS/MS, Abbott Architect, Beckman Access, and second generation Roche E170 assays, 95% confidence intervals encompassing 0% supported the absence of bias.
“In each case, 95% CIs encompassing 0% supported the absence of bias.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the male cohort, the first generation Roche E170 and Siemens Centaur XP assays displayed positive bias relative to target concentrations.
“In contrast, the first generation Roche E170 and Siemens Centaur XP displayed a positive bias relative to the target concentrations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the nonpregnant female cohort, all immunoassays demonstrated significant differences from the candidate reference measurement procedure.
“Although the Beckman Access and second generation Roche E170 exhibited good agreement with the cRMP in the male cohort, all immunoassays demonstrated significant differences with the cRMP in the nonpregnant female cohort.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
In the metyrapone cohort, three samples were outliers with target concentrations above 350 nmol/L and were separated from the majority of results.
“Within the cohort, 3 samples were evidently outliers as, with target concentrations Ͼ350 nmol/L, they were separated from the majority of results (Fig. 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The mean cortisol-binding globulin concentration in the pregnant female cohort was 52.02 mg/L (95% CI 47.78-56.26).
“The mean (95% CIs) CBG concentrations for the nonpregnant female and pregnant female cohorts were 27.23 mg/L (26.02-28.45)and 52.02 mg/L (47.78 -56.26), respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the prednisolone cohort, the Abbott Architect and first generation Roche E170 results did not significantly differ from a normal distribution.
“Whereas the sample distribution was found to be nongaussian for the cRMP and several routine assays, the results of the Abbott Architect and first generation Roche E170 were not found to significantly differ from a normal distribution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The cortisol-binding globulin distributions in the nonpregnant and pregnant female cohorts were statistically different (P < 0.0001).
“An independent t-test determined these CBG distributions to be statistically different (P Ͻ 0.0001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the nonpregnant female cohort, the first generation Roche E170 and Siemens Centaur XP assays produced results significantly different from the candidate reference measurement procedure (P < 0.01).
“This is further supported as each assay produced results significantly different from those of the cRMP (P Ͻ 0.01).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the pregnancy cohort, all immunoassay results were statistically significantly different from target concentrations (P < 0.0001).
“Although all immunoassay results were statistically significantly different from the target concentrations (P Ͻ 0.0001), the performance characteristics of the second generation Roche compared well to the cRMP.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the metyrapone cohort, all immunoassays had an overall positive bias relative to the candidate reference measurement procedure.
“Collectively, these performance characteristics resulted in an overall positive bias in each immunoassay that is clearly evident in Fig. 4, B-F.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the nonpregnant female cohort, routine LC-MS/MS results did not differ significantly from the candidate reference measurement procedure (P = 0.9284).
“Conversely, the routine LC-MS/MS assay results were not found to differ significantly from those of the cRMP (P ϭ 0.9284).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the metyrapone cohort, immunoassay results were highly statistically significantly different from the candidate reference measurement procedure (P < 0.0001).
“Wilcoxon analysis confirmed the immunoassay results were highly statistically significantly different from those of the cRMP (P Ͻ 0.0001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the metyrapone cohort, differences between routine LC-MS/MS and the candidate reference measurement procedure were not as marked (P = 0.0152).
“In contrast, the differences between the routine LC-MS/MS and cRMP results were not as marked (P ϭ 0.0152).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Considerable underestimation was demonstrated in these assays in pregnancy when compared directly with the candidate reference measurement procedure and relative to their performance in the nonpregnant female cohort.
“Considerable underestimation was demonstrated in these assays when compared both directly to the cRMP and relatively to their respective performance characteristics in the nonpregnant female cohort.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Considerable interassay variation exists across routine commercial immunoassays relative to the candidate reference measurement procedure.
“Our investigation into sex-specific bias has found that considerable interassay variation exists across the routine commercial immunoassays relative to the cRMP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The mean cortisol-binding globulin concentration in the nonpregnant female cohort was 27.23 mg/L (95% CI 26.02-28.45).
“The mean (95% CIs) CBG concentrations for the nonpregnant female and pregnant female cohorts were 27.23 mg/L (26.02-28.45)and 52.02 mg/L (47.78 -56.26), respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the prednisolone cohort, all assays produced results statistically significantly different from the candidate reference measurement procedure (P < 0.0001).
“Of the assays investigated, all produced results that were statistically significantly different from those of the cRMP (P Ͻ 0.0001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In both the male and nonpregnant female cohorts, the Abbott Architect, first generation Roche E170, and Siemens Centaur XP assays displayed significant differences from the candidate reference measurement procedure.
“In both cohorts, the Abbott Architect, first generation Roche E170 and Siemens Centaur XP displayed significant differences with the cRMP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the metyrapone cohort, the candidate reference measurement procedure produced nongaussian cortisol results ranging from 91.3 to 535.3 nmol/L.
“Analysis of this cohort by the cRMP yielded nongaussian results ranging from 91.3 to 535.3 nmol/L.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the prednisolone cohort, the candidate reference measurement procedure produced nongaussian cortisol results ranging from 2.6 to 99.3 nmol/L.
“Cortisol analysis by the cRMP generated nongaussian results ranging from 2.6 to 99.3 nmol/L.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The performance characteristics for each immunoassay differ across the male and nonpregnant female cohorts.
“Furthermore, we have observed that the performance characteristics for each immunoassay differ across male and nonpregnant female cohorts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the pregnancy cohort, the candidate reference measurement procedure produced normally distributed cortisol results ranging from 129.0 to 1067.2 nmol/L.
“As determined by the cRMP, this cohort generated normally distributed results ranging from 129.0 to 1067.2 nmol/L.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the pregnancy cohort, routine LC-MS/MS results were closest to the candidate reference measurement procedure (P = 0.0653).
“Of the assays investigated, the routine LC-MS/MS results were found to be closest to those of the cRMP (P ϭ 0.0653).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Intraassay performance is variable across the male and nonpregnant female cohorts.
“In addition, intraassay performance is variable across the male and nonpregnant female cohorts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the male cohort, the first generation Roche E170 and Siemens Centaur XP results were significantly different from the candidate reference measurement procedure (P < 0.0001).
“Accordingly, results produced by these assays were significantly different from those of the cRMP (P Ͻ 0.0001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cortisol-binding globulin concentrations differed weakly but statistically significantly between the presumed premenopausal and postmenopausal subgroups (P = 0.0029).
“An independent t-test demonstrated weak but statistically significant differences between these subgroups (P ϭ 0.0029).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Pregnancy had a striking effect across the Abbott Architect, Beckman Access, first generation Roche, and Siemens Centaur XP assays.
“We also observed that pregnancy had a striking effect across the Abbott Architect, Beckman Access, first generation Roche and Siemens Centaur XP assays.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In all cohorts, the routine LC-MS/MS assay and the candidate reference measurement procedure aligned well.
“In all cohorts, the routine LC-MS/MS assay and cRMP aligned well.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When the 5% measurement uncertainty of the candidate reference measurement procedure was applied, nearly all routine LC-MS/MS results fell within it and could be considered statistically unbiased.
“When the 5% measurement uncertainty of the cRMP is applied, nearly all routine LC-MS/MS results fell within this and could therefore be considered statistically unbiased.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Routine serum cortisol immunoassay performance remains highly variable.
“In summary, routine serum cortisol immunoassay performance remains highly variable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Overrecovery in the metyrapone and prednisolone cohorts is considerably reduced with the second generation Roche E170 assay, although still undesirable.
“Furthermore, the overrecovery in the metyrapone and prednisolone cohorts, although still undesirable, is now considerably reduced.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Many of the assays investigated failed to achieve a bias below 10.3%, the current desirable limit specified by Westgard.
