CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 50Heavy Metal Pollution RemediationHeavy metals in environmentChromium effects and bioremediation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phytoremediation of electroplating wastewater by vetiver grass (Chrysopogon zizanoides L.)

Open access
Nugroho, Andhika Puspito, Butar, Erni Saurmalinda Butar, Priantoro, Ekaputra Agung, Sriwuryandari, Lies, Pratiwi, Zulfa Berliana, Sembiring, Tarzan·2021·Scientific Reports
DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-93923-0PMC PMC8280137
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The electroplating industry generates wastewater containing a variety of heavy metals which potentially contaminate water ecosystems. The available and well-known electroplating wastewater treatments are considered as an expensive and less effective method, therefore phytoremediation was used as an alternative friendly solution. This study aims to evaluate the uptake and elimination rate of heavy metals by vetiver ( Chrysopogon zizanoides L.) on metal-polluted water. Vetiver was planted in artificial electroplating wastewater containing different levels (low, medium, high) of chromium (Cr) and nickel (Ni). Water, roots, and shoots were collected periodically to determine Cr and Ni contents using Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS). Metal accumulation and elimination rate, Bioconcentration Factor (BCF), Biological Absorption Coefficient (BAC), and Translocation Factor (TF) were calculated to evaluate plant’s effectiveness in metal remediation processes. The results showed that vetiver ( C. zizanoides L. ) was able to remove 61.10% Cr and 95.65% Ni on metal-contaminated water. The highest uptake rates for Cr and Ni are 127.21 mg/kg/day and 15.60 mg/kg/day respectively, while the elimination rates for Cr and Ni tend to slow 1.09 mg/kg/day and 12.24 mg/kg/day respectively. Vetiver BCF, BAC, and TF values on Cr and Ni contaminated water were greater than 1, which indicates that vetiver work through phytoextraction and phytostabilization to treat metals. The findings showed that vetiver has promise as a phytoremediation agent thus providing implication for electroplating wastewater treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-021-93923-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Cr and Ni content in shoots of vetiver (C. zizanoides L.): (a) uptake condition, (b) elimination condition.
Figure 1 Cr and Ni content in shoots of vetiver (C. zizanoides L.): (a) uptake condition, (b) elimination condition.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Sampling vetiver site.
Figure 2 Sampling vetiver site.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. Reis, M. T. A. & Ismael, M. R. C. Electroplating wastes. Phys. Sci. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2018-0024 (2018). · DOI
  2. Algarra, M., Jimenez, M. V., Rodrıguez-Castellon, E., Jimenez-Lopez, A. & Jimenez-Jimenez, J. Heavy metals removal from electroplating wastewater by aminopropyl-Si MCM-41. Chemosphere 59, 779–786 (2005). · DOI
  3. Yao, X. et al. Highly efficient removal of hexavalent chromium from electroplating wastewater using aminated wheat straw. RSC Adv. 6, 8797–8805 (2016). · DOI
  4. Hoque, E. & Fritscher, J. Multimetal bioremediation and biomining by a combination of new aquatic strains of Mucor hiemalis. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–16 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Forstner, U. Metal Pollution in the Aquatic Environment (Springer-Verlag, 1979). · DOI
  6. Islam, S., Ahmed, K., Raknuzzaman, M. & Kundu, G. K. Heavy metals in the industrial sludge and their ecological risk: A case study for a developing country. J. Geochem. Explor. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.09.006 (2016). · DOI
  7. Kafil, M., Nasab, S. B., Moazed, H. & Bhatnagar, A. Phytoremediation potential of vetiver grass irrigated with wastewater for treatment of metal contaminated soil. Int. J. Phytoremediat. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2018.1474443 (2019). · DOI
