CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 48

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Optimizing textile dyeing wastewater for tomato irrigation through physiochemical, plant nutrient uses and pollution load index of irrigated soil

Hassan, Jahidul, Rajib, Md. Mijanur Rahman, Sarker, Umakanta, Akter, Masuma, Khan, Md. Noor-E.-Azam, Khandaker, Shahjalal, Khalid, Farhan, Rahman, G. K. M. Mustafizur, Ercisli, Sezai, Muresan, Crina Carmen, Marc, Romina Alina·2022·Scientific Reports
DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-11558-1PMC PMC9203507

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Reuse of wastewater for vegetable cultivation is becoming popular in order to augment the inadequate irrigation supplies and meet the growing demands of ground water for agriculture and industries production in different regions of the world. This study was investigated to optimize different stages of textile dyeing wastewater (TDW) for irrigation focusing on their effect on growth, yield and physiochemical attributes of tomato, plant nutrient use, heavy metals enrichment and pollution load of the irrigated soil. Textile wastewater were collected from the seven stages of (second wash after scouring and bleaching T2; enzyme treated water T3; second wash after bath drain T4; neutralization treatment T5; second wash after soaping T6; fixing treatment water T7; mixed effluent T8) of a dyeing process for physiochemical characterization and evaluation their irrigation feasibility for tomato cultivation in compare with the ground water (T1). The pot experiment consists of eight irrigation treatments was laid out following a completely randomized block design with three replications. Results showed the presence of plant nutrients and heavy metals in all the studied samples where T8 (mixed effluent) exceeded the limit of agricultural standard for almost all physiological parameters such as TDS, TSS, EC, BOD, COD affording the highest value. T8 also delivered the highest Cl- and heavy metals like Cd, Ni, Cr followed by T4 < T7. As a consequence, these provided comparatively higher enrichment factor (EF), pollution load index (PLI) and sodium absorption ratio (SAR) to transform fresh soil into the category of severe and slightly to moderate saline. Therefore, the yield and physiochemical attributes of tomato were dramatically reduced with T8 and T4 treatment. On the other hand, T2, T3 and T6 treatment had significant positive impact on growth and yield of tomato due to having higher N, P, K, S and lower heavy metals (Cu, Zn, Fe, Pb, Cd, Ni, Cr) than the recommended guideline. These features were contributed to cause minimum EF and PLI in the soil irrigated with T2, T3 and T6 stages of TDW. Correlation matrix demonstrated that EF and PLI of heavy metals (except Cd, Ni) were negatively related to yield, while positively related to SAR and fruit abortion. Although T6 (2nd wash after soaping) performed better in respect to growth, yield, yield attributes and nutrient use efficiency, principal component analysis revealed that T2 (2nd wash after scouring and bleaching) and T3 (enzyme treated water) were also belong to the same group of T6 and T1 (ground water). Thus, it may be suggested that T2, T3 and T6 stages of textile dyeing wastewater could be used profitably without ETP for vegetable cultivation and would effectively supplement not only the nutrient requirement of the crop but may also act as the alternate source of irrigation water. Although, further research is needed to sort out the health risk assessment through the heavy metals’ accumulation in the plant parts after irrigation with different stages of textile dyeing wastewater.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-022-11558-1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 65

  1. Connor, R. et al. Evolution of Water Use. The United Nations World Water Development Report 3: Water in a Changing World (UNESCO Publishing, 2009).
  2. Khan, G. M., Deniel Konjit, M., Thomas, A., Eyasu, S. S. & Awoke, G. Impact of textile wastewater on seed germination and some physiological parameters in pea (Pisum sativum L.), Lentil (Lens esculentum L.) and Gram (gram arienum L.). Asian J. Plant Sci. 10(4), 269–273 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Hassan, J., Kamal, M. Z. U. & Alam, M. Z. Impact of textile dyeing effluents on germination and seedling stage of country bean (Lablab niger var. Typicus). Environ. Nat. Resour. J. 11(2), 80–96 (2013).
  4. Khandaker, S., Hassan, J. & Saha, G. C. Effect of textile dying wastewater on growth, yield and nutritional qualities of stem amaranth. Int. J. Agric. Sci. Res. 3(3), 171–178 (2013).