“Indeed, many of the assays investigated failed to achieve a bias Ͻ10.3%, the current desirable limit as specified by Westgard (21 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Westgard QC . Desirable biological variation database specifications. https://www.westgard.com/biodatabase1.htm (Accessed January 2016).
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
All five immunoassays overestimate cortisol in the prednisolone cohort.
“Our results showed that all 5 immunoassays overestimate cortisol in the prednisolone cohort.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Interassay imprecision for all routine assays ranged from 1.6% to 7.5% over cortisol concentrations of 84 to 990 nmol/L.
“Interassay imprecision for all routine assays ranged from 1.6% to 7.5% over cortisol concentrations of 84 to 990 nmol/L; a complete summary of assayspecific imprecision is available in online Supplemental Data File 3.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
The LC-MS/MS candidate reference measurement procedure had interassay coefficients of variation of 1.3%, 1.2%, and 1.1% at cortisol concentrations of 132, 520, and 772 nmol/L.
“Interassay %CVs for this method were 1.3%, 1.2%, and 1.1% at concentrations of 132, 520, and 772 nmol/L respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Hawley, 2016, Candidate reference measurement procedure for the quantification of total serum cortisol with LC-MS/MS, Clin Chem source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Accurate measurement of serum cortisol is necessary for diagnosing and managing adrenal pathologies correctly.
“Therefore, accurate serum cortisol measurement is essential for the correct diagnosis and management of adrenal pathologies.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“Accurate serum cortisol quantification is required for the correct diagnosis and management of adrenal pathologies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [1] Bornstein, 2016, Diagnosis and treatment of primary adrenal insufficiency: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline, J Clin Endocrinol Metab source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [2] Nieman, 2008, The diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline, J Clin Endocrinol Metab source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [6] Nieman, 2015, Treatment of Cushing's syndrome: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline, J Clin Endocrinol Metab source
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- Premisecitation
Commercial immunoassays are prone to sex-specific biases and matrix effects in selected patient groups when compared with a GC-MS reference measurement procedure.
“Comparisons of cortisol results to a GC-MS reference measurement procedure (RMP) have previously demonstrated that commercial immunoassays are prone to both sex-specific biases and matrix effects in select patient populations (8 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Dodd, 2014, The effect of serum matrix and gender on cortisol measurement by commonly used immunoassays, Ann Clin Biochem source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Immunoassay cortisol measurements in patients taking metyrapone show a positive bias relative to a routine LC-MS/MS assay.
“Immunoassay cortisol measurements in patients taking metyrapone have also been reported to display a positive bias relative to a routine LC-MS/MS assay (10,11 ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] Monaghan, 2011, Comparison of serum cortisol measurement by immunoassay and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in patients receiving the 11 beta-hydroxylase inhibitor metyrapone, Ann Clin Biochem source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] Owen, 2010, Cortisol measurement in patients receiving metyrapone therapy, Ann Clin Biochem source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The first generation Roche E170 and Siemens Centaur XP assays were particularly prone to over-estimation in the metyrapone cohort, likely secondary to antibody cross-reactivity with cortisol precursors.
“Of these, the first generation Roche E170 and Siemens Centaur XP were particularly prone to over-estimation, likely secondary to antibody cross-reactivity with cortisol precursors (10,11 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] Monaghan, 2011, Comparison of serum cortisol measurement by immunoassay and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in patients receiving the 11 beta-hydroxylase inhibitor metyrapone, Ann Clin Biochem source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] Owen, 2010, Cortisol measurement in patients receiving metyrapone therapy, Ann Clin Biochem source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Metyrapone reversibly inhibits 11-beta hydroxylase, preventing oxidation of 11-deoxycortisol to cortisol.
“Metyrapone reversibly inhibits 11- hydroxylase, preventing oxidation of 11-deoxycortisol to cortisol.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Nieman, 2015, Treatment of Cushing's syndrome: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline, J Clin Endocrinol Metab source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductnone given
Variation due to noncommutability and heterogeneity was minimized through consistent sample preparation and storage before analysis.
“In all cases, variation due to noncommutability and heterogeneity has been minimized through consistent sample preparation and storage before analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Consistent sample preparation and storage minimize variation due to noncommutability and heterogeneity.
- Study design and conductreasoning
This study benefits from using single donor samples for comparison, providing a true representation of each assay's performance for individual samples.
“In contrast to EQA schemes and previous studies (8 ), this study benefits from using single donor samples for comparison.Although pooling samples can provide sufficient volume for large-scale studies, it can also alter the sample matrix and potentially bias results.Our approach instead provides a true representation of the performance of each assay for individual samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Dodd, 2014, The effect of serum matrix and gender on cortisol measurement by commonly used immunoassays, Ann Clin Biochem source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The efficiency of 8-anilino-1-naphthalene sulfonic acid is influenced by the concentration of binding proteins.
“However, the efficiency of ANS is influenced by the concentration of binding proteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Bertholf, 2012, The adrenal cortex source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Assay-specific causes are likely the largest contributing factors to the variation observed.
“Hence, assay-specific causes are likely to be the largest contributing factors to any variation observed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
This is the first study to use a candidate reference measurement procedure to comprehensively assess routine assay performance for cortisol in serum from patients taking metyrapone or prednisolone.
“In addition, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to use a cRMP to comprehensively assess the performance of routine assays for the measurement of cortisol in serum obtained from patients taking either metyrapone or prednisolone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The underrecovery observed in patients with increased cortisol-binding globulin concentrations is secondary to the inability of the assay to completely liberate cortisol from its binding proteins.
“This supports the hypothesis that the underrecovery observed in patients with increased CBG concentrations is secondary to the inability of the assay to completely liberate cortisol from its binding proteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Accurate cortisol measurement relies on complete recovery of cortisol from its protein-bound fractions.
- Premisecitation
The concentration of 8-anilino-1-naphthalene sulfonic acid required for healthy male and nonpregnant female samples may be inadequate for samples with increased cortisol-binding globulin.
“Hence, the concentration of ANS required for healthy male and nonpregnant female samples may be inadequate for samples with increased CBG (19 ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Bertholf, 2012, The adrenal cortex source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The observations support recent Endocrine Society guidelines that advise measuring serum cortisol by LC-MS/MS in patients prescribed metyrapone.
“Our observations support recent Endocrine Society guidelines that advise serum cortisol is measured by LC-MS/MS in patients prescribed metyrapone (6 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Nieman, 2015, Treatment of Cushing's syndrome: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline, J Clin Endocrinol Metab source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Cortisol under- or overrecovery can affect interpretation of the short synacthen test and the overnight dexamethasone suppression test such that patients may not receive the correct diagnosis or appropriate follow-up.
“Cortisol under or overrecovery can affect the interpretation of both the short synacthen test and the overnight dexamethasone suppression test such that patients may not be provided with the correct diagnosis or appropriate follow-up.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Although calibrators may be traceable to certified reference materials, this does not necessarily translate to patient samples.
“Although calibrators may be traceable to certified reference materials, this does not necessarily translate to patient samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The use of a more specific antibody in the second generation Roche E170 assay is further substantiated by improved percentage cross-reactivities relative to the first generation assay.
“The use of a more specific antibody is further substantiated by the im-proved percentage cross-reactivities relative to the first generation assay (see online Supplemental Data File 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Supplemental Data File 2
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Overestimation in the prednisolone cohort is likely because reagent antibodies fail to differentiate cortisol from prednisolone and its metabolites.
“This is likely because reagent antibodies fail to differentiate cortisol from prednisolone and its metabolites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 32
- The quote only partly states this claim. 6
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 12
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the male cohort, the candidate reference measurement procedure produced normally distributed cortisol results ranging from 24.8 to 399.8 nmol/L.
“Analysis of this cohort by the cRMP generated normally distributed results ranging from 24.8 to 399.8 nmol/L.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the male cohort, the first generation Roche E170 assay had an overall mean bias of 17.0%, a proportional bias of 24.0%, and bias that increased with concentration.
