Cited by 583D Printing in Biomedical ResearchCancer Cells and MetastasisCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism

Application of LDH assay for therapeutic efficacy evaluation of ex vivo tumor models

Open access
Cox, Megan C., Mendes, Rita, Silva, Fernanda, Mendes, Teresa F., Zelaya-Lazo, Adelyn, Halwachs, Kathleen, Purkal, Julie J., Isidro, Inês A. +3 more·2021·Scientific Reports

Abstract

The current standard preclinical oncology models are not able to fully recapitulate therapeutic targets and clinically relevant disease biology, evidenced by the 90% attrition rate of new therapies in clinical trials. Three-dimensional (3D) culture systems have the potential to enhance the relevance of preclinical models. However, the limitations of currently available cellular assays to accurately evaluate therapeutic efficacy in these models are hindering their widespread adoption. We assessed the compatibility of the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay in 3D spheroid cultures against other commercially available readout methods. We developed a standardized protocol to apply the LDH assay to ex vivo cultures, considering the impact of culture growth dynamics. We show that accounting for growth rates and background release levels of LDH are sufficient to make the LDH assay a suitable methodology for longitudinal monitoring and endpoint assessment of therapeutic efficacy in both cell line-derived xenografts (xenospheres) and patient-derived explant cultures. This method has the added value of being non-destructive and not dependent on reagent penetration or manipulation of the parent material. The establishment of reliable readout methods for complex 3D culture systems will further the utility of these tumor models in preclinical and co-clinical drug development studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-021-97894-0

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Additional markers of cellular integrity, including lactate dehydrogenase release, caspase activation, and changes in mitochondrial membrane potential, have been adapted to evaluate apoptotic and necrotic responses within 3D tumor models.

    “Additional markers of cellular integrity, including lactate dehydrogenase release, caspase activation, and changes in mitochondrial membrane potential, have also been adapted to evaluate apoptotic and necrotic responses within 3D tumor models [186,308,309,310].”

    From Modeling Tumor Microenvironment Complexity In Vitro: Spheroids as Physiologically Relevant Tumor Models and Strategies for Their Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [308]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) describes LDH release as a measure of cell toxicity and its application to 3D tumor cultures; the Results also compare LDH-based cell-death measurements with apoptosis readouts. The cited paper does not describe adapting caspase activation or mitochondrial membrane potential measurements to these models, so it supports only part of the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cox, M. C., Mendes, R., Silva, F., Mendes, T. F., Zelaya-Lazo, A., Halwachs, K., Purkal, J. J., Isidro, I. A., Félix, A., Boghaert, E. R., & Brito, C.
Affiliations
  • AbbVie (United States) (US)
  • Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica (PT)
  • Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
  • Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil (PT)
Corresponding author
Brito, Catarina
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2021-09-17
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
18571-18571
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3199137995
Cited by
58
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/132163/2017, PD/BD/128377/2017, UIDB/04462/2020)
  • AbbVie
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (739572)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Keywords
lactate dehydrogenase assay, ex vivo tumor model, 3D spheroid culture, cell line-derived xenografts, treatment efficacy assessment, nondestructive readout, long-term monitoring, assay standardization, drug development
MeSH terms
Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor, Humans, L-Lactate Dehydrogenase, Neoplasms, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Spheroids, Cellular, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review