  8. Ackova, D. G. Heavy metals and their general toxicity on plants. Plant Sci. Today 5, 14–18 (2018). · DOI
  9. Algül, F. & Beyhan, M. Concentrations and sources of heavy metals in shallow sediments in Lake Bafa, Turkey. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–12 (2020). · DOI
  10. Goher, M. E., Hassan, A. M., Abdel-moniem, I. A., Fahmy, A. H. & El-sayed, S. M. Evaluation of surface water quality and heavy metal indices of Ismailia Canal, Nile River, Egypt. Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 40, 225–233 (2014). · DOI
  11. Shahid, M. et al. Chromium speciation, bioavailability, uptake, toxicity and detoxification in soil-plant system: A review. Chemosphere 178, 513–533 (2017). · DOI
  12. Bandara, P. C., Peña-Bahamonde, J. & Rodrigues, D. F. Redox mechanisms of conversion of Cr (VI) to Cr (III) by graphene oxide-polymer composite. Sci. Rep. 10, 9237 (2020). · DOI
  13. Tumolo, M. et al. Chromium pollution in European Water, sources, health risk, and remediation strategies: An overview. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 5438 (2020). · DOI
  14. Lotfi, S., Chakit, M. & Belghyti, D. Groundwater quality and pollution index for heavy metals in Saïs Plain, Morocco. J. Health Pollut. 10, 200603 (2020). · DOI
  15. He, S., He, Z., Yang, X. & Baligar, V. C. Mechanisms of nickel uptake and hyperaccumulation by plants and implications for soil remediation. Adv. Agron. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394278-4.00003-9 (2012). · DOI
  16. Laghlimi, M., Baghdad, B., Hadi, H. E. & Bouabdli, A. Phytoremediation mechanisms of heavy metal contaminated soils: A review. Open J. Ecol. 5, 375–388 (2015). · DOI
  17. Hassan, M. U. et al. Nickel toxicity in plants: Reasons, toxic effects, tolerance mechanisms, and remediation possibilities - a review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26, 12673–12688 (2019). · DOI
  18. Nie, J. et al. A comparative study on the uptake and toxicity of nickel added in the form of different salts to maize seedlings. Environ. Res. Public Health 12, 15075–15087 (2015). · DOI
  19. Rahman, L., Sarkar, S. M. & Yusoff, M. M. Efficient removal of heavy metals from electroplating wastewater using polymer ligands. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 10, 352–361 (2015). · DOI
  20. Liu, Z. et al. Effects of phytoremediation on industrial wastewater. Earth Environ. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/371/3/032011 (2019). · DOI
  21. Suelee, A. L., Hasan, S. N. M. S., Kusin, F. M., Yusuff, F. M. & Ibrahim, Z. Z. Phytoremediation potential of vetiver grass (Vetiveria zizanioides) for treatment of metal-contaminated water. Water Air Soil Pollut. 228, 1–15 (2017). · DOI
  22. Sarma, H. Metal hyperaccumulation in plants: A review focusing on phytoremediation technology. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 4, 118–138 (2011). · DOI
  23. Schwitzguébel, J. & Comino, E. Is phytoremediation a sustainable and reliable approach to clean-up contaminated water and soil in Alpine areas ?. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 18, 842–856 (2011). · DOI
  24. Shmaefsky, B. R. Principles of phytoremediation. In Phytoremediation. Concepts and Strategies in Plant Sciences (ed. Shmaefsky, B. R.) (Springer, 2020).
  25. Buendía-gonzález, L., Orozco-villafuerte, J., Cruz-sosa, F., Barrera-díaz, C. E. & Vernon-carter, E. J. Prosopis laevigata a potential chromium (VI) and cadmium (II) hyperaccumulator desert plant. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 5862–5867 (2010). · DOI
  26. Prabakaran, K. et al. Managing environmental contamination through phytoremediation by invasive plants: A review. Ecol. Eng. 138, 28–37 (2019). · DOI
  27. Lee, J. H. An overview of phytoremediation as a potentially promising technology for environmental pollution control. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 18, 431–439 (2013). · DOI
  28. Edao, H. G. Heavy metals pollution of soil; toxicity and phytoremediation techniques. Int. J. Adv. Res. Publ. 1, 29–41 (2017).