“With an overall mean bias of 17.0%, yet a proportional bias of 24.0%, it is apparent from Fig. 1D that bias increases with concentration for the first generation Roche E170 assay.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn the prednisolone cohort, immunoassays had mean biases ranging from 690.9% to 8169.4%, corresponding to 56.0 to 658.6 nmol/L.
“In contrast, the immunoassays exhibited mean biases ranging from 690.9% to 8169.4%, corresponding to 56.0 to 658.6 nmol/L.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the nonpregnant female cohort, only the routine LC-MS/MS assay had 95% confidence intervals encompassing 0%; the other assays' intervals fell below 0%, indicating slight negative bias.
“However, of these, only the routine LC-MS/MS assay possessed 95% CIs encompassing 0%.The 95% CIs of the other assays all fell below 0% indicating a slight negative bias.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the pregnancy cohort, the first generation Roche E170 assay had a mean bias of 10.2% and performed similarly to its performance in the nonpregnant female cohort.
“With a mean bias of 10.2%, the first generation Roche E170 performed similarly both in the pregnant female and nonpregnant female cohorts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn the nonpregnant female cohort, the routine LC-MS/MS, Abbott Architect, Beckman Access, and second generation Roche E170 assays had mean biases ranging from -4.9% to -0.4%.
“The routine LC-MS/MS, Abbott Architect, Beckman Access, and second generation Roche E170 all generated results with a mean bias ranging from Ϫ4.9% Beckman Access Roche E170 Generation II Siemens Centaur XP Fig. 1.Bland-Altman bias plots depicting the performance of the assays investigated relative to the cRMP in the male cohort (n = 51).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenIn the pregnancy cohort, the performance of the Siemens Centaur XP, Beckman Access, and Abbott Architect assays was distinctly different from their performance in the nonpregnant female cohort.
“The performance of these assays in the pregnant female cohort was dis- Dashed lines represent the 5% (95% CI) measurement uncertainty of the cRMP.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the male cohort, the Siemens Centaur XP assay had an overall mean bias of 18.5%, resulting from a 13.0% proportional bias and a 15.59 nmol/L constant bias.
“Conversely, in the case of the Siemens Centaur XP, the overall mean bias of 18.5% is the cumulative effect of a 13.0% proportional and a 15.59-nmol/L constant bias.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the prednisolone cohort, LC-MS/MS confirmed prednisolone in all samples, with a mean prednisolone concentration of 245 g/L and a range of 41 to 590 g/L.
“LC-MS/MS quantification confirmed the presence of prednisolone in all samples.The mean (range) prednisolone concentration was 245 g/L (range 41 to 590 g/L).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn the prednisolone cohort, routine LC-MS/MS had a mean bias of 15.5%, equating to 3.1 nmol/L, and all Passing-Bablok regression parameters had 95% confidence intervals including their targets.
“Although the mean bias for LC-MS/MS was 15.5% this equated to only 3.1 nmol/L and all Passing-Bablok regression parameters produced 95% CIs that included their respective targets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the pregnancy cohort, the second generation Roche assay compared well with the candidate reference measurement procedure, with a slight negative mean bias of -2.6% and Passing-Bablok slope and intercept 95% confidence intervals encompassing the target parameters.
“Despite a slight negative mean bias of Ϫ2.6%, Passing-Bablok regression analysis produced a slope and intercept with 95% CIs encompassing the cRMP target parameters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the prednisolone cohort, Passing-Bablok slope characteristics were positive relative to the line of identity for each assay except the Siemens Centaur XP, which failed the CUSUM linearity test (P < 0.01), invalidating regression analysis.
“In addition, Passing-Bablok slope characteristics were positive relative to the line of identity for each assay except the Siemens Centaur XP, which failed the CUSUM linearity test (P Ͻ 0.01) thereby, invalidating regression analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the pregnancy cohort, the first generation Roche E170 assay had Passing-Bablok characteristics markedly different from the nonpregnant cohort: the 95% confidence intervals for the two slopes shared no overlap, and the intercept shifted from negative to positive.
“Despite this, the Passing-Bablok characteristics were markedly different since the 95% CIs for the 2 slopes shared no overlap, and the intercept shifted from negative in the nonpregnant cohort to positive in the pregnant cohort.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the metyrapone cohort, immunoassay mean bias ranged from 16.4% to 95.0%, with Passing-Bablok slopes from 0.72 to 1.37 and intercepts from 34.02 to 127.82 nmol/L.
“Of the immunoassays, mean bias ranged from 16.4% to 95.0% with Passing-Bablok regression param-eters ranging from 0.72 to 1.37 (slope) and 34.02 to 127.82 nmol/L (intercept).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the nonpregnant female cohort, the presumed premenopausal subgroup had a mean cortisol-binding globulin concentration of 29.37 mg/L (95% CI 27.65-31.09) and the presumed postmenopausal subgroup had 25.92 mg/L (95% CI 23.64-27.08).
“Subdivision of the nonpregnant female cohort into their presumed pre-and postmenopausal cohorts provided mean (95% CIs) CBG concentrations of 29.37 (27.65-31.09)and 25.92 mg/L (23.64 -27.08), respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the pregnancy cohort, the Siemens Centaur XP, Beckman Access, and Abbott Architect assays had mean biases of -5.5%, -23.3%, and -25.0%, equating to -36.7, -143.6, and -156.6 nmol/L relative to the candidate reference measurement procedure.
“Conversely, with respective mean biases of Ϫ5.5%, Ϫ23.3%, and Ϫ25.0% equating to Ϫ36.7, Ϫ143.6, and Ϫ156.6 nmol/L, the Siemens Centaur XP, Beckman Access, and Abbott Architect displayed markedly negative bias relative to the cRMP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the nonpregnant female cohort, the candidate reference measurement procedure produced normally distributed cortisol results ranging from 56.5 to 602.7 nmol/L.
“Analysis of this cohort by the cRMP yielded normally distributed results ranging from 56.5 to 602.7 nmol/L.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingnone givenIn the prednisolone cohort, linearity was detected between the first generation Roche E170 and the candidate reference measurement procedure, but the software could not provide 95% confidence intervals for the slope and intercept.
“Although linearity was detected between the first generation Roche E170 and Dashed lines represent the 5% (95% CI) measurement uncertainty of the cRMP.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn the prednisolone cohort, only 24 of 42 samples were quantifiable by routine LC-MS/MS; the remaining samples were correctly identified as below the assay's limit of quantification.
“Furthermore, only 24/42 samples were quantifiable by the LC-MS/MS assay; the remaining samples were correctly identified as having a cortisol concentration below the limit of quantification of the assay.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Abbott Architect consistently underestimated cortisol, while the first generation Roche E170 and Siemens Centaur XP consistently overestimated it.
“Whereas the Abbott Architect consistently underestimated cortisol, the first generation Roche E170 and Siemens Centaur XP consistently overestimated it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the nonpregnant female cohort, the first generation Roche E170 and Siemens Centaur XP assays had mean biases of 11.8% and 14.6%, with 95% confidence intervals above 0% indicating positive bias.
“The first generation Roche E170 and Siemens Centaur XP displayed respective mean biases of 11.8 and 14.6%.Like the male cohort, both assays generated 95% CIs that were above 0% identifying a positive bias.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe first generation Roche E170 and Siemens Centaur XP assays are markedly affected by cross-reactivity, while the Abbott Architect, Beckman Access, and second generation Roche E170 assays are also subject to considerable overrecovery.
“While our data suggest that the first generation Roche E170 and Siemens Centaur XP are markedly affected by cross-reactivity, the Abbott Architect, Beckman Access and second generation Roche E170 are also subject to considerable overrecovery.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningOverrecovery in the male, nonpregnant, and pregnant female cohorts improved with the second generation Roche E170 assay, with better alignment to the candidate reference measurement procedure.
