Cited by 31Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

Enhancing cardiovascular risk prediction through AI-enabled calcium-omics

Open access
Hoori, Ammar, Al-Kindi, Sadeer, Hu, Tao, Song, Yingnan, Wu, Hao, Lee, Juhwan, Tashtish, Nour, Fu, Pingfu +3 more·2024·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Whole-heart coronary calcium Agatston score is a well-established predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), but it does not account for individual calcification features related to the pathophysiology of the disease (e.g., multiple-vessel disease, spread of the disease along the vessel, stable calcifications, numbers of lesions, and density). We used novel, hand-crafted calcification features (calcium-omics); Cox time-to-event modeling; elastic net; and up and down synthetic sampling methods for imbalanced data, to assess MACE risk. We used 2457 CT calcium score (CTCS) images enriched for MACE events from our large no-cost CLARIFY program (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04075162). Among calcium-omics features, numbers of calcifications, LAD mass, and diffusivity (a measure of spatial distribution) were especially important determinants of increased risk, with dense calcification (> 1000HU, stable calcifications) associated with reduced risk Our calcium-omics model with (training/testing, 80/20) gave C-index (80.5%/71.6%) and 2-year AUC (82.4%/74.8%). Although the C-index is notoriously impervious to model improvements, calcium-omics compared favorably to Agatston and gave a significant difference (P < 0.001). The calcium-omics model identified 73.5% of MACE cases in the high-risk group, a 13.2% improvement as compared to Agatston, suggesting that calcium-omics could be used to better identity candidates for intensive follow-up and therapies. The categorical net-reclassification index was NRI = 0.153. Our findings from this exploratory study suggest the utility of calcium-omics in improved risk prediction. These promising results will pave the way for more extensive, multi-institutional studies of calcium-omics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-024-60584-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Radiomics-based approaches sought to refine risk stratification by extracting higher-dimensional imaging features beyond the Agatston score, including plaque texture, spatial distribution, density characteristics and lesion morphology.

    “Radiomics-based approaches sought to further refine risk stratification by extracting higher-dimensional imaging features beyond the Agatston score, including plaque texture, spatial distribution, density characteristics and lesion morphology.252635–37”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. [1]Beswick AD Brindle P Fahey T Ebrahim S A Systematic Review of Risk Scoring Methods and Clinical Decision Aids Used in the Primary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease (Supplement) 2008 Royal College of General Practitioners 21834196
  2. [2]Orringer CE The National Lipid Association scientific statement on coronary artery calcium scoring to guide preventive strategies for ASCVD risk reduction J. Clin. Lipidol. 2021 15 33 60 10.1016/j.jacl.2020.12.005 33419719 · DOI
  3. [4]Osawa K Nakanishi R Budoff M Coronary artery calcification Glob. Heart 2016 11 287 293 10.1016/j.gheart.2016.08.001 27741976 PMC5108577 · DOI
  4. [5]Song Y Improved bias and reproducibility of coronary artery calcification features using deconvolution J. Med. Imaging 2023 10.1117/1.JMI.10.1.014002 PMC9836910 36647366 · DOI
  5. [6]Tota-Maharaj R Usefulness of regional distribution of coronary artery calcium to improve the prediction of all-cause mortality Am. J. Cardiol. 2015 115 1229 1234 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.555 25743208 · DOI
  6. [7]Brown ER Coronary calcium coverage score: Determination, correlates, and predictive accuracy in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis1 Radiology 2008 247 669 675 10.1148/radiol.2473071469 18413889 PMC5410932 · DOI
  7. [8]van Rosendael AR Association of high-density calcified 1K plaque with risk of acute coronary syndrome JAMA Cardiol. 2020 5 282 290 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5315 31968065 PMC6990946 · DOI
  8. [9]Neves PO Andrade J Monção H Coronary artery calcium score: Current status Radiol. Bras. 2017 50 182 189 10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0235 28670030 PMC5487233 · DOI
  9. [11]Hartman N Kim S He K Kalbfleisch JD Pitfalls of the concordance index for survival outcomes Stat. Med. 2023 42 2179 2190 10.1002/sim.9717 36977424 PMC10219847 · DOI
  10. [12]Cook NR Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction Circulation 2007 115 928 935 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.672402 17309939 · DOI
  11. [13]Song, Y. et al. Improved reproducibility of CT calcium score using blind deconvolution. in Medical Imaging 2021: Biomedical Applications in Molecular, Structural, and Functional Imaging vol. 11600 116000V (International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2021).
  12. [14]Agatston AS Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1990 15 827 832 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-T 2407762 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [15]Ramanathan S Coronary artery calcium data and reporting system: Strengths and limitations World J. Radiol. 2019 11 126 133 10.4329/wjr.v11.i10.126 31666937 PMC6819735 · DOI
  14. [16]Datta G Alexander LE Hinterberg MA Hagar Y Balanced event prediction through sampled survival analysis Syst. Med. 2019 2 28 38 10.1089/sysm.2018.0015 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoori, A., Al-Kindi, S., Hu, T., Song, Y., Wu, H., Lee, J., Tashtish, N., Fu, P., Gilkeson, R., Rajagopalan, S., & Wilson, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
Corresponding author
Wilson, David L.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-05-15
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
11134-11134
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386407683
Cited by
31
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 6
FWCI
7.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL167199)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (1P50MD017351-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
coronary artery calcium, major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular risk prediction, Agatston score, coronary artery calcium score

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review