  29. Fasani, E., Manara, A., Martini, F., Furini, A. & Dalcorso, G. The potential of genetic engineering of plants for the remediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals. Plant Cell Environ. 41, 1210–1232 (2017).
  30. Tangahu, B. V. et al. A review on heavy metals (As, Pb, and Hg) uptake by plants through phytoremediation. Int. J. ofChemical Eng. 2011, 1–31 (2011).
  31. Hossain, M. A., Piyatida, P., Teixeira, J. A. & Fujita, M. Molecular mechanism of heavy metal toxicity and tolerance in plants: Central role of glutathione in detoxification of reactive oxygen species and methylglyoxal and in heavy metal chelation. J. Bot. 2012, 1–37 (2012). · DOI
  32. Anjum, N. A. et al. Jacks of metal/metalloid chelation trade in plants-an overview. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 1–17 (2015).
  33. Chen, L., Wang, D., Long, C. & Cui, Z. Effect of biodegradable chelators on induced phytoextraction of uranium- and cadmium- contaminated soil by Zebrina pendula Schnizl. Sci. Rep. 9, 19817 (2019). · DOI
  34. Dipu, S., Kumar, A. A. & Thanga, S. G. Effect of chelating agents in phytoremediation of heavy metals. Remediat. J. 22, 133–146 (2012). · DOI
  35. Xia, S. et al. A critical review on bioremediation technologies for Cr (VI)-contaminated soils and wastewater. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2018.1564526 (2019). · DOI
  36. Raman, J. K. & Gnansounou, E. A review on bioremediation potential of vetiver grass. In Waste Bioremediation (eds Varjani, S. J. & Al, E.) 127–140 (Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd, 2018). · DOI
  37. Pk, I., As, A. K. & Pm, N. Agrotechniques for quality planting material production in vetiver (Chrysopogon zizanioides (L.) Nash.). J. Med. Plants Stud. 7, 211–213 (2019).
  38. Panja, S., Sarkar, D. & Datta, R. Removal of antibiotics and nutrients by Vetiver grass (Chrysopogon zizanioides) from secondary wastewater effluent. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 22, 764–773 (2020). · DOI
  39. Darajeh, N., Truong, P., Rezania, S., Alizadeh, H. & Leung, D. W. M. Effectiveness of vetiver grass versus other plants for phytoremediation of contaminated water. J. Environ. Treat. Tech. 7, 485–500 (2019).
  40. Kiiskila, J. D., Li, K., Sarkar, D. & Datta, R. Metabolic response of vetiver grass (Chrysopogon zizanioides) to acid mine drainage. Chemosphere 240, 124–961 (2020). · DOI
  41. Thakur, S. et al. Plant-driven removal of heavy metals from soil: Uptake, translocation, tolerance mechanism, challenges, and future perspectives. Environ. Monit. Assess. 188, 206 (2016). · DOI
  42. Mukta, R. H., Khatun, M. R. & Huda, A. K. M. N. Calcium induces phytochelatin accumulation to cope with chromium toxicity in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Plant Interact. 14, 295–302 (2019). · DOI
  43. Williams, L. E. & Mills, R. F. P 1B—ATPases: An ancient family of transition metal pumps with diverse functions in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 10, 491–502 (2005). · DOI
  44. Hall, J. L. Cellular mechanisms for heavy metal detoxification and tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 1–11 (2002). · DOI
  45. Roongtanakiat, N. Vetiver Phytoremediation for Heavy Metal Decontamination. PRVN Tech. Bull. (ORDPB, 2009).
  46. Centofanti, T. et al. Xylem exudate composition and root-to-shoot nickel translocation in Alyssum species Xylem exudate composition and root-to-shoot nickel translocation in Alyssum species. Plant Soil 373, 59–75 (2013). · DOI
  47. Singh, H. P., Mahajan, P., Kaur, S., Batish, D. R. & Koh, R. K. Chromium toxicity and tolerance in plants. Environ. Chem. Lett. 11, 229–254 (2013). · DOI
  48. Chen, C., Huang, D. & Liu, J. Functions and toxicity of nickel in plants: Recent advances and future prospects. Clean 37, 304–313 (2009).
