Cited by 24Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Minimising multi-centre radiomics variability through image normalisation: a pilot study

Open access
Campello, Víctor M., Martín-Isla, Carlos, Izquierdo, Cristian, Guala, Andrea, Palomares, José F. Rodríguez, Viladés, David, Descalzo, Martín L., Karakas, Mahir +6 more·2022·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Radiomics is an emerging technique for the quantification of imaging data that has recently shown great promise for deeper phenotyping of cardiovascular disease. Thus far, the technique has been mostly applied in single-centre studies. However, one of the main difficulties in multi-centre imaging studies is the inherent variability of image characteristics due to centre differences. In this paper, a comprehensive analysis of radiomics variability under several image- and feature-based normalisation techniques was conducted using a multi-centre cardiovascular magnetic resonance dataset. 218 subjects divided into healthy (n = 112) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 106, HCM) groups from five different centres were considered. First and second order texture radiomic features were extracted from three regions of interest, namely the left and right ventricular cavities and the left ventricular myocardium. Two methods were used to assess features’ variability. First, feature distributions were compared across centres to obtain a distribution similarity index. Second, two classification tasks were proposed to assess: (1) the amount of centre-related information encoded in normalised features (centre identification) and (2) the generalisation ability for a classification model when trained on these features (healthy versus HCM classification). The results showed that the feature-based harmonisation technique ComBat is able to remove the variability introduced by centre information from radiomic features, at the expense of slightly degrading classification performance. Piecewise linear histogram matching normalisation gave features with greater generalisation ability for classification ( balanced accuracy in between 0.78 ± 0.08 and 0.79 ± 0.09). Models trained with features from images without normalisation showed the worst performance overall ( balanced accuracy in between 0.45 ± 0.28 and 0.60 ± 0.22). In conclusion, centre-related information removal did not imply good generalisation ability for classification.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-022-16375-0

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Statistical features are affected by confounders such as inter-reader variability in segmentations and acquisition settings of scanners, limiting their applicability in diverse settings.

    “Moreover, these statistical features are affected by several confounders, such as inter-reader variability in segmentations26 and acquisition settings of the scanners27, limiting their applicability in diverse settings.”

    From Foundation Model for Cancer Imaging Biomarkers (2024) · cites this paper as [27]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campello, V. M., Martín-Isla, C., Izquierdo, C., Guala, A., Palomares, J. F. R., Viladés, D., Descalzo, M. L., Karakas, M., Çavuş, E., Raisi-Estabragh, Z., Petersen, S. E., Escalera, S., Seguí, S., & Lekadir, K.
Affiliations
  • Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • St Bartholomew's Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Campello, Víctor M.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2022-07-22
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
12532-12532
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4286487934
Cited by
24
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Horizon 2020 (825903)
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (IJC2018-037349-I, RTI2018-099898-B-I00)
  • British Heart Foundation (FS/17/81/33318)
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/P001009/1)
  • European Regional Development Fund
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (PID2019-105093GB-I00)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
radiomics, image normalization, combat, histogram matching, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, texture features, left ventricular myocardium
MeSH terms
Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Pilot Projects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review