  5. Allegre, C., Moulin, P., Maisseu, M. & Charbit, F. Treatment and reuse of reactive dyeing effluents. J. Mem. Sci. 269, 15–34 (2006). · DOI
  6. Jolly, Y. N. & Islam, A. Characterization of dye industry effluent and assessment of its suitability for irrigation purpose. J. Bangladesh Acad. Sci. 33, 99–106 (2009). · DOI
  7. DeFeo, G., Mays, L. W. & Angelakis, A. N. Water and wastewater management technologies in the ancient greece and roman civilizations. In Treatise in Water Science (ed. Wilder, P.) 3–22 (Elsevier, 2011). · DOI
  8. Kiziloglu, F. M., Turan, M., Sahin, U., Kuslu, Y. & Dursun, A. Effects of untreated and treated wastewater irrigation on some chemical properties of cauliflower (Brassica olerecea L. var. botrytis) and red cabbage (Brassica olerecea L. var. rubra) grown on calcareous soil in Turkey. Agric. Water Manag. 95, 716–724 (2008). · DOI
  9. Emongor, V. E. & Ramolemana, G. M. Treated sewage effluent (water) potential to be used for horticultural production in Botswana. Phys. Chem. Earth 29, 1101–1108 (2004). · DOI
  10. Pereira, B. F. F., He, Z. L., Stoffella, P. J. & Melfi, A. J. Reclaimed wastewater: Effects on citrus nutrition. Agric. Water Manag. 98, 1828–1833 (2011). · DOI
  11. Sousa, G., Fangueiro, D., Duarte, E. & Vasconcelos, E. Reuse of treated wastewater and sewage sludge for fertilization and irrigation. Water Sci. Technol. 64(4), 871–879 (2011). · DOI
  12. Letshwenyo, M. W. & Mokokwe, G. Accumulation of heavy metals and bacteriological indicators in spinach irrigated with further treated secondary wastewater. Heliyon https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05241 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Asano, T. Wastewater Reclamation and Reuse: Water Quality Management Library (Technomic Publishing Company, 1998).
  14. Hussain, I., Raschid-Sally, L., Hanjra, M. A., Marikar, F. & van der Hoek, W. Wastewater Use in Agriculture: Review of Impacts and Methodological Issues in Valuing Impacts (International Water Management Institute, IWMI, 2002).
  15. Mapanda, F., Mangwayana, E. N., Nyamangara, J. & Giller, K. E. The effect of longterm irrigation using wastewater on heavy metal contents of soils under vegetables in Harare, Zimbabwe. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 107, 151–165 (2005). · DOI
  16. Anwar, S. et al. Uptake and distribution of minerals and heavy metals in commonly grown leafy vegetable species irrigated with sewage water. Environ. Monit. Assess. 188, 1–9 (2016). · DOI
  17. Hussain, I., Raschid, L., Hanjra, M. A., Marikar, F. & van der Hoek, W. Wastewater use in agriculture: Review of impacts and methodological issues in valuing impacts. Working Paper 37. International Water Management Institute, Colombo in contaminated soils and food crops irrigated with wastewater in Beijing, China. Environ. Pollut. 152, 686692 (2004).
  18. De Miguel, E., Jimenez de Grado, M., Llamas, J. F. & Martin-Dorado, A. The overlooked contribution of compost application to the trace element load in the urban soil of Madrid (Spain). Sci. Total Environ. 215, 113–122 (1998). · DOI
  19. Mielke, H. W., Gonzales, C. R., Smith, M. K. & Mielke, P. W. The urban environment and children health: Soils as an integrator of lead, zinc and cadmium in New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. Environ. Res. 81, 117–129 (1999). · DOI
  20. Madrid, L., Diaz-Barrientos, E. & Madrid, F. Distribution of heavy metals contents of urban soils in parks of Seville. Chemosphere 49, 1301–1308 (2002). · DOI
  21. Lazarova, V. et al. Role of water reuse for enhancing integrated water management in europe and mediterranean Countries. Water Sci. Technol. 43(10), 25–33 (2001). · DOI
  22. Anderson, J. The environmental benefits of water recycling and reuse. Water Sci. Technol.: Water Supply. 3(4), 1–10 (2003).
  23. Jimenez, B. & Asano, T. Water reclamation and reuse around the world. In Water Reuse: An international Survey of Current Practice, Issues and Needs (eds Jimenez, B. & Asano, T.) 3–27 (IWA Publishing, 2008).
  24. World Health Organization, WHO. Guidelines for the Safe Use of Wastewater, Excreta and Greywater (WHO, 2006).
  25. Ensink, J. H. J., Simmons, R. W. & van der Hoek, W. Wastewater use in Pakistan: The cases of Haroonabad and Faisalabad. In Wastewater Use in Irrigated Agriculture: Confronting the Livelihood and Environmental Realities (eds Scott, C. A. et al.) 91–99 (CAB International, 2004). · DOI
  26. Toze, S. Reuse of effluent water: Benefits and risks. Agric. Water Manag. 80(1–3), 147–159 (2006). · DOI
  27. Keraita, B., Jiménez, B. & Drechsel, P. Extent and implications of agricultural reuse of untreated, partially treated and diluted wastewater in developing Countries. CAB Rev. Persp. Agric. Vet. Sci. Nutr. Nat. Resour. 3(58), 1–15 (2008).