“Certainly, the overrecovery exhibited in the male, nonpregnant and pregnant female cohorts has improved, with better alignment to the cRMP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Endocrine Society has set minimum performance criteria for steroid assays, acknowledging that metrological traceability is not yet available for all assays but remains an important goal.
“The Endocrine Society has now established minimum performance criteria for steroid assays, which recognize that metrological traceability is not currently available for all assays, yet remains an important goal (12)(13)(14).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [12] Handelsman, 2013, Requirement for mass spectrometry sex steroid assays in the journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, J Clin Endocrinol Metab source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [13] Wierman, 2014, The new instructions to authors for the reporting of steroid hormone measurements [Editorial], Mol Endocrinol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14] Monaghan, 2014, Case for the wider adoption of mass spectrometry-based adrenal steroid testing, and beyond, J Clin Endocrinol Metab source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMean cortisol concentrations at baseline and 30 minutes after synacthen are assay-specific and show a consistent negative bias in women taking the oral contraceptive pill.
“Furthermore, mean cortisol concentrations at baseline and 30 min post-synacthen were found to be assay specific and exhibit a consistently negative bias in women taking the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) (9 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] El-Farhan, 2013, Method-specific serum cortisol responses to the adrenocorticotrophin test: comparison of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and five automated immunoassays, Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premiseown dataExternal quality assessment schemes show wide dispersion of serum cortisol results across methods, with a sex-specific bimodal distribution.
“Although variation for individual methods generally remains within narrow limits, the variation across all methods is considerably wider.This frequently produces a wide dispersion of results with a sexspecific bimodal distribution (see the Data File 1 in the Data Supplement that accompanies the online version of this article at http://www.clinchem.org/content/vol62/ issue9).”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · boosted
“Presently, most laboratories use immunoassay to measure serum cortisol with proficiency schemes demonstrating a wide dispersion of results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Most laboratories use automated commercial immunoassays for serum cortisol quantification.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · boosted
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Partnership for Accurate Testing of Hormones was established to address standardization in selected assays.
“The Partnership for Accurate Testing of Hormones has been established to address this issue in select assays (15 ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] PATH. Partnership for the accurate testing of hormones. http://www.hormoneassays.org (Accessed January 2016).
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPrevious work speculated that cortisol underrecovery may be attributed to increased cortisol-binding globulin concentrations secondary to pregnancy or oral contraceptive pill medication.
“Previous work has speculated that cortisol underrecovery may be attributed to increased CBG concentra-tions secondary to pregnancy (8 ) or OCP medication (9 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [8] Dodd, 2014, The effect of serum matrix and gender on cortisol measurement by commonly used immunoassays, Ann Clin Biochem source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] El-Farhan, 2013, Method-specific serum cortisol responses to the adrenocorticotrophin test: comparison of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and five automated immunoassays, Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMetyrapone attenuates negative feedback on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, resulting in accumulation of cortisol precursors.
“This attenuates negative feedback on the hypothalamic-pituitaryadrenal axis, resulting in the accumulation of cortisol precursors (6 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Nieman, 2015, Treatment of Cushing's syndrome: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline, J Clin Endocrinol Metab source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTarget cortisol concentrations for patients prescribed metyrapone should fall between 150 and 300 nmol/L.
“In the treatment of Cushing syndrome, target cortisol concentrations for patients prescribed metyrapone should fall between 150 and 300 nmol/L (6 ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Nieman, 2015, Treatment of Cushing's syndrome: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline, J Clin Endocrinol Metab source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningUsing a candidate reference measurement procedure ensured each method was compared with a higher-order measurement procedure, certifying metrological traceability to SI units and providing a platform for meaningful statistical analysis.
“Underpinning this study with a cRMP has ensured that each method was compared to a higher-order measurement procedure.This certifies metrological traceability to SI units thereby, providing a platform for meaningful statistical analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Hawley, 2016, Candidate reference measurement procedure for the quantification of total serum cortisol with LC-MS/MS, Clin Chem source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationManufacturers may displace cortisol from cortisol-binding globulin by adjusting temperature, lowering pH, or using agents such as salicylate or 8-anilino-1-naphthalene sulfonic acid.
“Nevertheless, it has been reported that manufacturers may displace cortisol from CBG by adjusting temperature, lowering pH or alternatively using agents such as salicylate or 8-anilino-1-napthalene sulfonic acid (ANS) (19 ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Bertholf, 2012, The adrenal cortex source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenOver-recovery in the first generation Roche E170 and Siemens Centaur XP assays is secondary to nonspecific cross-reactivity.
“Whereas underrecovery is attributed to matrix effects such as increased CBG concentrations, we hypothesize that the over-recovery in the first generation Roche E170 and Siemens Centaur XP is secondary to nonspecific cross-reactivity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrednisolone and prednisone are the most commonly prescribed exogenous glucocorticoids.
“Prednisolone and prednisone are the most commonly prescribed exogenous glucocorticoids (20 ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Forss, 2012, Current practice of glucocorticoid replacement therapy and patient-perceived health outcomes in adrenal insufficiency – a worldwide patient survey, BMC Endocr Disord source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCortisol-binding globulin concentrations decline after menopause, possibly secondary to an attenuated estrogenic stimulus.
“This infers that CBG concentrations decline postmenopause, possibly secondary to the attenuated estrogenic stimulus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Conditions with a high estrogenic state stimulate cortisol-binding globulin synthesis.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationFor patients not on lifelong treatment, adrenal reserve should be ascertained before altering dosing regimens.
“For patients not on lifelong treatment, their adrenal reserve should be ascertained before altering dosing regimens (4 ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Bancos, 2015, Diagnosis and management of adrenal insufficiency, Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol source
Not checked in the free run.
The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationown dataIn the prednisolone cohort, the routine LC-MS/MS assay exhibited superior performance compared with the immunoassays.
“Despite this, the routine LC-MS/MS assay exhibited superior performance compared to the immunoassays.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe study is representative of the male and nonpregnant female populations, although it is limited by the absence of particularly high cortisol concentrations.
“Although limited by an absence of particularly high cortisol concentrations in the male and nonpregnant female cohorts, this study is representative of these populations, with high concentrations difficult to obtain without sample adulteration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: High cortisol concentrations are difficult to obtain without sample adulteration.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningUnderestimation in pregnancy was exacerbated with increasing cortisol concentrations, a relationship seemingly related to increased cortisol-binding globulin concentrations.
“This underestimation was exacerbated with increasing cortisol concentrations, a relationship that was seemingly related to increased CBG concentrations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningCortisol precursors share structural homology with cortisol, necessitating highly specific antibodies for immunoassay selectivity.
“These precursors share structural homology with cortisol, necessitating that immunoassays require highly specific antibodies to ensure selectivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSex- and assay-specific cutoffs may be helpful in the short term, but reagent lot changes, recalibration, and assay reformulation may increase result uncertainty and thus not represent a long-term solution.
“Although these may be helpful in the short-term, reagent lot changes, recalibration and assay reformulation may increase result uncertainty and thus not represent a longterm solution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataFor patients prescribed metyrapone, immunoassay quantification may lead to an inappropriate dosing regimen and may ultimately mask adrenal insufficiency.
“Similarly, for patients prescribed metyrapone, immunoassay quantification may lead to an inappropriate dosing regimen and may ultimately mask adrenal insufficiency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningAssays must differentiate cortisol from exogenous glucocorticoids and their metabolites to guarantee the integrity of the short synacthen test.
“This provides a requirement for assays to differentiate cortisol from exogenous glucocorticoids and their metabolites, to guarantee the integrity of the short synacthen test.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningResults are not comparable across assay, location, or time.
“Consequently, results are not comparable across assay, location or time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe case for sex- and assay-specific cutoffs has been made.