  49. Bluskov, S. Distribution of Chromium and Its Effect on Morphology and Anatomy of Brassica Juncea (Indian Mustard) and Soil Microorganisms (The University of Northern British Columbia, 2004).
  50. di Toppi, L. S., Fossati, F., Musetti, R., Mikerezi, I. & Favali, M. A. Effects of hexavalent chromium on maize, tomato, and cauliflower plants. J. Plant Nutr. 25, 701–717 (2002). · DOI
  51. Fargasova, A. Plants as models for chromium and nickel risk assessment. Ecotoxicology 21, 1476–1483 (2012). · DOI
  52. Shahid, M. et al. Foliar heavy metal uptake, toxicity and detoxification in plants: A comparison of foliar and root metal uptake. J. Hazard. Mater. 326, 36–58 (2016).
  53. Mufarrege, M. M. et al. Organic matter effects on the Cr (VI) removal efficiency and tolerance of Typha domingensis. Water Air Soil Pollut. 229, 1–12 (2018). · DOI
  54. V, D. V. & Sushama, P. K. Heavy Metal Contamination of Dumpyard Soils and its Phytoremediation with Vetiver Grass ( Chrysopogon zizaniodes ). Nat. environment. Pollut. Technol. 16, 257–260 (2017).
  55. Bader, N., Alsharif, E., Nassib, M., Alshelmani, N. & Alalem, A. Phytoremediation potential of Suaeda vera for some heavy metals in roadside soil in Benghazi, Libya. Asian J. Green Chem. 3, 82–90 (2019).
  56. Masarovicova, E., Kralova, K. & Kummerova, M. Principles of classification of medicinal plants as hyperaccumulators or excluders. Acta Physiol. Plant. 32, 823–829 (2010). · DOI
  57. Anderson, L. L. Assessment of Thelypteris palustris, Asparagus sprengeri, and Lolium perenne for Their Potential Use in the Phytoremediation of Arsenic- Contaminated Soils (Louisiana State University, 2007).
  58. Sinha, V., Pakshirajan, K. & Chaturvedi, R. Chromium tolerance, bioaccumulation and localization in plants: An overview. J. Environ. Manage. 206, 715–730 (2018). · DOI
  59. Greger, M. Metal availability, uptake, transport and accumulation in plants. In Heavy Metal Stress in Plants Heavy (ed. Prasad, M. N.) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2004).
  60. Sajad, M. A. et al. Evaluation of chromium phytoremediation potential of some plant species of Dir Lower, Khyber, Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Acta Ecol. Sin. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2019.12.002 (2019). · DOI
  61. Yap, C. K., Ismail, A., Tan, S. G. & Omar, H. Accumulation, depuration and distribution of cadmium and zinc in the green-lipped mussel Perna viridis (Linnaeus) under laboratory conditions. Hydrobiologia 498, 151–160 (2003). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 50

Metadata

Authors
Nugroho, A. P., Butar, E. S. B., Priantoro, E. A., Sriwuryandari, L., Pratiwi, Z. B., & Sembiring, T.
Affiliations
  • Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
  • Indonesian Institute of Sciences (ID)
Corresponding author
Butar, Erni Saurmalinda Butar
ORCID
Venue
Scientific Reports
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2021-07-14
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
14482-14482
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/s41598-021-93923-0
PMC
PMC8280137
OpenAlex
W3183043819
Cited by
50
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Chromium effects and bioremediation
Keywords
phytoremediation, Vetiveria zizanioides, electroplating wastewater, heavy metal removal, chromium, nickel, phytoextraction, phytostabilization, bioconcentration factor, translocation factor, bioaccumulation factor, metal uptake

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review