  28. Rahman, M. A., Saha, B. K., Chowdhury, M. A. H., Chowdhury, M. A. K. & Mohiuddin, K. M. Public perception and health implication of loom-dye effluent irrigation on growth of rice (Oryza sativa L.) and red amaranth (Amaranthus tricolor L.) seedlings. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27(16), 19410–19427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08377-0 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  29. Rai, P. K., Lee, S. S., Zhang, M., Tsang, Y. F. & Kim, K.-H. Heavy metals in food crops: Health risks, fate, mechanisms, and management. Environ. Int. 125, 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.01.067 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  30. Zucco, M. A., Walters, S. A., Chong, S.-K., Klubek, B. P. & Masabni, J. G. Effect of soil type and vermicompost applications on tomato growth. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste. 4, 135–141 (2015). · DOI
  31. Stone, M. A. & Taylor, L. T. SFE-GC with quantitative transfer of the extraction effluent to a megabore capillary column. Anal. Chem. 72(14), 3085–3092 (2000). · DOI
  32. McLean, E. O. Soil pH and lime requirement. In Methods of soil analysis. Part 2: Chemical and microbiological properties 2nd edn, Vol. 9 (eds Page, A. L. et al.) 199–223 (Agronomy, 1982). · DOI
  33. Nelson, D. W., & Sommers, L. E. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Methods of Soil Analysis, part 2. ASA 9, 2nd edition (1982). · DOI
  34. Olsen, S. R. & Sommers, L. E. Phosphorus. In Methods of Soil Analysis, part2. Agron. Mongr. 2nd edn (ed. Pageetal, A. L.) 403–430 (ASA and SSSA, 1982). · DOI
  35. Bremner, J. M. & Mulvaney, C. S. Total nitrogen. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part2, Chemical and Microbiologicalproperties (eds Page, A. L. et al.) 595–624 (American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America Inc, 1982). · DOI
  36. Chesin, L. & Yien, C. H. Turbidimetric determination of available sulfates. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 15, 149–151 (1951). · DOI
  37. Lindsay, W. L. & Norvall, W. A. Development of a DTPA micronutrient soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 42, 421–428 (1978). · DOI
  38. Nagata, M. K. & Yamashita, D. I. Simple method for simultaneous determination of Chlorophyll and Carotenoids in tomato. J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci. 61(2), 686–687 (1992).
  39. Witham, H., Blades, D. F. & Devin, R. H. Exercise in Plant Physiology 2nd edn, 128–131 (PW Publishers, 1986).
  40. Paul, E. F., Tom, B., Frank, B., & Fernando, G. Nutrient/fertilizer use efficiency: Measurement, current situation and trends. In Chapter: 1, 1–26. (International Plant Nutrition Institute, 2015).
  41. Hussain, A., Priyadarshi, M. & Dubey, S. Experimental study on accumulation of heavy metals in vegetables irrigated with treated wastewater. Appl. Water Sci. 9, 122 (2019). · DOI
  42. Liu, W. H., Zhao, J. Z., Ouyang, Z. Y., Soderlund, L. & Liu, G. H. Impacts of sewage irrigation on heavy metals distribution and contamination in Beijing, China. Environ. Int. 31, 805–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2005.05.042 (2005). · DOI
  43. Rajendran Prasad, D. S., Sadashivaiah, C. & Rangnna, G. Health risk assessment of heavy metals for population via consumption of vegetables. World Appl. Sci. J. 6(12), 1602–1606 (2009).