“The case for sex-and assay-specific cutoffs has been made (9 ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] El-Farhan, 2013, Method-specific serum cortisol responses to the adrenocorticotrophin test: comparison of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and five automated immunoassays, Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) source
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
Most laboratories use automated commercial immunoassays for serum cortisol quantification.
“Currently, the majority of laboratories use automated commercial immunoassays for cortisol quantification.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The poor performance of routine cortisol assays has not yet been considered.
“However, despite its clinical importance, the poor performance of routine cortisol assays has yet to be considered.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Conditions with a high estrogenic state stimulate cortisol-binding globulin synthesis.
“These conditions are associated with a high estrogenic state that serves to stimulate CBG synthesis.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Accurate cortisol measurement relies on complete recovery of cortisol from its protein-bound fractions.
“Accurate cortisol measurement relies on the complete recovery of cortisol from its protein-bound fractions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Consistent sample preparation and storage minimize variation due to noncommutability and heterogeneity.
“In all cases, variation due to noncommutability and heterogeneity has been minimized through consistent sample preparation and storage before analysis.”
The paper relies on this without support.
High cortisol concentrations are difficult to obtain without sample adulteration.
“Although limited by an absence of particularly high cortisol concentrations in the male and nonpregnant female cohorts, this study is representative of these populations, with high concentrations difficult to obtain without sample adulteration.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An increased amount of corticosteroid-binding globulin entails a risk for misleadingly normal total plasma cortisol levels.
“However, an increased amount of corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG) entails a risk for misleadingly normal total plasma cortisol levels as more CBG-bound cortisol will be measured, even though cortisol release and free, biologically active cortisol levels may be low (5-9).”
From Salivary Cortisol and Cortisone Can Circumvent Confounding Effects of Oral Contraceptives in the Short Synacthen Test (2024) · cites this paper as [8]
The Discussion (page unavailable) links increased CBG in pregnant patients to immunoassay underrecovery of cortisol: the assays may fail to release and measure all CBG-bound cortisol. That is contrary to the attributed explanation that increased CBG causes more bound cortisol to be measured, producing misleadingly normal total levels. The paper does not assess whether free cortisol is low in that situation. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredImmunoassays have been shown to give variable results depending on the specificity and sensitivity of the antibody used.
“Immunoassays have seen shown to give variable results depending on the specificity and sensitivity of the antibody used”
From Bioavailability of Oral Hydrocortisone Corrected for Binding Proteins and Measured by LC-MS/MS Using Serum Cortisol and Salivary Cortisone (2018) · cites this paper as [4]
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports variable cortisol immunoassay results and links overestimation to antibody cross-reactivity; it also suggests that a more specific antibody improved one assay. The paper does not establish that variation depends on antibody sensitivity, and it identifies matrix effects as another cause. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredLC-MS/MS is the gold standard method for measuring steroids.
“LC-MS/MS is now the gold standard method for measuring steroids [4].”
From Bioavailability of Oral Hydrocortisone Corrected for Binding Proteins and Measured by LC-MS/MS Using Serum Cortisol and Salivary Cortisone (2018) · cites this paper as [4]
The ASSAYS section uses an LC-MS/MS candidate reference measurement procedure for serum cortisol, and the results report that routine LC-MS/MS performed better than the immunoassays tested. The paper does not establish LC-MS/MS as the gold standard for measuring steroids generally; its comparison is specific to cortisol. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
First-generation Roche assay described as both overestimating and underestimating cortisol in pregnancy
MajorThe pregnancy results report a positive 10.2% mean bias for the first-generation Roche E170, but the discussion says this assay showed considerable underestimation relative to the cRMP in pregnant patients.
“With a mean bias of 10.2%, the first generation Roche E170 performed similarly both in the pregnant female and nonpregnant female cohorts.”
“We also observed that pregnancy had a striking effect across the Abbott Architect, Beckman Access, first generation Roche and Siemens Centaur XP assays.Considerable underestimation was demonstrated in these assays when compared both directly to the cRMP”
Postmenopausal CBG confidence interval is not centered on its reported mean
MinorThe reported 95% confidence interval has a midpoint of 25.36 mg/L, not the stated mean of 25.92 mg/L. Unlike the other mean confidence intervals in this paragraph, its bounds are not symmetric about the mean.
Reported 25.92 · recomputed 25.36
“25.92 mg/L (23.64 -27.08)”
Cites
The diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline.
Nieman, L. K., Biller, B. M. K., Findling, J. W., Newell-Price, J., Savage, M. O., Stewart, P. M., & Montori, V. M. (2008) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2008-0125 · Cited by 2,718 · see citing works
Bornstein, S. R., Allolio, B., Arlt, W., Barthel, A., Don-Wauchope, A., Hammer, G. D., Husebye, E. S., Merke, D. P., Murad, M. H., Stratakis, C. A., et al. (2016) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2015-1710 · Cited by 1,769 · see citing works
Treatment of Cushing's syndrome: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline
Nieman, L. K., Biller, B. M. K., Findling, J. W., Murad, M. H., Newell-Price, J., Savage, M. O., & Tabarin, A. (2015) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2015-1818 · Cited by 1,270 · see citing works
Diagnosis and management of adrenal insufficiency
Bancos, I., Hahner, S., Tomlinson, J., & Arlt, W. (2015) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(14)70142-1 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
Handelsman, D. J., & Wartofsky, L. (2013) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2013-3375 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
El‐Farhan, N., Pickett, A., Ducroq, D., Bailey, C., Mitchem, K., Morgan, N., Armston, A., Jones, L., Evans, C., & Rees, D. A. (2013) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/cen.12039 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Self-citationWhy glucocorticoid withdrawal may sometimes be as dangerous as the treatment itself
Dinsen, S., Baslund, B., Klose, M., Rasmussen, A. K., Friis-Hansen, L., Hilsted, L., & Feldt-Rasmussen, U. (2013) · European Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2013.05.014 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Monaghan, P. J., Owen, L. J., Trainer, P. J., Brabant, G., Keevil, B. G., & Darby, D. (2011) · Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1258/acb.2011.011014 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationForss, M., Batcheller, G., Skrtic, S., & Johannsson, G. (2012) · BMC Endocrine Disorders · doi:10.1186/1472-6823-12-8 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Hubert, V., Hendrik, E., Matthew, G., et al. (2010) · Joint Research Centre (European Commission) · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Owen, L. J., Adaway, J., Davies, S. L., Neale, S., El‐Farhan, N., Ducroq, D., Evans, C., Rees, A., MacKenzie, F., & Keevil, B. G. (2013) · Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1177/0004563212473448 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationCase for the wider adoption of mass spectrometry-based adrenal steroid testing, and beyond
Monaghan, P. J., Keevil, B. G., Stewart, P. M., & Trainer, P. J. (2014) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2014-2258 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Cortisol measurement in patients receiving metyrapone therapy
Owen, L. J., Halsall, D. J., & Keevil, B. G. (2010) · Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1258/acb.2010.010167 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationHawley, J. M., Owen, L. J., MacKenzie, F., Mussell, C., Cowen, S., & Keevil, B. G. (2016) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2015.243576 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationThe effect of serum matrix and gender on cortisol measurement by commonly used immunoassays
Dodd, A., Ducroq, D., Neale, S., Wise, M., Mitchem, K., Armston, A., Barth, J., El-Farhan, N., Rees, D., & Evans, C. (2014) · Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1177/0004563213514567 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationNational UK audit of the Short Synacthen ® Test
Chatha, K. K., Middle, J. G., & Kilpatrick, E. S. (2010) · Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1258/acb.2009.009209 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Prednisolone measurement in human serum using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry
Owen, L., Gillingwater, S., & Keevil, B. (2005) · Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1258/0004563053492810 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationEditorial: The New Instructions to Authors for the Reporting of Steroid Hormone Measurements
Wierman, M. E., Auchus, R. J., Haisenleder, D. J., Hall, J. E., Handelsman, D., Hankinson, S., Rosner, W., Singh, R. J., Sluss, P. M., & Stanczyk, F. Z. (2014) · Molecular Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/me.2014-1285 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Bertholf, R. L., Jialal, I., & Winter, W. E. (2012) · Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4160-6164-9.00054-8 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The cortisol stress response induced by surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Prete, A., Yan, Q., Al‐Tarrah, K., Akturk, H. K., Prokop, L. J., Alahdab, F., Foster, M. A., Lord, J. M., Karavitaki, N., Wass, J. A., et al. (2018) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/cen.13820 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Javorsky, B. R., Raff, H., Carroll, T. B., Algeciras-Schimnich, A., Singh, R. J., Colón-Franco, J. M., & Findling, J. W. (2021) · Journal of the Endocrine Society · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvab022 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
“Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is a non-antibody, structural assay highly specific for cortisol [22-25].”
Competitive Immunoassays for the Detection of Small Molecules Using Single Molecule Arrays
Wang, X., Cohen, L., Wang, J., et al. (2018) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.8b11185 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Hormone Immunoassay Interference: A 2021 Update
Ghazal, K., Brabant, S., Prié, D., & Piketty, M. (2021) · Annals of Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.3343/alm.2022.42.1.3 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Electrochemical sensors for cortisol detections: Almost there
Zea, M., Bellagambi, F. G., Halima, H. B., Zine, N., Jaffrezic-Renault, N. J., Villa, R., Gabriel, G., & Errachid, A. (2020) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2020.116058 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Karuppaiah, G., Lee, M., Bhansali, S., & Manickam, P. (2023) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2023.115600 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Simultaneous detection of small molecules, proteins and microRNAs using single molecule arrays
Wang, X., & Walt, D. R. (2020) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d0sc02552f · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Relationship between plasma and salivary melatonin and cortisol investigated by LC-MS/MS
van Faassen, M. H. J. R., Bischoff, R., & Kema, I. P. (2016) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm-2016-0817 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
The role of corticosteroid-binding globulin in the evaluation of adrenal insufficiency
Verbeeten, K. C., & Ahmet, A. H. (2018) · Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1515/jpem-2017-0270 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Central adrenal insufficiency: open issues regarding diagnosis and glucocorticoid treatment
Ceccato, F., & Scaroni, C. M. (2018) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm-2018-0824 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Group 2: Adrenal insufficiency: screening methods and confirmation of diagnosis
Chanson, P., Guignat, L., Goichot, B., Chabre, O., Samara‐Boustani, D., Reynaud, R., Simon, D., Tabarin, A., Gruson, D., Reznik, Y., et al. (2017) · Annales d Endocrinologie · doi:10.1016/j.ando.2017.10.005 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Mezzullo, M., Pelusi, C., Fazzini, A., Repaci, A., Di Dalmazi, G., Gambineri, A., Pagotto, U., & Fanelli, F. (2020) · The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2019.105538 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Ahmet, A. H., Mokashi, A. S., Goldbloom, E. B., Huot, C., Juřenčák, R., Krishnamoorthy, P., Rowan-Legg, A., Kim, H. L., Pancer, L., & Kovesi, T. (2019) · BMJ Paediatrics Open · doi:10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000569 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Fanelli, F., Cantù, M., Temchenko, A., Mezzullo, M., Lindner, J. M., Peitzsch, M., Hawley, J. M., Bruce, S., Binz, P.-A., Ackermans, M. T., et al. (2022) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm-2021-1028 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationNegishi, E., Fukuda, N., Otsuki, T., et al. (2018) · American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00370.2018 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“Serum cortisol was measured by RIA as described previously (14).”
MethodMass spectrometry or immunoassay: est modus in rebus
Antonelli, G., Marinova, M., Artusi, C., & Plebani, M. (2017) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm-2017-0197 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
A multidisciplinary approach to the management of adrenal incidentaloma
Voltan, G., Boscaro, M., Armanini, D., Scaroni, C. M., & Ceccato, F. (2021) · Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1080/17446651.2021.1948327 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“150 nmol/L [44]), leading to an uncertainty in the range of autonomous cortisol secretion (considering serum cortisol after 1-mg DST).”
BackgroundPregnancy disrupts the accuracy of automated fT4 immunoassays
Jansen, H. I., van Herwaarden, A. E., Huijgen, H. J., Painter, R. C., Hillebrand, J. J., Boelen, A., & Heijboer, A. C. (2022) · European Thyroid Journal · doi:10.1530/etj-22-0145 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Wang, Z., Zhou, Q., Seth, A., et al. (2021) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2021.113918 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Glucocorticoid treatment and adrenal suppression in children: current view and open issues
Improda, N., Chioma, L., Capalbo, D., Bizzarri, C., & Salerno, M. (2024) · Journal of Endocrinological Investigation · doi:10.1007/s40618-024-02461-9 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Ahmet, A. H., Rowan-Legg, A., & Pancer, L. (2021) · Paediatrics & Child Health · doi:10.1093/pch/pxab015 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Okutan, S., Jørgensen, N. T., Pedersen, L. E., Borresen, S. W., Hilsted, L. M., Friis-Hansen, L. J., Feldt‐Rasmussen, U., & Klose, M. (2024) · Endocrine · doi:10.1007/s12020-024-03752-0 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“ElecsysCort I has interassay CVs (Coef fi cients of Variability) of 4.3%, 3.8%, and 2.5% at concentrations of 101, 436 and 1095 nmol/L, respectively, while ElecsysCort II has interassay CVs of 2.1%, 1.6%, and 1.8% at concentrations of 161, 532 and 837 nmol/L [21].”
InfluentialManagement of adrenal incidentalomas: Working through uncertainty
Cambos, S., & Tabarin, A. (2020) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.beem.2020.101427 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Araujo-Castro, M., García Cano, A., Jiménez Mendiguchía, L., Escobar-Morreale, H. F., & Valderrábano, P. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-00011-4 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Wu, C.-H., Guo, L., Hao, D.-D., Wang, Q., Ye, X., Ito, M., Huang, B., Mineo, C., Shaul, P., & Li, X.-A. (2023) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.1110516 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“However, current immunoassays measure total cortisol, not free cortisol (21).”
BackgroundACTH Stimulation Test for the Diagnosis of Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency: Light and Shadow
Birtolo, M. F., Antonini, S., Saladino, A., Zampetti, B., Lavezzi, E., Chiodini, I., Mazziotti, G., Lania, A. G., & Cozzi, R. C. (2023) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines11030904 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Gao, X., Yamazaki, Y., Tezuka, Y., Pieroni, J., Ishii, K., Atsumi, N., Ono, Y., Omata, K., Morimoto, R., Nakamura, Y., et al. (2020) · The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2020.105764 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Kamemura, M., Yokota, M., Ogawa, S., et al. (2020) · Journal of Chromatography B · doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2020.122117 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Brown, S. J., Hadlow, N. C., Badshah, I., & Henley, D. (2017) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/cen.13405 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Impact of age, body weight and metabolic risk factors on steroid reference intervals in men
Mezzullo, M., Dalmazi, G. D., Fazzini, A., Baccini, M., Repaci, A., Gambineri, A., Vicennati, V., Pelusi, C., Pagotto, U., & Fanelli, F. (2020) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/eje-19-0928 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Braun, V., Stuppner, H., Risch, L., & Seger, C. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms232314691 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
LC-MSMS assays of urinary cortisol, a comparison between four in-house assays
Brossaud, J., Leban, M., Corcuff, J., de Casson, F. B., Loupp, A.-G. L., Masson, D., Moal, V., & Bach‐Ngohou, K. (2018) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm-2017-0806 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
The hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis in childhood cancer survivors
Wei, C. H., & Crowne, E. C. (2018) · Endocrine Related Cancer · doi:10.1530/erc-18-0217 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Flowers, K. C., & Shipman, K. E. (2023) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics13081415 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“, to form parent and daughter ions to give more unique signals [18].”