  44. Ayers, R. S. & Westcot, D. W. FAO irrigation and drainage paper. Water Qual. Agric. 29, 8–96 (1985).
  45. Ewers, B. E., Oren, R., Albaugh, T. J. & Dougherty, P. M. Carry-over effects of water and nutrient supply on water use of Pinus taeda. Ecol. Appl. 9(2), 513–525. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0513:coeowa]2.0.co;2 (1999). · DOI
  46. Eid, E. M. et al. Sewage sludge enhances tomato growth and improves fruit-yield quality by restoring soil fertility. Plant Soil Environ. 67, 514–523 (2021). · DOI
  47. Hamilton, A. J. et al. Wastewater irrigation: The state of play. Vadose Zone J. 6, 823–840 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  48. Rusan, M. J. M., Hinnawi, S. & Rousan, L. Long term effect of wastewater irrigation of forage crops on soil and plant quality parameters. Desalination 215, 143–152 (2007). · DOI
  49. Pedrero, F., Allende, A., Gil, M. I. & Alarcon, J. J. Soil chemical properties, leaf mineral status and crop production in a lemon tree orchard irrigated with two types of wastewater. Agric. Water Manage. 109, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.02.006 (2012). · DOI
  50. Singh, R. P. & Agrawal, M. Potential benefits and risks of land application of sewage sludge. Waste Manage. 28, 347–358 (2008). · DOI
  51. Sharma, B., Sarkar, A., Singh, P. & Singh, R. P. Agricultural utilization of biosolids: A review on potential effects on soil and plant grown. Waste Manage. 64, 117–132 (2017). · DOI
  52. Nahar, N. & Hossen, Md. S. Influence of sewage sludge application on soil properties, carrot growth and heavy metal uptake. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 52, 1–10 (2021). · DOI
  53. Lellis, B., Favaro-Polonio, C. Z., Pamphile, J. A. & Polonio, J. C. Effects of textile dyes on health and the environment and bioremediation potential of living organisms. Biotechnol. Res. Innov. 3, 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biori.2019.09.001 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  54. Goel, P. K. Water Pollution: Causes, Effects and Control 2nd edn. (New Age International Publisher, 2006).
  55. Joshi, U. N., Rathore, S. S. & Arora, S. K. Effect of chromium on growth and development of cow pea. Indian J. Environ. Prot. 19(10), 157–162 (1999).
  56. Guo, J., Dai, X., Xu, W. & Ma, M. Over expressing GSHI and AsPCSI simultaneously increases the tolerance and accumulation of cadmium and arsenic in Arabidopsis thaliana. Chemosphere 72, 1020–1026 (2008). · DOI
  57. Kausar, S., Faizan, S. & Haneef, I. Effect of Wastewater Irrigation on Heavy Metal Accumulation, Growth and Yield of Vegetables. Intl. J. Plant Environ. 3(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.18811/ijpen.v3i.8448. (2017). · DOI
  58. Segura, M. L., Grandos, M. R., Moreno, J. & Urrestarazu, M. Response of greenhouse melon and tomato crops to wastewater irrigation. Acta Hort. 633, 391–396 (2004). · DOI
  59. Sheng, P. H., Zhou, A. X. & Li, P. J. Pollution Ecology (Science Press, 2001).
  60. Berge, H., Kiibus, M. & Kautsky, N. Heavy metals in tropical Kariba, Zimbabwe. Water Air Soil Pollut. 83, 237–252 (1995). · DOI
  61. Gupta, S., Satpati, S., Nayek, S. & Garai, D. Effect of wastewater irrigation on vegetables in relation to bioaccumulation of heavy metals and biochemical changes. Environ. Monit. Assess. 165, 169–177 (2010). · DOI
  62. Ghosh, A. K., Bhatt, M. A. & Agrawal, H. P. Effect of long-term application of treated sewage water on heavy metal accumulation in vegetables grown in Northern India. Environ. Monit. Assess. 184(2), 1025–1036 (2012). · DOI
  63. Xue, Z.-J., Liu, S.-Q., Liu, Y.-L. & Yan, Y.-L. Health risk assessment of heavy metals for edible parts of vegetable grown in sewage-irrigated soils in suburbs of Baoding city, China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 184, 3503–3513 (2012). · DOI
  64. Copaciu, F. et al. Diffuse water pollution by anthraquinone and azo dyes in environment importantly alters foliage volatiles, carotenoids and physiology in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Water, Air Soil Pollut. 224(3), 1478 (2013). · DOI
  65. Ackah, M. et al. Uptake of heavy metals by some edible vegetables irrigated using wastewater: A preliminary study in Accra, Ghana. Environ Monit Assess 186, 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3403-0 (2014). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hassan, J., Rajib, M. M. R., Sarker, U., Akter, M., Khan, M. N.-E.-A., Khandaker, S., Khalid, F., Rahman, G. K. M. M., Ercisli, S., Muresan, C. C., & Marc, R. A.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2022-06-16
Volume
12
Issue
1
ISSN
2045-2322
DOI
10.1038/s41598-022-11558-1
PMC
PMC9203507
Cited by
48
References
0
Language
en
Licence
Funders
International Foundation for Science (IFS-W-5415)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review