BackgroundInfluentialSerum cortisol assay performance following the 1 mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test
Atkins, J. S., Hawley, J. M., Owen, L. J., Clayton, J. C., Scargill, J., & Keevil, B. G. (2023) · Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1177/00045632231179560 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“12 In the Siemens assay, Hawley et al. observed an 18.5% and 14.6% bias in the male and non-pregnant female cohorts respectively.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationPharmacological and analytical interference in hormone assays for diagnosis of adrenal incidentaloma
Lopez, A.-G., Fraissinet, F., Lefèbvre, H., Brunel, V., & Ziegler, F. (2019) · Annales d Endocrinologie · doi:10.1016/j.ando.2018.11.006 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Evaluating the Low-Dose ACTH Stimulation Test in Neonates: Ideal Times for Cortisol Measurement
LeDrew, R. L., Bariciak, E., Webster, R. J., Barrowman, N., & Ahmet, A. H. (2020) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaa635 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Prognostic usefulness of ACTH in the postoperative period of Cushing’s disease
Galiana, P. A., Fajardo, C., Riesgo-Suárez, P., Pérez-Bermejo, M., Ríos-Pérez, C., & Gómez-Vela, J. (2019) · Endocrine Connections · doi:10.1530/ec-19-0297 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“7) [1-117] months); late remission in 56/65 cases, with a mean remission follow-up time of 45.”
BackgroundKline, G. A., So, B., Campbell, D. J. T., Chin, A., Harvey, A. M., Venos, E., Pasieka, J. L., & Leung, A. A. C. (2021) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/cen.14546 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Should patients with Phosphomannomutase 2-CDG (PMM2-CDG) be screened for adrenal insufficiency?
Čechová, A., Honzík, T., Edmondson, A. C., et al. (2021) · Molecular Genetics and Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2021.06.003 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
TN, J., MJ, W., B, K., & RJ, R. (2018) · Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability · doi:10.4172/jbb.1000365 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Immunoassays have seen shown to give variable results depending on the specificity and sensitivity of the antibody used and LC-MS/MS is now the gold standard method for measuring steroids [4].”
Self-citationJansen, H. I., van Herwaarden, A. E., Huijgen, H. J., Vervloet, M. G., Hillebrand, J. J., Boelen, A., & Heijboer, A. C. (2023) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm-2022-1133 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Bäcklund, N., Lundstedt, S., Tornevi, A., Wihlbäck, A.-C., Olsson, T., Dahlqvist, P., & Brattsand, G. (2024) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/clinem/dgad763 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Anker, S. C., Morgenstern, J., Adler, J., Brune, M., Brings, S., Fleming, T., Kliemank, E., Zorn, M., Fischer, A., Szendroedi, J., et al. (2022) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm-2022-0603 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Rotolo, L., Galante, G., Coscia, K., Bissi, V., Tucci, L., Mezzullo, M., Gambineri, A., Vicennati, V., Zavatta, G., Pagotto, U., et al. (2025) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1093/ejendo/lvaf141 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Tan, S. Y. T., Tan, H. C., Zhu, L., Loh, L. M., Lim, D. S. T., Swee, D. S., Chan, Y. L., Lim, H. B., Ling, S. L., Ou, E. J., et al. (2023) · Endocrine Connections · doi:10.1530/ec-23-0004 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“However, the differences in serum and salivary cortisol assays, as well as the varying definitions of AI using serum cortisol, could account for the small differences in the salivary cortisol cut-off level derived (37).”
Quantitative MALDI-MS/MS assay for serum cortisol through charged derivatization
Nakamura, M., Marina, M., Yuda, K., Fujimura, S., Sugiura, Y., Shimma, S., Nishimoto, K., Nishikawa, T., Suematsu, M., Ogawa, S., et al. (2019) · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2019.112912 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The cortisol-CBG ratio affects cortisol immunoassay bias at elevated CBG concentrations
Vos, M. J., Bisschop, P. H. L. T., Deckers, M. M. L., & Endert, E. (2017) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm-2017-0095 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Agrawal, N., Chakraborty, P. P., Sinha, A., & Maiti, A. (2020) · BMJ Case Reports · doi:10.1136/bcr-2020-235450 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Cortez, S., Arbeláez, A. M., Wallendorf, M., & McNerney, K. P. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology · doi:10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2023.2023-2-3 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Moreover, all samples were analyzed using the pAb immunoassay, mAb immunoassay, and LC/ MS, which is considered the reference standard when using 1 mcg Cosyntropin stimulation test in pediatric population (14).”
MethodAre serum cortisol measurements by immunoassays reliable?
Haq, N., Araque, K., Kanegusuku, A. G., Wei, B., & Soldin, S. J. (2020) · Medical Research Archives · doi:10.18103/mra.v8i5.2128 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“These results are very unusual since IA measurements of cortisol are susceptible to cross-reactivity with structurally similar compounds, typically leading to higher values when compared to LC-MS/MS.(1)”
MethodResultInfluentialKumar, K., Sinha, R. R. K., Singh, P. K., et al. (2023) · Ruminants · doi:10.3390/ruminants3020015 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Kline, G. A., Buse, J. D., van der Gugten, J. G., Holmes, D. T., Chin, A., & Sadrzadeh, S. M. H. (2017) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/cen.13478 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Zhang, T., Zhao, H., Li, M., et al. (2020) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-019-02356-2 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Medical Treatment of Cushing’s Syndrome
Guignat, L., & Bertherat, J. Y. (2025) · Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.3803/enm.2024.501 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Standardization of steroid tests and implications for the endocrine community
Honour, J. W. (2017) · Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1177/0004563217715273 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Carpentier, A., Zampetas, D., Durand, A., Naassïla, M., & Bralet, M. (2025) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.70384 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“However, CRP and cortisol are limited by their lack of specificity, with CRP reflecting generalized inflammation and cortisol subject to considerable interindividual variability (Hawley et al. 2016; Orsolini et al. 2018).”
A brief update on mass spectrometry applications to routine clinical endocrinology
Holmes, D. T. (2019) · Clinical mass spectrometry · doi:10.1016/j.clinms.2019.05.006 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“For example, the performance of routine cortisol assays against both a routine LC-MS/MS method and a candidate reference LC-MS/MS method revealed clinically significant biases in immunoassay analyses which for some platforms reached ~25 to 40% having obvious implications to their performance in ACTH-stimulation testin…”
MethodImproving the Dexamethasone Suppression Test
Keevil, B. G. (2021) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/hvab076 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“nonspecific antibody–antigen interactions or failure to liberate cortisol from cortisol binding globulin efficiently (10).”
BackgroundSelf-citationNoël, M., Fraissinet, F., Lefèbvre, H., Bénichou, J., Brunel, V., & Ziegler, F. (2021) · Clinical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2021.11.016 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Jiang, X., Gou, M., Yin, Y., Chen, W., Li, Y., Chen, S., Pan, S., Luο, X., Tan, S., Tian, B., et al. (2025) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2025.107501 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Rates of adrenal insufficiency using a monoclonal vs. polyclonal cortisol assay
McNerney, K. P., & Arbeláez, A. M. (2021) · Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1515/jpem-2021-0519 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Yin, Y., Tong, J., Huang, J., Tian, B., Chen, S., Tan, S., Wang, Z., Tong, Y., Fan, F., Kochunov, P. V., et al. (2024) · Stress and Health · doi:10.1002/smi.3482 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Thephilah Cathrine, R., Aruna, S., & Vijayaragahavan, R. (2022) · Bioscience Journal · doi:10.14393/bj-v38n0a2022-54176 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Agrawal, N., Sinha, A., Chakraborty, P. P., Bhattacharjee, R., Awasthi, A., & Maiti, A. (2025) · Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.4103/ijem.ijem_482_23 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“[11] This was attributed to the differences in the extent of cross‑reactivity between these analyzers.”
Surgical treatment of ACTH-ectopic syndrome
Krylov, V. V., Dobreva, E. A., Kharnas, S. S., Kuznetsov, N. S., Marova, E. I., & Levkin, V. V. (2019) · Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery · doi:10.17116/hirurgia201908174 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Majumder, S., Chakraborty, P. P., Ghosh, P. C., & Bera, M. (2020) · BMJ Case Reports · doi:10.1136/bcr-2019-233722 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Carson, J. P., & Gronowski, A. M. (2021) · Journal of the Endocrine Society · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvab136 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Adrenal insufficiency - causes and laboratory diagnosis
Brutvan, T., Ježková, J., Kotasová, M., & Kršek, M. (2024) · Biomedical Papers · doi:10.5507/bp.2024.033 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Tosun, B. G., Turan, S., Haklar, G., Bereket, A., & Güran, T. (2025) · Hormone Research in Paediatrics · doi:10.1159/000544945 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“These include mAb immunoassays such as Elecsys Cortisol II and Beckman Access Cortisol, as well as the highly speci fi c non-antibody structural assay LC-MS/MS [26, 44, 45].”
Cortisol assays across the physiologic spectrum: access immunoassay compared with LC-MS/MS
Newman, A. J., Mahrokhian, S., Hanna, I., Tsai, C.-H., Salle, S. P., Brown, J. M., Stouffer, D. G., Auchus, R. J., & Vaidya, A. (2026) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1093/ejendo/lvag043 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Cortisol as a stress biomarker: analytical perspectives and challenges
Suryawanshi, R., & Sharma, S. (2026) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.cca.2026.121008 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Hillebrand, J. J., Bons, J. A. P., van den Berg, S. A. A., Heijboer, A. C., & van Herwaarden, A. E. (2026) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm-2026-0136 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“We observed high agreement and correlations with minor bias for the Roche immunoassay compared to IHD LC-MS/MS, which was also shown before [2, 3, 16, 17].”
Evaluation of adrenal function in hemodynamically stable patients with liver cirrhosis
Naguib, R., Fayed, A. A., Abouelnaga, S., et al. (2022) · Clinical and Experimental Hepatology · doi:10.5114/ceh.2022.113291 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“The tests were performed using the ADVIA Centaur XPT immunoassay system Cortisol kit (ADVIA Centaur Cortisol assay (REF: 10994924) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (Siemens Health Care Diagnostics, USA) [9].”
MethodCAI Score for the Diagnosis of Central Adrenal Insufficiency
Almalki, M., Saygılı, E. S., Aboalsamh, N., Alghassab, A. S., Alshammari, Y., Alali, F., Alghufaili, S., Alshehri, H., Alshahrani, A. S., & Elhassan, Y. (2025) · Journal of the Endocrine Society · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvaf167
“This intentionally inclusive threshold accounts for the performance characteristics of our chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay, which may overestimate cortisol levels compared to LC-MS/MS [18] and ensures we captured all patients with potential diagnostic uncertainty.”
Diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency
Park, J., Powell, D. J., & Blair, J. (2019) · Paediatrics and Child Health · doi:10.1016/j.paed.2019.04.005 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Insuffisance surrénalienne secondaire : actualités diagnostiques et thérapeutiques
Vinolas, H., Lombès, M., & Tabarin, A. (2019) · Annales d Endocrinologie · doi:10.1016/s0003-4266(19)30111-8
Ahmet, A. H., Rowan-Legg, A., & Pancer, L. (2021) · Paediatrics & Child Health · doi:10.1093/pch/pxab016
Drake, W. M., Keevil, B. G., & Trainer, P. J. (2022) · doi:10.1093/med/9780198870197.003.0006
Self-citationChurch, D., & Halsall, D. J. (2021) · Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mpmed.2021.05.002
Adrenal insufficiency: a commentary
Ryan, A., & Twomey, P. J. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2022-208162
Zöllner, E. W., Lombard, C. J., & Zemlin, A. E. (2022) · Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1515/jpem-2022-0252
Steroids in urine, other fluids and tissues
Honour, J. W. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818124-9.00007-3
Hao, J. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3859299/v1
Adrenal Multidisipliner Güncel Yaklaşım
Özen, F. Z., Özer, M., Özsoy, Ç., Binnetoğlu, E., Alparslan, A. Ş., Budak, E. S., Kök, E. V., Çetinkaya, G. S., Durmuş, M. E., Köker, G., et al. (2024) · Akademisyen Kitabevi eBooks · doi:10.37609/akya.2992
Geeta, M. E. T. (2023) · International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) · doi:10.21275/sr23602230140
Church, D., & Halsall, D. J. (2025) · Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mpmed.2025.06.005
Rotolo, L., Galante, G., Coscia, K., Bissi, V., Tucci, L., Mezzullo, M., Gambineri, A., Vicennati, V., Zavatta, G., Pagotto, U., et al. (2025) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1093/ejendo/lvaf176
Kanazawa, K., Hijikata, M., & Kuwabara, K. (2025) · AACE Endocrinology and Diabetes · doi:10.1016/j.aed.2025.10.010
“16,40,41 Furthermore, we could not fully account for confounding factors that in fl uence the HPA axis, such as the regular use of complementary medicine, physical inactivity, sleep disturbances, and night-shift work.”
Izuchi, T., Iwama, S., Yamagami, A., Kobayashi, T., Suzuki, K., Murase, T., Ando, M., Murasawa, S., Mukai, K., Takagi, H., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2026.1741709 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“However, since 2016, serum cortisol assays have shifted from polyclonal antibody-based immunoassays to newer methods utilizing monoclonal antibodies (10 – 12).”
Zheng, S. (2026) · International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management · doi:10.1007/s13198-026-03269-x
Aoyama, Y., Haruyama, Y., Ozaki, Y., et al. (2026) · Internal Medicine · doi:10.2169/internalmedicine.7478-26
Marrington, R., Anderson, M., Roch, M., Davies, S. L., Forster, R., Williams, G., d’Oyen-Fitchett, J., & MacKenzie, F. (2026) · British Journal of Biomedical Science · doi:10.3389/bjbs.2026.16559
“Outliers in EQA schemes offered by Birmingham Quality are removed by Healy trimming with is applied to all data [27].”
Jørgensen, N. T., Borresen, S. W., Hilsted, L., Christoffersen, C., Brødbæk, K., Ugleholdt, R., Feltoft, C. L., Skaanning, L. K., Thorsby, P. M., Rasmussen, Å. K., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2026.1872524
“Previous cortisol immunoassays generally performed poorly compared with LC – MS/MS (10, 12, 40), but modern immunoassays using highly speci fi c monoclonal antibodies and mass spectrome-try-traceable calibration have demonstrated substantially improved accuracy compared with fi rst-generation assays…”
- Authors
- Hawley, J. M., Owen, L. J., Lockhart, S. J., Monaghan, P. J., Armston, A., Chadwick, C. A., Wilshaw, H., Freire, M., Perry, L., & Keevil, B. G.
- Affiliations
- University Hospital South Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
- The Christie Hospital (GB)
- Southampton Hospital (US)
- Aintree University Hospital (GB)
- St. Georges' University Hospital, London, UK
- Croydon University Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hawley, James M
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-09-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1220-1229
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W2501751012
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 6.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Clinical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Abbott Laboratories
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
- Keywords
- serum cortisol, immunoassay performance, matrix effects, antibody specificity, corticosteroid-binding globulin, pregnancy, metyrapone, prednisolone, assay standardization, adrenal function testing
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Cohort Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review